Your support
means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you
access to exclusive bonus material on
our Patreon page. Click
here to become a patron. MRL
on Patreon
UNITED
NATIONS, August 8 --
UN
Secretary
General
Antonio
Guterres says
he has a "zero
tolerance"
policy for
sexual
harassment,
and for
retaliation. But
after Guterres
imposed
on
Inner City
Press on
ongoing ban
against
entering the
UN, his two
spokesman on
July 20 and
since have
refused to answer a
written
question from
Inner City
Press. For the
PBS
Frontline "UN
Sex Abuse
Scandal"
documentary,
Guterres
arrogantly refused
to be interviewed - by
contrast he
did 30 minutes
with RT
recently - and
went on
vacation
on the broadcast
date, after ousting
and banning
Inner City
Press which
has asking
him about UN
sex abuse. Now in
his UN Women,
Ravi Karkara
is being
accused of sexual harassment
of men. Under
Guterres
the UN is
getting more
and more unaccountable,
evidenced by
his lawless
and violent
ouster
and ban of the Press
which asked
him about it.
So on August 8
Inner City
Press for a UN
noon briefing
it was banned
from for the 36th
day in a row by Guterres
emailed his
spokesmen:
"August 8-3:
What is the
Secretary
General's
comment and
action on the
reported
sexual
harassment
charges
against UN
Women's Ravi
Karkara for
“using his
prestige and
position to
sexually
harass” at
least 8 men?"
Deputy spokesman
Haq replied,
after the briefing,
with this: "Regarding
the Ravi Karkara case, UN Women has put out the
following:
Update:
Investigation into allegations of sexual
misconduct at UN Women
Date:Wednesday, August 8, 2018
Following on
from our earlier statement on our website,
the investigation into allegations of sexual
misconduct involving a UN Women staff member by
the Office of Audit and Investigations (OAI) of
UNDP is nearing its completion and UN Women
continues to urge for the speedy finalization of
the investigation process.
UN Women
continues to ensure that the case is
investigated thoroughly and receiving the
priority it deserves. We recognize the gravity
with which such cases should be treated and have
taken the allegations very seriously at every
stage.
Ending all
forms of sexual and gender-based violence is at
the heart of UN Women’s mission. As recent
events have shown, the United Nations and UN
Women are not immune from allegations of sexual
misconduct. We are particularly committed to
placing the rights and dignity of victims at the
forefront of our response efforts and have been
in contact with the reported victims of this
case and offered our support and assistance.
UN Women will
continue to implement its zero-tolerance policy
and will take all necessary actions that are
within its purview. Once the report setting out
the findings of the investigation is shared with
UN Women, if the facts warrant it, UN Women will
initiate a disciplinary process under theUN Women
Legal Policy for addressing non-compliance
with UN Standards of Conduct. The
disciplinary process includes charging the
subject, terminating the contract, and, if
appropriate, imposing a sanction. Steps may then
be taken to refer the matter to national
authorities if warranted.
UN Women aims
to be as transparent as possible while ensuring
that the integrity of the investigative, and
disciplinary process, if any, is safeguarded.
For this reason, we cannot comment on any
further specifics of the case, as that could
undermine the accountability process.
Anyone with
information regarding sexual misconduct or other
wrongdoing relating to UN Women programmes or
involving UN Women personnel is strongly
encouraged to report this information through
theinvestigations
hotlineor theonline formwhich
since January 2018 is managed by our new
investigation service provider the Office of
Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) of the United
Nations."
UN Women says
Karkara is “remains
on
administrative
leave” and
that, while
still on U.N.
payroll, he
“is not
currently
performing any
active
function.”
Keep on paying
the predators,
as in UN Peacekeeping,
while trying
to destroy the
business
of independent
Press which reports
on it - that
is the Guterres
way,
which must
end. h/t
Newsweek - who
knew? - which
has yet
to cover Guterres'
censorship but, it
seems,
should... On
July 25, banned
from entering
the UN
by Guterres
for the 22nd day
Inner City
Press put
written questions to
several
missions and
has received
this, to his
credit,
from Swiss
Mission
spokesman
Johann
Aeschlimann: "I do
not have any
comment on
Cameroon, but
regarding your
question on
sexual abuse,
I would like
to assure you
that for
Switzerland
these matters
are of high
importance.
Consistent
with our
national
approach, we
consider all
instances of
sexual
misconduct by
UN
peacekeepers
as
unacceptable.
Switzerland is
working
closely with
the offices of
the Special
Coordinator on
improving the
United Nations
response to
sexual
exploitation
and abuse
(SEA), Ms.
Jane Holl
Lute, and of
the Victim’
Rights
Advocate
(VRA), Ms.
Jane Connors.
Moreover, the
President of
the Swiss
Confederation
is a member of
the
Secretary-General’s
Circle of
Leadership on
the prevention
of and
response to
SEA in United
Nations
operations.
Switzerland
holds that an
adequate
response to
SEA should be
victims-centered.
In the
upcoming
negotiations
in the Fifth
Committee this
fall,
Switzerland
will engage
for a
strengthening
of the office
of the VRA...
On the matter
of your access
problems to
the UN
premises, I
appreciate
your
information."
We'll have
more on this -
including on the EU
response. It
was covering
the July 3
meeting of the
referenced Fifth
(Budget)
Committee that
Inner City Press was
roughed up by
Guterres' Security
and has been
banned by him
since, 24 days
and counting.
