On UN
Rapes, ICP
Asks Spox Of
Code Blue
Critiques, He
Doesn't Agree
With Any Of
Them
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, April
11 -- Amid the
latest in a
series of
allegations of
child rapes
against UN and
French
peacekeepers
in the Central
African
Republic, the
UN General
Assembly
convened a
meeting on
April 5 in the
UN's
Trusteeship
Council
Chamber. But
due to UN
retaliation,
Inner City
Press was not
able to cover
it, at least
not without a
UN minder, see
below.
Now
the US House
of
Representatives
will hold a
hearing on the
topic on April
13, entitled
"Peacekeepers:
Allegations of
Abuse and
Absence of
Accountability
at the United
Nations."
Apparently as
balance to
three who will
call for
justice, there
will be Jordie
Hannum, Senior
Director,
Better World
Campaign,
saying that
the UN's
response is
adequate.
But IS
the UN's
response
adequate? On
April 11, UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric was
dismissive of
the detailed
critiques of
the UN's
response,
saying he
doesn't agree
with any of
them.
In an April 11
online press
conference
with Code
Blue's Paula
Donovan, and
Yasmin Sooka
of the UN
panels of
rapes and
before that on
Sri Lanka,
held by the
African Press
Organization,
Donovan
slammed the UN
for "grilling"
the accusers.
Sooka said
French
investigators
went around
CAR like
"bulls in a
china shop."
Inner City
Press
submitted
questions
about UN
Peacekeeping
chief Herve
Ladous linking
rapes to
R&R, and
light
punishment for
Canadian
police after
sexual
exploitation
in Haiti. Then
Inner City
Press asked
about
Burundian
troops, and
Sri Lankan
troops, and
the upcoming
April 13 House
hearing. The
way the
questions were
"managed" left
a lot to be
desired.
Here's some of
what Inner
City Press
asked:
To
Paula Donovan:
What do you
think of
Burundi, when
troops
repatriated
from CAR for
abuse, sending
them out to
AMISOM in
Somalia?
To
Yasmin Sooka:
knowing what
you do about
Sri Lankan
army, do you
think they
should be
deployed by
the UN as
“peacekeepers”?
Or would that
be further UN
negligence?
At the April
11 UN noon
briefing,
Inner City
Press
asked
Ban Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
the critiques
of the UN's
response, video here,
Inner
City Press:
this morning,
there was a
press
conference by
Paula Donovan
of Code Blue
and Yasmin
Sooka, who was
on the panel
to look at
these
things.
And they were
highly
critical of
how the UN is
going about it
in CAR and
elsewhere.
They were
saying that
the interviews
that are
taking place
are
inappropriate.
They describe
them as
essentially
being…
grilling
victims to try
to disprove
their
accounts.
They said
there’s a
conflict of
interest for
the UN to be
doing the
interviews;
they should be
done
independently.
And they also
called on the
Secretary-General
to turn over
the cases of
civilian staff
members
charged with
sexual abuse
in CAR to the
authorities
and going
forward to
take DNA
samples of
civilian UN
staff when
they fired
them.
What’s your
view?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
Well, first of
all, I would
disagree
respectfully
with Ms.
Donovan.
I think
extreme care
is being taken
when
interviewing
victims of…
alleged
victims of
sexual
violence and
abuse.
Our colleagues
at UNICEF and
other agencies
who are
dealing with
this issue
know how to do
their
job. The
last thing
anyone wants
to do is to
victimize
these young
women, because
they’re mostly
women, and,
unfortunately,
a lot of them
are minors a
second
time.
So, you know,
Ms. Donovan
can say…
express her
opinion.
That’s
fine.
But I would
strongly rebut
that.
Second of all,
I don’t think
anyone… I
think, if you
look at the
way we’ve come
out with the
information on
this specific
case, where I
think every
step of the
way we’ve said
we’re sending
a team and so
forth, I don’t
think anyone
is trying to
bury these
cases and
trying to make
them go
away. On
the contrary,
we’re just
trying to seek
out the
truth.
On the issue
of civilians,
I’m not… I
don’t
completely
understand
what you’re
saying,
because,
obviously, if
there is a
criminal case
to be had with
any UN
civilian, that
is… that may
have acted
improperly,
those cases
are turned
over to their…
usually to
their native
country, so…
Question:
She was saying
to the CAR
authorities.
But I guess
what I’m
saying…
[cut off by UN
spokesperson]
Spokesman:
And I would
add that the
CAR
authorities,
the Minister
of Justice,
the Prime
Minister have
all been kept…
and the
prosecutors
have been kept
very well
aware and
updated on all
these
developments.
Inner City
Press:
Just overall
she said,
even, for
example, the
involvement of
UNICEF, she
said the UN as
an entity
that’s
actually…
stands accused
of being…
being part of
the problem to
be doing the
investigation
is a
conflict.
She also
pointed
specifically…
and I’d like
to get your
answer to
this… on the
Sangaris
force, a
recent French
investigation
into the… the
allegations of
bestiality
being cleared
so quickly,
she said, is
proof of the
French
authorities
being… them
saying we
haven’t found
evidence of it
as proof of a
desire to go
in quickly and
say none of
it’s true.
Spokesman:
I think the
French have to
speak for
themselves.
