UN
Sexual
Exploitation
in South Sudan
by UN
International
Half Disclosed
UN Withholds
Nationality
Covers Up
Rapes by
Cameroon
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Video here,
Vine here
UNITED
NATIONS GATE,
January 21 -- UN
Secretary
General
Antonio
Guterres says
he has a "zero
tolerance"
policy for
sexual abuse,
exploitation
and harassment,
and for
retaliation. But
when Inner
City Press
asked
Guterres' deputy
spokesman Farhan
Haq on 15
March 2018 about
Michel
Sidibé's reported
threats of retaliatory
investigations
against those
making
and offering
support to sexual
harassment
complaints at
UNAIDS, Haq said
this is entire
a matter for
UNAIDS. Earlier
Inner City
Press story here; exclusive
publication of
whistleblowers'
international
condemnation
of retaliation
and favoritism
in Sidibe's
UNAIDS, below.
On 21
January 2019,
the 201st day
Guterres had
banned Inner
City Press,
the UN put on
its website
another allegation
about UN
sexual
exploitation,
this
time in South
Sudan by an
International
with no
nationality disclosed, photo here.
Inner
City Press asked
Guterres' lead
spokesman
Stephane Dujarric
on January 21
about UN abuse
in South Sudan
with no answer
at all despite
Dujarric's
on camera
promise. To
this new low
has Guterres
brought the
UN. On
December
4,
the 153rd
day Guterres
had
banned Inner
City Press --
the UN data
dumped after four
pm another
case of sexual
exploitation,
this time in
South
Sudan where
Guterres who
has not
disclosed the
nationality
of this UN
"Volunteers"
has issued a
canned statement
about others'
sexual abuse.
Photo
here,
along with
another
case on which
the UN is not
disclosing
even the
nationality of
the accused.
Guterres' UN
is refusing to
provide
if-asked
information it
gives to
others, on
other countries,
to Inner City
Press on rapes
by Cameroon
soldiers.
Before
10 am on
December 5
Inner City
Press in
writing asked:
"December 5-2:
On UN Sexual
Exploitation
and Abuse,
please
immediately
provide the
additional
if-asked
information
about the new
case(s) in
South Sudan,
including
stating why
the
nationality of
the UN
“Volunteers”
was withheld -
and the long
requested
information
about the
Cameroonian
peacekeepers'
alleged rapes
in CAR and
explain why
this has not
been provided
for two
weeks." Deputy
spokesman Farhan
Haq sent the
standard if-asked
not sent on
Cameroon, this
time without
nationality:
"Regarding
question 5
December-3, we
have the
following
information to
share:
The UN Mission
in South Sudan
(UNMISS)
has received
an allegation
of sexual
exploitation
involving an
International
UN Volunteer
(UNV).
The allegation
refers to
exploitative
relationship
with one adult
woman that
allegedly took
place from
beginning of
2017 to
January 2018.
The matter has
been reported
to the Office
of Internal
Oversight
Services
(OIOS) and the
UNDP has been
notified of
the allegation
for review and
appropriate
action.
The Mission
has offered
assistance to
the alleged
victim and
will continue
to monitor her
needs." So
why conceal the
nationality?
Back on
November 14
the UN data
dumped after
four pm five
rape charges
against six
Cameroonian UN
"peacekeepers"
in the Central African
Republic, on
which the Paul
Biya
government has
not even responded
to the UN, a case
of sexual
exploitation
by a UN
civilian staffer
in DR Congo.
Photo here.
Inner
City Press,
banned amid
its critical
coverage of
impunity in
and of Guterres'
UN, would have
to wait to ask for
more
information -
apparently
asking is
"harassment,"
according to
Guterres' spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric. But
even though
Inner City
Press emailed
in the
question
before Dujarric's
laughing noon
briefing on
November
14, at which
none of those
present asked
about these just
disclosed UN
rapes and Dujarric
did not bring
them up, afterward
still no answer. Nor a
full day
later, so Inner City
Press submitted
this on
November 16,
before a briefing
Dujarric said
he would keep
short so he
and his
interlocutors
could
go have lunch:
"November
16-5: AGAIN -
On sexual
exploitation
and abuse and
the new
charges
against
Cameroonian
peacekeepers
in CAR put
online
yesterday,
please now
provide all
further
if-asked
information
about these
abuses, as for
example you
did when asked
in person by
those not
banned from
the previous
briefing about
the Nigerian
peacekeeper(s)."
Four hours
later, with
Friday about
to end, no
answer at all.
Guterres is
covering up
rapes by
Cameroonian
troops,
while using
state media to
selectively
tell good news
spin about the
few times the
UN can even claim
to work for
accountability.
