As
Obama
Omits Sudan in GA Speech, Trip “Is Dead,” Power Speaks of Kitchen Sink
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
September 23 -- The UN
Security Council's long planned trip
to Sudan in early October “is dead,” a non Permanent member of
the Council told Inner City Press on Thursday.
Sudan insisted that
Council members meet with the country's President, Omar al Bashir,
who has been indicted by the International Criminal Court for war
crimes and genocide. To the US, at least the US Mission to the UN,
this was a non-starter.
Inner
City Press
asked US Presidential senior adviser and Senior Director for
Multilateral Affairs Samantha Power about the trip, and the
absence of the words Sudan much less Darfur from President Barack
Obama's speech to the UN General Assembly on Thursday morning.
Ms.
Power acknowledged the absence of Sudan from the speech, saying that
“he didn't mention it, you're right, in the General Assembly today”
but “the truth is the President is giving a very substantial set of
remarks on Sudan tomorrow, so the judgment was, let's do this right,
you'll hear alot about Darfur, a lot about the CPA.”
But
it's not either
- or: if Sudan is so important, it could have joined such topics as
Poland and former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe in the speech.
On
the trip, Ms.
Power said “the details and logistics are still being worked out,
it's still very much in play, as part of this drumbeat...pretty much
the kitchen sink is being through at this challenge, the trip is
being seen in this light.”
But
multiple
sources tell Inner City Press that the trip is dead, killed by the
US' resistance to meeting with Omar al Bashir. Several Council
members expressed frustration to Inner City Press, that the US and UK
monopolized the deliberation on the trip. Some said the US wants to
get all the credit if things “somehow work out in Sudan” -- a
“strange multilateralism,” one called it.
Samantha Power viewing rights (commissioner), SC
Sudan trip not shown
In
terms of Obama
delivering a 14 minute speech at the September 24 meeting, the UN's
planners of the meeting, bragging about Ban Ki-moon's role and five
minutes speech, have indicated they hope all participants keep
themselves to five minutes. The US now seems to think that's good to
know.
There
is a dispute
about whether the opening of the meeting will be open and can be
filmed. The US seems to want there to be footage of Obama talking
about Sudan at Friday's meeting. But he could have done it in the
General Assembly on Thursday. We'll see. Watch this site.
* * *
As
Clinton
Meets Sudan VP, Bashir “Does Not Come Up,” UN Dodges on
Darfur
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
September 21 -- When US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
met Tuesday with Sudanese Vice President Ali Osman Taha, somehow the
topic of President Omar al Bashir and his indictments for genocide
and war crimes by the International Criminal Court “did not come
up,” Clinton's spokesman PJ Crowley told the Press.
Some
wonder how
this is possible, not only given the US' claimed interest in
accountability for genocide but also Bashir's
importance in the
processes in South Sudan and Darfur. Could Clinton meet about
Zimbabwe and have Robert Mugabe “not come up”? Could she meet
about North Korea and not mention Kim Jong Il?
In
fact, the UN
Security Council's planned trip to Sudan about the referendum and
Darfur, slated for October 4 to 11, is being blocked by the stated
concern of the UK, France and the US to not have to have a photo op
with Bashir.
On
September 19, a
Permanent Five Council member Ambassador told Inner City Press that
the issue of the trip, and of having to meet Bashir, would be raised
with Taha as early as Monday night's dinner hosted by the Sudanese.
So how could the issue, and Bashir himself, not come up in Clinton's
meeting Tuesday with Taha?
Crowley
said that
there will be other meetings throughout the week, in the run up to
the meeting involving President Obama on September 24. He also to his
credit promised answered to other questions at his next briefing in
New York. We'll see.
Hillary Clinton, Tony Blair & UN's Ban in
past, Bashir not shown - "did not come up"
Meanwhile,
Inner
City Press on
Tuesday asked UN Spokesman Martin Nesirky five
questions about both Darfur and South Sudan:
Inner
City
Press: First, can you confirm that some staff members of UNAMID
in South Darfur were attacked and injured near Muhajeriya. Do you
have anything on it?
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
I have heard some reports. I don’t have details. I would
need to get some details on that. I don’t have that.
Inner
City
Press: And I guess there is a few, yesterday I had asked you
this question…
Spokesperson:
Media reports is what I am referring to.
Inner
City
Press: Right. Yesterday
I had asked you this question of
whether the Commissioner of the Referendum, the Secretary-General of
the Referendum Commission for South Sudan, was a UN staff member
previously serving with United Nations Mission for the Referendum in
Western Sahara (MINURSO) in Western Sahara. Were you able to get
the
answer on that?
Spokesperson:
I think my colleagues in Department of Peacekeeping Operations
(DPKO) will be in touch with you. But as I understand it, the person
concerned was a UN staff member, but is no longer.
Inner
City
Press: Right. Okay. And also, I mean, maybe it will be in
connection with that. I have heard that, in fact, the UN, while
saying publicly that they will be opening 80 monitoring stations
throughout South Sudan for the referendums scheduled for January, in
fact expects to open no more than 55 or so. That seems the number,
the difference between internal and external presentation seems so
wide that I wonder if you can confirm that.
Spokesperson:
I am not aware of any change in the intention to open the number of
monitoring stations that has already been publicly stated. Let me
find out if there’s been a change. I am not aware of that.
Inner
City
Press: And just one last one. This is a Secretary-General
question rather than DPKO, I believe. Can you, I guess, confirm that
the Secretary-General intends to name this panel of eminent persons,
three-person panel to monitor or at least he is attempting to name
this before Friday’s meeting? And can you give any sense of what
the back and forth is or whether it will contain a Head of State? There
is a lot of interest in this panel and not a lot of
information.
Spokesperson:
Well, I can fully understand that there is a lot of interest in the
forming of a monitoring panel, which is something that, as you know,
was mentioned in a Security Council press statement last week, if I
am not mistaken, that the Security Council supports the request that
there has been for such a monitoring panel. This is something that
is in the works. We will have something to announce when it is
finalized. I think we are getting quite close to that. The
intention is to have something in place and the people in place in
good time for this to be useful for all concerned.
Inner
City
Press: Even to participate in Friday’s meeting?
Spokesperson:
I beg your pardon?
Inner
City
Press: Even to participate in Friday’s meeting [inaudible]?
Spokesperson:
This I don’t know, this I don’t know.
Inner
City
Press: Okay.
Spokesperson:
More important at the moment is simply to make sure that the pieces
of the jigsaw puzzle are in the right place. This is something that
is being worked on and I hope that we will have a little bit more to
say about this in the next couple of days.
Watch
this site.
Footnote: Secretary
Clinton, after her 3 pm meeting with the Middle East Quartet, was
scheduled to appear at a 4 pm press conference at the UN on the topic.
The presser was canceled, Inner City Press was told by the UN, due to a
power outage. But Clinton's name plate wasn't on the rostrum, even
before the lights went dim.
Crowley said that Clinton had planned to meet with Tony
Blair. But as one reporter pointed out, Blair's name plate WAS on the rostrum. More than a
little strange.
* * *
, 