Back
on July 25, banned
from entering
the UN
by Guterres
for the 22nd day
Inner City
Press put
questions on
First Avenue
to the French
Mission's
political
coordinator
(who refused
to answer,
video here)
and French UN
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric who
said without
explaining
that Guterres
chosen to to
speak and
sent Lute.
Inner City
Press in the
morning
wrote again to the
French
Mission: "Dear
Ambassador
Gueguen,, Ms
Bree, Ms Negga,
others:
This is a
reiterated
request for
your, your
Mission's and
Ambassador
Delattre's
comment on
three issues:
first, the
troubling
issue of UN
sexual abuses,
detailed in a
one hour
Frontline
documentary
broadcast an
hour ago, for
which UN
Secretary
General
explicitly
refused to be
interviewed
while now
going on
vacation. What
is your
mission and
country's
comment
on this?
Here at the
Delegates
Entrance,
banned from
the UN for 22
days with no
end in sight,
I asked your
Mission's
political
coordinator
this morning.
Nothing.
Second, again,
the human
rights abuses
by the
Cameroon army
and security
forces, not
only in the
Anglophone
areas (which I
have been
asking about
in the UN
since early
2017) but now
also in the
north, video
linked to in Inner City
Press, here,
as verified
by Amnesty
International.
(Now HCHR has
commented,
today - why is
there no
meeting of the
UNSC, at least
under Any
Other
Business?) Given
that the
Security
Council has
supported
these
Cameroonian
forces, and
given France's
role in
Cameroon and
the region,
this is a
request for
comment on
deadline
including on
whether your
Mission will
now seek
and/or support
a Security
Council
meeting on
these abuses,
and if not,
why not. I
am asking
these
questions in
writing now
because I was
banned all
week from
entering the
UN and could
not ask them
at the
Security
Council
stakeout.This
notifies your
Mission that I
have been
banned from
the UN since
at latest July
5, with no due
process. See,
The
Independent
(UK), July 12,
2018, “UN
'roughs up and
bans'
investigative
reporter long
considered
thorn in side
of world body
officials, Mr
Lee has
written about
UN in
connection to
Haiti,
Burundi, Sri
Lanka and
other
nations." Frontline
did well by
interviewing
victims, but
entirely misrepresented
several
interviewees'
roles, most
notably Isobel Coleman,
who did not
criticize the
UN when she
worked for
Samantha
Power, and
stood by as the
UN evicted
Inner City Press
from its work
space
and made it a
"non resident
corresponent."
(Guterres has
gone much
further,
trying to
strip even
that, deploying
violence and
banning the
Press.) There was
no mention of
"R&R"
Ladsous' role,
nor of
Lacroix. It was
filmed some
time ago, with
David
Gressley. But
a key
point is the
32 new allegations
this year, each of
which Inner
City Press
has asked the
UN about before
being targeted with
violence and
Guterres ban.
That, and his
arrogant
refusal to
answer, and
going on
vacation,
should have consequences.
Watch this
site. Before
the July
20 UN noon
briefing it
was banned
from attending
Inner City Press asked
UN Spokesman
Stephane Dujarric
and Farhan
Haq, as well
as Guterres'
chief of
staff, his Global
Communicator
Alison Smale
and Deputy SG
Amina J.
Mohammed: "What is
the SG's
comment on the
already
completed
Frontline
documentary
S36 E11: 'UN
Sex Abuse
Scandal' - 'An
investigation
of sex abuse
by United
Nations
peacekeepers
in the world's
conflict
zones. The
film traces
allegations
from Boston to
Congo to the
Central
African
Republic, with
firsthand
accounts from
survivors,
witnesses, and
officials'?"
There had
been no answer so on
July 24 Inner
City Press asked
again, in
writing: "On
July 20 I
asked for UN's
comment on
Frontline's
documentary on
UN Sexual
Abuse, but not
no answer on
that. Now with
the
documentary
set for
broadcast at
10 pm Eastern
this evening,
again - please
provide UN
comment on gap
between the
SG's “zero
tolerance”
statements and the
documentary.
Still waiting
for answer to
July 21-1,
regarding
location of SG
and public
costs."
After Stephane
Dujarric's noon
briefing from
which Inner
City Press was
banned, his
deputy Farhan
Haq emailed
this to
Inner City
Press:
"Ending sexual
exploitation
and abuse has
been a
priority for
Secretary-General
António
Guterres since
he took
office. The UN
has a unique
responsibility
to set a
global
standard for
preventing,
responding to
and
eradicating
this scourge.
We have a
strict
zero-tolerance
policy. We
have
implemented a
number of
measures to
that effect.
During his
first week,
the
Secretary-General
established a
High-Level
Task Force to
develop
ambitious
proposals to
improve the
system-wide
approach to
preventing and
responding to
sexual
exploitation
and abuse.
These
proposals led
to a
comprehensive
strategy that
we have since
been
implementing.
He has
mobilized
Member States
to work with
the UN in
fighting this
scourge. He
appointed
victims’
rights
advocates,
both at
Headquarters
and in the
field, who
work across
the UN system
to make sure
victims have
access to
urgent
assistance;
that they can
file
complaints
safely and
reliably; and
that they get
timely
information on
the progress
of their case.
They connect
personally and
directly with
victims to
make sure that
their voices
are heard. On
the ground, we
are also
strengthening
complaint
mechanisms to
make it easier
for victims to
come forward.
We are
conducting
outreach
activities to
inform
communities on
the standards
under which UN
personnel are
expected to
perform, as
well as the
risks of
sexual
exploitation
and abuse and
how to report
such behavior.