This non-provision
of if-asked
information is
completely
contrary to
the promise
by Guterres' Global
Communicator
or Censor Alison
Smale to UNSR
David Kaye. Guterres' UN
including
Dujarric functionally
cover up UN
rapes. On
November 5
Guterres'
spokesman Stephane
Dujarric
quickly read out
new allegations
of UN sexual
exploitation
and abuse.
No one in the
room asked about
the 24 alleged
child
rape (one late
set of
softball
questions were
lobbed);
Dujarric said
all the
information,
including
for previous
periods for
comparison
was
in his office
and immediately
available
to those he HASN'T
had roughed
up and banned
from the UN:
Dooj's
Stooges. Inner
City Press
immediately
emailed him,
his deputy,
Guterres'
Global Censor
Alison
Smale, Amina
J. Mohammed,
Maria Luiza
Viotti, Hua
Jiang and
others: "This
is a request
to immediately
be emailed the
UN sexual
exploitation
and abuse data
rattled off in
the noon
briefing Inner
City Press
remains banned
from, and
reiterates
UNSR David
Kaye's 20 July
2018 question
what is the
appeals
process for
this ban,
still not
answered." The
briefing
ended
with Dujarric
joking with his
softball interlocutor,
to whom he'd said
"Vannina
in my
office has
more information,"
video
here, presumably
gone and
returned
Vannina
Maestracci.
But when Inner
City Press
emailed
Dujarric and
his deputy for
this additional
information,
the deputy
Farhan Haq
sent no additional
information, claiming
"The data
provided below
is
exactly
the same as
the data
shared with
the accredited
press.
For
comparisons,
please look at
the Conduct
and Discipline
Unit website,
which includes
previous
data." But
that's only
peacekeeper,
not civilian
staff
information,
much less UNSC
authorized
forces. What's
the additional
information
that Dujarric
said Maestracci
has? From the past, before
Dujarric
and Guterres had
Inner City Press
roughed up and
banned: one,
two, three
strikes and
you're
out. More
than an hour
after he read
it out, and
with none of
the promised
historical data, what
Dujarric read
was emailed to
banned Inner
City Press by
Dujarric's deputy:
"We have been
giving you
regular
updates on
cases of
sexual
exploitation
and abuse in
the UN system
in line with
the
Secretary-General’s
initiative on
increasing
transparency
on these
allegations.
Today I have
an update for
the period 1
July to 30
September
2018. Please
note that not
all the
allegations
have been
fully verified
and many are
in the
preliminary
assessment
phase. During
this period,
the United
Nations
received 39
allegations
involving UN
personnel – 6
for
peacekeeping
and 33 from
agencies,
funds and
programmes. We
also received
25 allegations
involving
non-UN
personnel
working as
implementing
partners.
There were no
allegations
pertaining to
non-UN
international
forces
authorized by
Security
Council
mandate for
this period.
The total
allegations
reported for
this period is
64. 30
incidents
allegedly took
place in 2018;
7 in 2017; 2
in 2016; 6 in
2015 or before
and the date
is unknown for
19
allegations.
From the 64
allegations,
there are 77
victims: 42
women, 24
girls (under
the age of
18), 2 men and
1 boy (under
the age of
18). The age
of 8 victims
is unknown.
The
categorization
of the
allegations
against these
77 victims is
16 as sexual
abuse, 55 as
sexual
exploitation,
4 unknown. Two
(2) are
categorized as
others as they
were
unsubstantiated
following
investigation.
The alleged
perpetrators
are 66 men, 1
woman, and 2
individuals
whose gender
is unknown.
Of the 39
allegations
related to UN
personnel, one
was not
substantiated,
22 are at
various stages
of
investigation
and 16 are
under
preliminary
assessment to
determine if
there is
sufficient
information to
investigate.
Of the 25
allegations
relating to
implementing
partners, 2
have been
substantiated
through an
investigation
and the
perpetrators
were dismissed
by the
implementing
partner. One
allegation was
not
substantiated,
14 are at
various stages
of
investigation,
7 are under
preliminary
assessment and
1 allegation
was closed at
the request of
the victim.
The efforts to
implement the
Secretary-General’s
strategy to
combat sexual
exploitation
and abuse have
continue to be
strengthened.
You’ll
remember that
on 27
September
2018, the
Secretary-General
issued a
Collective
Statement of
the Members of
his Circle of
Leadership in
which they
reaffirmed
their
continued
personal
commitment as
global leaders
to support
efforts to
combat sexual
exploitation
and abuse
across the
United Nations
system. As of
today, that
Statement has
been endorsed
by 49 Heads of
State and
Government and
22 Heads of
United Nations
entities. 72
global leaders
have joined
the Circle of
Leadership.
And also, 100
Member States
are to this
date
signatories to
the voluntary
compact with
the United
Nations to
eliminate
sexual
exploitation
and abuse.
During this
quarter, the
electronic
tool, “Clear
Check” used
for screening
UN staff
dismissed as a
result of
substantiated
allegations of
sexual
exploitation
and abuse, or
who resigned
or were
separated
during an
investigation
is on its way
to be fully
utilized
system-wide."
