At
UN,
SC Meets in
Secret on
Transparency,
Down Closed
Hall, Concept
Paper Here
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
March 23 -- On
Monday the UN
Security
Council
Permanent
Members met in
their
consultations
room about
transparency.
Inner
City Press
later obtained
from an
unnamed source
the underlying
Concept Paper,
which it puts
online below.
On
Friday the
Council's
Committee on
Working
Methods took
up the topic
again, this
time amid in
the North Lawn
building amid
even greater
secrecy.
Inner
City Press
stood in the
hall outside
Conference
Room 7, as
media often
do. A
non-Council
diplomat told
Inner City
Press,
"Transparency
and
the Security
Council? Give
me a break."
The Council's
substantive
work of the
day was the
negotiation of
a long-stalled
Presidential
Statement
about the
Sahel,
unblocked in
light of the coup
d'etat
in Mali. (Our
next articles
is on that.)
On
March 22 Inner
City Press
asked Council
president Mark
Lyall Grant
about the
stalled Sahel
statement and
was told that
political
coordinators
would meet on
Friday at
10:30. But it
was not at the
Council, and
only at 3 pm
was it learned
that a draft
of the Sahel
would go now
go "under
silence."
Non-Permanent
members
of the Council
were mostly
represented on
Working
Methods by
their
Political
Coordinators;
the Permanent
Five at a
lower level.
The UK and
France,
for example,
were
represented by
the diplomats
who
represented
them
during the
recent
meetings of
the
International
Criminal Court
state
parties.
Friday after
France's
Beatrice Le
Fraper du
Hellen walked
in, soon Inner
City Press was
told to leave
even the
hallway. So
much for
transparency.
The
Press' ability
to cover UN
meeting should
not depend so
much on in
which UN
building
the hosts
choose to hold
the meeting.
This is
similar to the
meeting
in UN-rented
380 Madison
Avenue of the
UN Senior
Advisory Group
on
Peacekeeping
Operations,
including Sri
Lankan General
Shavendra
Silva
whose Division
58 is depicted
in the UN's
own Panel of
Experts report
as engaged in
war crimes.
When Inner
City Press
covered it as
it
would in the
UN, Sri Lanka
got UN
Security to
throw Inner
City Press.
Now the North
Lawn building
is said to
have secret
corridors, and
the
Council tries
to meet in
them.
And
so we have the
Concept Paper,
which invited
comment on
among other
things a
proposal
to not have
Ambassadorial
level meetings
on, "say,"
Friday
afternoons:
The
Council
is allotted
five full
conference
days per week
but, on
average, our
figures
indicate that
only around
half of these
allotted
conference
resources are
used. Just
under half of
the unused
resources can
be
re-allocated
within the UN
system, but
around a
tbird of the
overall
allotted time
is not
utilized.
While
maintaining
the capacity
to meet at any
time and at
short notice
should the
need
arise, we
believe there
is a case for
the Council
agreeing to a
practice that
it should not
meet, say, on
Friday
afternoons
(other
than when
urgently
necessary).
Providing this
level of
clarity to the
Secretariat
would enable
them to adjust
their planning
so that the
level of
unused
resources
would be
sharply
reduced. Our
estimates
indicate that
this modest
reform would
save several
million
dollars.
Additionally,
we think that
we should look
at redeploying
some of the
time from the
Council itself
to subsidiary
organs, whose
number and
frequency of
meeting have
increased in
recent years.
Periodicity.
Recently
steps have
been taken to
reduce the
number of
mandate
renewals
concentrated
disproportionately
at a few
points in the
year
(notably June
and December).
However more
can be done to
avoid spikes
in the work of
the Council
with
consequences
for the
workload of
the
Secretariat
and all
Missions of
Council
members. We
believe that
recent
planning
documents from
the
Secretariat
(see
Secretariat
Note
of 1 March
2012)
demonstrate
that there is
scope for the
Council to
spread its
workload more
evenly
throughout the
year by
adjusting
mandate
renewal
periods and
reporting
requirements
so that these
are
not
concentrated
at particular
points. There
is also scope
to align
related
reporting
requirements
(e.g. of
mission
reports and
sanctions
committee
reports
concerning the
same country)
so that
Council
consideration
of related
items could
easily be
"clustered"
into a single
thematically
consistent
session.
Interactivity,
We
welcome the
greater level
of
interactivity
achieved in
recent
months
through, for
example, less
recourse to
speakers'
lists for
consultations,
more
informality of
discussion,
through
regular
horizon-scanning
sessions and
through the
judicious use
of
videoconferencing
technology
wherever
appropriate
and
practically
feasible
(which
increased from
3 uses in 2010
to 28 in
2011). Our
view is that
this leads to
more
productive and
stimulating
exchanges
and generates
purposeful
debate. We
believe that
we should
actively
explore
further such
changes.
And
so ostensibly
to discuss
reform, and
greater
openness in
publishing the
full year's
schedule on
the Council's
website, the
Council meet
Friday in a
closed door
down a hallway
some wanted
the Press out
of. We'll have
more on this.