We have
launched
mandatory
training for
all UN
personnel
prior to
deployment. We
now have an
electronic
tool for
screening UN
staff
dismissed as a
result of
substantiated
allegations of
sexual
exploitation
and abuse, or
who resigned
or were
dismissed
during an
investigation.
We have
improved our
reporting and
data
collection
methods,
including
through the
development of
a system-wide
incident
reporting
form. The
whistleblower
policy has
been
strengthened
to ensure that
people who
come forward
feel safe and
are protected
from
retaliation.
We also report
allegations
publicly on
our websites
and in press
briefings on a
regular basis
in a spirit of
transparency. While
accountability
is a shared
responsibility
between the UN
and Member
States, only
Member States
can conduct
criminal
investigations
and
prosecutions.
The
Secretary-General
has been
personally
engaged at the
highest levels
with countries
on this issue.
Regarding the
Secretary-General,
he is on
annual
leave.
He pays for
his own
expenses." Including
for security?
The
child rapes
and sexual
exploitation
continue, and
Inner City Press which
has most asked
about them
remains banned
from entering
the UN to ask
more, with no
end in sight. We'll
have more on
this. When
Inner City
Press asked
Guterres' deputy
spokesman Farhan
Haq on March
15 about
Michel
Sidibé's reported
threats of retaliatory
investigations
against those
making
and offering
support to sexual
harassment
complaints at
UNAIDS, Haq said
this is entire
a matter for
UNAIDS. Earlier
Inner City
Press story here; exclusive
publication of
whistleblowers'
international
condemnation
of retaliation
and favoritism
in Sidibe's
UNAIDS, below.
On July
18, even as
Guterres read
a speech about
sustainable
development in
ECOSOC, his UN disclosed
yet another
case of sexual
exploitation, by a
Morocco
"peacekeeper"
in the Central
African
Republic. Inner
City Press published
a report on
that one, and
later noticed
yet another
case, against
a Malawian peacekeeper
in the DRC. On
July 19 before a
UN noon
briefing from
which Inner
City Press was
banned - and
the UN Webcast
of which had
no audio, nearing the
very
definition of
censorship
- Inner City
Press asked
Haq, "Please
provide all
information on
the new sexual
exploitation
and abuse
cases put on
UN website
yesterday
while SG spoke
to HLPF. What
is the stage
of
investigation(s)?"
The question
was plural -
but Haq only
replied
about the
second of the
two
cases, the Maliwian:
"Regarding
your first
question, we
have the
following
information:
The UN
peacekeeping
mission in the
Democratic
Republic of
Congo,
MONUSCO, has
received one
new allegation
of sexual
exploitation
involving a
member of the
Malawian
military
contingent
formerly
deployed to
the
Mission.
The allegation
refers to
transactional
sex with an
adult woman
that allegedly
took place in
March 2016,
resulting in
the birth of a
child.
The UN has
informed the
Member State
of the
allegation and
has requested
that a
National
Investigation
Officer be
appointed
within five
(5) working
days, and for
the
investigation
to be
completed
within the
reduced
90-days
timeframe.
The alleged
victim and her
child have
been referred
to UNFPA for
appropriate
support and
assistance.
The Mission
will continue
to monitor
their needs,
as well as
provide any
additional
assistance
such as the
collection of
DNA samples if
requested to
do so by the
victim."
What
about Morocco?
And
audio? Inner
City Press has
asked. On
July 11 there
were two more
sets of cases,
both
in the Central
African
Republic, photo here:
one by a
peacekeeper
from The (Republic of the)
Congo and another
by a
peacekeeper
from Morocco,
which chairs
the UN
Peacebuilding
configuration
on CAR. This
comes has the
UN has banned
Inner City
Press from
entering the UN
and asking
questions, Fox
News story here,
GAP blogs I
and II,
Independent here,
since
it was
physically ousted
while covering
the UN
Peacekeeping
budget on July
3.
Morocco state
media, by
contrast, are
given by the UN
of Antonio
Guterres and
Alison Smale
multiple
offices and
full access.
Without access,
Inner City
Press sat in
the sun on First
Avenue and
emailed in six
questions, two
of which have
been answered
including this
"if-asked" on
the UN's
trends of
sexual exploitation
abuse. Inner
City Press'
question on
this: "On the
two new sexual
exploitation
and abuse
cases put on
the UN's
website last
night, what
was the age of
the victims
and what is
the response
of the TCC
(Morocco and
Congo-Brazzaville)
and each's
past record in
holding
accusees
accountable?"
UN's if-asked
answer: "regarding
your first
question
below, we have
the following
information:
The UN
Multidimensional
Integrated
Stabilization
Mission in the
Central
African
Republic
(MINUSCA) has
received two
reports of
sexual
exploitation
and abuse.
The first
allegation
involves
thirteen (13)
members of the
military
contingent
from the
Republic of
the Congo,
previously
deployed to
the mission.
Military
contingents of
the Republic
of Congo left
MINUSCA in
early 2017.
The allegation
refers to
exploitative
relationships
with eleven
(11) adult
women that are
alleged to
have taken
place between
2015 and 2017,
resulting in
pregnancies
and the birth
of ten (10)
children.
The UN has
informed the
Member State
of the
allegation and
has requested
that a
National
Investigation
Officer be
appointed
within five
(5) working
days, and for
the
investigation
to be
completed
within the
reduced
90-days
timeframe.
