Your support
means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you
access to exclusive bonus material on
our Patreon page. Click
here to become a patron. MRL
on Patreon
UNITED
NATIONS GATE,
November 15 -- UN
Secretary
General
Antonio
Guterres says
he has a "zero
tolerance"
policy for
sexual abuse,
exploitation
and harassment,
and for
retaliation. But
when Inner
City Press
asked
Guterres' deputy
spokesman Farhan
Haq on March
15 about
Michel
Sidibé's reported
threats of retaliatory
investigations
against those
making
and offering
support to sexual
harassment
complaints at
UNAIDS, Haq said
this is entire
a matter for
UNAIDS. Earlier
Inner City
Press story here; exclusive
publication of
whistleblowers'
international
condemnation
of retaliation
and favoritism
in Sidibe's
UNAIDS, below.
Now Guterres
is similarly
passing the buck on FAO,
see response
to Inner City
Press here. On
November 8,
Inner City
Press asked in
writing Guterres,
his Deputy and
his
Global Censor
Alison Smale,
as well as his
spokesmen,
this: "
November
8-7:
Given the SG's
claim of
accountability
for sexual
exploitation
by UN Police
from Ghana in
South Sudan,
please
immediately
provide his
comment and
action on this
contradictory
report from
Ghana:
“Government
says it is yet
to conclude
its
investigations
into the case
of some
Ghanaian
police
peacekeepers
indicted by
the United
Nations for
sexual
misconduct in
South Sudan
last year.
Though the
Police
Administration
in May this
year said
investigations
by the IGP’s
three-man
investigative
team had
concluded its
work, the
Interior
Minister
Ambrose Dery
claimed in
Parliament
Thursday the
team was yet
to finish with
the
investigations.
Director
General of the
Police
Intelligence
and
Professional
Standards, COP
Kofi Boakye
who said in
May the
investigations
had ended,
noted that the
Police was
awaiting the
results of the
UN
investigators
to “compare
notes in order
to have a
compete and
comprehensive
report”. But
when summoned
by Parliament
to brief
members of the
House what
have been the
results of the
investigations,
Mr. Dery said
the
investigations
are expected
to end by the
end of
November 2018,
nine months
on. Some MPs
wanted to know
if the sexual
exploitation
incident had
affected
Ghana’s
participation
UN in
peacekeeping
but the
minister
responded in
the negative,
noted even
after that
incident some
troops were
deployed for
peacekeeping.
Mr. Dery said
some of those
police
officers who
were withdrawn
from South
Sudan over the
alleged sex
exploitation
and abuse have
been
interdicted
while others
are still at
post.” No
answer for four
days -
so was
the claim of rare
accountability
for this Ghana
contingent
even true?
Impossible to
know in Guterres
murky UN of
censorship.
Now on
November 12
from Guterres'
deputy
spokesman
Farhan Haq
this, which we
publish in full:
"Regarding
your question
about the
Ghanaians in
South Sudan,
we have the
following: The
Office of
Internal
Oversight
Services
(OIOS)
conducted an
investigation
into the
allegations of
sexual
exploitation
by Ghanaian
police in
South Sudan.
The
investigation
concluded that
eight police
officers had
engaged in
transactional
sex in Wau. As
per UN rules,
these officers
are barred
from
deployment to
any current or
future UN
peace
operations.
The OIOS
report was
shared with
the Ghanaian
authorities
who are in the
process of
conducting
their own
national
investigation
into the
allegations.
The Government
of Ghana has
pledged to
take
disciplinary
and/or
criminal
action for
substantiated
acts. As per
standard
practice,
Member States
have the
responsibility
to ensure
accountability
of their
personnel. The
UN does not
have judicial
authority.
The United
Nations is
following up
closely with
the Ghanaian
authorities on
information
regarding its
investigation
and any other
relevant
actions." But
Ghana's
investigation
was said
finished in
May, but is
now said to be
ongoing - and
repatriatees
still "at
post." Now
that is ALL of
the
repatriatees -
on November
14, banned
Inner City Press
asked in
writing,
"November 14-
2: Now in
Ghana, even
the 14
suspended are
back on the
job. What is
the SG's (and
separately USG
Lacroix's)
comment and
action on that
“14 Police
officers who
were accused
of sexual
misconduct in
a peacekeeping
mission in
South Sudan
have been
recalled back
into the
service after
they were
interdicted.
According to a
police
internal memo
sighted by
Primenewsghana,
the personnel
have been
recalled to
resume work
while
investigations
continue.
“This
headquarters
signal directs
the immediate
lifting of
interdiction
of the
underlisted
personnel,”
the memo
said”? There
was no answer
that day. On November
15, with lead
spokesman back
from a week long junket
to Japan with
no
transcript,
Haq instead
of addressing
Ghana's
statements and
action
merely resent
the same
answer on
Ghana (and
left unanswered
Inner
City Press'
about six new
rape
allegations
against Cameroonian
UN peacekeepers)
- "On
question Nov
14-2,
re-sending
what we had
sent you on
this earlier:
The Office of
Internal
Oversight
Services
(OIOS)
conducted an
investigation
into the
allegations of
sexual
exploitation
by Ghanaian
police in
South Sudan.
The
investigation
concluded that
eight police
officers had
engaged in
transactional
sex in Wau. As
per UN rules,
these officers
are barred
from
deployment to
any current or
future UN
peace
operations.
The OIOS
report was
shared with
the Ghanaian
authorities
who are in the
process of
conducting
their own
national
investigation
into the
allegations.
The Government
of Ghana has
pledged to
take
disciplinary
and/or
criminal
action for
substantiated
acts. As per
standard
practice,
Member States
have the
responsibility
to ensure
accountability
of their
personnel. The
UN does not
have judicial
authority.
The United
Nations is
following up
closely with
the Ghanaian
authorities on
information
regarding its
investigation
and any other
relevant
actions." Yeah-
really
closely.
We'll
have more and this -- even as
banned from
entering the UN and asking
question in
person by
Antonio "The
Censor"
Guterres,
while
publishing written
answer in
full.
On
November 5
Guterres'
spokesman Stephane
Dujarric
quickly read out
new allegations
of UN sexual
exploitation
and abuse.
