On
W.
Sahara, As Ban Ki-moon Dropped Credibility, France Pushes Group of
Friends
Against Human Rights
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
April 18, updated -- With the
Western Sahara draft resolution still
in the hands of the so-called Group of Friends and not distributed to
UN Security Council members like Nigeria and South Africa, Inner City
Press on Monday asked Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's acting Deputy
Spokesman Farhan Haq about Ban's
report belatedly released on April
15.
While
Haq declined
to comment, the changes between the draft report obtained and
published by Inner City Press in early April, and that ultimately
released, concerns not only the lack of a human rights monitoring
mechanism for the MINURSO mission, but even the characterization of
past probes of detentions in Laayoune last November.
The
initial
or
draft report, in Paragraph 92, said that “Credible investigations
by local and international human rights investigations found that 200
Saharans, including children, were detained.”
Ban's
final
draft,
after lobbying by Morocco and France, dropped among other things the
word “credible,” reading “investigations by local and
international human rights investigations found that 200 Saharans,
including children, were detained.”
Compare
Paragraph
92 in this
draft text to this
final text.
While
the Security
Council consultations were pushed from April 15 to Tuesday April 19,
as of the afternoon before, the Group of Friends had still not agreed
on a draft resolution. An experts level meeting was scheduled for
Monday afternoon with the idea of getting the Group of Friends'
ambassador together Monday evening.
France
was said
to be resisting the idea of distributing the text to the other
Council members until it was entirely agreed within the Group of
Friends.
Ban & Sarkozy, human rights monitoring in W.
Sahara not shown
At
the April 18
noon briefing, Inner City Press asked Ban's deputy spokesman Haq to
respond to the critique by the UN's former Special Representative on
Western Sahara Francesco Bastagli that “past experience shows
occasional assessments by special rapporteurs do not suffice to
address the grave and deteriorating human rights situation of the
Saharawi. The UN must not fail to establish a robust, continuous and
dedicated capacity to monitor, protect and advocate the human rights
of the Saharawi people.”
Haq,
after making
sure to correct pronunciation of former Assistant Attorney Bastagli's
name, then refused to respond to his critique of Ban's report and
recommendation.
Some
predict,
however, that France's insistence that the resolution only refer to
the “human dimension” cannot prevail this time, that a small
incremental move to at least mentioning “human rights” will
occur. Watch this site.
Update
of
6:30 pm -- At the end of the Group of Friends on #WesternSahara
meeting at 6:20pm, UK Ambassador Lyall Grant told Inner City Press
that “a text will go out tonight.” Ambassador Susan Rice of the
US, chair of the Group of Friends, didn't really answer when Inner
City Press asked if the text would include human rights. Five
minutes later, France's Ambassador Gerard Araud & Morocco
Ambassador Loulichki came out together, silent as they walked up the
stairs. We'll see.
* * *
UN
on
Western Sahara, Ban's Final Report Has No Rights Monitor in
MINURSO
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
April
15 -- Nine days after UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon
was supposed to issue his annual report on Western Sahara, and after extensive
lobbying by Morocco and France, Ban on Friday put out a
text which did not include the human rights monitoring mechanism that
even the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has urged.
Instead
the
finalreport, being put online here and here, has Ban
“appreciating”
Morocco's “expressed commitment” to allow Special Procedures and
presumably Special Rapporteurs from the UN Human Rights Council. See
Paragraph 121 in this
file, and compare to this.
Not
explained is
why having a human rights monitoring mechanism, which other UN
Peacekeeping missions in Africa have, is not being done in the case
of Western Sahara, particularly at a time when France and other
Permanent Five members of the Security Council are citing human
rights and the protection of civilians as the basis for military
action in Libya and Cote d'Ivoire.
The
lead Ambassador
of a non-permanent member of the Security Council told Inner City
Press that Morocco's push was that it would “stop the political
track” if a human rights monitoring mechanism were imposed. But if
such threats are successful here, they will be tried even more
elsewhere, in places like the Democratic Republic of the Congo or
Sudan.
Is
it, he wondered,
that France is more unequivocally the attack dog for Morocco than any
P-5 member is for Sudan? The consultations were postponed until
Monday. Watch this site
* * *
On
W.
Sahara,
Not
Answering
on Morocco Lobbying, UN Decries
Leaks to Press
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
April
7
--
A day after the UN
refused to take questions
about its draft Western Sahara report, on April 7 Secretary General
Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Martin Nesirky had a written statement ready.