The Field
Victim Rights
Advocate (VRA)
immediately
referred all
alleged
victims for
appropriate
services. The
Mission will
continue to
monitor the
situation and
stands
available to
provide any
assistance in
the future if
requested to
do so by the
victims.
The second
allegation
involves
a member
of the
military
contingent
from Morocco,
previously
deployed to
the mission.
The allegation
refers to an
exploitative
relationship
with an adult
woman that
allegedly took
place between
July and
August 2016,
resulting in
the birth of a
child.
The TCC has
informed that
national
investigation
officers,
already
present in the
mission area,
will conduct
an
investigation
into this
allegation
jointly with
OIOS. The UN
has requested
for the
investigation
to be
completed
within the
reduced
90-days
timeframe.
The Field
Victim Rights
Advocate (VRA)
has referred
the alleged
victim to
UNFPA for
appropriate
services. The
Mission will
continue to
monitor the
situation and
stands
available to
provide any
assistance in
the future if
requested to
do so by the
victim." Inner
City Press has
also asked,
among other
things, "1)
why is this UN
investigation
of the ouster
of a
journalist
taking so
long, and
being limited
to only the
latter of two
“incidents”
and not taking
into account
Lt Dobbins'
motive and my
June 25
notification
to Guterres
and Smale?
Didn't the
Deputy
Spokesman call
me a “repeat
offender” and
cite June 22?
Why have I
still not been
given a copy
of “my
statement,
much less
those of Lt
Dobbins, ASG
Saunders and
the UNnamed
July 3 officer
who tore my
shirt and
twisted my
arm? Is this a
cover up of
retaliation,
and of the SG
and his team's
knowledge?
2) why am I
banned during
this
investigation
so that I
cannot enter
and ask any
questions? Who
made that
decision and
why has it not
been reversed
given the
video of the
incident,
questions
raised by the
Government
Accountability
Project, etc?"
We'll have more on
this. On
June 18, the
UN disclosed yet
another case
of child rape
- alleged child
rape - by a
UN Peacekeeper
from Tanzania,
in the DR Congo.
Photo here.
On June 19,
Inner City
Press asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
the case and
only then
was it revealed that this
UN child rape resulted
in the birth
of a child.
From the UN transcript:
Inner City
Press: there's
a new case of…
in this case,
it's listed as
child rape,
was disclosed
by the UN
yesterday, a
Tanzanian
peacekeeper in
MONUSCO
[United
Nations
Organization
Stabilization
Mission in the
Democratic
Republic of
the Congo],
DRC. And
all it said is
everything is
pending.
It seems like…
this seems
like a pretty
serious
charge.
And so I'm
wondering,
what can… what
more can you
say about
this?
When… when did
the UN learn
of it?
Where is the
person?
Spokesman:
What I have,
the
information
that I was
given is that
the UN Mission
in the DRC
received
allegations of
sexual abuse
involving a
member of the
Tanzania
military
contingent
deployed to
the Mission in
June 2014 and
'15. The
allegation
refers to
sexual abuse
on a minor,
aged 17 at the
time, an
incident which
occurred
sometime
between '14
and '15,
resulting in
the birth of a
child.
The UN has
informed the
Member State
of the
allegations,
has requested
the National
Investigative
Officer be
appointed
within five
working days,
as the
procedure is,
and that the
investigation
be completed
within the
reduced 90-day
time
frame.
The alleged
victim and her
child have
been referred
to UNFPA
[United
Nations
Population
Fund] for
appropriate
support and
assistance.
The Mission
will continue
to monitor
their needs,
as well as
provide any
additional
assistance,
such as the
collection of
DNA samples if
[requested] to
do so by the
victim.
Inner
City Press:
Andthe
accused, has
he remained
deployed in
MONUSCO during
that
time?
What's the
information on
that?
Spokesman:
My
understanding
is that he was
deployed
between 2014
and '15, so
that person is
no longer
deployed on
the ground."
Minutes later
Inner City Press
asked the UN's
Special Representative on
Sexual Violence
and Conflict
Pramila Patten
about the case
and she said it
it not part of
her Office,
since Guterres
has other
officials on
victim's
issues and, as
said before,
Jane Holl
Lute. But what
is wrong
with the UN? Earlier
on June 18
Inner City
Press asked
the head of UN
Police in
South Sudan
about the
sexual
exploitation
by the Ghana
contingent in
Wau, and it is
still unclear what
punishment, if
any, those
found involved
by the UN's
OIOS face. Inner
City Press was
unable to live
stream this
Q&A: Inner
City Press'
livestream
Periscope
account has
been suspended
by Twitter for
showing UN
reacting to
the World Cup
and a screen
installed by
the Russian
Mission to the
UN. But the
above, though
Inner City Press
was unable to
Periscope it,
is what was
said. On
June 12, the
UN disclosed yet
another sexual
exploitation
complaint,
this time
against a
peacekeeper
from Morocco,
in the Central
African
Republic where
so many of the
UN's abuses
have occurred.
But there are
also recently
disclosed
cases
involving
peacekeepers
from Tanzania and
Malawi, in the
DC Congo. On
June
13, Inner City
Press asked
Guterres'
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric, UN
transcript
here,
Inner City
Press: on
sexual
abuse.
Okay.
Some new cases
have been
disclosed.
And that's
all… again,
it's all to
the good to be
disclosing,
but I did want
to ask, it's a
little unclear
to me,
because, in a
category
called
"investigation",
the most
recent one
involves a
Moroccan
peacekeeper,
and it says
investigation
by TCC
[troop-contributing
country] and
OIOS [Office
of Internal
Oversight
Services].