No one in the
room asked about
the 24 alleged
child
rape (one late
set of
softball
questions were
lobbed);
Dujarric said
all the
information,
including
for previous
periods for
comparison
was
in his office
and immediately
available
to those he HASN'T
had roughed
up and banned
from the UN:
Dooj's
Stooges. Inner
City Press
immediately
emailed him,
his deputy,
Guterres'
Global Censor
Alison
Smale, Amina
J. Mohammed,
Maria Luiza
Viotti, Hua
Jiang and
others: "This
is a request
to immediately
be emailed the
UN sexual
exploitation
and abuse data
rattled off in
the noon
briefing Inner
City Press
remains banned
from, and
reiterates
UNSR David
Kaye's 20 July
2018 question
what is the
appeals
process for
this ban,
still not
answered." The
briefing
ended
with Dujarric
joking with his
softball interlocutor,
to whom he'd said
"Vannina
in my
office has
more information,"
video
here, presumably
gone and
returned
Vannina
Maestracci.
But when Inner
City Press
emailed
Dujarric and
his deputy for
this additional
information,
the deputy
Farhan Haq
sent no additional
information, claiming
"The data
provided below
is
exactly
the same as
the data
shared with
the accredited
press.
For
comparisons,
please look at
the Conduct
and Discipline
Unit website,
which includes
previous
data." But
that's only
peacekeeper,
not civilian
staff
information,
much less UNSC
authorized
forces. What's
the additional
information
that Dujarric
said Maestracci
has? From the past, before
Dujarric
and Guterres had
Inner City Press
roughed up and
banned: one,
two, three
strikes and
you're
out. More
than an hour
after he read
it out, and
with none of
the promised
historical data, what
Dujarric read
was emailed to
banned Inner
City Press by
Dujarric's deputy:
"We have been
giving you
regular
updates on
cases of
sexual
exploitation
and abuse in
the UN system
in line with
the
Secretary-General’s
initiative on
increasing
transparency
on these
allegations.
Today I have
an update for
the period 1
July to 30
September
2018. Please
note that not
all the
allegations
have been
fully verified
and many are
in the
preliminary
assessment
phase. During
this period,
the United
Nations
received 39
allegations
involving UN
personnel – 6
for
peacekeeping
and 33 from
agencies,
funds and
programmes. We
also received
25 allegations
involving
non-UN
personnel
working as
implementing
partners.
There were no
allegations
pertaining to
non-UN
international
forces
authorized by
Security
Council
mandate for
this period.
The total
allegations
reported for
this period is
64. 30
incidents
allegedly took
place in 2018;
7 in 2017; 2
in 2016; 6 in
2015 or before
and the date
is unknown for
19
allegations.
From the 64
allegations,
there are 77
victims: 42
women, 24
girls (under
the age of
18), 2 men and
1 boy (under
the age of
18). The age
of 8 victims
is unknown.
The
categorization
of the
allegations
against these
77 victims is
16 as sexual
abuse, 55 as
sexual
exploitation,
4 unknown. Two
(2) are
categorized as
others as they
were
unsubstantiated
following
investigation.
The alleged
perpetrators
are 66 men, 1
woman, and 2
individuals
whose gender
is unknown.
Of the 39
allegations
related to UN
personnel, one
was not
substantiated,
22 are at
various stages
of
investigation
and 16 are
under
preliminary
assessment to
determine if
there is
sufficient
information to
investigate.
Of the 25
allegations
relating to
implementing
partners, 2
have been
substantiated
through an
investigation
and the
perpetrators
were dismissed
by the
implementing
partner. One
allegation was
not
substantiated,
14 are at
various stages
of
investigation,
7 are under
preliminary
assessment and
1 allegation
was closed at
the request of
the victim.
The efforts to
implement the
Secretary-General’s
strategy to
combat sexual
exploitation
and abuse have
continue to be
strengthened.
You’ll
remember that
on 27
September
2018, the
Secretary-General
issued a
Collective
Statement of
the Members of
his Circle of
Leadership in
which they
reaffirmed
their
continued
personal
commitment as
global leaders
to support
efforts to
combat sexual
exploitation
and abuse
across the
United Nations
system. As of
today, that
Statement has
been endorsed
by 49 Heads of
State and
Government and
22 Heads of
United Nations
entities. 72
global leaders
have joined
the Circle of
Leadership.
And also, 100
Member States
are to this
date
signatories to
the voluntary
compact with
the United
Nations to
eliminate
sexual
exploitation
and abuse.
During this
quarter, the
electronic
tool, “Clear
Check” used
for screening
UN staff
dismissed as a
result of
substantiated
allegations of
sexual
exploitation
and abuse, or
who resigned
or were
separated
during an
investigation
is on its way
to be fully
utilized
system-wide."
On
October 24 -
UN Day, and
the 112th day
Guterres has
banned Inner
City Press --
the UN data
dumped at 11 am a
rape charge
against a UN
Volunteer in
DR Congo, as recent
as August
2018. Photo here.
But no
one let into
the UN noon
briefing even asked
about it, or
any question about
anything in
Africa where
the UN - and Guterres'
son Pedro
Guimarães e
Melo De
Oliveira Guterres
- raise their
money. Inner
City Press asked
before noon in writing:
October 24-3:
On sexual
exploitation
and abuse and
the new rape
charges
against the
UNV in MONUSCO
put online an
hour ago,
please now
provide all
further
if-asked
information
about these
abuses, as for
example you
did when asked
in person by
those not
banned from
the briefing
about the
Nigerian
peacekeeper(s)."
More
than an hour
later, this
from Deputy
Spokesman
Farhan Haq:
"Regarding
question 24-3,
we can say the
following:
The UN Mission
in the
Democratic
Republic of
Congo
(MONUSCO) has
received an
allegation of
sexual abuse
involving an
International
UN Volunteer
(UNV). The
allegation
concerns two
Congolese
adult females
and allegedly
took place in
Bunia in
August 2018.
The matter is
being
investigated
by the Office
of Internal
Oversight
Services
(OIOS) and the
United Nations
Volunteers
Programme has
been notified
of the
allegation and
the ongoing
investigation.
MONUSCO
reports that
the alleged
victims were
examined by a
doctor at a
local hospital
on the day of
the reported
incident and
further
referred to
the UN
Population
Fund (UNFPA)
for
appropriate
support, as
per the UN’s
Victim
Assistance
Protocol.
The protection
of and
assistance to
victims is our
top priority.
The Mission
will maintain
contact with
them and
continue to
monitor the
situation."
Nothing on the nationality,
for example,
of the alleged
UN rapist -
why not?
Banned Inner
City Press
cannot ask,
and no one
else does.
Guterres is a
cover up
artist.
On
October 18,
the 107th day
Guterres
has banned
Inner City
Press from
entering the
UN - now on a
secret banned list
along
with "political
activists," see
here, the UN
mid afternoon
data dumped
another case of
sexual
exploitation
by a
Cameroonian
"peacekeeper"
in CAR, photo
here.
