UN
Keeps Clinton-Aligned Feltman, French Mission
Legal Adviser Heads
to 38, No Answers
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Exclusive Series
UNITED NATIONS,
January 31 – The United States
has controlled the UN
Department of Political
Affairs under former Clinton
State Department official
Jeffrey Feltman, and Inner
City Press was informed by
whistleblowers, and exclusively
reported, that Feltman is
trying to stay on at the UN
until July 4, 2017.
Inner City Press asked asked
about Feltman "contributing"
DPA staffer Katrin Hett to new
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres' transition and now
Executive Office. Feltman
didn't answer, and the UN's
holdover spokesman called even
the question "despicable." Video here.
There are
new questions, about people
seemingly seconded to the
Executive Office of the
Secretary General. Last week,
deputy UN spokesman Farhan Haq
told Inner City Press it would
become clear by the end of
January.
But on
January 31, when Inner City
Press asked holdover lead
spokesman Dujarric for the
information, including on
having seen French mission
legal adviser Tanguy Stehelin
going up with the entourage to
the 38th floor, Dujarric
refused to answer and walked
off the podium. Video
here, at end. From the UN
transcript:
Inner City
Press: I'd asked about
people that I've seen up on
[the 38th Floor] and said,
like, are they now part of the
Executive Office of the
Secretary-General or
not? He [deputy spokesman
Farhan Haq] said, until the
end of the month, it's still
the transition. So, I
guess I wanted… are we going
to get kind of a chart of,
like, who transitioned from
the transition? I saw
the French legal adviser — or
at least the person I think of
as the French legal adviser —
going up and down. Is he
now part of working for the
UN? Is he seconded?
Spokesman: As I said,
we're still in a period of
transition. When we can
have a little more clarity on
the staffing, we'll share it
with. Thank you.
This is not
transparency.
Inner City
Press is informed of other
staffers placed on 38, by
other countries. Disclosure is
needed, and soon.
One point
here, made by whistleblowing
staff, is that if the reason
for Guterres' muted response
to the US Executive Order is
to try for a good relationship
with Washington, doing side
favors for Obama / Clinton
holdover(s) may not be the best
way (just as continuing the
censorship of the former SG
and his USG Gallach, resulting
in Banned
coverage and delay,
makes little sense.) They cite
cost-benefit analysis, in
UNese.
The reason
for the extension, the
whistleblowers tell Inner City
Press, is so that Feltman's UN
pension can "vest."
But is it
wise for the UN to spend
taxpayer money in this way,
keeping on an official so closely
aligned with Hilary Clinton?
This takes
place after reporting on, but
not publication of, a draft
Executive Order to cut UN
funding. Now Inner City Press
publishes the draft, here.
Here's
UN Budget Cut Draft Executive Order,
On Hold Jan 27 as Inner City Press
Exposes Clinton-Aligned Felt...
by Matthew
Russell Lee on Scribd
Even as it's said it won't be
signed imminently, there are
scams at the UN, including
Feltman, Cristina Gallach and
Herve Ladsous, which can and
should be stopped immediately.
Inner City
Press put the questions
directly to Feltman:
"Dear Mr. Feltman
- These are Press questions
very much on deadline, very
straight forward:
1) When does your contract
with the UN end?
2) Separately, please confirm
or deny that your contract got
extended.
3) Separately, that your
contract was extended through
June.
4) Separately, that this was
related to your UN pension
vesting.
5) Entirely separately,
whether Katrin Hett is taking
up a position in the Secretary
General's office.
6) Separately, does this
involves a jump from P4 to P5?
As noted, very much on
deadline. Thanks in advance
for your answers, asap."
Current UN
Spokesman Stephane Dujarric,
also a holdover, does not
answer Inner City Press'
management and reform
questions, most recently about
a UN "Hospitality Log" of
wining and dining, click
here for that. In fact,
Dujarric and the UN threw
Inner City Press out of the UN
without a hearing, and
restrict it still.
After
publication of the above, and
this, Inner City Press at the
January 27 noon briefing asked
spokesman Dujarric, who called
the questioning "despicable."
Video
here, UN
transcript here:
Inner City Press:
I’ve asked Mr. [Jeffrey]
Feltman and now I’m asking
you, that his contract was
extended from March through
June so that his UN pension
can vest. And I wanted
to know, just… you said
something like it’s early
days, but just, did that
occur? And was Katrin
Hett from his office, placed
in the Executive Office of the
Secretary-General, moved from
P4 to P5? I’m told by
people in DPA (Department of
Political Affairs),
essentially, to kind of keep
an eye on things. But
the most important thing I
want to know is… and I’m
asking not to be personal, but
because it is public
money. That’s why I
expected a yes-or-no answer… a
yes-or-no answer.
