On
Libya,
Rice Explains Rejection of Russian Ceasefire Proposal, Blame
Game On
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
March 16 -- On Libya, Russia offered a ceasefire resolution
and offered “Chapter Seven” of the UN Charter, Russian Ambassador
Vitaly Churkin told the Press on Wednesday evening when the UN
Security Council meeting ended.
Asked why other Council members did
not all agree to the ceasefire proposal, Churkin told the Press that
Russia does not describe other countries' positions, and to ask them.
Inner
City Press
asked US Ambassador Susan Rice to explain opposition to Russia's
ceasefire proposal. She said that there was a need for enforcement
action, and that a call to end violence was already in the Council's
previous Resolution 1970 on Libya.
A
Western
spokesperson emerged and told the Press that since this earlier
Council call for a cessation of violence had no effect, the Russian
ceasefire resolution would have sent the wrong signal.
Asked
if the US
now supports a no fly zone, Rice said the US is looking at a package
that includes a no fly zone but goes beyond it.
Rice
did not list
Arab countries which have offered to enforce a no fly zone. Ibrahim
Dabbashi, the diplomat for Libya but not Gadhafi, said there are five
such countries.
Inner City
Press has heard of four: Jordan, Saudi
Arabia, the UAE and Qatar, whose Permanent Representative and
presumptive next President of the UN General Assembly came to visit
the Council consultations on Wednesday, accompanied by a bodyguard.
Accused
of
filibustering, Churkin denied it, saying this is not the US Senate or
House of Representatives.
Susan
Rice, when
asked if Churkin was filabustering to give Gadhafi more time
answered, “What do you think?”
To
some the
proceedings have the aura of a blame game. Russia can now argue that
it is not obstructionist, it offered a ceasefire resolution which was
rejected.
The
US can explain
what many saw as its indecisiveness about calling for a no fly zone
by saying that it wants MORE than a no fly zone.
And
if Russia
somehow blocks such a proposal -- the deployment of a veto seems
unlikely -- the US could blame Russia for being obstructionist.
In
the background,
countries like India and even Germany have expressed reservations or
questions about a no fly zone.
For
now, Council
members' experts will convene Thursday at 9 am, the Permanent
Representative at 11 am. But what will happen in the next 13 hours
in Libya? Watch this site.
* * *
As
UN Council Slows on Libya, Dabbashi Says “10 Hours, Treki in
Cairo"
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
March 16 -- While the UN Security
Council went through its
five page draft resolutions paragraph by paragraph, Libyan diplomat
Ibrahim Dabbashi came out to talk to the Press. He had prepared
talking about, about Gadhafi using mercenaries “who fought in
Congo, Rwanda, Burundi and Uganda,” from Niger, Mali (off camera)
and Chad (on camera).
Chad's
Permanent
Representative has told Inner City Press that while they may be
“individual Chadians” fighting with Gadhafi, the Deby government
does not choose between him and the rebels.
On
camera,
Dabbashi said a Council resolution authorizing air strikes is needed
“in ten hours.”
“How many
planes
do you have?” Inner City Press asked Dabbashi. Enough, he said. He
said the rebels' use of these planes has driven Gadhafi crazy.
After
a series of
questions about timing -- Dabbashi backed off the ten hour figure,
ending up saying the revolutionaries are “not counting” on the
Council -- Inner City Press asked him if the UN Secretariat has
spoken to him about the letter from Gadhafi's government saying he
and Shalgam no longer represent Libya, or if he thought the UN
Secretariat now recognized the rebels as the government,as France
has.
We
are continuing
our work with credentials, Dabbashi said.
He
was asked,
Where is Shalgam? He is here in New York, Dabbashi said.
Inner
City Press
asked, “Where is Treki?”
“In Cairo,”
Dabbashi quickly answered.
Hillary
Clinton in
Benghazi met with Ahmed Gebreel, who worked on Treki's transition
into the Presidency of the GA. There is talk of the UN of Ali Treki,
former President of the General Assembly, seeking to go into exile
rather than come to New York to represent Gadhafi at the UN. But his
family is still in Libya. Has there ever been an Ambassador at the
UN under duress?
Dabbashi earlier at UN: now, only 10 hours? Recognized by UN?
A
Western
spokesperson emerged from the Council to say that the Council is
going through the resolution paragraph by paragraph, given the
urgency.
Russian
Ambassador
Vitaly Churkin came out and told press he was angry at being
portrayed as an obstructionist. The buzz is that Russia by asking
questions is seeking to slow things down. “They don't dare veto
it,” a source said, “so they seek to slow it down.” But what
about the US? Watch this site.
* * *
As
Gadhafi
Forces
Advance, UN Delays, “Not the End of the
World” - But Benghazi?
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
March
16 -- As in Libya the Gadhafi forces say they are
prepared to move on the rebel capital Benghazi, at the UN
Security
Council in New York the Permanent Representative of the UK Mark
Lyall
Grant told the Press that if there's not a vote on a no fly zone
until tomorrow, it's “not the end of the world.”
But
could it be the
end of Benghazi? “We don't think it will happen on that time
frame,” he said. He came out to add that Russia, perhaps not
surprisingly, had asked for a postponement of the scheduled
consultations on the no fly zone, from 11 am to noon.