On October 19
Inner City Press,
banned from
the UN
briefing for
the 108th day,
asked
questions in
writing
including:
"October 19-3:
On sexual
exploitation
and abuse and
the new
charges
against
Cameroonian
peacekeeper in
CAR put online
yesterday,
please now
provide all
further
if-asked
information
about these
abuses, as for
example you
did when asked
in person by
those not
banned from
the briefing
about the
Nigerian
peacekeeper(s)."
Two hours
after the
briefing, at which
none of those
allowed into the
briefing asked
about this new
sexual
exploitation
outrage, the
UN sent Inner City
Press
this: "Regarding
question 19-3,
we have the
following
information: The
UN
Multidimensional
Integrated
Stabilization
Mission in the
Central
African
Republic
(MINUSCA) has
received a new
allegation of
sexual
exploitation
involving one
member of the
Cameroon
military
contingent
deployed to
the
Mission.
The
allegation
refers to an
exploitative
relationship
with one adult
woman that
allegedly took
place in
February 2018,
resulting in
pregnancy. The
UN has
informed the
Member State
of the
allegation and
has requested
that a
National
Investigation
Officer be
appointed
within five
(5) working
days. The UN
has also
requested for
the
investigation
to be
completed
within the
reduced
90-days
timeframe. The
alleged victim
has been
referred for
assistance to
humanitarian
partners. The
Mission will
continue to
monitor the
victim needs,
as well as
provide any
additional
assistance
such as the
collection of
DNA samples if
requested to
do so by the
victim."
Inner City
Press contends
the UN needs a
new column
or data point:
if pregnancy
resulted.
How many more
abuses by Cameroonian
soldiers, both
in and outside
of that
country, will
Guterres put
up with? On
October
9, the 98th
day Guterres
has banned
Inner City Press
from entering
the UN in any
capacity, at
12:01 pm as the noon
briefing was
to start, and
banned Inner
City Press'
questions for
the day had
already
been emailed
in, the UN
disclosed yet
more sexual
exploitation
charges, against
two Gabonese
"peacekeepers"
concerning
three women
- no age given - in
the Central
African
Republic. And
Dujarric
didn't even
bring it up in
the briefing
and no one
whom Guterres
allowed into
"his" room
asked about
it. On
October 5, the
94th day Guterres
has banned Inner
City Press
from the UN,
at 12:02 as the noon
briefing
started, and banned Inner
City Press'
questions for
the day had
already
been emailed
in, the UN
disclosed yet
more child
rape charges,
against
four
Mauritanian
"peacekeepers"
against three
minors - no
age given - in
the Central
African
Republic.
Tellingly,
lead Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric then
gave the first
question to
Reuters which
asked not
about the UN's
child rapes but
whether
Guterres, who
is responsible
for them, has
a view on
Brett Kavanaugh and
women
victims. Video here.
After
UNSG @AntonioGuterres'
spokesman @StephDujarric
says 3 more UN
peacekeepers are
charged with
child rape in
CAR, he gives
first question
to @Reuters
-- which asks
not about the UN
rapes but if
Guterres has a
comment on
SCOTUS nominee
Brett Kavanaugh.
#UNpic.twitter.com/t27vN6rU7Z
On October
3 the UN
disclosed a
case of rape
by "peacekeepers"
from Cameroon,
in the Central
African
Republic. Inner
City Press, unable
to attend the UN
noon briefing
at the order
of Guterres
or, Haq
insisted, only
Alison Smale,
asked in
writing:
"October 4-1:
On the
specific new
case of sexual
abuse (rape)
by a
Cameroonian
peacekeeper in
CAR, please
immediately
provide Inner
City Press all
additional
information in
the possession
of your
Office, unlike
what you did
on Question
October 2-1
which you have
yet to respond
to but
provided
answer(s) off
camera to a
pro-SG
correspondent."
After
the briefing -
apparently
Inner City
Press only gets an
answer if none of
the
pro-Guterres
resident
correspondents
can be
cajoled to ask
-- this:
"The UN
Multidimensional
Integrated
Stabilization
Mission in the
Central
African
Republic
(MINUSCA) has
received an
allegation of
rape of three
adult women
involving six
unidentified
members of the
Cameroon
military
contingent
deployed to
the Mission.
This
allegation
refers to
incidents that
allegedly took
place in April
2018.
Protection of
and assistance
to victims is
our top
priority. All
alleged
victims have
received
medical and
psychosocial
assistance
from an
international
humanitarian
partner, and
the Mission
continues to
monitor their
needs and will
keep them
informed of
the status and
progress of
the matter.
The UN
informed the
Republic of
Cameroon of
the
allegations on
28 September
and has
requested that
a National
Investigation
Officer be
appointed
within five
(5) working
days, and for
the
investigation
to be
completed
within the
reduced
90-days
timeframe." So
it was gang
rape, recent,
by soldiers of
Cameroon
for whom
Guterres
stands accused
of covering up -
this is
what Guterres (or,
sorry,
Smale) wants
to avoid being
asked on camera
and is willing
to have the Press
roughed up
and banned in
order to cover
it up... While
Inner City
Press has repeatedly
asked Guterres'
spokesman
about (lack
of) vetting of
Cameroon
soldiers by the UN, not
only have those
and other
questions not
been answered
- more recently,
Guterres'
deputy
spokesman
Farhan Haq refused to
respond to
Inner City
Press' written
question and
gave the
answer which may or
may not be true to a
pro-Guterres
correspondent
left in
Guterres' briefing
room. On
October 1 his
UN data dumped
a case
sexual
exploitation
by a Nigerian
UN Police in
DR Congo - a
case listed
as
"substantiated"
but with
little other
information
about any accountability.
Inner City
Press remains
banned
from the UN noon
briefings to
ask. Photo here.
On October 2
before the
noon briefing
Inner City
Press asked
Haq and
Dujarric,
Smale and Amina J.
Mohammed, "October
2-1: In the
Sexual
Exploitation
case of the UN
Police from
Nigeria in the
DRC, put
online after 5
pm yesterday,
since it is
listed as
“substantiated”
what actions
for
accountability
have been
taken?" No
answer, but Haq took
another, less
specific correspondent
off line, off
camera, for a
pro-UN answer, video
of this
scam, here.
Meanwhile
Guterres' lead
spokesman
Stephane Dujarric,
who on
camera on
September 28
promised Inner
City Press' written
questions
would be
answered, has
since blocked
it on Twitter,
here.
