In UN
Bribery Case
Patrick Ho
Guilty on 7 of
8 Charges
Sentencing
March 14 US
Speaks UN
Silent
By Matthew
Russell Lee, HK
FEDERAL
COURTHOUSE, December 5 – In
the UN bribery prosecution by
the US against Patrick Ho of
China Energy Fund Committee,
both prosecution and defense
did their summations on
December 4. On December 5 at 2
pm the jurors quickly found Ho
guilty on seven of the eight
changes against him: all five
under the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act and money
laundering and conspiracy for
the Uganda scheme with Sam
Kutesa and Museveni but NOT
for money laundering in Chad.
There the payment was $2
million in cash - it was never
laundered.
It was announced
that Ho is scheduled to be
sentenced before Judge Preska
on March 14, 2019, at 10:00
am. Later this statement:
"Manhattan U.S. Attorney
Geoffrey S. Berman said:
“Patrick Ho now stands
convicted of scheming to pay
millions in bribes to foreign
leaders in Chad and Uganda,
all as part of his efforts to
corruptly secure unfair
business advantages for a
multibillion-dollar Chinese
energy company. As the
jury’s verdict makes clear,
Ho’s repeated attempts to
corrupt foreign leaders were
not business as usual, but
criminal efforts to undermine
the fairness of international
markets and erode the public’s
faith in its leaders.”
Assistant Attorney General
Brian A. Benczkowski:
“Patrick Ho paid millions of
dollars in bribes to the
leaders of two African
countries to secure contracts
for a Chinese
conglomerate. Today’s
trial conviction demonstrates
the Criminal Division’s
commitment to prosecuting
those who seek to utilize our
financial system to secure
unfair competition advantages
through corruption and
bribery.”
According to the Indictment,
evidence presented at trial,
and other public proceedings
in the case.
HO was involved in two bribery
schemes to pay top officials
of Chad and Uganda in exchange
for business advantages for
CEFC China, a Shanghai-based
multibillion-dollar
conglomerate that operates
internationally in multiple
sectors, including oil, gas,
and banking. At the
center of both schemes was HO,
the head of a non-governmental
organization based in Hong
Kong and Arlington, Virginia,
the China Energy Fund
Committee (the “CEFC NGO”),
which held “Special
Consultative Status” with the
United Nations (“UN”) Economic
and Social Council." The UN
has yet to act: it has left
CEFC accredited while banning
the Press that reported on it,
and on this
(CEFC moving to violate
Iran sanctions). On December 4
prosecutor Daniel Richenthal
did a rebuttal on both the
Chad and Uganda schemes.
Richenthal tried to
rehabilitate Cheikh Gadio,
saying the money he took from
an unnamed courier from a
businessman was only $20,000
and that Gadio hadn't lied
about it. He emphasized the
emails as evidence and ended
with a photo of Ho with
Uganda's oil minister, looking
at a map of sites. Ho paid to
be there, Richenthal said.
This is what bribery looks
like. Judge Loretta Preska
deliverd a nearly two hour
jury charge, including the
Uganda anti-corruption law
that must mean little, if
Kutesa hasn't been charged
under it. Th jury will
returned at 10 am on December
5, now a Federal holiday in
honor of George H.W. Bush (who
nominated Preska). Defense
attorney Edward Kim urged them
to request and review many
exhibits, and it's to some of
those that Inner City Press
will not turn. Watch this
site. It still seems that the
US does not know if the gift
boxes CEFC brought to Kampala
on its jet included $500,000
in cash. Prosecutor Douglas
Zolkind said it doesn't
matter. But it surely did
matter to Museveni - and to
the Ugandan people, if they
and their votes matter (see,
e.g., Bobi Wine). And it
mattered to the defense, whose
Edward Kim made much of the
$500,000 discrepancy, as well
as calling Gadio a liar. Next
up: Richenthal for the
prosecution, and the charge.
