By
Matthew
Russell Lee,
Exclusive
Follow Up
UNITED
NATIONS,
January 14, video here -- Minutes after the
UN announced
the departure
of
Humanitarian
Affairs chief
Baroness
Valerie Amos
on November
26, Inner City
Press asked
UN Deputy
Spokesperson
Farhan Haq if
the vacancy
would be
advertised for
candidates
from all
countries, or
if it is set
aside for
Amos' United
Kingdom.
Then on
January 9,
Inner City
Press
exclusively
reported that
the UK after
first
submitting
only the name
of Andrew
Lansley has
added too
more, scarcely
more
qualified.
And,
significantly,
the Italy had
nominated Emma
Bonino,
sources
exclusively told
Inner City
Press, and
Germany
nominated
Martin Kobler,
currently the
head of the
UN's Mission
in the Congo.
Now on January
14, Inner City
Press is
informed by
sources of
another
candidate, a
minister from
the United
Arab Emirates,
Lubna Khalid
Al Qasimi, a
member of the
ruling family
of Sharjah.
The UAE has,
it is noted,,
the
"Humanitarian
City." And the
UAE did give
$1 million to
OCHA's CERF
last month.
Bonino is well
regarded in
international
circles -- one
source said
she is "too
strong a
character" for
UN Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon to
choose -- and
Kobler after
Iraq has his
experience in
the Congo, for
better and
worse. Either
is more
experience
than the UK
troika.
Beyond
Lansley, whose
qualification
is a brief
visit to UN
health
conferences,
the other UK
candidates
sources tell
Inner City
Press are
Caroline
Spelman and
Stephen
O'Brien.
Humanitarian
groups, who
have
petitioned Ban
to establish a
selection
procedure
including the
IASC, the
Inter-Agency
Standing
Committee, are
not impressed
by the UK's
candidates.
Could the UK
really lose
this Under
Secretary
General post?
It's looking
more likely.
If Kobler were
chosen, would
fellow German
Angela Kane
have to leave?
What about
Staffan De
Mistura, USG
and Syria
envoy, and
Bonino? We'll
have more on
this.
Back on
November 26,
UN deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq
insisted to
Inner City
Press that the
position is
"open to
people from
any region," transcript
below, the
disposition of
the top jobs
in UN
Peacekeeping
(four
Frenchmen in a
row) and
Political
Affairs (two
consecutive
Americans)
indicates
otherwise.
Then from the
UK came word
that Prime
Minister David
Cameron is
tapping the
man he in July
"sacked as
Health
Secretary and
Leader of the
House: Andrew
Lansley" and
"has
reportedly
refused to
come up with
two
alternative
candidates, as
requested by
the UN
Secretary
General."
Inner City
Press asked UN
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
this on
December 1. Video here. He declined to
comment on
what "may or
may not be
private
diplomatic
communications."
Consider, now,
that Lansley's
controversies
include health
care law
conflicts of
interest,
carrying
the water of
McDonald's and
KFC and using
public funds
to renovate
his country
house.
OCHA, anyone?
Dujarric, when
asked by Inner
City Press on
December 1,
insisted that
Ban will put
out a call to
all member
states to
nominate
candidates.
We'll see --
but if true,
why wasn't
this done
before Ban
made Herve
Ladsous the
fourth
Frenchman in a
row atop UN
Peacekeeping?
While the UN
refuses to be
transparent
about this
"please submit
three
candidates"
form of
limited
competition
for positions
already
designated by
nationality,
it is what
happened with
UN
Peacekeeping,
multiple
sources have
told Inner
City Press.
But even this
is often
waived. It is
UNclear if
when B. Lynn
Pascoe left as
head of the UN
Department of
Political
Affairs, the
US put forward
anyone beyond
Jeffrey
Feltman, who
has the job.
For
Peacekeeping,
as Inner City
Press exclusively
reported
in July 2011,
when Alain Le
Roy left
France put
forward three
candidates and
Ban Ki-moon selected
Jerome
Bonnafont,
then France's
ambassador to
India.
After
Bonnafont
started
bragging about
having the
job, and Inner
City Press reported
such boast
based on
sourcing in
India and closer,
Team Ban
decided that
Bonnafont was
not the team
player they
were looking
for.
But then
president
Nicolas
Sarkozy,
angered,
refused to put
forward
another trio
of candidates,
instead
"dumping" on
the UN Herve
Ladsous, who
had been
rejected by
Kofi Annan
during a
previous
one-of-three
process. Ban
Ki-moon
accepted these
damaged goods,
and Ladsous
has gone on to
cover up rapes
by the
Congolese Army
and now
in Darfur,
and to openly
refuse to
answer Press
questions, video compilation here, UK New
Statesman
coverage here.
