On Sri Lanka, UN's Ban Says "Never Again" to Call
for Ceasefire or Suspension
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of
Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS,
April 7 -- With the situation for
civilians trapped between the Sri Lankan Army and the Tamil Tigers
growing more
dire by the day, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon on April 7 was asked
if he is
calling for a ceasefire. Mr. Ban's 127-word answer, while describing
two phone
calls to President Mahinda Rajapaksa, did not use the word ceasefire,
or even
Ban's previous phrases, a suspension of fighting or humanitarian pause.
Inner City
Press noted, both in Monday's UN noon briefing and later to Mr. Ban
himself,
that "it is unclear whether you are asking actually for a ceasefire." In
response, Ban expressed "hope that the Sri Lankan Government takes all
necessary measures so that these civilians can move freely, without any
danger,
without threat, to the safety zone." Video
here,
from Minute 13.
By the UN's
repeated admission, dozens are being killed each day. (Click here for
the UN casualty estimate leaked to Inner City Press, and here for video of
the UN's response.) Senior UN officials have
told Inner City Press on background that in Ban's office on the UN's
38th
floor, there is talk that many more
civilians may be killed in further fighting
in and bombing of the so-called No Fire Zone. Why then has Ban Ki-moon
backtracked even on calling
for a temporary cessation of the fighting, as he did when Inner City
Press asked him on February 23?
President
Rajapaksa has said he will not be pressured by the international
community, and
that the military offensive will continue until the end. After that,
Ban backed
away from his call for a suspension of bombing, fighting and killing.
As his
spokesperson
clarified at Tuesday's noon briefing, the New
York Times' report
on April 6 that Ban had the previous day called for "an immediate
cease-fire" was and is not
true. Ban may ultimately wish that he had, but he
has and is not.
Earlier on
April 7, Ban had attended a memorial for the victims in Rwanda in 1994,
where
the UN is widely acknowledged as having done far too little as
civilians were
being killed. In fact, Ban was asked "the UN has been accused of
cowardice
for standing aside in Rwanda fifteen years ago... What is your
reaction?"
Ban
replied, "I attended a very solemn meeting this afternoon, and I again
expressed my resolve, as Secretary-General, that I will do all in my
power not
to repeat this kind of human tragedy."
UN's Ban on April 7, speaking on Rwanda and then on Sri Lanka
Here is the
UN's
own transcription of Inner City Press' question and Ban's answer on Sri
Lanka:
Inner City Press: Given that
there are about 100,000 civilians trapped in Sri Lanka between the
Government
and the Tamil Tigers, it is unclear whether you are asking actually for
a
ceasefire. Have you asked the Government
to not try to go into the conflict zone in a way that can’t hurt the
civilians? What is the UN’s thinking on
Sri Lanka at this time?
S-G Ban Ki-moon: I have spoken
on many occasions with
President [Mahinda] Rajapaksa of Sri Lanka.
As you know, I have sent OCHA [Office for the
Coordination of Humanitarian
Affairs] Under-Secretary-General, John Holmes.
Even most recently, I have spoken with President
Rajapaksa on the
necessity and importance of protecting the human rights of civilians
who have
been trapped in the fighting zones. I
again hope that the Sri Lankan Government takes all necessary measures
so that
these civilians can move freely, without any danger, without threat, to
the
safety zone. At the same time, the LTTE
[Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam] must fully cooperate with the
Government in
allowing these civilians so that they can move freely from this war
zone. These are basic human rights and
basic humanitarian
matters.
As several
reporters noted after Ban's answer, he did not use the word ceasefire,
nor even
suspension of fighting. Soon Ban will travel to Laos then the ASEAN
meeting in
Thailand. North Korea's rocket launch will be the hottest topic. By
then, what
will be the situation in northern Sri Lanka? Watch this site.
Footnote: earlier
on April 7, Inner
City Press had
asked Ban's spokesperson
Inner City Press: yesterday,
there was a
New York Times story -– this is also on Sri Lanka –- saying that
“in his call Sunday for an immediate cease-fire, Ban Ki-moon” blah,
blah,
blah. Did I miss something?
Was there a statement Sunday calling for an
immediate ceasefire as regards Sri Lanka?
Spokesperson Montas: No.
Not on Sunday.
Inner City Press: Has he called
for a ceasefire?
Spokesperson: No, he has
called for stopping hostilities –-
a pause –- which we mentioned before.
And then
even that was gone...
Click here
for a new YouTube video, mostly UN Headquarters footage, about civilian
deaths
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12 debate on Sri Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile (and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|