And then ones
that seem to
be… have been
earlier
disclosed or
have taken
place earlier
under
investigation
it just says
"pending".
Does that mean
there's no
investigation
yet taking
place or is
there some…?
Spokesman:
I think it
depends on the
case.
Thank you."
That is not
transparent. On
May 22 at 5:30
pm, the UN
disclosed a
rape
allegation against
one of its
civilian
contractors in
Mali, in the
MINUSMA mission in
2018. The
Office of
Internal
Oversight
Services,
whose director
has declined Press
requests to
take questions
about OIOS'
procedures,
is the one
investigating
it. But why
isn't it
a crime
subject to
real prosecution by
Mali?
After UNclear
answers on May
25, below, on
May 30 after
Guterres' two
days in Mali
Inner City Press
asked his lead
spokesman Stephane
Dujarric,
video here,
UN transcript
here:
Inner City Press: a
UN contractor
in Mali, is
alleged to
have engaged
in… in child
rape, so I
wanted to
know,
particularly
since the
Secretary-General
was just
there.
It was unclear
to me last
week from
Farhan [Haq]'s
answer whether
this
individual can
be, and will
be, prosecuted
by the Malian
authorities,
and I guess my
question would
be is this a
case in which
the UN would
waive immunity
that… that may
or may not
apply to the
contractor or,
if none
applies, has
the person
been… been
apprehended?
Spokesman:
The
investigation
I think is
ongoing from
what I
have.
And they're
being
investigated
by the
OIOS. As
a matter of
principle, the
Secretary-General
has always
said he would
waive immunity
in cases of
sexual abuse.
Inner
City Press:
Did he look
into this case
while… during
the two days
he's been
there?
Spokesman:
I don't have
any update...
Inner
City Press:
One more
question.
Spokesman:
No.
Thank you." Dujarric
canceled the
May 31 UN noon
briefing, in
exchange for
Guterres
taking a few
(pre-selected?)
questions at 5
pm. The UN is
increasingly
UNtransparent.
Inner City
Press asked
Haq on May 25,
UN transcript
here:
Inner City
Press: an
additional
case of child
rape by a
civilian
contractor of
the UN in
Mali, and
unlike for
military
personnel, it
doesn't
disclose, one
the
nationality,
and two it's a
pretty serious
charge, and
the
Secretary-General
is obviously
going there
for the Day of
the
Peacekeepers,
so I wanted to
know what's
the
nationality of
the
contractor?
How did the UN
become aware
of this?
And what… in
the serious
instance of
alleged child
rape, what is
the UN going
to do about
it?
Deputy
Spokesman:
I don't have
the
nationality to
share with
you.
What I can say
is that
MINUSMA has
received a
report of
sexual abuse
involving a
national
civilian
contractor, so
this… I assume
from that what
the
nationality
is, but it
says it
involves a
national
civilian
contractor.
The
allegations
refer to the
rape of a
female minor,
resulting in
her
pregnancy.
The incident
allegedly took
place at an
unspecified
date in
2018.
Ensuring the
provision of
assistance to
the victims is
our
priority.
The victim has
been referred
to UNICEF
[United
Nations
Children’s
Fund] and an
NGO
[non-governmental
organization]
partner for
appropriate
medical,
psychosocial,
and legal
support.
The Mission
also stands
ready to
provide
additional
assistance as
needed and the
allegation is
currently
being
investigated
by the Office
of Internal
Oversight
Services
(OIOS).
Inner
City
Press: If,
in fact, the
contractor is
Malian and the
victim is
Malian, why
wouldn't… why
would not this
be a criminal
matter for
actual
prosecution in
Mali? Is
the person
given immunity
simply by
being a UN
contractor?
What is it…
like, for
example, what
was this
person doing
for the UN…?
Deputy
Spokesman:
You would have
to ask the
Malian
authorities
whether
there's any
criminal
prosecution
being followed
up in that
case.
That is a
matter between
the contractor
and the
Government of
Mali.
I've given you
the details on
our side.
Inner
City Press: But
what was the
contractor
doing?
You say he's a
contractor,
just to
understand a
little bit
better how
someone could
get immunity
for child
rape, what
services were
their
performing for
the UN?
Deputy
Spokesman:
I didn't say
that any…
first of all,
there's not
immunity for
crimes that
are
committed.
Second of all,
I didn't say
that immunity
was in play.
Inner
City Press: Is
it immunity
from local
prosecution?
[Inaudible]…
rape by the
UN…
Deputy
Spokesman:
Again, you
would have to
ask… no, it's
not by the
UN.
Like I said,
it's by a
national
contractor.
Second of all,
you would have
to check with
the Malian
authorities
whether they
are following
up with
criminal
charges." The
"inaudible"
was a correspondent
often used
by the UN for
this purpose
trying to cut
off the follow
up on UN child
rape with an
unrelated
question.
We'll have
more on
this.
On
May 17 at
12:30 pm, just
after the
day's UN noon
briefing ended
(Inner City
Press asked
about UN
sexual
harassment in
India, and
about Vienna),
the UN
disclosed yet
another
case, of sexual
exploitation
by a South
African peacekeeper
in the
Democratic
Republic of
the Congo in
the November
2017 time frame,
photo here. On
May 4, the UN
at 5:30 pm disclosed
another case,
of sexual
exploitation
by a South
African peacekeeper
in the
Democratic
Republic of
the Congo, photo here.