On
September
24, the 83rd day
Guterrs had
banned Inner
City Press
from the UN as a
journalist and
the first
as simply a
person who had
RSVP-ed
to an
event about banks
profiting from slavery,
the UN data
dumped two more
abuses in CAR:
"transactional" sex by a
soldier from
Niger,
UNresponded to -- and
child rape by one
from Cameroon,
Guterres' good
friend. Zero
tolerance
indeed. On
September
17, the 76th
day Guterres
has banned
Inner City Press
from the UN
with no
hearing or
appeal amid
its reporting
on his
inaction on
abuses by Cameroon's
military,
his UN in a
data dump after 5
pm
revealed a new
case of
sexual
misconducted
in the Central
African
Republic by a
soldier from...
Cameroon. Photo here;
there were also
complaints
about soldiers
from Niger and Congo
Brazzaville,
and one about a
Burunian
alleged child
rapist from
three days
ago.
On the morning
of September
14, before the
noon briefing
Inner City
Press was
banned again
by Guterres
from
attending,
Inner City
Press asked
Guterres'
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric in
writing:
"September
18-1: In the
new sexual
exploitation
and abuses
cases, please
explain
whether the
“Congo (the)”
cases, of
exploitation
and alleged
rape of adult,
are about the
same suspect;
explain why in
one MINUSCA
case payments
have been
suspended but
not others
(for example,
not to the
Cameroon
suspect)." But
five hours
after the
briefing,
despite two
promises by
Guterres' Global
Communicator
Alison Smale
that even
banned, Inner
City Press' written
questions
would be
answered,
there was no
answer. This is
not "zero
tolerance" -
it is stonewalling. On
September 14,
the 73rd day
Guterres has
banned
Inner City Press
from the UN
with no
hearing or
appeal, his UN
in a data dump
after 6
pm on Friday
revealed yet
another case
of alleged
child rape, by a "peacekeeper"
from Burundi
in the Central
African
Republic.
Inner City Press is
banned from
the noon
briefing,
where for three days
in a
row there has
not been a
single
question about
anything
in Africa.
Guterres is
killing the UN -
and covering
up child rape.
His "Victims
Rights Advocate"
Jane Connor
said she would
look into his
censorship but
... nothing
has been heard
back from her.
The UN now has
a dictator who
censors
and brings those
around him
down to his
Kafkaesque and
secretive
level. Zero
tolerance,
indeed. We'll
have more on this. On
July 18, even as
Guterres read
a speech about
sustainable
development in
ECOSOC, his UN disclosed
yet another
case of sexual
exploitation, by a
Morocco
"peacekeeper"
in the Central
African
Republic. Inner
City Press published
a report on
that one, and
later noticed
yet another
case, against
a Malawian peacekeeper
in the DRC. On
July 19 before a
UN noon
briefing from
which Inner
City Press was
banned - and
the UN Webcast
of which had
no audio, nearing the
very
definition of
censorship
- Inner City
Press asked
Haq, "Please
provide all
information on
the new sexual
exploitation
and abuse
cases put on
UN website
yesterday
while SG spoke
to HLPF. What
is the stage
of
investigation(s)?"
The question
was plural -
but Haq only
replied
about the
second of the
two
cases, the Maliwian:
"Regarding
your first
question, we
have the
following
information:
The UN
peacekeeping
mission in the
Democratic
Republic of
Congo,
MONUSCO, has
received one
new allegation
of sexual
exploitation
involving a
member of the
Malawian
military
contingent
formerly
deployed to
the
Mission.
The allegation
refers to
transactional
sex with an
adult woman
that allegedly
took place in
March 2016,
resulting in
the birth of a
child.
The UN has
informed the
Member State
of the
allegation and
has requested
that a
National
Investigation
Officer be
appointed
within five
(5) working
days, and for
the
investigation
to be
completed
within the
reduced
90-days
timeframe.
The alleged
victim and her
child have
been referred
to UNFPA for
appropriate
support and
assistance.
The Mission
will continue
to monitor
their needs,
as well as
provide any
additional
assistance
such as the
collection of
DNA samples if
requested to
do so by the
victim."
What
about Morocco?
And
audio? Inner
City Press has
asked. On
July 11 there
were two more
sets of cases,
both
in the Central
African
Republic, photo here:
one by a
peacekeeper
from The (Republic of the)
Congo and another
by a
peacekeeper
from Morocco,
which chairs
the UN
Peacebuilding
configuration
on CAR. This
comes has the
UN has banned
Inner City
Press from
entering the UN
and asking
questions, Fox
News story here,
GAP blogs I
and II,
Independent here,
since
it was
physically ousted
while covering
the UN
Peacekeeping
budget on July
3.
Morocco state
media, by
contrast, are
given by the UN
of Antonio
Guterres and
Alison Smale
multiple
offices and
full access.
Without access,
Inner City
Press sat in
the sun on First
Avenue and
emailed in six
questions, two
of which have
been answered
including this
"if-asked" on
the UN's
trends of
sexual exploitation
abuse. Inner
City Press'
question on
this: "On the
two new sexual
exploitation
and abuse
cases put on
the UN's
website last
night, what
was the age of
the victims
and what is
the response
of the TCC
(Morocco and
Congo-Brazzaville)
and each's
past record in
holding
accusees
accountable?"
UN's if-asked
answer: "regarding
your first
question
below, we have
the following
information:
The UN
Multidimensional
Integrated
Stabilization
Mission in the
Central
African
Republic
(MINUSCA) has
received two
reports of
sexual
exploitation
and abuse.
The first
allegation
involves
thirteen (13)
members of the
military
contingent
from the
Republic of
the Congo,
previously
deployed to
the mission.
Military
contingents of
the Republic
of Congo left
MINUSCA in
early 2017.
The allegation
refers to
exploitative
relationships
with eleven
(11) adult
women that are
alleged to
have taken
place between
2015 and 2017,
resulting in
pregnancies
and the birth
of ten (10)
children.
The UN has
informed the
Member State
of the
allegation and
has requested
that a
National
Investigation
Officer be
appointed
within five
(5) working
days, and for
the
investigation
to be
completed
within the
reduced
90-days
timeframe.
The Field
Victim Rights
Advocate (VRA)
immediately
referred all
alleged
victims for
appropriate
services. The
Mission will
continue to
monitor the
situation and
stands
available to
provide any
assistance in
the future if
requested to
do so by the
victims.
The second
allegation
involves
a member
of the
military
contingent
from Morocco,
previously
deployed to
the mission.
The allegation
refers to an
exploitative
relationship
with an adult
woman that
allegedly took
place between
July and
August 2016,
resulting in
the birth of a
child.
The TCC has
informed that
national
investigation
officers,
already
present in the
mission area,
will conduct
an
investigation
into this
allegation
jointly with
OIOS. The UN
has requested
for the
investigation
to be
completed
within the
reduced
90-days
timeframe.
