As
African Nations Oppose Indigenous Rights Treaty, Stories from Botswana and
Rwanda
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN
UNITED NATIONS, May
15, updated May 16, 10 am -- The fate of the draft UN declaration on the
rights of indigenous peoples remains unclear, six months after it was opposed,
first by Australia and Canada, then by the larger African Group.
Inner
City Press on May 14 asked proponent Victoria Tauli-Corpuz which country was now
most actively opposing the passage of the declaration. "Botswana," she answered,
"especially after they lost of the case of the San Bushmen." Video
here,
from Minute 32:23.
On May
15, this case and its aftermath was described by Kgosimontle Kebuelemang. In
1997 and against in 2002, the government of Botswana moved to drive the Bushmen
out of Central Kalahari Game Reserve. The Bushmen filed suit, asserting their
ancestral right to the land. During the pendency of the case, the San Bushmen
received support from, among others, indigenous groups from elsewhere in Africa,
from Finland and elsewhere.
In
December 2006 they won the case -- click
here for
the decision -- but its implementation has proved difficult. What few services
the government of Botswana previously provided in the CKGR, including education
and health care, have now been curtailed.
Most
recently, the government of Botswana has moved to block a visit by the UN's
special rapporteur on the rights of the indigenous, Rudolf Stavenhagen. Asked
about this by Inner City Press, Ms. Tauli-Corpuz noted that he has managed to
visit Kenya and Tanzania, but that resistance remains. One wonders if he will
get to visit the Karimojong in Northeast Uganda, or the Mushunguli in Somalia.
PFII@UN
Rwandan
filmmaker Gilbert Ndahayo explained that even the most basic networking by the
indigenous in Rwanda was difficult. The reason, diplomatized in a subsequent
written statement, is that "the post-genocide government deliberately removed
the mention of ethnic affiliations in our identity cards to allow Rwandans to
reconcile and put an end to all ethnic discrimination." However, sources say
that only one of the 75 people in the Rwandan legislature is a Batwa, and and
that this person says very little.
Furthermore, as Inner City Press has previously reported, during the last
presidential campaign, the Kagame government arrested political opponents who
made sociological and demographic analyses which are routine in other countries.
How these policies impact minority and/or indigenous groups is a matter of some
debate -- but not within Rwanda.
There are
other assaults on the rights of indigenous people that are too-little-known. The
expanding market for bio-fuels, including from palm oil and sugar cane, is
driving indigenous people off their lands in Indonesia and Malaysia, Uganda and
Costa Rica. At Monday's press conference, the practices of banks such as
Citigroup, HSBC, JPMorgan Chase and ABN Amro were criticized, as not living up
to their stated principles. In Borneo alone, 1.3 million hectares currently used
and lived-in by indigenous people stand to be clear-cut in the next three years.
This is largely for so-called bio-fuels, a response to climate change that, by
rote or not, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has recently been supporting.
But as the indigenous reception took place at the UN, Ban Ki-moon was providing
answers elsewhere, at the Korea Society dinner at the Waldorf Astoria. His
speech, embargoed until 9 p.m., spoke of human rights and climate change.
Meanwhile without comment from Ban Ki-moon, Belarus, Egypt and Angola are poised
to win election to the UN Human Rights Council on Thursday, and the indigenous,
concerned that the production of bio-fuels like palm oil is displacing them from
their land, can only hope to catch the ear of Ban Ki-moon.
Victoria
Tauli-Corpuz on Monday asked Inner City Press' question about help from the
Secretariat by saying she didn't know if Ban would even meet with them. "I hope
we will be able to meet with him," she said. "I'm not sure he will give us the
attention." Video
here,
from Minute 32:23.
At
Tuesday's UN noon briefing, Inner City Press had asked if Ban Ki-moon had any
intention of meeting with the indigenous during their conference from May 14 to
25, or in supporting their declaration of human rights, which is stalled under
opposition from the African Group and others. To both questions, his
spokesperson
said, "I
don’t have a position right now and I’ll ask for you if there is a meeting
planned."
Ms.
Tauli-Corpuz said that after more than twenty years of waiting for the
declaration of rights, it is too late to renegotiate the definitions of
self-determination and prior informed consent.
A
separate question is whether the declaration, if enacted by the General Assembly
before September, as nearly all have said they favor, would be sufficiently
enforced. But as Gilbert Ndahayo told Inner City Press on Tuesday, it would be
a good first step. Will it be taken? We'll be watching.
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here, and
some are available in the ProQuest service.
Copyright 2006-07 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com -
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540