Spokesman: I think two
things. As I said, we’re
in a period of
transition. The
Secretary-General is looking
at his senior
leadership. He’s taking
decisions that will need… that
will ensure the continuing
smooth transition that is
already ongoing. That’s
for Mr. Feltman. I have…
I don’t have the exact dates
of his contract. We’re
in a period of
transition. As for… as
for the other person you
mentioned, you know, I… you’re
free to ask. I find it
somewhat despicable that
people use you or others to
drag people’s names through
the mud and insinuate
things. The… we’re in a
transition period. The
Secretary-General’s Office is
in the midst of changes.
New staff’s coming in.
All rules are being observed
and… all rules and regulations
are being observed. And
I’ll leave it at that.
Inner City Press: I
guess my… my… you can use the
word “despicable” if you
want. What I wanted to
know about the Mr. Feltman
thing is, if… and you can
easily ask… I guess he
contacted you when I e-mailed
him, but if, in fact, his
contract was extended and if
you know that he was appointed
by the previous administration
and you know that the new
administration came in and
said… I guess they believe
they deserve a USG
(Under-Secretary-General)
post, what was the thinking
behind extending and is it
related… [inaudible]
Spokesman: The only
thing that matters is to have
as smooth of a transition
continue, as we’ve had.
Yeah, go ahead.
Inner City Press: But
you understand, other
organizations actually
transition. [end]
As the UN
remains unreformed after Ban
Ki-moon's ten years ended with
corruption, long asked about
by the Press, exposed, budget
cuts are coming.
In
Washington executive orders
are being prepared to cut up
to 40% of the US'
contributions to the UN, and
to fully cut funding to
entities blamed for violation
of human rights.
One
obvious question is whether
the total denial of due
process for whistleblowers -
already part of US law - and
investigative press which covers
UN corruption
constitutes such a violation.
For
example, the UN Department of
Public Information under
Cristina Gallach in early 2016
threw
Inner City Press out of the
UN, dumping its
investigative files onto First
Avenue, without a single
hearing or opportunity to be
heard, and no
appeal since.
All this for
seeking to cover an event in
the UN Press Briefing Room
which was nowhere listed as
closed, and leaving as soon as
a single UN Security officer
said the Spokesman, Stephane
Dujarric, wanted Inner City
Press out.
Gallach had a
conflict of interest, having
been asked
by Inner City Press about her
own links with
Macau-based businessman Ng Lap
Seng, facing trial (like Ban
Ki-moon's nephew and brother)
on bribery charges.
There are no
rules, only the one-person
fiat rule of an official
dumped on Ban's UN by Spain,
where she had previously
managed, at most, seven people
as spokesperson to Javier
Solana. Nothing has been done;
eleven months later Gallach
still requires Inner City
Press to have "minders"
to cover the UN Security
Council.
The cuts,
and a new US Ambassador, are
coming. Six days after a
confirmation hearing in which
she called for accountability
at the UN, including for
peacekeepers' abuses, Nikki
Haley on January 24 was
confirmed to replace Samantha
Power as US Ambassador to the
UN.
This came
after at least two business
days of no
photos replacing those
of President Barack Obama and
Vice President Joe Biden at
the US Mission to the UN.
On January
24, Inner City Press asked
former UN official, now
Swedish foreign minister
Margot Wallstrom about Haley's
call to defund countries whose
peacekeepers abuse. Tweeted
video here. There are
reforms needed at the UN.
Back on
January 18 before Haley spoke
as nominee for US Ambassador
to the UN, Senator Bob Corker
said he sometimes wondered if
just-left Secretary General
Ban Ki-moon had a pulse.
In fact,
Ban was quite active in
helping his own relatives at
the UN, promoting his son in
law to the top UN job in
Kenya, his brother mining in
Myanmar with a "UN
delegation," indicted nephew
using Ban's name to sell real
estate.
When Haley
began, she said the UN has a
"checkered history." That's
being diplomatic. Consider a
head of Peacekeeping who has
linked rapes to R&R, video
here.
Consider a
head of the UN "Department of
Public Information" who did no
due diligence over indicted UN
briber Ng Lap Seng - then
evicted and still restricts
the Press which asked here
about it. Audit
here, Para 37-40, 20b; NYT
here.
In
response to questions, Haley
praised the UN peacekeeping
mission in Sierra Leone,
questioned the one in South
Sudan and that country's
government. She noted that
countries make money off their
peacekeepers. The case in
point, we note, is Burundi, here.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in
the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-2015 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
for
|