Minutes
after the UN put
that
case online,
Inner City
Press asked three
UN spokespeople,
"on the new
Sexual
Exploitation
case put on
the UN website
at 5:30 pm on
Friday, can
you explain
why these
cases,
involving
South African
contingent in
MONUSCO, were
unknown or
undisclosed so
long?" Deputy
Spokesman
Farhaq Haq
replied, "We
received the
new
allegations
yesterday and
have asked for
national
investigation
officers to be
appointed
within an
expedited five
day
timeframe." This
comes after on
May 2, the UN
after 6 pm
disclosed yet
another case,
of alleged
sexual
exploitation
in the DR
Congo by a
South African
peacekeeper.
And then
another, of
sexual assault by
a South African
Military
Observer, in
April 2018, here.
Inner
City Press is
quoted here,
that the UN is
a joke on
this, no one
is held accountable.
True to form,
on May 2 Inner
City Press
was informed
there is
still no
outcome from
the loudly
announced
investigation
of sexual exploitation
by Ghana UN
Police in Wau,
South Sudan.
On
May 1,
Guterres'
Deputy
Spokesman
Farhan Haq read
out a
disclosure on
sexual abuse
and
exploitation
cases
(distinguished
by the UN from
sexual
harassment,
the term they
use whenever a UN
staff member
is the
victim), and
Inner City
Press is
near-immediately
publishing it
in full:
"Today, I want
to give you an
update on
cases of
sexual
exploitation
and abuse in
the UN system,
in line with
the
Secretary-General’s
initiative on
increasing
transparency
on these
allegations.
"For
the first
three months
of this year,
from 1 January
to 31 March
2018, we have
received 54
allegations
for all UN
entities and
implementing
partners. Not
all
allegations
have been
fully
verified, and
many are in
the
preliminary
assessment
phase.
"Out of
the 54
allegations,
14 are
reported from
peacekeeping
operations and
18 from
agencies,
funds and
programmes. 21
allegations
relate to
implementing
partners and 1
to a member of
a non-UN
international
force.
"Of the
54
allegations,
17 are
categorized as
sexual abuse,
34 as sexual
exploitation,
and 3 are of
an unknown
nature.
The
allegations
involve 66
victims –
including 13
girls (under
the age of 18)
and 16 victims
whose age
remains
unknown.
"With
regard to the
status of the
allegations, 2
have been
substantiated
by an
investigation;
2 were not
substantiated;
21 are at
various stages
of
investigation;
27 are under
preliminary
assessment;
and 1
investigation’s
result is
under review.
"With
over 95,000
civilians and
90,000
uniformed
personnel
working for
the UN, sexual
exploitation
and abuse are
not reflective
of the conduct
of the
majority of
the dedicated
women and men
who serve the
Organization.
But every
allegation
involving our
personnel
undermines our
values and
principles and
the sacrifice
of those who
serve with
pride and
professionalism
in some of the
most dangerous
places in the
world. For
this reason,
combating this
scourge, and
helping and
empowering
those who have
been scarred
by these
egregious
acts, continue
to be key
priorities for
the
Secretary-General
in 2018."
After this read out,
Inner City
Press asked
again from the
UN "nomenclature"
for child
rape, which
has still not
been provided.
On
April 30
the
Guardian's
Rebecca
Ratcliffe reports
that "Miriam
Maluwa, who
has worked for
the UN for
more than 25
years, was
placed on
administrative
leave from her
post as
country
director for
UNAids in
Ethiopia on 27
March." On
April 30,
Inner City
Press asked
Guterres'
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
Maluwa and more
about the Luiz
Loures case,
and WFP in
Fiji. Video here.
From the UN transcript:
Inner City Press:
at UNAIDS
[Joint United
Nations
Programme on
HIV/AIDS], one
of the
complainants
against Luiz
Loures has
been suspended
from heading
the Ethiopia
office of
UNAIDS and
told not to go
back into the
office.
Many people
see it as
exactly the
retaliation
that was
promised in
Mr. [Michel]
Sidibé’s
speech to
staff, saying
that he will
investigate
all
accusers.
What does
António
Guterres think
of this
suspension?
Spokesman:
We're aware of
the
issue.
Our
understanding
is that this
is completely
unrelated, but
questions
should be
directed at
UNAIDS.
Inner
City Press:
And
also, just, I
guess, in
terms of the…
the extent of
this problem
within the UN
system, over
the weekend,
it emerged and
I'm wondering
if you can…
will confirm
and have… if
he has
anything to
say on it,
that there are
sexual
harassment
complaints
about… in Fiji
on… at UN
World Food
Programme
(WFP).
And have the
staff been
suspended?
And does the
Secretary-General
believe that,
in such cases,
staff should
be
suspended?
And what's the
timeline for
an
investigation?
Spokesman:
My
understanding
is that WFP's
fully aware
and is
starting the
procedures.
I think WFP,
under the
leadership of
the new
Executive
Director, has
been extremely
forward-leaning
on these
issues.
They will
handle them
according to
procedures.
I'm not going
to get into
detail,
because I'm
not aware of
the details in
the
investigation.
Inner
City Press:
But
is there a
UN-wide policy
under António
Guterres of
suspending…
suspending
pending
investigation…?
Spokesman:
I think each
case… I think
cases
vary.
One of the
things that
we're looking
at the CEB is,
obviously,
some
harmonization
and
understanding
across the
system.
But,
obviously,
each…
especially
when it comes
to specialized
agencies have
their own
governing body
and their own
rules and
regulations...
