As
Clinton Falters,
At UN Talk of
Bolton and
Schaefer, Ban
Silent on
Trump
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS,
November 8-9
-- In New York
City early on
the evening of
November 8,
from the UN on
First Avenue
to Trump Tower
and the
Peninsula
Hotel on Fifth
Avenue (Inner
City Press'
Periscope
video here),
the assumption
was that
Hilary Clinton
would win.
Then Ohio then
Florida then
finally
Pennsylvania
went Trump.
Now what?
Some predict
John Bolton as
Secretary of
State. More
nitty gritty
some wonder if
someone like
Brett
Schaefer might
be UN
Ambasssador.
(The current
UN Ambassador
prepared for a
victory party
- there are no
photos to
mirror those
from the
Javitz
Center).
In Seoul,
South Korea
issued
statements;
from Ban
Ki-moon,
wannabe South
Korean
president,
there was
nothing yet.
Earlier a
Permanent
Representative
told Inner
City Press,
gesturing at
the UN campus,
If Trump wins,
this is all
over. We shall
cover it, in
detail. Watch
this site.
At 2 a.m.,
John "E-mail"
Podesta
said... we'll
have more to
say tomorrow.
Way back
on March 8,
with his back
to the wall
after losses
in Southern
primaries,
Bernie Sanders
scored an
upset win in
the Michigan
primary on
March 8.
It came
after Sanders
grew less
reticent in
linking
front-runner
Hillary
Clinton with
the
deregulation
of banks and
the bailouts
that followed,
increasingly
demanding that
Clinton
release the
transcripts of
paid speeches
she gave at
Goldman Sachs
and elsewhere.
While
most of
Sanders'
program is
understandably
domestic, it
is noted that
in 2006 he was
a co-sponsor
of a consensus
resolution
supporting a
peacekeeping
mission in
Darfur.
(Sanders'
views of the
UNAMID mission
under Herve
Ladsous
covering up
mass rapes in
Tabit, for
example, are
not yet
known.)
Hillary
Clinton, with
her stint as
US Secretary
of State, has
a more
extensive
foreign policy
record, as
reflected in
the released
email Inner
City Press
reviewed, in
mid-February
2016, here.
Back on
January 17,
the Iran
deal's
Implementation
Day, and
mutual freeing
of detainees
including
Jason Rezaian
with the
United States,
inevitably
came up in the
Democratic
Party debate
in South
Carolina,
albeit late in
the
proceedings.
Hillary
Clinton took
credit for the
sanctions on
Iran and
called this
merely one
good day in 36
years. She
cited what she
called Iran's
“bad behavior”
in Yemen --
with no
mention of
airstrikes
including on
Doctors
Without
Borders
facitilities
by the
Saudi-led,
US-supported
Coalition.
Bernie Sanders
cited Goldman
Sachs a half
dozen times,
asking why its
executives are
not in jail
while people
caught with
marijuana are;
he pledged if
President not
to name a
Treasury
Secretary from
Goldman Sachs,
which would be
a change. (Click here
for Inner City
Press' work on
Goldman Sachs
including a
FOIA response
showing the
Federal
Reserve's
solicitude for
Goldman,
offering
merger advice
and
pre-approval
on the
weekend.)
Martin
O'Malley, who
has since
dropped out,
late in the
debate brought
up the
mis-treatment
of Puerto
Rico; earlier
in the
campaign he
wrote an op-ed
about the UN's
impunity for
bringing
cholera to
Haiti. The UN
barely comes
up in these
debates, but
they will have
an effect on
UN
Secretariat.
It is,
however, Obama
who will have
the US' veto
during the
selection of
the Next SG in
2016. Watch
this site.
Back in
December the
Syria
resolution
adopted by the
UN Security
Council after
the closed
door sessions
at the Lotte
New York
Palace on
December 18
was widely
described as
weak or vague
by diplomats
at the UN.
But at
the December
19 Democratic
Party debate
in New
Hampshire,
Hillary
Clinton
repeatedly
cited the
resolution as
a new
beginning.
Clinton took
credit for the
resolution,
saying it grew
out of her
work in
Geneva.
Martin
O'Malley, who
earlier tried
to sputter in
to contrast
Leahy to
Bernie
Sanders, said
we should
“spring-board”
off the UN
Security
Council
resolution.
This
stood in
contrast to
the near
absence of the
UN from the
Republican
debates. There
was at least
one echo:
Bernie
Sanders'
questioning of
regime change
in Iraq, Libya
and now
attempted in
Syria was
similar to the
positions of
Rand Paul and
some others on
the Republican
side. Sanders
also called
out Saudi
Arabia for
making war on
Yemen instead
of ISIS, and
Qatar for its
spending on
the World Cup.
O'Malley used
the “G-word,”
genocide, with
regard to
Chaldean
Christian in
Syria. Inner
City Press
wondered
whether
Africa, other
than oblique
references to
Libya, would
come up in the
Democratic
Party debate,
much less
Burundi. We're
stilll
waiting. Watch
this site.
In the Lotte
New York
Palace Hotel
on December
18, ministers
Lavrov and
Gentiloni,
Fabius and
Kerry passed
through with
entourages; UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon left
early
typically
without
answering any
questions.
Hours later,
the draft
resolution was
agreed to,
then adopted
15-0 by the UN
Security
Council, here.
The US
day ended in a
bilateral
meeting
between
Iranian
minister Zarif
and John Kerry
-- a photo
spray was
canceled --
and a low key
meeting on
Iraq and
Turkey that
we'll report
on next. Now
that the US
has
transcribed
the climax of
Kerry -
Lavrov.