I think there
is absolutely
no desire… in
fact, it’s
quite the
opposite… on
the part of
the United
Nations, we
want to get to
the bottom of
it, and we
want to make
sure those who
suffered have
their
tormenters
punished to
the fullest
extent of the
law. And
Ms. … and no
doubt Ms.
Donovan will
continue to
have her
opinions, but
I don’t
agree with any
of them.
On
April 8, Inner
City Press
asked UN
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric, video here
Inner
City Press: I
wanted to ask
you about
sexual
abuse.
The report
that came out
that mentioned
a peacekeeper
in Haiti, who
had fathered
children in a
condition of
sexual
exploitation,
was suspended
for nine
days.
And now
there's
reports in
Canada that
are more
specific, that
say this was a
Montreal
police
officer.
There were
actually two
of them.
One was only
suspended for
five
days.
And there are
calls in the
Haitian
community in
Montreal that
this is an
outrage in
terms of the
lack of
punishment.
I asked at the
time, Mr.
[Atul] Khare,
I think it
was, was nine
days
enough?
What does the
UN
think?
Given it was
in the UN's
report as one
of the few
cases in which
a home country
actually took
action, is
nine days
enough?
And what is
the UN going
to do in terms
of Canada's
dealing with
sexual
exploitation
in Haiti when
the people
come home?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
Obviously, I
think each…
Member States
are
responsible
for the
prosecution of
people who may
have committed
crimes.
We hope that
those people
are prosecuted
to the full
extent of the
law. I'm
not aware of
the details of
the case, and
I… it's hard
for me to say
what is
sufficient or
not
sufficient.
Inner City
Press:
Should they
pay child
support?
Spokesman:
Obviously,
people who
father
children have
responsibilities.
Inner City
Press:
But, does the
UN… there was
no criminal
anything…
Spokesman:
No, and I also
think, you
know, there
is… be this
Trust Fund for
support for
the victims,
but I have no
more details
on the
case.
Well, the case
is in the
newspapers in
Montreal, and
should the UN
be paying the
child support
of Canadian
policemen?
Before
the April 5
session, Inner
City Press for
two days asked
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
Office of the
Spokesperson
how, with its
accreditation
capriciously
reduced, it
could stakeout
and cover the
meeting
without a UN
minder.
Amazingly,
this proved to
be impossible.
But Inner City
Press still
covered it.
First, Inner
City Press was
told by the
guard at the
turnstile at
which Inner
City Press'
pass no longer
work to “Go
get MALU,” the
Media
Accreditation
and Liaison
Unit. But
MALU, when
they came,
said they were
understaffed
and did not
even have the
time to be
Inner City
Press' minder.
So Inner City
Press missed
more than 15
minutes of the
diplomats
entering the
meeting about
rapes.
(Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric had
previously
said that if
Inner City
Press couldn't
get through
the turnstile,
“Don't tweet
about it, go
talk to MALU.”
Inner City
Press this
time followed
the advice -
but MALU would
not get it
through the
turnstile. So
Inner City
Press did then
tweet about
it.)
Then MALU said
they had time
to be the
minder of
Inner City
Press. This
was done, at
least for part
of the time,
along with a
board member
of the UN
Correspondents
Association.
But even under
this sinister
watch, Inner
City Press
managed to
speak to at
least some
Permanent
Representatives,
while others
respectfully
declined to
speak, citing
the minder.
One said they
weren't much
impressed by
Jane Holl
Lute's excuse
that the
response had
been slow
because the
site of the
rapes was
remote and
dangerous.
Another
said a major
P5 country's
“intervention”
had been
ill-informed
and
unprepared.
But most with
whom Inner
City Press
spoke said it
was good the
session
happened, that
if the UN
doesn't “man
up” as one
Permanent
Representative
put it to
Inner City
Press, its
reputation
will be hurt
for decades.
Ban Ki-moon's
chief of staff
Edmond Mulet,
who spoke in
the meeting,
left and at
least smiled
at Inner City
Press. He has
received
letters to
give to Ban,
from Burundi
and elsewhere.
Several
diplomats,
including one
who for this
reasons
wouldn't not
comment to
Inner City
Press about
the meeting,
commented that
the
requirement of
a minder for
the Press was
absurd,
wasteful and
"beneath the
UN." Another
said, "But
she's nice,"
referring to
the minder.
Inner City
Press does not
disagree, and
is trying to
be agreeable.
But the
restriction is
not
sustainable,
is unjustified
and must be
reversed,
shared office
and Resident
Correspondent
accreditation
restored.
While Inner
City Press
spoke with a
Permanent
Representative
it has long
known, an UNCA
board member -
we are being
diplomatic
here - came up
from behind
and moved the
Perm Rep's
scart (it was
a cold day),
then hugged
him.
The Permanent
Representative
turned and
asked, “Who
are you?”
This
individual
walked freely
without
minder,
apparently not
covering the
meeting on UN
rapes. We'll
have more on
this.
Footnote:
while staking
out the UN
rapes meeting
regarding
which some
Perm Reps
wouldn't speak
to the Press
because of the
minder, Inner
City Press
also covered
as a bonus the
election to
some ECOSOC
bodies. People
emerged, some
with swag
bags, some
saying they
hadn't
accepted the
bag to not "be
on Inner City
Press."
On
April 5 the
Narcotics
Board was
completed; on
April 6 it
will continue
on the
indigenous and
three other
ECOSOC bodies.
Watch this
site - unless
Inner City
Press remains
Banned from
covering this.