UN
in Murky DRC Drone Procurement
Tells ICP Lowest Bidder Needn't
Win, Stonewalls
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Exclusive
UNITED
NATIONS, March 26 --
In UN Procurement,
the lowest bidder
doesn't always win,
the UN confirmed on
March 26 in response
to Inner City Press'
March 23 question.
Rather than e-mail
the statement to
Inner City Press
which asked, UN
Secretary General
Antonio Guterres'
spoksman Farhan Haq
waited to read it
out at the March 26
noon briefing, and
then refused to
answer questions
about it. See
transcript, and
below. Today's UN is
corrupt. Inner City
Press was
exclusively informed
that in the bidding
for the UN's
Democratic Republic
of the Congo UAS or
Unmanned Aerial
Systems (drones)
program, the low
bidder is being
displaced by more
favored companies,
unilaterally, by UN
Procurement chief
Dmitry Dovgopoly.
The
story, exclusive to
Inner City Press,
goes like this: out
to bid is a $50
million contract to
provide Unmanned
Aerial Systems
services to the UN's
MONUSCO in the DRC
for a term of five
(3 + 1 + 1) years.
The present company,
Leonardo, has a
contract which
expires in November.
PPI beat out
Leonardo, CAE,
Thales, Qintetiq,
Airbus and Trans
Capital.
But
shortly after our
award, UN
Procurement chief
Dmitry Dovgopoly
refused to approve
the agreed upon
terms and demanded
PPI perform a
demonstration flight
prior to contract
signature. Inner
City Press covered
Dovgopoly and
similar tricks back
when he was at the
“D-1” level, and
received pushback
and is currenty still
restricted to
minders in the UN
for pursuing
its anti-corruption
coverage
into the UN
Press Briefing
Room,
its work space
purportedly assigned
to a no-show
Eygptian state
corresponent Sanaa
Youssef who has not
asked a question in
ten years.
On
March 23, Inner City
Press asked Stephane
Dujarric, spokesman
for Antonio Guterres
who had Inner City
Press evicted from
the UN Press
Briefing Room then
its office, and
still restricted,
about this, UN
transcript here:
Inner City Press: on
UN Procurement, I
wanted to ask you
something. It…
it seems like
there's a… there's a
contract for the
drones, or aerial
unmanned systems?
Spokesman:
Unmanned.
Inner City Press:
And there was a
declared winner,
and… and somehow the
winner… the… the…
the low bidder is
now being told that
they're not getting
the contract, and
that Mr. [Dmitri]
Dovgopoly of UN
Procurement seeks to
do sole-source
negotiations with
people that had
higher bids. I
wonder if you can
get a statement from
them what the status
of that is?
Spokesman:
I'll see… I'll see
what I can get."
But
when Dujarric got UN
Procurement's
misleading line, he
didn't email it to
Inner City Press.
Instead, on March 26
his deputy read out
at the briefing:
"Stéphane [Dujarric]
was asked some
procurement
questions last
Friday. I can
say that the
requirement for
unmanned aerial
services was the
subject of a request
for proposals - or
“RFP”. Under
RFP exercises, the
Organization may
award a contract to
the proposer
offering the best
value for
money. This
requires an
evaluation of both
the technical and
financial offers of
each proposer.
The lowest bidder,
therefore, will not
necessarily be
successful. In
the MONUSCO [United
Nations Organization
Stabilization
Mission in the
Democratic Republic
of the Congo]
exercise, there was
no “declared
winner”. One
of the proposers,
whose financial
proposal was the
lowest, had been
issued a “notice of
consideration of
award”. The
award was subject to
successful contract
negotiations.
Unfortunately, no
contract was
concluded because
the UN technical
experts rescinded
the original
technical evaluation
of this vendor after
learning of
information which
rendered the
technical proposal
non-compliant.
Any suggestion of an
intention to enter
into 'sole source'
negotiations is not
correct."
Then after more
read-outs and
questions about the
expulsion of Russian
diplomats (Inner
City Press story
here), Haq called on
Inner City Press.
Video here. Here's
how the UN transcribed
it, intentionally
chopped -up,: Inner
City Press: I
have other stuff,
but I wanted… on the
answer that you're
reading to what I
asked on Friday, my
question, I guess,
is this. Is…
is… the… the… number
one, the low bidder
says that… that they
were subjected after
they were deemed to
be the low bidder,
if not awarded the
contract, to
additional checks
that the previous
winners had not been
subjected to,
namely, Leonardo and
Thales. The
main question… you
seem… maybe sole
source is the wrong
word. I've
been informed that
Mr. [Dmitri]
Dovgopoly has sought
permission from
Mr. Christian
Sau… Mr.… excuse…
Mr. Saunders to
inform the… the
losing bidders or
the higher bidders
of exactly how much
money the UN has to
pay for this
service, basically
instructing them on
how to submit a
winning bid so there
can be done by… by
November. And
it seems… that seems
wasteful.
Beyond whatever the
rights of the… of
the initially low
bidder was, it
doesn't seem to… way
to… to conduct
procurement is if
you're holding a
bidding one to say
here's how much
money we have; tell
us how you can spend
it. So, I
guess I… I don't
know if you're…
maybe you're reading
a statement, and I
wish it could have
been sent to me so I
could have… could
have narrowed down
the issue. But
it… there seems to
be irregularities in
the procurement of
these drones and…
and the main
question being, why
is the low bidder in
this case being
subjected to tests
that others weren't
submitted to?
Deputy
Spokesman:
Regarding what you
said, like I said,
the offer had been
rescinded after we
learned of
information which
rendered the
technical proposal
noncompliant.
And, regarding the
process, this is a
process that
involves procurement
and our Office for
Legal Affairs, who
have both reviewed
this matter.
Inner City
Press: And are
they informing the
bidders of how much
money there is for
them to bid for the
full amount, then?
Deputy
Spokesman:
This is as much as
I'll say about that
procurement process
at this stage."
Today's UN is
corrupt.
In this
case, Dovgopoly is
said to be lobbied
by European
interests, see the
list of bidders
above. As Inner City
Press
reported, the
UN drone program was
pushed by Herve
Ladsous, the fourth
of now five
Frenchmen in a row
to run UN
Peacekeeping.
Dovgopoly's
“ditch the winner”
campaign has
included two site
inspections and the
demand for a
demonstration flight
prior to deployment,
none of which was
performed with
Leonardo or Thales.
PPI tells Inner City
Press it agreed to
all demands and
began manufacturing
of aircraft with its
contractors.
Dovgopoly canceled
the demonstration
flight a month
later. The
manufacturing of
aircraft has been
suspended as a
result.
Dovgopoly
has
reportedly since
alleged that PPI
misrepresented a
relationship with
one of its proposed
vendors, which PPI
denies. Dovgopoly
has sent PPI notice
rescinding the
notice of
consideration for
award and requested
permission to
directly negotiate
with competitors due
to the urgent need
to provide MONUSCO
with airborne ISR
capability as soon
as possible. He has
requested permission
to inform vendors of
the allocated
budget, and allow
vendors to revise
their technical
proposals to
“accommodate the
financial
constraint.”
Inner
City Press
understands that the
UN's Headquarters
Committee on
Contracts has ruled
the losing
competitors' bids no
longer valid since
the Request For
Proposals was from
October 2016. It
seems Dovgopoly
wishes to discloses
how much money is
available and allow
vendors to inform
the UN services they
can perform and
dictate the price.
Paying more for
less! But it has
happened before, as
Inner City Press.
And now, under
Antonio Guterres.
We'll have more on
this.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past
(and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|