The Field
Victim Rights
Advocate (VRA)
has referred
the alleged
victim to
UNFPA for
appropriate
services. The
Mission will
continue to
monitor the
situation and
stands
available to
provide any
assistance in
the future if
requested to
do so by the
victim." Inner
City Press has
also asked,
among other
things, "1)
why is this UN
investigation
of the ouster
of a
journalist
taking so
long, and
being limited
to only the
latter of two
“incidents”
and not taking
into account
Lt Dobbins'
motive and my
June 25
notification
to Guterres
and Smale?
Didn't the
Deputy
Spokesman call
me a “repeat
offender” and
cite June 22?
Why have I
still not been
given a copy
of “my
statement,
much less
those of Lt
Dobbins, ASG
Saunders and
the UNnamed
July 3 officer
who tore my
shirt and
twisted my
arm? Is this a
cover up of
retaliation,
and of the SG
and his team's
knowledge?
2) why am I
banned during
this
investigation
so that I
cannot enter
and ask any
questions? Who
made that
decision and
why has it not
been reversed
given the
video of the
incident,
questions
raised by the
Government
Accountability
Project, etc?"
We'll have more on
this. On
June 18, the
UN disclosed yet
another case
of child rape
- alleged child
rape - by a
UN Peacekeeper
from Tanzania,
in the DR Congo.
Photo here.
On June 19,
Inner City
Press asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
the case and
only then
was it revealed that this
UN child rape resulted
in the birth
of a child.
From the UN transcript:
Inner City
Press: there's
a new case of…
in this case,
it's listed as
child rape,
was disclosed
by the UN
yesterday, a
Tanzanian
peacekeeper in
MONUSCO
[United
Nations
Organization
Stabilization
Mission in the
Democratic
Republic of
the Congo],
DRC. And
all it said is
everything is
pending.
It seems like…
this seems
like a pretty
serious
charge.
And so I'm
wondering,
what can… what
more can you
say about
this?
When… when did
the UN learn
of it?
Where is the
person?
Spokesman:
What I have,
the
information
that I was
given is that
the UN Mission
in the DRC
received
allegations of
sexual abuse
involving a
member of the
Tanzania
military
contingent
deployed to
the Mission in
June 2014 and
'15. The
allegation
refers to
sexual abuse
on a minor,
aged 17 at the
time, an
incident which
occurred
sometime
between '14
and '15,
resulting in
the birth of a
child.
The UN has
informed the
Member State
of the
allegations,
has requested
the National
Investigative
Officer be
appointed
within five
working days,
as the
procedure is,
and that the
investigation
be completed
within the
reduced 90-day
time
frame.
The alleged
victim and her
child have
been referred
to UNFPA
[United
Nations
Population
Fund] for
appropriate
support and
assistance.
The Mission
will continue
to monitor
their needs,
as well as
provide any
additional
assistance,
such as the
collection of
DNA samples if
[requested] to
do so by the
victim.
Inner
City Press:
Andthe
accused, has
he remained
deployed in
MONUSCO during
that
time?
What's the
information on
that?
Spokesman:
My
understanding
is that he was
deployed
between 2014
and '15, so
that person is
no longer
deployed on
the ground."
Minutes later
Inner City Press
asked the UN's
Special Representative on
Sexual Violence
and Conflict
Pramila Patten
about the case
and she said it
it not part of
her Office,
since Guterres
has other
officials on
victim's
issues and, as
said before,
Jane Holl
Lute. But what
is wrong
with the UN? Earlier
on June 18
Inner City
Press asked
the head of UN
Police in
South Sudan
about the
sexual
exploitation
by the Ghana
contingent in
Wau, and it is
still unclear what
punishment, if
any, those
found involved
by the UN's
OIOS face. Inner
City Press was
unable to live
stream this
Q&A: Inner
City Press'
livestream
Periscope
account has
been suspended
by Twitter for
showing UN
reacting to
the World Cup
and a screen
installed by
the Russian
Mission to the
UN. But the
above, though
Inner City Press
was unable to
Periscope it,
is what was
said. On
June 12, the
UN disclosed yet
another sexual
exploitation
complaint,
this time
against a
peacekeeper
from Morocco,
in the Central
African
Republic where
so many of the
UN's abuses
have occurred.
But there are
also recently
disclosed
cases
involving
peacekeepers
from Tanzania and
Malawi, in the
DC Congo. On
June
13, Inner City
Press asked
Guterres'
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric, UN
transcript
here,
Inner City
Press: on
sexual
abuse.
Okay.
Some new cases
have been
disclosed.
And that's
all… again,
it's all to
the good to be
disclosing,
but I did want
to ask, it's a
little unclear
to me,
because, in a
category
called
"investigation",
the most
recent one
involves a
Moroccan
peacekeeper,
and it says
investigation
by TCC
[troop-contributing
country] and
OIOS [Office
of Internal
Oversight
Services].
And then ones
that seem to
be… have been
earlier
disclosed or
have taken
place earlier
under
investigation
it just says
"pending".
Does that mean
there's no
investigation
yet taking
place or is
there some…?
Spokesman:
I think it
depends on the
case.
Thank you."
That is not
transparent. On
May 22 at 5:30
pm, the UN
disclosed a
rape
allegation against
one of its
civilian
contractors in
Mali, in the
MINUSMA mission in
2018. The
Office of
Internal
Oversight
Services,
whose director
has declined Press
requests to
take questions
about OIOS'
procedures,
is the one
investigating
it. But why
isn't it
a crime
subject to
real prosecution by
Mali?
After UNclear
answers on May
25, below, on
May 30 after
Guterres' two
days in Mali
Inner City Press
asked his lead
spokesman Stephane
Dujarric,
video here,
UN transcript
here:
Inner City Press: a
UN contractor
in Mali, is
alleged to
have engaged
in… in child
rape, so I
wanted to
know,
particularly
since the
Secretary-General
was just
there.
It was unclear
to me last
week from
Farhan [Haq]'s
answer whether
this
individual can
be, and will
be, prosecuted
by the Malian
authorities,
and I guess my
question would
be is this a
case in which
the UN would
waive immunity
that… that may
or may not
apply to the
contractor or,
if none
applies, has
the person
been… been
apprehended?
Spokesman:
The
investigation
I think is
ongoing from
what I
have.
And they're
being
investigated
by the
OIOS. As
a matter of
principle, the
Secretary-General
has always
said he would
waive immunity
in cases of
sexual abuse.
Inner
City Press:
Did he look
into this case
while… during
the two days
he's been
there?
Spokesman:
I don't have
any update...
Inner
City Press:
One more
question.
Spokesman:
No.
Thank you." Dujarric
canceled the
May 31 UN noon
briefing, in
exchange for
Guterres
taking a few
(pre-selected?)
questions at 5
pm. The UN is
increasingly
UNtransparent.
