UNITED
NATIONS, July
3 -- Voice of
America as propaganda
has belatedly
been covered
by the New
York Times,
but ignoring
the role of
VOA and its
Broadcasting
Board of
Governors as
censors,
trying for
example to get
the
investigative
Press thrown
out of the UN.
The Times
covers the
House of
Representative
bill which
Inner City
Press panned
in April,
focusing on a
split between
the union and
some who work
at VOA.
Alongside the
draft US law
to further
make "clear
that the Voice
of America
mission is to
support U.S.
public
diplomacy
efforts,"
there are
still claims
that VOA
currently is
more
independent
than this.
At the United
Nations, this
has hardly
been the case.
In the spirit
of the 4th of
July we note:
on April 15,
2014, France's
outgoing
Ambassador to
the UN Gerard
Araud told a reporter for what's called
Shi'ite media,
"You are not a
journalist,
you are an
agent."
But VOA's
questions are
no less
directed.
Significantly,
Voice of
America not
only at the UN
but from its
Washington
headquarters,
in a formal
complaint
submitted to
the current UN
spokesman
by editor
Steve Redisch
with the
approval of
supervisor
David Ensor,
asked the UN
to "review the
accreditation"
of the
investigative
Press, click
here for that.
In e-mails
subsequently
obtained by
Inner City
Press under
the Freedom of
Information
Act, the VOA
bureau chief
sought and
said she had
obtained
support for
censorship
from the United
Nations
Correspondents
Association
and the bureau
chiefs of Agence
France Presse
and
Reuters, here,
here
and then
here
(censorship
under the
Digital
Millennium
Copyright Act).
Back on
January 8,
with Voice of
America's
Broadcasting
Board of
Governors still not
having
addressed
censorship
bids by VOA which it oversees, President Obama
nominated to
the BBG
Michael W.
Kempner, a founder
of New
Jersey's
ConnectOne
Bancorp and a
bundler of
campaign
contributions.
We asked and
ask again, why
does the US
government
need a
propaganda
network, and
why turn it
loose inside
the US? And
why would its
BBG, after
first granting
Freedom of
Information
Act access and
fee waivers
then try to
reverse all
this after the
documents
released
proved
embarrassing?
After that,
BBG's FOIA
Officer Andrew
Krog suspended
processing in
the October
2013
government
"funding
lapse;" then
Appeals Access
Committee
chair Marie
Lennon denied
access to any
documents
about taxpayer
funded BBG
programming in
Sudan and
Afghanistan
(see below.)
Back
on July 2,
2013, Inner
City Press published a
short critique
of Voice of
America and
its
Broadcasting
Board of
Governors,
here.
In the
three days
that followed,
mail poured in
providing yet
more detailed
accounts of
BBG and Voice
of America
incompetence
and assaults
on the
principles
they
supposedly
uphold.
The
union that
represents
workers there,
AFGE Local
1812, has written
that
“poor
morale was
made markedly
worse by a
decision in
2010 to
re-appoint the
present
newsroom
director
[Sonja Pace].
A
correspondent
since the
1980’s, she
had been
reassigned
from the
position of
news chief
more than a
decade
earlier. Fast
forward to
2010: An audio
recording of
an open
meeting in
VOA’s newsroom
shows that
strong
protests
against the
reappointment
of the former
news director
were dismissed
by VOA's
Executive
Editor [Steve
Redisch] a
former CNN
employee. In
the recording,
the Executive
Editor
rejected staff
concerns,
saying 'you’re
responsible
for your own
morale.'
Though he has
known of the
morale crisis
in VOA’s
Central News
Division
created by the
2010 decision,
current VOA
director David
Ensor has
allowed this
situation to
continue.”
Inner
City Press in
2012 had its
own experience
of these three
individuals. VOA's
Executive
Editor Steve
Redisch wrote
to the UN
asking that
Inner City
Press' accreditation
be “reviewed.”
The
only
communication
Inner City
Press had
received from
VOA or BBG in
Washington
prior to this
was from Sonja
Pace, that
“regarding
VOA’s Charter
and Code, we
absolutely
stand by those
mandates and
guidelines,
without
exception.”
Apparently
Voice
of America's
principles
don't include
the First
Amendment.
Subsequent
inquiring
under the
Freedom of
Information
Act found
David Ensor
involved in
the decision
to try to get
Inner City
Press thrown
out of the UN.
Ensor served
the US State
Department in
Afghanistan
and perhaps
re-formed his
view of press
freedom there.
In mid
2013, the
Obama
administration
nominated
former
Afghanistan
envoy Ryan
Crocker to
join the then half-empty
Broadcasting
Board of
Governors,
along with
John Kerry,
while claiming
that the
output under
the BBG is
entirely
independent
from the US
government.
This is not
credible.
The
Colombia
Journalism
Review, with
its own
conflicts, has
made
this point,
and BBG has
belatedly
responded.
Will any of
this finally
bring
accountability?
Watch this
site.
, 