On
October 24 -
UN Day, and
the 112th day
Guterres has
banned Inner
City Press --
the UN data
dumped at 11 am a
rape charge
against a UN
Volunteer in
DR Congo, as recent
as August
2018. Photo here.
But no
one let into
the UN noon
briefing even asked
about it, or
any question about
anything in
Africa where
the UN - and Guterres'
son Pedro
Guimarães e
Melo De
Oliveira Guterres
- raise their
money. Inner
City Press asked
before noon in writing:
October 24-3:
On sexual
exploitation
and abuse and
the new rape
charges
against the
UNV in MONUSCO
put online an
hour ago,
please now
provide all
further
if-asked
information
about these
abuses, as for
example you
did when asked
in person by
those not
banned from
the briefing
about the
Nigerian
peacekeeper(s)."
More
than an hour
later, this
from Deputy
Spokesman
Farhan Haq:
"Regarding
question 24-3,
we can say the
following:
The UN Mission
in the
Democratic
Republic of
Congo
(MONUSCO) has
received an
allegation of
sexual abuse
involving an
International
UN Volunteer
(UNV). The
allegation
concerns two
Congolese
adult females
and allegedly
took place in
Bunia in
August 2018.
The matter is
being
investigated
by the Office
of Internal
Oversight
Services
(OIOS) and the
United Nations
Volunteers
Programme has
been notified
of the
allegation and
the ongoing
investigation.
MONUSCO
reports that
the alleged
victims were
examined by a
doctor at a
local hospital
on the day of
the reported
incident and
further
referred to
the UN
Population
Fund (UNFPA)
for
appropriate
support, as
per the UN’s
Victim
Assistance
Protocol.
The protection
of and
assistance to
victims is our
top priority.
The Mission
will maintain
contact with
them and
continue to
monitor the
situation."
Nothing on the nationality,
for example,
of the alleged
UN rapist -
why not?
Banned Inner
City Press
cannot ask,
and no one
else does.
Guterres is a
cover up
artist.
On
October 18,
the 107th day
Guterres
has banned
Inner City
Press from
entering the
UN - now on a
secret banned list
along
with "political
activists," see
here, the UN
mid afternoon
data dumped
another case of
sexual
exploitation
by a
Cameroonian
"peacekeeper"
in CAR, photo
here.
On October 19
Inner City Press,
banned from
the UN
briefing for
the 108th day,
asked
questions in
writing
including:
"October 19-3:
On sexual
exploitation
and abuse and
the new
charges
against
Cameroonian
peacekeeper in
CAR put online
yesterday,
please now
provide all
further
if-asked
information
about these
abuses, as for
example you
did when asked
in person by
those not
banned from
the briefing
about the
Nigerian
peacekeeper(s)."
Two hours
after the
briefing, at which
none of those
allowed into the
briefing asked
about this new
sexual
exploitation
outrage, the
UN sent Inner City
Press
this: "Regarding
question 19-3,
we have the
following
information: The
UN
Multidimensional
Integrated
Stabilization
Mission in the
Central
African
Republic
(MINUSCA) has
received a new
allegation of
sexual
exploitation
involving one
member of the
Cameroon
military
contingent
deployed to
the
Mission.
The
allegation
refers to an
exploitative
relationship
with one adult
woman that
allegedly took
place in
February 2018,
resulting in
pregnancy. The
UN has
informed the
Member State
of the
allegation and
has requested
that a
National
Investigation
Officer be
appointed
within five
(5) working
days. The UN
has also
requested for
the
investigation
to be
completed
within the
reduced
90-days
timeframe. The
alleged victim
has been
referred for
assistance to
humanitarian
partners. The
Mission will
continue to
monitor the
victim needs,
as well as
provide any
additional
assistance
such as the
collection of
DNA samples if
requested to
do so by the
victim."
Inner City
Press contends
the UN needs a
new column
or data point:
if pregnancy
resulted.
How many more
abuses by Cameroonian
soldiers, both
in and outside
of that
country, will
Guterres put
up with? On
October
9, the 98th
day Guterres
has banned
Inner City Press
from entering
the UN in any
capacity, at
12:01 pm as the noon
briefing was
to start, and
banned Inner
City Press'
questions for
the day had
already
been emailed
in, the UN
disclosed yet
more sexual
exploitation
charges, against
two Gabonese
"peacekeepers"
concerning
three women
- no age given - in
the Central
African
Republic. And
Dujarric
didn't even
bring it up in
the briefing
and no one
whom Guterres
allowed into
"his" room
asked about
it. On
October 5, the
94th day Guterres
has banned Inner
City Press
from the UN,
at 12:02 as the noon
briefing
started, and banned Inner
City Press'
questions for
the day had
already
been emailed
in, the UN
disclosed yet
more child
rape charges,
against
four
Mauritanian
"peacekeepers"
against three
minors - no
age given - in
the Central
African
Republic.
