| Senate
Questions To Judge Nathan Touch Covid But
Not Call-In Lines, Nothing on Maxwell
Trial
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Dec 15 – The U.S. Senate
Judiciary Committee held a
hearing on December 15
on a number of nominees for
District Court seats, and on
Alison J. Nathan who while
presiding of the U.S.
v. Ghislaine Maxwell
sex trafficking trial has been
nominated for the Second
Circuit Court of
Appeals.
During
jury selection in the Maxwell
trial, one prospective juror
said they could not sit for
two days between Christmas and
New Years Day as their spouse
had bought non-refundable
tickets for a trip.
The juror
was asked to change the plans
and when they didn't, they
were dropped from the
jury.
Notably,
after the ten days of the
government's case, the Maxwell
trial took a three day hiatus.
The reason
was not publicly explained, in
keeping with the redaction in
the case of the flight logs of
Jeffrey Epstein's planes, the
withholding of Maxwell's
witness list, and the
curtailing of the public
call-in line that other
Districts and even some SDNY
judges maintain.
(In full
disclosure, Inner City Press
has written three times to
Judge Nathan on these topics.
The first two letters were docketed
and denied, here.
The third,
citing the Omicron variant of
COVID and the ban on travel
from African countries that
Epstein's plane flew to, with
former President Clinton and
Kevin Spacey, has yet to be
acted on or even
docketed.)
At the
December 15 Senate Judiciary
hearing, none of these topics
came up. Most Democratic
Senators offered only praise.
(Senator Mazie Hirono, to her
credit, asking her standard
question about unwanted sexual
advances.)
Two
Republican Senators asked
about Judge Nathan shaving a
year off the sentence of
William Tucker in 13-cr-378
and questioned it, since he
already had COVID and was
vaccinated.
One of
Judge Nathan's boldest
decisions, to at least
initially grill the
prosecutors for Brady
violations in US
v. Nejad, did not
come up in the Committee, nor
in some recent profiles. Judge
Nathan for her part shouted
by, by name, her SDNY
courtroom deputy Khalilah
Williams.
In DC on
December 15 there were
questions about the Second
Amendment and the place of
international law, citing
Nathan having noted the
presence in the Supreme Court
gallery of a delegation
from China when the
application of the death
penalty was
limited.
But nothing
about the Maxwell case and its
implications; nothing about
court transparency either.
Video of hearing here,
from 1:00 to 1:48.
To some it seemed
strange (some might note that
since big wigs of both parties
are implicated in l'affaire
Epstein and Maxwell, neither
side wants to touch it).
To others, it was
a missed opportunity. We'll
see - watch this site.
***
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a
month helps keep us going and grants you
access to exclusive bonus material on our
Patreon page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|
,