That
Kerry's
spokesman John
Kirby, who ran
the press
conference,
gave the
second
question to
the Washington
Post, and the
third to
Russian media,
was perhaps
understandable.
But the first
question,
Kirby set
aside for “Al
Arabiya.”
The question
quickly turned
into three,
after being
branded for
“UNCA,” now
the UN
Corruption
Association, a
group which
sold seats
with UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon for
$6000 only
earlier this
week.
We now
add: UNCA gave
one of its
prizes, a free
trip to
Turkey, to one
of its Vice
Presidents,
from Agence
France Presse.
Even Kellogg's
prohibits its
employees from
competing for
its prizes.
But not UNCA,
which ignoring
the Iraq -
Turkey meeting
in the
Security
Council was
trying to buy
people with
Prosecco on
December 18,
after selling
seats with Ban
for $6,000.
Several
other UN-based
journalists --
not (only)
this one --
complained
afterward that
the first
question and
attempted
follow up were
a “Saudi
circus” which
made the UN
press corps
look bad -- as
did attempt to
throw out
certain
journalists,
photographers,
from the front
row at the
beginning.
Afterward a
photo spray of
a meeting
between Kerry
and Iran's
Zarif was
declared “by
invitation
only” and then
canceled. In
the Security
Council, with
very few
journalists
still at the
stakeout, the
US presidency
began the
meeting on
Iraq's
complaint
against Turkey
being in its
territory.
We'll have
more on this.
After the vote
inside the
Council Lavrov
said, “The
unanimous
adoption today
on the Council
has created a
broad front on
the basis of
the UN
Charter, on
the basis of
all of those
who are
pushing back
against
terror,
including the
Syrian army,
[some] armed
militias,
parts of the
Syrian
opposition,
and the
Russian air
forces, in
response to
the legitimate
request of the
Syrian
government."
Inside as
Nasser Judeh
of Jordan
spoke, UN TV
cut repeatedly
to Syria's
Bashar
Ja'afari,
looking more
and more
skeptical.
France's
Fabius spoke
briefly and
left. Outside
at the
stakeout, talk
turned to a
Kerry press
conference,
open to all.
Italy's
Paolo
Gentiloni, by
contrast,
scheduled a
press
availability
only for
Italian media.
A wag from the
Free UN
Coalition for
Access asked,
Isn't
Gentiloni the
foreign and
not interior
minister?
Isn't he
running for a
Security
Council seat?
We'll have
more on this.
In the
hotel lobby in
the late
morning a
Permanent Five
member of the
Security
Council's
spokesperson
briefed a
gaggle of
journalists in
the lobby amid
hissed that it
was “off the
record.”
There
was a
gingerbread
model of the
NY Palace
hotel which,
the sign said,
took 300 hours
to make. All
that was
lacking, one
wag - this one
- snarked on
Twitter, was a
little
gingerbread
Laurent
Fabuis.
Back
that UN, the 1
pm stakeout by
the EU's
Mogherini was
postponed and
then canceled.
The Security
Council
scheduled for
3 pm got
pushed back to
4. Inner
City Press
asked Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric if
Ban had
spoken, what
would he have
said? Vine
here.
On December
17, the day
before Syria
talks resumed
at the New
York Palace
Hotel in
Manhattan,
finance
ministers
spoke in the
UN Security
Council about
cutting off
financing for
ISIS. French
finance
minister
Michel Sapin
spoke darkly
of the use of
pre-paid cards
for the
November 13
Paris attacks;
Russia's
Ambassador
Churkin named
two Turkish
companies as
involved in
ISIS oil sale.
Inner
City Press
asked Syria's
Ambassador
Bashar
Ja'afari, who
came to take
questions at
the Council
stakeout,
about ISIS'
oil. He named
Turkey, then
want on to
name Qatar and
Saudi Arabia,
slamming its
“Sunni
coalition”
recently
announced.
When US
Treasury
Secretary
Jacob Lew,
along with
Sapin and the
UK's George
Osborne held a
short press
conference in
the UN
briefing room,
Inner City
Press hoped to
asked Sapin
about pre-paid
cards, and Lew
and Osborne
about Bitcoin.
But the
question, just
four, were
limited to
Reuters, the
Wall Street
Journal, the
New York and
Financial
Times. So it
goes.
It seems there
will be no
Press access
at the New
York Palace;
Ja'afari has
said he will
speak, at the
UN, and
whatever ISSG
press
availability
there is
should be at
the UN, with a
3 pm meeting
on December 18
scheduled.
Watch this
site.
Back on
December 8,
Inner City
Press put thee
questions
to
Turkey's
Ambassador
Cevic. Video
here.
Here's fast
transcript by
InnerCityPro.com:
Inner City
Press: On
Syria, do you
think the
Vienna process
meeting should
take place in
New York on
the 18th? Are
you satisfied
with the Saudi
process for
choosing the
opposition?
Amb Cevik: The
plans, I don’t
know how
fixed, I mean
how clear it
is, but we are
making our
preparations
for the
meeting.
Inner City
Press: Are
there any
groups invited
to Saudi
Arabia that
you think
shouldn’t be
part of the
opposition
delegation?
Amb Cevik: I
think so far,
in our view,
they are
working on the
right concept.
Let’s see if
they succeed.
Having a
coalition
group that
would be able
to take part
in the process
is one of the
most important
things.
Inner City
Press:
[Russia] said
the group that
killed their
pilot should
be put on the
terror list.
Do you have
any view on
that?
Amb Cevik: If
they know the
specifics, I
don’t know.
But to our
knowledge,
there was no
terrorist
organization,
no extreme
Daesh, Nusra,
in that area.
They are the
Turkomens, and
we know them,
they are
moderate
people.
This
may be an
issue. Watch
this site.