On UNOPS
Corruption After Guterres Refuses
Questions Refers to Peter Browne Ukraine
Censor
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell
Book
BBC-Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
NY
Mag
UN GATE, May 9 –
In the United Nations under
Antonio Guterres, there is
nothing but failure and
excuses and fundraising on
crises like Ukraine,
Burma, Haiti and
Cameroon.
There is impunity
for sexual abuse by
peacekeepers and UN staff like
Juan Carlos Cunillera, just
"along for the ride" during
the UN
sex-in-the-van exposed
by Inner City Press.
But now as we
looked at and asked about
Guterres' omission of his
links to UN briber CEFC China
Energy, leading to him banning
the Press (and Melissa Fleming
continuing the ban, not even answering
a law firm's pro bono letter),
on April 17, 2022 we published
on other officials - including
long time UNOPS operative
Vitaly Vanshelboim (whom Inner
City Press covered in
connection with UNOPS gag
orders before being banned
from UN by corrupt Guterres.)
We noted
that Vanshelboim's skeeze in
the S3i scam of UNOPS's Grete
Faremo or whom Inner City
Press repeated asked UN
Spokesman Stephane Dujarric in
writing, with no answer, nor
by Melissa Fleming.
Weeks
later the NYT, silent on most
of Guterres' and his cronies'
corruption, has come to the
UNOPS story. Fine. And quick
spin by Dujarric: "The
Secretary-General has accepted
the resignation of Grete
Faremo, the Executive Director
of the United Nations Office
for Project Services
(UNOPS).
Ms. Faremo’s resignation is
effective Sunday, 8
May.
The Secretary-General is
grateful for Ms. Faremo’s
commitment and dedicated
service to the
Organization.
Mr. Jens Wandel of Denmark is
being appointed as the Acting
Executive Director, effective
9 May, while the
Secretary-General launches a
recruitment process, in
consultation with the UNOPS
Executive Board, to find a
successor to Ms. Faremo."
[Inner City
Press, prior to being thrown
out by SG Antonio Guterres,
Dujarric and Fleming exposed
Wendel too, for example here.]
On May 9 while
refusing Inner City Press' written
questions including on
UNOPS UN Deputy Spokesperson
Farhan Haq repeatedly passed
the buck to UNOPS spokesman
Peter Browne. Well, here is
Peter Browne carrying out
Guterres' and Melissa
Fleming's cover up job on the
slaughter in Ukraine:
"From: Peter
BROWNE To: UNOPS Subject:
Guidance on communications
about the situation in Ukraine
Date: 7 March 2022 Dear
colleagues The ongoing
crisis in Ukraine is deeply
upsetting and a matter of
grave concern. Although the
current situation has affected
our ability to deliver, we
remain determined to find ways
to continue helping the people
of Ukraine. While it is
understandable that many of us
feel compelled to share views
about the events that are
unfolding, including in
personal fora such as social
media, personnel are reminded
of their rights and duties
which require us to act
independently and impartially.
General points: • UNOPS
does not have a political or
advocacy mandate within the UN
system. We are a project
implementer and service
provider, supporting our
partners. • In relation to
political crises, conflicts
and/or other sensitive,
rapidly evolving humanitarian
situations: our approach
should always be guided by the
principle of supporting
broader UN system messaging. •
In these situations, UNOPS
neutrality is critical. UNOPS
does not provide any
commentary that could be
perceived as jeopardizing our
neutrality, which may be
considered as going outside of
our mandated areas and role
within the UN system.
Accordingly, personnel are
asked to frame any
communications on Ukraine in
alignment with the UNOPS
approach. Corporate accounts
(including country and liaison
offices) • Messages or
information shared on UNOPS
social media channels,
websites etc. will to every
extent possible directly align
with the messages that have
been developed and
communicated by relevant UN
units (such as the Dept. of
Global Communications), UN
Country Teams (such as the
Ukraine UNCT and Resident
Coordinator), and shared via
official UN channels. •
Caution should be exercised
when sharing messages from UN
channels, which adopt stronger
(non-neutral) or politicized
language on the evolving
situation aligned to their
respective thematic and
advocacy mandates. • Bespoke
messages on UNOPS channels
should focus on how UNOPS is
committed to supporting
humanitarian needs and
responses for those most
vulnerable and affected.
Personal/individual accounts:
• UNOPS personnel are also
strongly encouraged to
consider the above guidance
when considering sharing or
engaging (retweets, likes
etc.) with messages about the
conflict in Ukraine on their
personal social media
accounts. • Please also take a
moment to familiarize
yourselves with the policies
on outside activities and the
use of social media.
Attention is also drawn to
guidance from the Ethics and
Compliance Office on political
activity., and the “2022
Guidance on Political
Activities” recently issued by
the UN Ethics Office. • NB:
The official Twitter account
of the UNOPS Executive
Director (@UNOPS_Chief) may be
used to provide more direct
messages outlining a UNOPS
perspective. Any tweets from
the Executive Director on the
situation may be shared
(retweeted) on UNOPS other
official channels, if deemed
appropriate considering the
primary audiences of those
channels (partners,
stakeholders) and local
context. Please forward this
message to any colleagues who
may find this information
useful. Should any specific
guidance be requested please
contact the Communications
Group. Our thoughts are with
all of those who are impacted
as a result of this
devastating conflict. Best
regards, Pete." Yeah,
Pete. Guterres' UN is corrupt.
While the NYT
notes for example that a long
time member of the UN
Correspondents Association
Gloria Starr Kins (Inner City
Press previous tweet here)
played a role in hooking up
the fraud, they don't mention
UNCA nor the NYT
correspondents' membership in
it and their role in banning
the Press. That the NYT, so
active on some beats, is
generally little more than a
cheerleader at the UN is a
travesty. Watch this site -
and Vanshelboim, here:
Two (2)
residential properties,
Ukraine
Two (2) residential
properties, jointly owned, USA
Annuity, ING, USA
Investment fund, Citi Bank,
USA
Investment fund, Danske
Invest, jointly owned, Denmark
So while
Citibank ("Citi Bank") still
does business in Russia, what
are the statuses of
Vanshelboim's Ukraine
properties? Either way, no
friend of Press freedom.
We'll
have more on this.
***
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a
month helps keep us going and grants you
access to exclusive bonus material on our
Patreon page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|