Inner
City Press:
just
one more on
UNAIDS, and
then I have
some other
stuff, but I'm
sure you've
seen that…
that Ms.
[Cristina]
Brostrom, the…
the alleged
victim in the
Luiz Loures
case has
written to say
that she
entirely
rejects the
re-opening and
has no
confidence in
it. I'm
just
wondering, is
there a UN
response?
She's also
said…
Spokesman:
Well, I think…
go ahead.
Inner
City Press:
No, no.
She's said
that a
toothless UN
investigation
could impact
her ability to
pursue the
case outside
of the system,
so she act… is
actively
requesting
that this not
take place and
views it as a
cover-up.
What's your
response?
Spokesman:
Well, I think
my response is
in what I just
read, which is
— and I'll
read it again
— that the
complainant
called for an
investigation
to be
conducted by
an external
independent
investigation
entity outside
of the
UN. The
General
Assembly, as
you know, has
mandated OIOS
to have
operational
independence
to conduct
investigations.
OIOS has been
requested to
conduct it and
re-open the
investigation
by WHO.
They've agreed
to do
so. I
think we are
all hoping
that… we all
want to see
what comes out
of this
re-opened
investigation."
The UN is
failing.
On
April
16, mid growing
requests for
Sidibe to
resign, Inner
City Press
asked
Guterres' led
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric, who
reiterated
Guterres has
full
confidence in
Sidibe. So much for
zero
tolerance.
Video here,
UN transcript
here:
Inner
City
Press: I
wanted to ask
you about
UNAIDS.
As I'm sure
you've seen, a
number of… a
number of
groups have
asked for an
investigation,
but the AIDS
Healthcare
Foundation,
which does
work on AIDS
in 39
countries, has
reportedly
written to
António
Guterres
asking that
Mr. [Michel]
Sidibé step
down in light
of his alleged
retaliation
against staff,
in light of a
staff member
having, in
2015, told him
that Luiz
Loures was a
sexual
predator.
And I'm
wondering,
what does the
Secretary-General
think now
that… that…
basically, it
doesn't seem
that Mr.
Sidibé is
going to
self-resign.
What does he
make of… of a
member of
the…?
Spokesman:
I think it’s
always
important to
hear from our
partners.
Mr. Sidibé
continues to
have the
confidence of
the
Secretary-General.
Inner
City Press:
And… and the
investigation
[inaudible] of
Luiz Loures
meets António
Guterres'
standards of
zero
tolerance…?
Spokesman:
I think we've
spoken about
the
investigation."
On
March 29
when
Inner City
Press
audibly asked
Guterres, if
he had even
yet spoken to
Sidibe,
Guterres did
not answer.
Vine video here.
Present
was Guterres'
Global
Communicator
Alison Smale,
who
orders UN
staff to
"speak with
one voice" -
hers - on
allegations of
sexual harassment.
She has
continued to
restrict Inner
City Press,
declining for
monthes to
even answer
what
the rules are.
Inner
City Press has
been receiving
detailed complaints
about mismanagement
and harassment
in UNAIDS, but
the UN refuses
to answer. So
below
are
some more
of the
complaints.
Tellingly, the
day after
Guterres
refused Inner
City Press'
question
about UNAIDS,
here
are Loures' victims
speaking publicly,
in their own
names:
Martina
Brostrom, a
policy advisor
at UNAIDS, said of
Loures at
a conference
in Bangkok,
Thailand in
2015: "I
was pleading
with him, and
I was just
bracing with
all that I
could just to
not leave the
elevator."
Guterres? No
answer -
and no action.
Where is
Guterres on
this? Where is
Guterres?
Malayah
Harper, who
used to run
UNAIDS'
programs in
Uganda and
Kenya, on
Loures
a year
earlier, also
at a hotel: "He
got into the
lift with me,
and then kind
of lunged
forward to --
you could call
it -- kiss me,
but I thought
a kiss had to
be
consensual."
We'll have more on
this, and on retaliation. Some
more of the
complaints
exclusively
published by
Inner City
Press: "Michel
Sidibé
has established
this 'boys
club'
culture where
qualified
women are made
to feel less
worthy, are
openly
ridiculed by
male
colleagues
except those
women who are
providing
favors to him
and his 'boys,' he
continues to
give perks
to his boys
who serve as
his connectors
to presidents,
prime
ministers etc
by appointing
them to
important
positions as
well as even
when they
retired
bridging them
back on
special
assignments
for them to
make easy
money. People
such as Fritz
Lherisson,
Georges Shaw
and more
recently
Abdoul Dieng."
There are the
Mali connections,
beyond
what Inner
City Press
reported about
Burundi on March
23, here:
"Ben
Wahab - A
Malian
recently
appointed as
UNAIDS Country
Director for
Burundi with
no country
level and no
management
experience. He
came in as a
P4 Adviser and
very quickly
in 3 years he
rose to his
present
position of
UNAIDS Country
Director.... Theresa
Poirier, a
Malian
Canadian,
UNAIDS Country
Director for
Malawi .Also a
relatively new
comer to
UNAIDS
appointed by
Michel as
Director in
Mali and now
serving in
Malawi as
UNAIDS Country
Director... Fode
Simanga a
Malian serving
as senior
adviser in
Geneva but
graded at
Director level... Dado
SY Kagnsssy a
Malian before
UNAIDS Country
Director for
Djibouti, very
little
experience,non
articulative
and a fairly
new comer to
UNAIDS who was
appointed to
this position
whilst many
longer serving
staff members
are over
looked and now
posted to
Guinea as
UNAIDS Country
Director.. Amakonde
Sande (moved
from
consultant to
P4 in short
order to
P5 as UNAIDS
Country
Director in
Malawi and
then sent to
Uganda a
D1 position
where she
stayed only
for 3 months
only to be
appointed to
China as
UNAIDS Country
Director... Bridgitte
Quenum
recently
appointed as
UNAIDS Country
Director but
she has no
leadership,
management
experience and
was appointed
over other
more
senior
persons. It is
reputed that
her family
is/was a great
friend of
Michel Sidibe
and that is
how she
entered UNAIDS
and now gained
this
distinguished
position." But
note - not
only has
Antonio
Guterres
bragged
recently that
now at the
UN "we have
some Portuguese
things" - he
also has his
own hiring and
traveling
patterns.