Inner
City Press asked
about
Morocco
lobbying
the UN Secretariat to ensure no human
rights monitoring mechanism for the MINURSO peacekeeping mission,
and
what Ban's position was:
Inner
City
Press:
There
is
a report that’s due of the Secretary-General
on the situation on Western Sahara. Various leaked copies of
it have
circulated. And I have heard that there was some extensive lobbying
of the Secretariat by Morocco to have paragraph 119 not ask for human
rights monitoring mechanism but rather for, welcome Morocco
inviting
in special rapporteurs. So, I wonder if you could describe, some of
these accounts come from within the Secretariat; could you describe
what the communications, what the process is for creating such a
paragraph? Who the Secretary-General has spoken to and what his
thinking is on having a human rights mechanism in the MINURSO [United
Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara] mission.
Spokesperson
Martin
Nesirky:
Well,
what
I can tell you is that we are aware that
an internal working document pertaining to the situation in Western
Sahara was leaked and published electronically. This document is not
a final report. It has not been endorsed by the Secretary-General
and, therefore, it has no status. The United Nations finds it
regrettable that internal working documents of the Organization have
been leaked and published. Thank you very much.
Inner
City
Press:
Are
you
being lobbied by Morocco, as someone inside the
Secretariat has told me? I mean, just yes or no?
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
Matthew,
I
said
one last question and you’ve asked
another question. I have answered your question.
But
the initial
question, which Nesirky refused to take on April 6, was about the
lobbying of the Secretariat and its Department of Peacekeeping
Operations that Morocco is allowed to do -- and Nesirky still hasn't
answered it.
Ban and Nesirky in North Lawn, Morocco lobbying
& answers not shown
Rather,
Inner City
Press has now learned from multiple sources, after Inner City Press
left the briefing room Nesirky stayed loudly complaining about Inner
City Press somehow “speaking over” him. But Inner City Press had
said it had a question to ask about Western Sahara - and the lobbying
Ban allows, at least from one side - and will continue to ask the
question until it is answered.
Footnote:
while
the
UN's
Western
Sahara report was slated to be released on
April 6, by 6 pm on April 7 it had still not been released. Watch
this site.
* * *
On
Western
Sahara,
Draft
Reports
Published
as UN Refuses to Take Morocco Q
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
April
6
--
For
days, senior UN officials have been telling
Inner City Press about aggressive lobbying by Morocco about the
specifics of the forthcoming UN report on Western Sahara, a leaked
copy of which Morocco was given from within the UN Secretariat.
Inner
City
Press
on
April
4 wrote about the topic -- having also obtained a copy from
diplomatic sources -- and on April 6 repeatedly told Secretary
General Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Martin Nesirky that it wanted to ask
a Western Sahara question at that day's noon briefing.
“I have a
question on Western Sahara,” Inner City Press said, ceding first to
another journalist on Haiti. But Nesirky then declared without
explanation he would take only one more question, on another topic.
Inner City Press repeated, “I have a question on Western Sahara.”
But Nesikry stood up, declaring his briefing over. Nor does he respond
to or even acknowledge the majority of e-mailed Press questions.
Diplomatic
sources
tell
Inner
City
Press
that Ban's final, post-lobbying report
is due out. And so, Inner City Press now published a scanned version
of the draft to obtained, both with Paragraph 119 as urged by Morocco
and a proposal
by
the
Office
for
the High Commissioner on Human
Rights, which proposes a human rights mechanism for the UN's MINURSO
mission.
Click here and here.
Even
those
close
to
Ban
say
that the level of pressure -- which Ban has apparently
given into -- was extreme. At the same time, Ban is closely linked
with France in military action in Cote d'Ivoire.
A
day
after
French
foreign
minister
Alain Juppe said that UN Secretary
General Ban Ki-moon agrees that Laurent Gbagbo must sign a letter
ceding power to Alassane Ouattara, Inner City Press asked Ban's
spokesman Martin Nesirky if that is, in fact, Ban's position.
“I don't speak
for the French Foreign Minister,” Nesirky said.
“But you do
speak for the Secretary General,” Inner City Press asked. Is it
Ban's position or not?
Nesirky
would
not
answer,
saying
he
would not characterize the Secretary General's
communications with Juppe. Then he refused repeated requests that he
answer a question about Western Sahara.
Thus
does
the
UN
thumbs
its
nose at transparency and lose credibility, by being used
by France and Morocco, not only in Cote d'Ivoire but Western Sahara
too. Watch this site.
Click for Mar 1, '11
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption
Click
here
for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters
footage, about civilian
deaths
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12
debate
on
Sri
Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis
here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office:
S-453A,
UN,
NY
10017
USA
Tel:
212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile
(and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier
Inner
City
Press
are
listed
here,
and
some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08
Inner
City
Press,
Inc.
To
request
reprint
or
other
permission,
e-contact
Editorial
[at]
innercitypress.com
-
|