Tellingly,
lead Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric then
gave the first
question to
Reuters which
asked not
about the UN's
child rapes but
whether
Guterres, who
is responsible
for them, has
a view on
Brett Kavanaugh and
women
victims. Video here.
On October
3 the UN
disclosed a
case of rape
by "peacekeepers"
from Cameroon,
in the Central
African
Republic. Inner
City Press, unable
to attend the UN
noon briefing
at the order
of Guterres
or, Haq
insisted, only
Alison Smale,
asked in
writing:
"October 4-1:
On the
specific new
case of sexual
abuse (rape)
by a
Cameroonian
peacekeeper in
CAR, please
immediately
provide Inner
City Press all
additional
information in
the possession
of your
Office, unlike
what you did
on Question
October 2-1
which you have
yet to respond
to but
provided
answer(s) off
camera to a
pro-SG
correspondent."
After
the briefing -
apparently
Inner City
Press only gets an
answer if none of
the
pro-Guterres
resident
correspondents
can be
cajoled to ask
-- this:
"The UN
Multidimensional
Integrated
Stabilization
Mission in the
Central
African
Republic
(MINUSCA) has
received an
allegation of
rape of three
adult women
involving six
unidentified
members of the
Cameroon
military
contingent
deployed to
the Mission.
This
allegation
refers to
incidents that
allegedly took
place in April
2018.
Protection of
and assistance
to victims is
our top
priority. All
alleged
victims have
received
medical and
psychosocial
assistance
from an
international
humanitarian
partner, and
the Mission
continues to
monitor their
needs and will
keep them
informed of
the status and
progress of
the matter.
The UN
informed the
Republic of
Cameroon of
the
allegations on
28 September
and has
requested that
a National
Investigation
Officer be
appointed
within five
(5) working
days, and for
the
investigation
to be
completed
within the
reduced
90-days
timeframe." So
it was gang
rape, recent,
by soldiers of
Cameroon
for whom
Guterres
stands accused
of covering up -
this is
what Guterres (or,
sorry,
Smale) wants
to avoid being
asked on camera
and is willing
to have the Press
roughed up
and banned in
order to cover
it up... While
Inner City
Press has repeatedly
asked Guterres'
spokesman
about (lack
of) vetting of
Cameroon
soldiers by the UN, not
only have those
and other
questions not
been answered
- more recently,
Guterres'
deputy
spokesman
Farhan Haq refused to
respond to
Inner City
Press' written
question and
gave the
answer which may or
may not be true to a
pro-Guterres
correspondent
left in
Guterres' briefing
room. On
October 1 his
UN data dumped
a case
sexual
exploitation
by a Nigerian
UN Police in
DR Congo - a
case listed
as
"substantiated"
but with
little other
information
about any accountability.
Inner City
Press remains
banned
from the UN noon
briefings to
ask. Photo here.
On October 2
before the
noon briefing
Inner City
Press asked
Haq and
Dujarric,
Smale and Amina J.
Mohammed, "October
2-1: In the
Sexual
Exploitation
case of the UN
Police from
Nigeria in the
DRC, put
online after 5
pm yesterday,
since it is
listed as
“substantiated”
what actions
for
accountability
have been
taken?" No
answer, but Haq took
another, less
specific correspondent
off line, off
camera, for a
pro-UN answer, video
of this
scam, here.
Meanwhile
Guterres' lead
spokesman
Stephane Dujarric,
who on
camera on
September 28
promised Inner
City Press' written
questions
would be
answered, has
since blocked
it on Twitter,
here.
On
September
24, the 83rd day
Guterrs had
banned Inner
City Press
from the UN as a
journalist and
the first
as simply a
person who had
RSVP-ed
to an
event about banks
profiting from slavery,
the UN data
dumped two more
abuses in CAR:
"transactional" sex by a
soldier from
Niger,
UNresponded to -- and
child rape by one
from Cameroon,
Guterres' good
friend. Zero
tolerance
indeed. On
September
17, the 76th
day Guterres
has banned
Inner City Press
from the UN
with no
hearing or
appeal amid
its reporting
on his
inaction on
abuses by Cameroon's
military,
his UN in a
data dump after 5
pm
revealed a new
case of
sexual
misconducted
in the Central
African
Republic by a
soldier from...
Cameroon. Photo here;
there were also
complaints
about soldiers
from Niger and Congo
Brazzaville,
and one about a
Burunian
alleged child
rapist from
three days
ago.