How would
Lansley be?
And how is the
UN in such
decay? Even
for the
Secretary
General
position there
was some
limited
competition.
At
a much smaller
but not
unrelated
level, the
in-house
United Nations
Correspondents
Association is
set to "elect"
as president,
with
no competition,
a rarely
present
Italian scribe
Giampaolo
Pioli, who
tried to
censor Press
articles about
Sri
Lanka in his
previous
tenure, click
here for that.
Also under
Pioli, UNCA
was used to
try to censor,
or censure,
Inner City
Press'
reporting
about how
Ladsous was
foisted on the
UN, here.
One reason the
UN is in such
decay is that
few questions
are asked, and
even fewer are
answered, at
the UN. Here's
the UN's transcript
of what Inner
City Press
asked Ban
Ki-moon's
deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq on
November 26:
Inner
City Press: on
the
Under-Secretary-General
position for
OCHA, Office
for the
Coordination
of
Humanitarian
Affairs, could
describe what
the process
for
recruitment
will be in the
context that
many people
say that at
least the top
three jobs are
pretty much
assigned by
country, for
Humanitarian
Affairs that
was John
Holmes and
then Amos; the
US had [B.
Lynn] Pascoe,
now Mr.
Feltman; that
France has had
peacekeeping
four times in
a row.
Is this job
going to be
put in The
Economist?
Are you
seeking
candidates
from any
Member State
that chooses
to step
forward, or is
it essentially
designated for
the United
Kingdom?
Deputy
Spokesman
Haq: The
idea that
there are
spots that are
designated is
more a popular
myth than
reality.
As you know,
many of the
positions that
have been said
to be
earmarked for
this or that
country have
not over time
proven to be
that
way.
There was an
idea that
Political
Affairs was
reserved for
someone from
the United
Kingdom.
It hasn’t been
that way for
quite some
time.
There’s been
talk of how
different
agencies are
headed by
Americans or
other
nationalities,
for example,
UNDP (United
Nations
Development
Programme),
and over time
you see that
hasn’t held
true.
That’s the
case with this
position, as
well.
We’re seeking
applicants
from every
area.
Inner
City
Press:
Will it be
like in The
Economist?
Is there going
to be some
public process
to seek
candidates?
Deputy
Spokesman
Haq: We
are seeking
candidates.
We don’t talk
so much about
the
appointment
process as
it’s in
procedure, but
certainly it’s
open to people
from any
region.
We'll
stay on this.
There
have been
rumblings,
noted by Inner
City Press, of
DPA chief
Jeffrey
Feltman
leaving -- and
of the US
perhaps
trading
Political
Affairs for
Peacekeeping.
But that
theory seems
to have been
that US State
Department
Number Three
Wendy Sherman
would move up
to William
Burns' deputy
spot, opening
her position
for the return
of Feltman.
Now
that the Obama
administration
has put Tony
Blinken into
the State
Department
Deputy post,
as one insider
told ICP,
“Feltman stays
at the UN.”
Even
without any
double switch,
Ladsous is
under fire
atop DPKO, not
only for refusal
to answer
questions,
back to rapes
in Minova in
DR Congo,
but now in
Tabit in
Darfur as
well.
Haq,
like lead UN
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric on
November 26,
would not when
Inner City
Press asked
confirm
receipt of a letter,
critical of
Ladsous' DPKO,
from Darfuri
groups, here.
Outgoing
UN Security
Council
president Gary
Quinlan of
Australia not
only confirmed
receipt of the
letter -
he circulated
it to the
other Council
members. A
press officer
of UK mission
to the UN told
Inner City
Press, "I can
confirm that
we received
the letter
indirectly."
We'll have
more on this,
and on Amos'
work while at
the UN, and
perhaps
reason(s) for
leaving,
including as,
like Lansley,
may related to
UK politics.
We might also
suggest, if
the UN under
Ban is to
remain so
captured by
Permanent
Members of the
Security
Council, a
more deserving
British
candidate, in
connection
with the April
2015 arrival
of Matthew
Rycroft
atop the UK
Mission to the
UN.
On
November 25,
it was Quinlan
and not Amos
who took
question after
Amos' briefing
on Syria. How
much will Amos
speak,
publicly,
before her
departure at
the end of
March? Much,
is the hope
and goal of
the Free
UN Coalition
for Access.
Watch this
site.