On the afternoon of December 3
the jury charge was agreed to,
after the defense temporarily
argued that "New York, New
York" might not be in
Manhattan and thus in the
Southern District's
jurisdiction.
Prosecutor Daniel
Richenthal said he was ready
to re-open his case to prove
the 60 Wall Street, where
Deutsche Bank is, is in fact
in Manhattan. Defense attorney
Benjamin Rosenberg said, after
a time, "We won't make that
objection. Judge Preska said,
"That's a wise move." She also
asked if the exhibits had been
made available. Inner City
Press replied Not yet, which
remains the case as least as
to it as of 6:35 pm the night
before summations. (Before 9
am Inner City Press had
written requesting particular
exhibits, on which we will
have more.)
Despite
Wednesday's national holiday
in honor of George H.W. Bush
(of whom Judge Preska spoke a
number of times during
Tuesday's down-times), Ho will
on that day be produced
(legalese requiring
translation from the largely
Hong Kong media left) the jury
will deliberate. We'll be
there. There was hardly any
defense, other than the
explosive cross examination of
Senegal's former foreign
minister Cheikh Gadio (who
admitted taking cash from an
undisclosed businessman for
his previous presidential
campaign). The government
finally put into evidence
CEFC's purchase of Apartment
78B in Trump World Tower,
which PGA Vuk Jeremic, Gadio
and others visited. There were
weapons for oil offers
prepared inside the UN. The
jury will be charged on
December 4. on the morning of
November 30 the
prosecution detailed how
CEFC bought UN PGA Sam Kutesa
- and played an audio wiretap
of Ho discussing bribing UN
PGA John Ash with Sheri Yan,
who did jail time in the first
UN bribery case of Ng Lap
Seng. As to Uganda, CEFC
instead of $500,00 case did a
wire transfer - it was
cheaper, through pliant HSBC
bank which also money launders
for Mexican drug cartels - and
there was Ho, in purple like
today, as Museveni's
inauguration. He brought gift
with him - a vase, painting,
what locked to be a clock - to
a dinner at Kutesa's
residence. Then the
prosecution flashed a list of
the times Ho entered the UN -
the UN has that information,
you see, though they refused
to provide it when Inner City
Press asked, as to Francis
Lorenzo, Ho and Carlos Garcia,
preferring to ban Inner City
Press. The prosecution left
for Monday showing the
agreement under which CEFC and
its missing Chairman Ye bought
unit 78B in Trump World Tower.
After a wan cross examination
by Ho's lawyer Benjamin
Rosenberg (Judge Preska
essentially shut him down),
the jury was told they may get
the case as early as
Wednesday, when Antonio
Guterres like his predecessor
will be put up for sale at
Cipriani on 42nd Street. This
week, along with the depths of
UN corruption, revealed how in
China the formal government
has a murky relationship with
quasi state firms like CEFC,
which on the one hand paved
Xi's way into the Czech
Republic and on the other,
tried to get Chad's Deby to
"make" Chinese state oil
company CNPC to get it a piece
of the action, perhaps for the
Defense Committee of the
Chinese Communisty Party,
presumably the sources of the
weapons and drones CEFC was
offering to Deby and others in
Libya and South Sudan. This is
the NGO that Antonio Guterres
has refused to audit and keeps
in the UN while roughing up
and banning Inner City Press.
Kutesa's sale of the UN began
through previous PGA Vuk
Jeremic, who told Kutesa it
would be "win - win" with
CEFC. Then Ho emailed Kutesa's
chief of staff Arthur Kafeero,
whom Inner City Press wrote
about before being banned from
even entering the UN by UNSG
Antonio Guterres. Later Ho did
his emailing with Sam's wife
Edith Gasana Kutesa, who asked
for money to supposedly make
good on an electoral campaign
to pledge help Kutesa's
young constituents (although
she also bragging that Kutesa
had no opposing candidate).
She wrote, Youth are impatient
- so send me the money! Ho
arranged for $500,000 while
pitching Edith on all the
things (and people) CEFC had
bought in Czech Republic...
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold
Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|