On the morning
of September
14, before the
noon briefing
Inner City
Press was
banned again
by Guterres
from
attending,
Inner City
Press asked
Guterres'
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric in
writing:
"September
18-1: In the
new sexual
exploitation
and abuses
cases, please
explain
whether the
“Congo (the)”
cases, of
exploitation
and alleged
rape of adult,
are about the
same suspect;
explain why in
one MINUSCA
case payments
have been
suspended but
not others
(for example,
not to the
Cameroon
suspect)." But
five hours
after the
briefing,
despite two
promises by
Guterres' Global
Communicator
Alison Smale
that even
banned, Inner
City Press' written
questions
would be
answered,
there was no
answer. This is
not "zero
tolerance" -
it is stonewalling. On
September 14,
the 73rd day
Guterres has
banned
Inner City Press
from the UN
with no
hearing or
appeal, his UN
in a data dump
after 6
pm on Friday
revealed yet
another case
of alleged
child rape, by a "peacekeeper"
from Burundi
in the Central
African
Republic.
Inner City Press is
banned from
the noon
briefing,
where for three days
in a
row there has
not been a
single
question about
anything
in Africa.
Guterres is
killing the UN -
and covering
up child rape.
His "Victims
Rights Advocate"
Jane Connor
said she would
look into his
censorship but
... nothing
has been heard
back from her.
The UN now has
a dictator who
censors
and brings those
around him
down to his
Kafkaesque and
secretive
level. Zero
tolerance,
indeed. We'll
have more on this. On
July 18, even as
Guterres read
a speech about
sustainable
development in
ECOSOC, his UN disclosed
yet another
case of sexual
exploitation, by a
Morocco
"peacekeeper"
in the Central
African
Republic. Inner
City Press published
a report on
that one, and
later noticed
yet another
case, against
a Malawian peacekeeper
in the DRC. On
July 19 before a
UN noon
briefing from
which Inner
City Press was
banned - and
the UN Webcast
of which had
no audio, nearing the
very
definition of
censorship
- Inner City
Press asked
Haq, "Please
provide all
information on
the new sexual
exploitation
and abuse
cases put on
UN website
yesterday
while SG spoke
to HLPF. What
is the stage
of
investigation(s)?"
The question
was plural -
but Haq only
replied
about the
second of the
two
cases, the Maliwian:
"Regarding
your first
question, we
have the
following
information:
The UN
peacekeeping
mission in the
Democratic
Republic of
Congo,
MONUSCO, has
received one
new allegation
of sexual
exploitation
involving a
member of the
Malawian
military
contingent
formerly
deployed to
the
Mission.
The allegation
refers to
transactional
sex with an
adult woman
that allegedly
took place in
March 2016,
resulting in
the birth of a
child.
The UN has
informed the
Member State
of the
allegation and
has requested
that a
National
Investigation
Officer be
appointed
within five
(5) working
days, and for
the
investigation
to be
completed
within the
reduced
90-days
timeframe.
The alleged
victim and her
child have
been referred
to UNFPA for
appropriate
support and
assistance.
The Mission
will continue
to monitor
their needs,
as well as
provide any
additional
assistance
such as the
collection of
DNA samples if
requested to
do so by the
victim."
What
about Morocco?
And
audio? Inner
City Press has
asked. On
July 11 there
were two more
sets of cases,
both
in the Central
African
Republic, photo here:
one by a
peacekeeper
from The (Republic of the)
Congo and another
by a
peacekeeper
from Morocco,
which chairs
the UN
Peacebuilding
configuration
on CAR. This
comes has the
UN has banned
Inner City
Press from
entering the UN
and asking
questions, Fox
News story here,
GAP blogs I
and II,
Independent here,
since
it was
physically ousted
while covering
the UN
Peacekeeping
budget on July
3.
Morocco state
media, by
contrast, are
given by the UN
of Antonio
Guterres and
Alison Smale
multiple
offices and
full access.
Without access,
Inner City
Press sat in
the sun on First
Avenue and
emailed in six
questions, two
of which have
been answered
including this
"if-asked" on
the UN's
trends of
sexual exploitation
abuse. Inner
City Press'
question on
this: "On the
two new sexual
exploitation
and abuse
cases put on
the UN's
website last
night, what
was the age of
the victims
and what is
the response
of the TCC
(Morocco and
Congo-Brazzaville)
and each's
past record in
holding
accusees
accountable?"
UN's if-asked
answer: "regarding
your first
question
below, we have
the following
information:
The UN
Multidimensional
Integrated
Stabilization
Mission in the
Central
African
Republic
(MINUSCA) has
received two
reports of
sexual
exploitation
and abuse.
The first
allegation
involves
thirteen (13)
members of the
military
contingent
from the
Republic of
the Congo,
previously
deployed to
the mission.
Military
contingents of
the Republic
of Congo left
MINUSCA in
early 2017.
The allegation
refers to
exploitative
relationships
with eleven
(11) adult
women that are
alleged to
have taken
place between
2015 and 2017,
resulting in
pregnancies
and the birth
of ten (10)
children.