Inner
City
Press
asked, as it did Tuesday evening, if Lebanon had an answer from the
Arab League if its request is for a ban on all or only military
flights. A Western spokesman said his delegation has some answers,
but on that one would have to “ask Lebanon.”
But they have not
responded.
Gadhafi over Gillard & Rudd, Downer &
no fly zone not shown, h/t AdelaideNow
French
Ambassador
Gerard
Araud seemed resigned to no vote on Wednesday, speaking
instead of “tomorrow night” or even “the end of the week.”
But
would any of
the other Permanent Five members dare veto such a resolution? Many
asked about the US position, without receiving answers. Watch this
site.
* * *
UN
Libya
Draft
Paused on Whether All or Only Military Flights Would be
Banned
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
March
15, update -- Which flights would a No Fly Zone
over Libya actually
ban? All or only military flights?
Tuesday
at
the UN
after Lebanon distributed a draft resolution that it said based based
on the Arab League's decision, German Permanent Representative Wittig
came out and told the Press that Germany questioned whether a no fly
zone would be inconsistent with the Arab League's opposition to
military intervention.
When
Tuesday's
Security
Council consultations ended, to be resumed on Wednesday,
Inner City Press at the stakeout asked Lebanon's Ambassador about
Germany's stated concern that a No Fly Zone could be foreign
intervention.
He
said no, that
“the Libyan people” and the Arab League asked for it, and if the
UN Security Council authorized it, it could not be intervention.
In
the course of
further reporting, informed Council sources told Inner City Press
that issue in closed door consultations was that the Arab League, in
Arabic, referred to banning military flights, while the version
introduced at the UN in English would ban ALL flights. Lost in
translation? Watch this site.
Update of 5:20 pm --
French Ambassador Gerard Araud did not echo his foreign minister
Juppe's call to bomb Gadhafi's air fields in Libya, something that
Lebanon's Ambassador seemed to speak against at the stakeout, hoping
that approving a No Fly Zone would obviate the need to bomb. Hey:
Danish Foreign Affairs minister Lene Espersen has said Denmark
stands
ready, with four jets and 90 staff....
Update of 5:44 pm:
India's Permanent Representative Hardeep Puri came out and told the
Press pointedly that the draft would ban ALL flights -- but as Inner
City Press first reported, is that what the Arab League has called for?
In Arabic?
Hardeep Singh
also said that India might not have the right kind of assets to enforce
a no fly zone.
Update of 5:59 pm --
when Chinese Permanent Representative Li Baodong, this month's Council
president, came to the stakeout, Inner City Press asked him to confirm
the closed door discussion of Arab League referring to military
flights, not the "all" in the draft resolution. "You're raised a good
question," he replies. So this is one of the issues Lebanon has
to check with the Arab League about overnight...
Update of 6:05 pm --
and now we have asked Lebanon's Mission to the UN, via their Twitter
account, to answer when they can. New era? We'll see.
* * *
UN
Envoy
Al
Khatib
Is
On
Board
of Jordan Ahli Bank, Links With Libya
Central Bank
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee,
Exclusive
UNITED
NATIONS,
March
8
--
In
selecting
Abdul
Ilah
al Khatib as the UN's
envoy on Libya, Secretary General Ban Ki-moon moved quickly --
maybe
too quickly.
Since
serving
as
the
foreign
minister
of Jordan,
describe even some close to Ban as an autocracy, al
Khatib
has
served
on
the
boards
of director not only of Lafarge Jordan Cement Company
but also of Jordan Ahli Bank.
Jordan
Ahli
Bank
is
active
beyond
that
country's borders. A sample connection: along
with Libyan
Foreign Bank, a fully owned subsidiary of the Central
Bank of Libya, Jordan Ahli Bank
is a top 20 shareholder of Union de
Banques Arabes et Francaises.
Could
there
be
conflicts
of
interest?
Did
the UN's Ban administration even consider
these?
Ban & al-Khatib in 2007, directorships not shown: or considered?
Ban
previously claimed that 99% of his officials have made
public financial disclosure. But when Inner City Press showed this is
not true -- even Ban's close ally Choi Young-jin, his envoy in Cote
d'Ivoire, declined to make public financial disclosure -- Ban's
spokesman Martin Nesirky said Ban's statement had been
“metaphorical.”
Now
Ban names and
injects al Khatib into a struggle about democracy and free press,
when as Inner City Press noted
yesterday
"Foreign
Minister
Abd
al-Ilah
al-Khatib
in
January
initiated a criminal
defamation suit against weekly newspaper al-Hilal's editor-in-chief
Nasir Qamash and journalist Ahmad Salama. He [al-Khatib] objected to
the content of a January article, and said his tribe had threatened
to beat up Salama if he failed to take action. The case remains in
the courts at this writing."
By
what process was
al-Khatib vetted and selected? Watch this site.
Click
for
Mar 1,
'11
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption
Click
here
for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters
footage, about civilian
deaths
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12
debate
on
Sri
Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis
here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office:
S-453A,
UN,
NY
10017
USA
Tel:
212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile
(and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier
Inner
City
Press
are
listed
here,
and
some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08
Inner
City
Press,
Inc.
To
request
reprint
or
other
permission,
e-contact
Editorial
[at]
innercitypress.com
-
|