Inner City
Press asked
Haq on May 25,
UN transcript
here:
Inner City
Press: an
additional
case of child
rape by a
civilian
contractor of
the UN in
Mali, and
unlike for
military
personnel, it
doesn't
disclose, one
the
nationality,
and two it's a
pretty serious
charge, and
the
Secretary-General
is obviously
going there
for the Day of
the
Peacekeepers,
so I wanted to
know what's
the
nationality of
the
contractor?
How did the UN
become aware
of this?
And what… in
the serious
instance of
alleged child
rape, what is
the UN going
to do about
it?
Deputy
Spokesman:
I don't have
the
nationality to
share with
you.
What I can say
is that
MINUSMA has
received a
report of
sexual abuse
involving a
national
civilian
contractor, so
this… I assume
from that what
the
nationality
is, but it
says it
involves a
national
civilian
contractor.
The
allegations
refer to the
rape of a
female minor,
resulting in
her
pregnancy.
The incident
allegedly took
place at an
unspecified
date in
2018.
Ensuring the
provision of
assistance to
the victims is
our
priority.
The victim has
been referred
to UNICEF
[United
Nations
Children’s
Fund] and an
NGO
[non-governmental
organization]
partner for
appropriate
medical,
psychosocial,
and legal
support.
The Mission
also stands
ready to
provide
additional
assistance as
needed and the
allegation is
currently
being
investigated
by the Office
of Internal
Oversight
Services
(OIOS).
Inner
City
Press: If,
in fact, the
contractor is
Malian and the
victim is
Malian, why
wouldn't… why
would not this
be a criminal
matter for
actual
prosecution in
Mali? Is
the person
given immunity
simply by
being a UN
contractor?
What is it…
like, for
example, what
was this
person doing
for the UN…?
Deputy
Spokesman:
You would have
to ask the
Malian
authorities
whether
there's any
criminal
prosecution
being followed
up in that
case.
That is a
matter between
the contractor
and the
Government of
Mali.
I've given you
the details on
our side.
Inner
City Press: But
what was the
contractor
doing?
You say he's a
contractor,
just to
understand a
little bit
better how
someone could
get immunity
for child
rape, what
services were
their
performing for
the UN?
Deputy
Spokesman:
I didn't say
that any…
first of all,
there's not
immunity for
crimes that
are
committed.
Second of all,
I didn't say
that immunity
was in play.
Inner
City Press: Is
it immunity
from local
prosecution?
[Inaudible]…
rape by the
UN…
Deputy
Spokesman:
Again, you
would have to
ask… no, it's
not by the
UN.
Like I said,
it's by a
national
contractor.
Second of all,
you would have
to check with
the Malian
authorities
whether they
are following
up with
criminal
charges." The
"inaudible"
was a correspondent
often used
by the UN for
this purpose
trying to cut
off the follow
up on UN child
rape with an
unrelated
question.
We'll have
more on
this.
On
May 17 at
12:30 pm, just
after the
day's UN noon
briefing ended
(Inner City
Press asked
about UN
sexual
harassment in
India, and
about Vienna),
the UN
disclosed yet
another
case, of sexual
exploitation
by a South
African peacekeeper
in the
Democratic
Republic of
the Congo in
the November
2017 time frame,
photo here. On
May 4, the UN
at 5:30 pm disclosed
another case,
of sexual
exploitation
by a South
African peacekeeper
in the
Democratic
Republic of
the Congo, photo here.
Minutes
after the UN put
that
case online,
Inner City
Press asked three
UN spokespeople,
"on the new
Sexual
Exploitation
case put on
the UN website
at 5:30 pm on
Friday, can
you explain
why these
cases,
involving
South African
contingent in
MONUSCO, were
unknown or
undisclosed so
long?" Deputy
Spokesman
Farhaq Haq
replied, "We
received the
new
allegations
yesterday and
have asked for
national
investigation
officers to be
appointed
within an
expedited five
day
timeframe." This
comes after on
May 2, the UN
after 6 pm
disclosed yet
another case,
of alleged
sexual
exploitation
in the DR
Congo by a
South African
peacekeeper.
And then
another, of
sexual assault by
a South African
Military
Observer, in
April 2018, here.
Inner
City Press is
quoted here,
that the UN is
a joke on
this, no one
is held accountable.
True to form,
on May 2 Inner
City Press
was informed
there is
still no
outcome from
the loudly
announced
investigation
of sexual exploitation
by Ghana UN
Police in Wau,
South Sudan.
On
May 1,
Guterres'
Deputy
Spokesman
Farhan Haq read
out a
disclosure on
sexual abuse
and
exploitation
cases
(distinguished
by the UN from
sexual
harassment,
the term they
use whenever a UN
staff member
is the
victim), and
Inner City
Press is
near-immediately
publishing it
in full:
"Today, I want
to give you an
update on
cases of
sexual
exploitation
and abuse in
the UN system,
in line with
the
Secretary-General’s
initiative on
increasing
transparency
on these
allegations.
"For
the first
three months
of this year,
from 1 January
to 31 March
2018, we have
received 54
allegations
for all UN
entities and
implementing
partners. Not
all
allegations
have been
fully
verified, and
many are in
the
preliminary
assessment
phase.
"Out of
the 54
allegations,
14 are
reported from
peacekeeping
operations and
18 from
agencies,
funds and
programmes. 21
allegations
relate to
implementing
partners and 1
to a member of
a non-UN
international
force.
"Of the
54
allegations,
17 are
categorized as
sexual abuse,
34 as sexual
exploitation,
and 3 are of
an unknown
nature.
The
allegations
involve 66
victims –
including 13
girls (under
the age of 18)
and 16 victims
whose age
remains
unknown.
"With
regard to the
status of the
allegations, 2
have been
substantiated
by an
investigation;
2 were not
substantiated;
21 are at
various stages
of
investigation;
27 are under
preliminary
assessment;
and 1
investigation’s
result is
under review.
"With
over 95,000
civilians and
90,000
uniformed
personnel
working for
the UN, sexual
exploitation
and abuse are
not reflective
of the conduct
of the
majority of
the dedicated
women and men
who serve the
Organization.
But every
allegation
involving our
personnel
undermines our
values and
principles and
the sacrifice
of those who
serve with
pride and
professionalism
in some of the
most dangerous
places in the
world. For
this reason,
combating this
scourge, and
helping and
empowering
those who have
been scarred
by these
egregious
acts, continue
to be key
priorities for
the
Secretary-General
in 2018."
After this read out,
Inner City
Press asked
again from the
UN "nomenclature"
for child
rape, which
has still not
been provided.
