At UN, Who Can Speak At Darfur Meeting, Sudan Asks,
As Ocampo Arrives -- Ostensibly on Uganda, He Will Not Explain
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of
Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS,
March 20, updated -- In the wake of Sudan's
expulsion of 13 non-governmental organizations from Darfur, a
procedural fight
broken on Friday in the UN Security Council, with Sudan saying it has a
right
to be heard at a public briefing by top UN humanitarian John Holmes
scheduled
for Friday afternoon. The UN Spokesperson's Office at 11:06 in the
morning sent
out an "urgent" update, while the Council met on the subject of
Somalia. The update said that the "Council will hold consultations on
the
subject of Sudan immediate following the adjournment of the [Somalia]
meeting
currently in progress."
Inner City
Press immediately inquired Friday morning with a range of diplomats and
learned
that while a public meeting on Darfur had been proposed for Friday
afternoon,
when Sudan asked to participate and speak, the proposal had to be
changed. The plan
then switched to a public "briefing," by John Holmes, after which no
members would speak in public. To Sudan and its supporters -- and it
has some
-- this seemed like sleight of hand, a hit and run proceeding in which
they
would not be heard. Emergency
consultations were then set, on no other topic than the format.
A Western
diplomat scoffed that Sudan is using the Council's schedule -- a
retreat with
Ban Ki-moon is planned to begin on Friday -- to try to block even
Holmes'
briefing. He said that initially the idea was just to have Holmes
briefing
publicly, then to take off to the retreat. But if Sudan speaks,
"everyone
else will want to." He argued that Sudan "could just come and speak at
the stakeout."
UN's Ban and ICC's Ocampo, Sudan's request to be heard not shown
On Thursday the US
Mission to the UN told the Press
that they had pushed to get a Friday meeting on Darfur. They explained
that
some had initially demurred, saying it could be done next week. But
with the
expulsion of 13 NGOs just after the International Criminal Court
indicted Sudanese
President Omar al-Bashir for war crimes, and President Bashir's more
recent
statements that he might expel diplomats and "security forces" from
the country, the US pushed for the meeting, it said. But when a country
is
discussed in the Council, in a public meeting, it has some right to
speak. Hence
the standoff. Watch this site -- and note that at 11:38 a.m., ICC
prosecutor
Luis Moreno Ocampo walked into the Council, then paced around outside
clutching his
cell phone.
Footnote (followed
by updates) -- While the UK, and the U.S., are titularly
in support of Austria's and Mexico's request for a second Council
meeting on
Sri Lanka, it appears they are putting substantially less political
capital
into the Sri Lanka request than for even interim briefings on Darfur.
The
above-quoted Western diplomat agreed that each country's political
capital is
limited, and consciously deployed, but added that the deployment is
also based
on the amount of push-back.
Does this mean that Sri Lanka has more or
stronger
supporters in the Council -- meaning, among China and Russia of the
Permanent
Five member -- than Sudan does? Or that this, added to the
procedural point
that Sudan is, and Sri Lanka is not, inscribed on an ongoing basis on
the
Council agenda makes the US and UK less likely to "waste" energy on
overcoming objections to a Sri Lanka briefing now that the UN's
knowledge of
2,683 civilian deaths from January 20 to March 7 is known?
Update of 12:44 p.m. -- on the mystery of Luis
Moreno Ocampo's strutting presence in the Security Council as members
fight
about the format for their Darfur meeting, Ocampo refused to answer any
questions. His spokesperson, more polite, explained that Ocampo was in
Washington for talks, then came to New York to speak with
representatives of
Uganda about the Joseph Kony / Lord's Resistance Army case. The claim
then is
that his presence has nothing to do with the Sudan case -- despite
Ocampo
standing in front of the Council chatting with representatives of
Missions to
the UN of the United States and other countries. As
Inner City Press conversed with a UN
agency spokesman and Ocampo walked by, he was asked: are you really
here only
on Uganda? He smirked but said nothing. The agency spokesman said, you
can't
even call that a no comment...
It
was
explained -- not by Ocampo -- that when for example UN High
Commissioner on
Human Rights Navi Pillay says that war crimes may be being committed by
both
the Tamil Tigers and the Sri Lankan government, the ICC Prosecutor's
Office
puts a notation in a data base. Since Sri Lanka is not a signatory of
the ICC's
Rome Statute, it is said, there is nothing they can do. It was noted
that "the
Tamils have not even tried to argue for jurisdiction, like the
Palestinians
have." Watch this site.
Update of 4:09
p.m. -- the outcome of the consultations
was a public meeting, with "everyone" speaking, including Sudan and
others. The UK Ambassador John Sawers referred to Abyei; Susan Rice
intoned and
inveighed against president Bashir. Russia's Vitaly Churkin, on the
other hand,
called the proceedings "symptomatic," hastily convened and
politically motivated. Luis
Moreno-Ocampo, long after his meeting with the Ugandan mission, is
still
hanging around the Security Council in the afternoon, now without the
Uganda
fig leaf. The Ambassador of Liechtenstein, too, is around, the head of
the
state parties to the ICC's Rome Statute. One
would expect Ocampo to answer some press
questions while here. But so far, not.
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12 debate on Sri Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile (and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|