On Sri Lanka, Japan Wants UN Briefing, Austria
Concerned about Killing by Both Sides
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of
Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS,
March 23 -- As Sri Lanka's
government continues to ignore UN Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon's month-old call for a
suspension of fighting in the north, it also bragged
of China's blocking of a
Security Council briefing requested by the Council's European Union
members
along with, at least Mexico and the U.S.. Pro-government media claimed
over the weekend that Japan, along with six other Council members
including Turkey and Uganda,
was also opposed to any briefing of the Council.
Monday outside the Council, Inner City Press asked Japan's
Ambassador to the UN, Yukio Takaso, if this is Japan's position. "No, I
don't think that is accurate," Ambassador Takasu said of the report
Japan
does not want a Council briefing. "We are still hoping for consensus,"
he added.
Austria's
position had been more openly misrepresented, as their support for a
Council
briefing being based only on the actions of the LTTE or Tamil Tigers.
The
spokesperson for the Austrian Mission to the UN, Verena Nowotny, in the
course
of a ten minute clarifying interview with Inner City Press offered the
following on-the-record quote, that "because of concern about the
humanitarian situation in Sri Lanka, we [Austria] want to make it part
of the
agenda of the Security Council."
Inner City
Press asked Marty Natalegawa, the UN Ambassador of Indonesia which was
on the Security
Council last year, why some countries are opposing a briefing in the
Council
about the conflict in Sri Lanka. "It always starts with a humanitarian
briefing,"
he said, referring among others to Zimbabwe and Myanmar, which
humanitarian
briefings led to formal inscription on the Council's agenda and, in the
case of
Zimbabwe, sanctions resolutions proposed by the United States and UK,
among
others.
On March
20, US Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice told Inner City Press that "the
United States feels strongly about and concerned about Sri Lanka and we
support
the provision of it to the Council- a full and updated information on
the
humanitarian situation." (Strangely, India's
National Newspaper the Hindu
sourced this quote to a Tamil website, when it is available on-camera
on the
Internet, and through
the US Mission to the UN.)
UN's and Japan's Takasu, with former
US Amb. Khalilzad, Susan Rice and follow-up not yet shown
But another
Council diplomat
on Monday noted that "every country has its list of priorities," and
that for the U.S. that for now is Sudan. The U.S. expended political
capital to
get a Council meeting on Sudan on March 20; how hard the U.S. is
pushing for a
briefing of the Council with "full and updated information on the
humanitarian situation" in Sri Lanka is not clear.
Likewise,
while UK minister David Miliband has said that the UK would like a
resolution
on Sri Lanka but has held off because it is worse to get resolutions
vetoed --
as China and Russia have apparently threatened to do -- it is noted
that the UK
pushed forward supporting the Zimbabwe draft sanctions resolution even
as China
and Russia vetoed it. Every country has its priorities.
A senior UN
official opined to Inner City Press that even those countries which are
troubled by the killing of civilians in northern Sri Lanka, including
by the
government, are nevertheless reticent to too openly call for a
ceasefire. If
they do, the official continued, and the Tamil Tigers bounce back and
kill civilians,
the Sri Lankan government will blame those who called for the ceasefire.
To
summarize -- can't tell the players
without a scorecard -- those Security Council members which say
they are in favor of a Sri
Lanka briefing in the Council have the nine votes they would need to
get the
meeting, if they pushed forward and called the procedural vote they are
entitled to, which is not subject to the veto power of China or Russia. But these ostensible supporters, or at least
some of them, are "waiting for consensus," as Japan's Takasu said.
Such consensus seems unlikely, unless some countervailing concession is
made
to, at least, China. What might that be? Watch this site.
Footnote: Japan's priority in the
Council for now
is the threatened April 4-8 launch by North Korea of a satellite or
missile.
While Japan said it wanted a Council meeting, it now appears they want
the
meeting only after the scheduled launch. Japan would like a condemning
resolution,
but others, including China, want only a less powerful Presidential
Statement.
Negotiations have already begun -- some have ever mis-reported that a
Presidential Statement is already being drafted -- and one wonders how
this
effects Japan's presentation of its ostensible support for a Council
briefing
on Sri Lanka...
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12 debate on Sri Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile (and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|