On
April 30
the
Guardian's
Rebecca
Ratcliffe reports
that "Miriam
Maluwa, who
has worked for
the UN for
more than 25
years, was
placed on
administrative
leave from her
post as
country
director for
UNAids in
Ethiopia on 27
March." On
April 30,
Inner City
Press asked
Guterres'
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
Maluwa and more
about the Luiz
Loures case,
and WFP in
Fiji. Video here.
From the UN transcript:
Inner City Press:
at UNAIDS
[Joint United
Nations
Programme on
HIV/AIDS], one
of the
complainants
against Luiz
Loures has
been suspended
from heading
the Ethiopia
office of
UNAIDS and
told not to go
back into the
office.
Many people
see it as
exactly the
retaliation
that was
promised in
Mr. [Michel]
Sidibé’s
speech to
staff, saying
that he will
investigate
all
accusers.
What does
António
Guterres think
of this
suspension?
Spokesman:
We're aware of
the
issue.
Our
understanding
is that this
is completely
unrelated, but
questions
should be
directed at
UNAIDS.
Inner
City Press:
And
also, just, I
guess, in
terms of the…
the extent of
this problem
within the UN
system, over
the weekend,
it emerged and
I'm wondering
if you can…
will confirm
and have… if
he has
anything to
say on it,
that there are
sexual
harassment
complaints
about… in Fiji
on… at UN
World Food
Programme
(WFP).
And have the
staff been
suspended?
And does the
Secretary-General
believe that,
in such cases,
staff should
be
suspended?
And what's the
timeline for
an
investigation?
Spokesman:
My
understanding
is that WFP's
fully aware
and is
starting the
procedures.
I think WFP,
under the
leadership of
the new
Executive
Director, has
been extremely
forward-leaning
on these
issues.
They will
handle them
according to
procedures.
I'm not going
to get into
detail,
because I'm
not aware of
the details in
the
investigation.
Inner
City Press:
But
is there a
UN-wide policy
under António
Guterres of
suspending…
suspending
pending
investigation…?
Spokesman:
I think each
case… I think
cases
vary.
One of the
things that
we're looking
at the CEB is,
obviously,
some
harmonization
and
understanding
across the
system.
But,
obviously,
each…
especially
when it comes
to specialized
agencies have
their own
governing body
and their own
rules and
regulations...
Inner
City Press:
just
one more on
UNAIDS, and
then I have
some other
stuff, but I'm
sure you've
seen that…
that Ms.
[Cristina]
Brostrom, the…
the alleged
victim in the
Luiz Loures
case has
written to say
that she
entirely
rejects the
re-opening and
has no
confidence in
it. I'm
just
wondering, is
there a UN
response?
She's also
said…
Spokesman:
Well, I think…
go ahead.
Inner
City Press:
No, no.
She's said
that a
toothless UN
investigation
could impact
her ability to
pursue the
case outside
of the system,
so she act… is
actively
requesting
that this not
take place and
views it as a
cover-up.
What's your
response?
Spokesman:
Well, I think
my response is
in what I just
read, which is
— and I'll
read it again
— that the
complainant
called for an
investigation
to be
conducted by
an external
independent
investigation
entity outside
of the
UN. The
General
Assembly, as
you know, has
mandated OIOS
to have
operational
independence
to conduct
investigations.
OIOS has been
requested to
conduct it and
re-open the
investigation
by WHO.
They've agreed
to do
so. I
think we are
all hoping
that… we all
want to see
what comes out
of this
re-opened
investigation."
The UN is
failing.
On
April
16, mid growing
requests for
Sidibe to
resign, Inner
City Press
asked
Guterres' led
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric, who
reiterated
Guterres has
full
confidence in
Sidibe. So much for
zero
tolerance.
Video here,
UN transcript
here:
Inner
City
Press: I
wanted to ask
you about
UNAIDS.
As I'm sure
you've seen, a
number of… a
number of
groups have
asked for an
investigation,
but the AIDS
Healthcare
Foundation,
which does
work on AIDS
in 39
countries, has
reportedly
written to
António
Guterres
asking that
Mr. [Michel]
Sidibé step
down in light
of his alleged
retaliation
against staff,
in light of a
staff member
having, in
2015, told him
that Luiz
Loures was a
sexual
predator.
And I'm
wondering,
what does the
Secretary-General
think now
that… that…
basically, it
doesn't seem
that Mr.
Sidibé is
going to
self-resign.
What does he
make of… of a
member of
the…?
Spokesman:
I think it’s
always
important to
hear from our
partners.
Mr. Sidibé
continues to
have the
confidence of
the
Secretary-General.
Inner
City Press:
And… and the
investigation
[inaudible] of
Luiz Loures
meets António
Guterres'
standards of
zero
tolerance…?
Spokesman:
I think we've
spoken about
the
investigation."
On
March 29
when
Inner City
Press
audibly asked
Guterres, if
he had even
yet spoken to
Sidibe,
Guterres did
not answer.
Vine video here.
Present
was Guterres'
Global
Communicator
Alison Smale,
who
orders UN
staff to
"speak with
one voice" -
hers - on
allegations of
sexual harassment.
She has
continued to
restrict Inner
City Press,
declining for
monthes to
even answer
what
the rules are.
Inner
City Press has
been receiving
detailed complaints
about mismanagement
and harassment
in UNAIDS, but
the UN refuses
to answer. So
below
are
some more
of the
complaints.
Tellingly, the
day after
Guterres
refused Inner
City Press'
question
about UNAIDS,
here
are Loures' victims
speaking publicly,
in their own
names:
Martina
Brostrom, a
policy advisor
at UNAIDS, said of
Loures at
a conference
in Bangkok,
Thailand in
2015: "I
was pleading
with him, and
I was just
bracing with
all that I
could just to
not leave the
elevator."
Guterres? No
answer -
and no action.
Where is
Guterres on
this? Where is
Guterres?
Malayah
Harper, who
used to run
UNAIDS'
programs in
Uganda and
Kenya, on
Loures
a year
earlier, also
at a hotel: "He
got into the
lift with me,
and then kind
of lunged
forward to --
you could call
it -- kiss me,
but I thought
a kiss had to
be
consensual."
We'll have more on
this, and on retaliation. Some
more of the
complaints
exclusively
published by
Inner City
Press: "Michel
Sidibé
has established
this 'boys
club'
culture where
qualified
women are made
to feel less
worthy, are
openly
ridiculed by
male
colleagues
except those
women who are
providing
favors to him
and his 'boys,' he
continues to
give perks
to his boys
who serve as
his connectors
to presidents,
prime
ministers etc
by appointing
them to
important
positions as
well as even
when they
retired
bridging them
back on
special
assignments
for them to
make easy
money. People
such as Fritz
Lherisson,
Georges Shaw
and more
recently
Abdoul Dieng."