The UN has
informed the
Member State
of the
allegation and
has requested
that a
National
Investigation
Officer be
appointed
within five
(5) working
days, and for
the
investigation
to be
completed
within the
reduced
90-days
timeframe.
The Field
Victim Rights
Advocate (VRA)
immediately
referred all
alleged
victims for
appropriate
services. The
Mission will
continue to
monitor the
situation and
stands
available to
provide any
assistance in
the future if
requested to
do so by the
victims.
The second
allegation
involves
a member
of the
military
contingent
from Morocco,
previously
deployed to
the mission.
The allegation
refers to an
exploitative
relationship
with an adult
woman that
allegedly took
place between
July and
August 2016,
resulting in
the birth of a
child.
The TCC has
informed that
national
investigation
officers,
already
present in the
mission area,
will conduct
an
investigation
into this
allegation
jointly with
OIOS. The UN
has requested
for the
investigation
to be
completed
within the
reduced
90-days
timeframe.
The Field
Victim Rights
Advocate (VRA)
has referred
the alleged
victim to
UNFPA for
appropriate
services. The
Mission will
continue to
monitor the
situation and
stands
available to
provide any
assistance in
the future if
requested to
do so by the
victim." Inner
City Press has
also asked,
among other
things, "1)
why is this UN
investigation
of the ouster
of a
journalist
taking so
long, and
being limited
to only the
latter of two
“incidents”
and not taking
into account
Lt Dobbins'
motive and my
June 25
notification
to Guterres
and Smale?
Didn't the
Deputy
Spokesman call
me a “repeat
offender” and
cite June 22?
Why have I
still not been
given a copy
of “my
statement,
much less
those of Lt
Dobbins, ASG
Saunders and
the UNnamed
July 3 officer
who tore my
shirt and
twisted my
arm? Is this a
cover up of
retaliation,
and of the SG
and his team's
knowledge?
2) why am I
banned during
this
investigation
so that I
cannot enter
and ask any
questions? Who
made that
decision and
why has it not
been reversed
given the
video of the
incident,
questions
raised by the
Government
Accountability
Project, etc?"
We'll have more on
this. On
June 18, the
UN disclosed yet
another case
of child rape
- alleged child
rape - by a
UN Peacekeeper
from Tanzania,
in the DR Congo.
Photo here.
On June 19,
Inner City
Press asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
the case and
only then
was it revealed that this
UN child rape resulted
in the birth
of a child.
From the UN transcript:
Inner City
Press: there's
a new case of…
in this case,
it's listed as
child rape,
was disclosed
by the UN
yesterday, a
Tanzanian
peacekeeper in
MONUSCO
[United
Nations
Organization
Stabilization
Mission in the
Democratic
Republic of
the Congo],
DRC. And
all it said is
everything is
pending.
It seems like…
this seems
like a pretty
serious
charge.
And so I'm
wondering,
what can… what
more can you
say about
this?
When… when did
the UN learn
of it?
Where is the
person?
Spokesman:
What I have,
the
information
that I was
given is that
the UN Mission
in the DRC
received
allegations of
sexual abuse
involving a
member of the
Tanzania
military
contingent
deployed to
the Mission in
June 2014 and
'15. The
allegation
refers to
sexual abuse
on a minor,
aged 17 at the
time, an
incident which
occurred
sometime
between '14
and '15,
resulting in
the birth of a
child.
The UN has
informed the
Member State
of the
allegations,
has requested
the National
Investigative
Officer be
appointed
within five
working days,
as the
procedure is,
and that the
investigation
be completed
within the
reduced 90-day
time
frame.
The alleged
victim and her
child have
been referred
to UNFPA
[United
Nations
Population
Fund] for
appropriate
support and
assistance.
The Mission
will continue
to monitor
their needs,
as well as
provide any
additional
assistance,
such as the
collection of
DNA samples if
[requested] to
do so by the
victim.
Inner
City Press:
Andthe
accused, has
he remained
deployed in
MONUSCO during
that
time?
What's the
information on
that?
Spokesman:
My
understanding
is that he was
deployed
between 2014
and '15, so
that person is
no longer
deployed on
the ground."
Minutes later
Inner City Press
asked the UN's
Special Representative on
Sexual Violence
and Conflict
Pramila Patten
about the case
and she said it
it not part of
her Office,
since Guterres
has other
officials on
victim's
issues and, as
said before,
Jane Holl
Lute. But what
is wrong
with the UN? Earlier
on June 18
Inner City
Press asked
the head of UN
Police in
South Sudan
about the
sexual
exploitation
by the Ghana
contingent in
Wau, and it is
still unclear what
punishment, if
any, those
found involved
by the UN's
OIOS face. Inner
City Press was
unable to live
stream this
Q&A: Inner
City Press'
livestream
Periscope
account has
been suspended
by Twitter for
showing UN
reacting to
the World Cup
and a screen
installed by
the Russian
Mission to the
UN. But the
above, though
Inner City Press
was unable to
Periscope it,
is what was
said. On
June 12, the
UN disclosed yet
another sexual
exploitation
complaint,
this time
against a
peacekeeper
from Morocco,
in the Central
African
Republic where
so many of the
UN's abuses
have occurred.
