On
Sri Lanka, UN Meeting Called One-Off, UK Makes No Proposals, Holmes
Differs from Ban
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of
Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED
NATIONS, February 27 --
After the Security Council's closed-door meeting on Sri Lanka, Council
president Yukio Takasu emerged to tell the Press that that conflict, in
which
more than 2000 civilians have been killed so far this year, will not be
a
Council agenda item going forward. Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin,
even
before the meeting began, called the briefing by UN humanitarian chief
John
Holmes a "one-time" event. Video here,
from Minute 6:45.
While in London UK Foreign Minister David
Miliband spoke about publicly about a strategy of proposing a Council
resolution on Sri Lanka, in New York UK Ambassador John Sawers did not
even
propose a Presidential Statement. He left the Council stakeout after
taking a
single question, ignoring Inner City Press' question about what
Minister
Miliband had said. By contrast, even knowing albeit late that it would
be vetoed, the UK and U.S. put forward a sanctions resolution on
Zimbabwe last year. (US Ambassador Susan Rice was not at Friday's
meeting, and no US representative came to the stakeout to speak.)
Inner City Press has obtained a copy of Holmes
prepared remarks to the
Council's closed-door session, and puts it online here.
Whereas Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on
February 23 called for a suspension of fighting and for political
discussions
to bring an end to the conflict, Holmes on February 27 spoke of
tackling underlying
political issues only "after the end of the fighting."
It appears
that the UN Secretariat's public call is undermined by a more private
green light
to the Sri Lankan military's offensive in north Sri Lanka.
Holmes also dodged the question of whether UN money
would be use for
camps the Sri Lankan government in building in which Tamil people who
flee the
bombs in the conflict zone would be detained until at least the end of
2009.
Inner City Press also asked Japan's Takasu, who had mentioned
international
humanitarian law, about the camps, and his lengthy answer did not
address the
legality of the planned detentions. Video here,
from Minute 6:25. Nor did he answer whether it is the government which
is keeping media from covering the conflict. (While under no
restriction, at the post-meeting stakeout interviews, while Bloomberg
News was there, other wires including UK-based Reuters were not
present.)
When both in New York, UK's Miliband and
Sawers, Sri Lanka proposals not shown
Inner City Press asked Holmes about reports that he
used the Sri Lankan
government's Minister of Resettlement as his translator. Holmes
admitted that
this happened, then said "you should credit me with enough
intelligence" to assess what people told me, surrounded by the
military's
armed guards. But locals say that while a woman spoke of her son
abducted by
the Army, Holmes was told she'd said her son was killed by the Tamil
Tigers or
LTTE.
Holmes told the
Council of various assurances the government gave him.
But when Inner City Press asked if he had proof the government has
stopped
using heavy weapons, he admitted he did not. He went on, as he did but
only
initially in Gaza, to note that it is "hard to distinguish civilian and
LTTE cadres." Video here,
from Minute 4:30.
In fact, Medecins Sans Frontieres / Doctors
Without Borders put out of field report of February 26 describing how a
"
family spent days in a bunker without food and water. Out of
desperation, and
despite the shelling, they left their bunker to get some food when
three out of
her 15 family members were killed on the spot." This
is the situation which the UN's
humanitarian operation is, some say, glossing over, because of politics
in the
Security Council.
Inner City Press asked outgoing Council president
Takasu about these
politics, to explain why for example in Sudan the Council does not
demand that
the Justice and Equality Movement, which recruited child soldiers and
used them
in an assault on Omdurman last year, lay down its arms before urging
Khartoum
to refrain for retaking rebel held land and negotiating with JEM.
Takasu tried
to say that the Council's approach to Darfur and Sri Lanka is
consistent. Video
here,
from 14:13.
Why, Inner City Press,
is Sudan then on the Council's agenda, and Sri Lanka is not? The answer
is
politics. This topic is explored on an
online debate, following-up on the one linked-to below, that will go
online
this weekend.
Click
here
for Feb.
12 debate on Sri Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
Click here for Inner City
Press Nov. 7 debate on the war in Congo
Watch this site, and this Oct. 2 debate, on
UN, bailout, MDGs
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click
here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile (and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|