There are the
Mali connections,
beyond
what Inner
City Press
reported about
Burundi on March
23, here:
"Ben
Wahab - A
Malian
recently
appointed as
UNAIDS Country
Director for
Burundi with
no country
level and no
management
experience. He
came in as a
P4 Adviser and
very quickly
in 3 years he
rose to his
present
position of
UNAIDS Country
Director.... Theresa
Poirier, a
Malian
Canadian,
UNAIDS Country
Director for
Malawi .Also a
relatively new
comer to
UNAIDS
appointed by
Michel as
Director in
Mali and now
serving in
Malawi as
UNAIDS Country
Director... Fode
Simanga a
Malian serving
as senior
adviser in
Geneva but
graded at
Director level... Dado
SY Kagnsssy a
Malian before
UNAIDS Country
Director for
Djibouti, very
little
experience,non
articulative
and a fairly
new comer to
UNAIDS who was
appointed to
this position
whilst many
longer serving
staff members
are over
looked and now
posted to
Guinea as
UNAIDS Country
Director.. Amakonde
Sande (moved
from
consultant to
P4 in short
order to
P5 as UNAIDS
Country
Director in
Malawi and
then sent to
Uganda a
D1 position
where she
stayed only
for 3 months
only to be
appointed to
China as
UNAIDS Country
Director... Bridgitte
Quenum
recently
appointed as
UNAIDS Country
Director but
she has no
leadership,
management
experience and
was appointed
over other
more
senior
persons. It is
reputed that
her family
is/was a great
friend of
Michel Sidibe
and that is
how she
entered UNAIDS
and now gained
this
distinguished
position." But
note - not
only has
Antonio
Guterres
bragged
recently that
now at the
UN "we have
some Portuguese
things" - he
also has his
own hiring and
traveling
patterns.
As to
UNAIDS and
Sidibe, there is
talk of mining
business; there
are harassment
complaints
and findings
that Sidibé
refuses to act
on. Of
Girmay Haile,
the current
UNAIDS country
director in
Zimbabwe, whistleblowers
tell Inner
City Press
that a recent
internal
investigation
came
unanimously to
the conclusion
of severe
bullying and
intimidation
just two weeks
ago - but Sidibé
has refused to
move him. This
followed a
previous
investigation
against
Girmay Haile Girmay
HaileGirmay
HaileGirmay
Hailein
Kenya;
Sidibe
refused the
recommendation
of the
internal team
and promoted
him to country
director
Ghana. Girmay
Haile
has reportedly
said
he knows too
much and if he
falls they all
fall. We shall
see.
Back
on March 15 when
Inner City
Press asked
about the UN
Secretariat's
own investigation
of
whistleblowers,
for the second
day in a row,
Haq again
defended it,
as somehow
benefiting
member states.
From the UN transcript:
Inner City
Press: I'm
sure you've
seen the
article in The
Guardian
quoting Michel
Sibidé [sic]
of UNAIDS
[Joint United
Nations
Programme
against
HIV/AIDS].
What I wanted
to ask you is,
he seems to be
attacking
those who came
forward in the
sexual
harassment
case against
Luiz
Loures.
He's attacked
them.
He's said that
Loures is a…
is… made a
courageous
decision.
And, of his
detractors, he
says, we know
these people
are taking
their golden
shan…
handshakes
from us here
and knowing
they have a
job and then
attacking
us. We
know all about
that. We
know every
single
thing.
Time will come
for
everything.
When I hear
anything about
abuse of our
assets, I ask
for an
investigation.
Maybe these
investigations
are going
on. And
so, many staff
and many
people in the…
in the
“#MeToo”
movement see
this as a
direct threat
against those
who came
forward.
And I wonder,
what does
António
Guterres… who
I'm… I… I
would assume
is a reader of
The Guardian,
what does he
think of these
comments?
Deputy
Spokesman:
We're aware of
this
article.
Obviously,
it's for
UNAIDS and
Mr.
Sidibé to
explain what
the comments
attributed to
him are.
At
UNESCO in Paris
there are cover-ups
and retaliation in
the wake of the
two-step firing of
Assistant Director
General Frank La Rue
for sexual
harassment.
But
when Inner City
Press on March 20
asked Guy Berger,
the grandly titled
Director of Freedom
of Expression and
Media Development at
the United Nations
Educational,
Scientific and
Cultural
Organization, if he
thought reporting on
l'affaire La
Rue, which has
included Inner City
Press' exclusive
report that after
his suspension he
was still getting
paid and now
questions about
UNESCO Ethics
Adviser Rebecca
Trott, Berger said
he was unaware of
the specifics of the
case and to ask
UNESCO's press
officer.
Since Inner City
Press published the
video
of the Q&A, it
has heard from
UNESCO staff in New
York that Berger
"lied - he was among
the best friends of
La Rue, defended him
at every turn, while
also trying to take
his job." This is
how the UN works -
work with
collaborators like
Berger's former
student, to cover up
abuse, while seeking
mutual advancement.
It is disgusting. So
too on Rebecca
Trott, UNESCO's
"Ethics" adviser. As
question mount about
cover up, it will be
interesting to know
who is still
protecting her
within the
organization. We'll
have more on this.
Likewise,
after Berger has
spoken and joked
with a former
student (given the
first question)
about the importance
of independent media
and even holding
power in check, when
Inner City Press
asked about the UN's
FAO and WIPO going
after the press, he
said he was unaware
but implied it might
be justified.
When
Inner City Press
asked about the UN
Department of Public
Information's
continuing lack of
content neutral
media access rules,
despite Inner City
Press' repeated
requests to DPI boss
Alison Smale, both
his student and the
UN moderate looked
surprised, as if
they didn't
understand.
OK:
Inner City Press was
evicted from its UN
work space for
pursuing the Ng Lap
Seng UN bribery case
in the UN Press
Briefing Room - an
event of the group
headed by Berger's
student - and has
been a non-resident
correspondent
requiring DPI
“minders” to cover
the UN General
Assembly and its
President. Meanwhile
its office was given
to a no-show
Egyptian state
media, Akhbar al
Yom's Sanaa Youssef,
who has not ask the
UN a question in ten
years.
Media
that rarely come in
and ask anything
have arrived since
Inner City Press'
eviction and have
been given UN office
space. Inner City
Press has been told
it is not even on
the list, and Smale
has not answer a
single email. No
rules. We'll have
more on this
(charade) - and on
UNESCO. Watch this
site.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past
(and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for