But there are
also recently
disclosed
cases
involving
peacekeepers
from Tanzania and
Malawi, in the
DC Congo. On
June
13, Inner City
Press asked
Guterres'
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric, UN
transcript
here,
Inner City
Press: on
sexual
abuse.
Okay.
Some new cases
have been
disclosed.
And that's
all… again,
it's all to
the good to be
disclosing,
but I did want
to ask, it's a
little unclear
to me,
because, in a
category
called
"investigation",
the most
recent one
involves a
Moroccan
peacekeeper,
and it says
investigation
by TCC
[troop-contributing
country] and
OIOS [Office
of Internal
Oversight
Services].
And then ones
that seem to
be… have been
earlier
disclosed or
have taken
place earlier
under
investigation
it just says
"pending".
Does that mean
there's no
investigation
yet taking
place or is
there some…?
Spokesman:
I think it
depends on the
case.
Thank you."
That is not
transparent. On
May 22 at 5:30
pm, the UN
disclosed a
rape
allegation against
one of its
civilian
contractors in
Mali, in the
MINUSMA mission in
2018. The
Office of
Internal
Oversight
Services,
whose director
has declined Press
requests to
take questions
about OIOS'
procedures,
is the one
investigating
it. But why
isn't it
a crime
subject to
real prosecution by
Mali?
After UNclear
answers on May
25, below, on
May 30 after
Guterres' two
days in Mali
Inner City Press
asked his lead
spokesman Stephane
Dujarric,
video here,
UN transcript
here:
Inner City Press: a
UN contractor
in Mali, is
alleged to
have engaged
in… in child
rape, so I
wanted to
know,
particularly
since the
Secretary-General
was just
there.
It was unclear
to me last
week from
Farhan [Haq]'s
answer whether
this
individual can
be, and will
be, prosecuted
by the Malian
authorities,
and I guess my
question would
be is this a
case in which
the UN would
waive immunity
that… that may
or may not
apply to the
contractor or,
if none
applies, has
the person
been… been
apprehended?
Spokesman:
The
investigation
I think is
ongoing from
what I
have.
And they're
being
investigated
by the
OIOS. As
a matter of
principle, the
Secretary-General
has always
said he would
waive immunity
in cases of
sexual abuse.
Inner
City Press:
Did he look
into this case
while… during
the two days
he's been
there?
Spokesman:
I don't have
any update...
Inner
City Press:
One more
question.
Spokesman:
No.
Thank you." Dujarric
canceled the
May 31 UN noon
briefing, in
exchange for
Guterres
taking a few
(pre-selected?)
questions at 5
pm. The UN is
increasingly
UNtransparent.
Inner City
Press asked
Haq on May 25,
UN transcript
here:
Inner City
Press: an
additional
case of child
rape by a
civilian
contractor of
the UN in
Mali, and
unlike for
military
personnel, it
doesn't
disclose, one
the
nationality,
and two it's a
pretty serious
charge, and
the
Secretary-General
is obviously
going there
for the Day of
the
Peacekeepers,
so I wanted to
know what's
the
nationality of
the
contractor?
How did the UN
become aware
of this?
And what… in
the serious
instance of
alleged child
rape, what is
the UN going
to do about
it?
Deputy
Spokesman:
I don't have
the
nationality to
share with
you.
What I can say
is that
MINUSMA has
received a
report of
sexual abuse
involving a
national
civilian
contractor, so
this… I assume
from that what
the
nationality
is, but it
says it
involves a
national
civilian
contractor.
The
allegations
refer to the
rape of a
female minor,
resulting in
her
pregnancy.
The incident
allegedly took
place at an
unspecified
date in
2018.
Ensuring the
provision of
assistance to
the victims is
our
priority.
The victim has
been referred
to UNICEF
[United
Nations
Children’s
Fund] and an
NGO
[non-governmental
organization]
partner for
appropriate
medical,
psychosocial,
and legal
support.
The Mission
also stands
ready to
provide
additional
assistance as
needed and the
allegation is
currently
being
investigated
by the Office
of Internal
Oversight
Services
(OIOS).
Inner
City
Press: If,
in fact, the
contractor is
Malian and the
victim is
Malian, why
wouldn't… why
would not this
be a criminal
matter for
actual
prosecution in
Mali? Is
the person
given immunity
simply by
being a UN
contractor?
What is it…
like, for
example, what
was this
person doing
for the UN…?