As to
UNAIDS and
Sidibe, there is
talk of mining
business; there
are harassment
complaints
and findings
that Sidibé
refuses to act
on. Of
Girmay Haile,
the current
UNAIDS country
director in
Zimbabwe, whistleblowers
tell Inner
City Press
that a recent
internal
investigation
came
unanimously to
the conclusion
of severe
bullying and
intimidation
just two weeks
ago - but Sidibé
has refused to
move him. This
followed a
previous
investigation
against
Girmay Haile Girmay
HaileGirmay
HaileGirmay
Hailein
Kenya;
Sidibe
refused the
recommendation
of the
internal team
and promoted
him to country
director
Ghana. Girmay
Haile
has reportedly
said
he knows too
much and if he
falls they all
fall. We shall
see.
Back
on March 15 when
Inner City
Press asked
about the UN
Secretariat's
own investigation
of
whistleblowers,
for the second
day in a row,
Haq again
defended it,
as somehow
benefiting
member states.
From the UN transcript:
Inner City
Press: I'm
sure you've
seen the
article in The
Guardian
quoting Michel
Sibidé [sic]
of UNAIDS
[Joint United
Nations
Programme
against
HIV/AIDS].
What I wanted
to ask you is,
he seems to be
attacking
those who came
forward in the
sexual
harassment
case against
Luiz
Loures.
He's attacked
them.
He's said that
Loures is a…
is… made a
courageous
decision.
And, of his
detractors, he
says, we know
these people
are taking
their golden
shan…
handshakes
from us here
and knowing
they have a
job and then
attacking
us. We
know all about
that. We
know every
single
thing.
Time will come
for
everything.
When I hear
anything about
abuse of our
assets, I ask
for an
investigation.
Maybe these
investigations
are going
on. And
so, many staff
and many
people in the…
in the
“#MeToo”
movement see
this as a
direct threat
against those
who came
forward.
And I wonder,
what does
António
Guterres… who
I'm… I… I
would assume
is a reader of
The Guardian,
what does he
think of these
comments?
Deputy
Spokesman:
We're aware of
this
article.
Obviously,
it's for
UNAIDS and
Mr.
Sidibé to
explain what
the comments
attributed to
him are.
At
UNESCO in Paris
there are cover-ups
and retaliation in
the wake of the
two-step firing of
Assistant Director
General Frank La Rue
for sexual
harassment.
But
when Inner City
Press on March 20
asked Guy Berger,
the grandly titled
Director of Freedom
of Expression and
Media Development at
the United Nations
Educational,
Scientific and
Cultural
Organization, if he
thought reporting on
l'affaire La
Rue, which has
included Inner City
Press' exclusive
report that after
his suspension he
was still getting
paid and now
questions about
UNESCO Ethics
Adviser Rebecca
Trott, Berger said
he was unaware of
the specifics of the
case and to ask
UNESCO's press
officer.
Since Inner City
Press published the
video
of the Q&A, it
has heard from
UNESCO staff in New
York that Berger
"lied - he was among
the best friends of
La Rue, defended him
at every turn, while
also trying to take
his job." This is
how the UN works -
work with
collaborators like
Berger's former
student, to cover up
abuse, while seeking
mutual advancement.
It is disgusting. So
too on Rebecca
Trott, UNESCO's
"Ethics" adviser. As
question mount about
cover up, it will be
interesting to know
who is still
protecting her
within the
organization. We'll
have more on this.
Likewise,
after Berger has
spoken and joked
with a former
student (given the
first question)
about the importance
of independent media
and even holding
power in check, when
Inner City Press
asked about the UN's
FAO and WIPO going
after the press, he
said he was unaware
but implied it might
be justified.
When
Inner City Press
asked about the UN
Department of Public
Information's
continuing lack of
content neutral
media access rules,
despite Inner City
Press' repeated
requests to DPI boss
Alison Smale, both
his student and the
UN moderate looked
surprised, as if
they didn't
understand.
OK:
Inner City Press was
evicted from its UN
work space for
pursuing the Ng Lap
Seng UN bribery case
in the UN Press
Briefing Room - an
event of the group
headed by Berger's
student - and has
been a non-resident
correspondent
requiring DPI
“minders” to cover
the UN General
Assembly and its
President. Meanwhile
its office was given
to a no-show
Egyptian state
media, Akhbar al
Yom's Sanaa Youssef,
who has not ask the
UN a question in ten
years.
Media
that rarely come in
and ask anything
have arrived since
Inner City Press'
eviction and have
been given UN office
space. Inner City
Press has been told
it is not even on
the list, and Smale
has not answer a
single email. No
rules. We'll have
more on this
(charade) - and on
UNESCO. Watch this
site.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past
(and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for