Conflict
Prevention
Debate Has
Right to Truth
and Penholder
Reforms,
Rancor
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 21 --
The Conflict
Prevention
debate of the
UN
Security
Council on
August 21
ended with
angry “right
of reply”
speeches by
Azerbaijan and
Armenia. In
between,
various
non-Council
members
offered their
diagnosis of
Security
Council
failures.
New
Zealand, a
candidate to
join the
Council next
year,
correctly
noted
that the
drafting power
of the
“pen-holder”
is
concentrated
in
too few hands.
(It's worse
than that:
often the
former
colonial power
is allowed to
draft all
resolutions
about “its"
country.)
At
the beginning
of the debate,
outgoing High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights Navi
Pillay listed,
as conflict in
Africa,
Central
African
Republic, the
Democratic
Republic of
Congo,
Somalia, South
Sudan and
Sudan. France
holds the pen
on CAR, DRC
and Mali;
Somalia and
the
Sudans are
both shared by
the UK and US.
Ban
Ki-moon began
by praising
the outgoing
Pillay. He did
not say, and
it
almost
went
unreported,
that Pillay
is only
leaving now
because Ban
gave her only
half of a
second term.
Ban
spoke about
his “Rights Up
Front”
initiative,
which when
launches
was presented
as a response
to Ban's UN's
failure in Sri
Lanka in
2008 and 2009.
But Ban
doesn't make
that link
anymore. He
had the
vaunted
“Article 99 of
the UN
Charter” power
then, but
didn't use
it.
Current
Council
member Chile
said the
resolution adopted
after Ban's
and
Pillay's
speeches
should have
included a
reference to
the “right to
truth.” This
brought to
mind the UN's
lack of
truthfulness
about
bringing
cholera to
Haiti.
Inner City
Press can
report that
the
August 20
meeting of a
slew of Latin
American
Ambassadors
with Ban
was about the
UN's mission
in Haiti,
MINUSTAH.
We'll have
more on
this.
Pillay
also listed
Iraq, Libya,
the Occupied
Palestinian
Territories,
Afghanistan
and Ukraine. Canada,
however, left
Ukraine out of
its
litany of
conflicts.
And despite
rumblings of a
draft
statement for
a
ceasefire in
Ukraine under
the Council's
silence
procedure
until 4
pm, by then
under the
rules enforced
by the UK
presidency of
the
Council for
August, all of
the speakers
had finished.
(This
involved the
UK's genial
deputy Peter
Wilson
gaveling and
asking
Zimbabwe's
charge
d'affaires to
rapidly
conclude her
remarks, which
she did,
without
complaining as
Syria and to
some degree
Iraq did
after the
Council's
session about
ISIL and al
Nusra).
Then
before 4 pm
the UNTV
camera at the
Security
Council
stakeout was
disassembled.
No Council
press
statement on
Ukraine, no
prevention of
conflict.
Watch this
site.