Deputy
Spokesman:
You would have
to ask the
Malian
authorities
whether
there's any
criminal
prosecution
being followed
up in that
case.
That is a
matter between
the contractor
and the
Government of
Mali.
I've given you
the details on
our side.
Inner
City Press: But
what was the
contractor
doing?
You say he's a
contractor,
just to
understand a
little bit
better how
someone could
get immunity
for child
rape, what
services were
their
performing for
the UN?
Deputy
Spokesman:
I didn't say
that any…
first of all,
there's not
immunity for
crimes that
are
committed.
Second of all,
I didn't say
that immunity
was in play.
Inner
City Press: Is
it immunity
from local
prosecution?
[Inaudible]…
rape by the
UN…
Deputy
Spokesman:
Again, you
would have to
ask… no, it's
not by the
UN.
Like I said,
it's by a
national
contractor.
Second of all,
you would have
to check with
the Malian
authorities
whether they
are following
up with
criminal
charges." The
"inaudible"
was a correspondent
often used
by the UN for
this purpose
trying to cut
off the follow
up on UN child
rape with an
unrelated
question.
We'll have
more on
this.
On
May 17 at
12:30 pm, just
after the
day's UN noon
briefing ended
(Inner City
Press asked
about UN
sexual
harassment in
India, and
about Vienna),
the UN
disclosed yet
another
case, of sexual
exploitation
by a South
African peacekeeper
in the
Democratic
Republic of
the Congo in
the November
2017 time frame,
photo here. On
May 4, the UN
at 5:30 pm disclosed
another case,
of sexual
exploitation
by a South
African peacekeeper
in the
Democratic
Republic of
the Congo, photo here.
Minutes
after the UN put
that
case online,
Inner City
Press asked three
UN spokespeople,
"on the new
Sexual
Exploitation
case put on
the UN website
at 5:30 pm on
Friday, can
you explain
why these
cases,
involving
South African
contingent in
MONUSCO, were
unknown or
undisclosed so
long?" Deputy
Spokesman
Farhaq Haq
replied, "We
received the
new
allegations
yesterday and
have asked for
national
investigation
officers to be
appointed
within an
expedited five
day
timeframe." This
comes after on
May 2, the UN
after 6 pm
disclosed yet
another case,
of alleged
sexual
exploitation
in the DR
Congo by a
South African
peacekeeper.
And then
another, of
sexual assault by
a South African
Military
Observer, in
April 2018, here.
Inner
City Press is
quoted here,
that the UN is
a joke on
this, no one
is held accountable.
True to form,
on May 2 Inner
City Press
was informed
there is
still no
outcome from
the loudly
announced
investigation
of sexual exploitation
by Ghana UN
Police in Wau,
South Sudan.
On
May 1,
Guterres'
Deputy
Spokesman
Farhan Haq read
out a
disclosure on
sexual abuse
and
exploitation
cases
(distinguished
by the UN from
sexual
harassment,
the term they
use whenever a UN
staff member
is the
victim), and
Inner City
Press is
near-immediately
publishing it
in full:
"Today, I want
to give you an
update on
cases of
sexual
exploitation
and abuse in
the UN system,
in line with
the
Secretary-General’s
initiative on
increasing
transparency
on these
allegations.
"For
the first
three months
of this year,
from 1 January
to 31 March
2018, we have
received 54
allegations
for all UN
entities and
implementing
partners. Not
all
allegations
have been
fully
verified, and
many are in
the
preliminary
assessment
phase.
"Out of
the 54
allegations,
14 are
reported from
peacekeeping
operations and
18 from
agencies,
funds and
programmes. 21
allegations
relate to
implementing
partners and 1
to a member of
a non-UN
international
force.
"Of the
54
allegations,
17 are
categorized as
sexual abuse,
34 as sexual
exploitation,
and 3 are of
an unknown
nature.
The
allegations
involve 66
victims –
including 13
girls (under
the age of 18)
and 16 victims
whose age
remains
unknown.
"With
regard to the
status of the
allegations, 2
have been
substantiated
by an
investigation;
2 were not
substantiated;
21 are at
various stages
of
investigation;
27 are under
preliminary
assessment;
and 1
investigation’s
result is
under review.
"With
over 95,000
civilians and
90,000
uniformed
personnel
working for
the UN, sexual
exploitation
and abuse are
not reflective
of the conduct
of the
majority of
the dedicated
women and men
who serve the
Organization.
But every
allegation
involving our
personnel
undermines our
values and
principles and
the sacrifice
of those who
serve with
pride and
professionalism
in some of the
most dangerous
places in the
world. For
this reason,
combating this
scourge, and
helping and
empowering
those who have
been scarred
by these
egregious
acts, continue
to be key
priorities for
the
Secretary-General
in 2018."
After this read out,
Inner City
Press asked
again from the
UN "nomenclature"
for child
rape, which
has still not
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past (and future?)
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|