ICP
Asks Yemen
PR of
WFP Ship
Mainport
Cedar, He Cites
Iranian
Military
Equipment
By
Matthew
Russell Lee,
Exclusive
series
UNITED
NATIONS,
February 17 --
The UN
Secretariat's
bungling of
Yemen
mediation has
become ever
more clear,
according to
multiple
sources and
documents
exclusively
seen by Inner
City Press,
see below.
On February
16, Inner City
Press asked
the President
of the UN
Security
Council for
February,
Rafael Ramirez
of Venezuela,
about what
OCHA said in
the Council,
that the
Saudi-led
coalition
diverted a UN
World Food
Program ship,
the MV
Mainport
Cedar, from
Hodeidah to
the Saudi port
of Jizan.
Ramirez said
this had been
discussed and
that the UN's
Stephen
O'Brien is
trying to
clarify it.
On February
17, before the
Security
Council heard
from UN enovy
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed,
Inner City
Press asked
Yemen's stated
Permanent
Representative
to the UN
Khaled
Alyemany about
the WFP ship.
Alyemany said
that that ship
had been found
to have
Iranian
military
equipment. Video here. We'll have more on
this: we have
asked OCHA and
now three WFP
spokespeople
as well.
In
the Security
Council,
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
among other
things said,
"Deep
divisions
persist that
prevent me
from calling
for the next
round of
talks. The
parties are
divided over
whether a new
round of talks
should be
convened with
or without a
new cessation
of
hostilities. I
have not,
unfortunately,
received
sufficient
assurances
that a new
cessation of
hostilities,
should I call
for one, would
be respected."
It had been
said the talks
would resume
in March. What
is the Envoy's
team being
paid for?
Things
have gotten
worse. Inner
City Press is
exclusively
informed that
UN envoy
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed,
he of the
failed talks
and murky
trips to
Dubai, South
Korea and
Japan, has put
at least a
half dozen
no-show jobs
on the UN
payroll, with
the post
holders
getting paid
up to $15,000
a month to
stay in their
homes, in
London, Mecca,
Sweden, Dubai,
Cairo and
Beirut and
do... nothing.
We'll start,
as the first
example, with
the last of
these. Salim
Raad,
previously a
Ban Ki-moon
designated
Libya
sanctions
expert, was
hired by
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
as his
"military
adviser" -- as
the Saudi led
coalition
blasts away
from the air.
Inner City
Press' sources
tell it that
Salim Raad is
in Beirut,
reportedly to
his credit
"depressed" at
how little is
being
accomplished.
But the
paychecks are
still clearing
in Beirut --
as they are in
London, Mecca,
Sweden, Dubai
and Cairo.
Inner City
Press has
heard some
from, and is
open to
hearing more
from, each of
these places.
In New York --
which Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed doesn't
like to come
to because he
doesn't get UN
"Daily
Sustenance
Allowance"
travel pay in
NYC since it
is ostensibly
his
headquarters
-- Inner City
Press on
February 9
asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric why
the envoy was
in South Korea
and Japan.
Dujarric
curtly
confirmed the
envoy was in
South Korea,
"for a
conference."
When Inner
City Press
asked how it
related to his
mandate, the
failing talks
and DSA,
Dujarric
simply pointed
to another,
less critical
correspondent.
Video
here.
On
February 12,
Inner City
Press asked
again about
Japan, and was
told by
Dujarric he
would provide
more
information
after the
briefing. He
hasn't.
As we are now
filling in,
Ismael Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
has the UN
paying top
dollar to
people who are
hardly
working,
chilling in
London and in
one case
Mecca, an
associate of
Hadi. This is
UN money, thus
public money.
The question
is, what will
the UN's
Office of
Internal
Oversight
Services do?
We'll have
more on this.
And
now this -
Inner City
Press is
informed that
the Saudi-led
Coalition hit
with a missile
the UN's own
UNFPA
compound. The
UN should have
complained and
gone public,
but didn't.
Why not?
Because the UN
envoy IOCA has
been told to
stay away
while Saudi
Arabia bombs.
How's that
working out?
On
January 27,
Inner City
Press asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric, transcript here.
Back
on January 19,
Inner City
Press asked
Uruguay's Vice
Minister for
Foreign
Affairs Jose
Luis Cancela,
chairing the
day's Security
Council debate
on Protection
of Civilians,
if the Council
does enough to
protect
civilians in
Yemen,
including
monitoring the
effects of
airstrikes by
the Saudi-led
coalition. Video here.
Cancela
diplomatically
replied that
he was not
there to
comment on
specific
countries --
inside the
Council, there
was much talk
of Syria, a
smattering on
Burundi -- but
turned the
question
toward not
hitting
schools and
hospitals,
both of which
have happened
in Yemen.
Inner
City Press: I
wanted to on
Yemen ask you,
there's been
this pretty
extensively
reported
airstrike by
the coalition
in Sana’a on a
police station
that's
apparently
killed 25
people.
And also IRIN,
previously a
UN affiliate,
has said that
one of its
journalists
was killed in
an
airstrike.
And I wanted
to know, does
the UN… can
they confirm
particularly
the death of
the journalist
Almigdad
Mojalli and do
they have any
comment on it?
Deputy
Spokesman
Haq: We
don't have the
confirmation
that we can
provide, but
certainly we
would be
concerned
about the
killing of any
journalist.
We're aware of
the media
reports in
this case.
So, nothing on
the airstrike
on the police
station, and
non-acceptance,
it seems, of
even the
statement by
Voice of
America, which
has also written
to the UN
against the
Press.
What's wrong
with the UN?
Now
that the
Houthis and
the GPC have
both said they
won't
participate in
any more talks
facilitated by
the UN's
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
-- who insists
on retweeting
praise about
himself after
skipping any
public Q&A
at the UN --
Inner City
Press on
December 28
asked the UN's
lead spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric: "On
Yemen, what is
Ban Ki-moon's
or Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed's
response to
Saleh saying
GPC will only
negotiate
directly with
Saudi Arabia,
and seeming
rejection of
the
UN-faciliated
talks?"
Dujarric
replied at 2
pm on December
28 to another
question,
partial (on
Burundi) then
added: "On the
other issues,
if we have an
update to
share with
you, we will."
So
on Yemen, as
usual, there
is no UN
response.
In the
talks in
Switzerland,
despite the
happy-talk Note to
Correspondents
issued on
December 20,
UN envoy
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
was repeatedly
accused of
merely
operating “for
the Saudis,”
while the
Saudi-led
coalition took
more military
action.
Inner
City Press
intended to
put the
question
directly to
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed,
after UN
Deputy
Spokesperson
Farhan Haq at
the December
22 noon
briefing said
he would be
speaking at
the Security
Council
stakeout after
briefing the
Security
Council.
But after the
Council
meeting, in
which High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights Zeid al
Hussein said
that of harm
to schools and
hospitals, "a
disproportionate
amount
appeared to be
the result of
airstrikes
carried out by
Coalition
Forces" --
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
did not as
promised
appear at the
stakeout.
Last
time he was at
UN
Headquarters,
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
took only
three
questions at
the stakeout,
then went
upstairs to
the clubhouse
of UNCA, now
the UN
Corruption
Association
after selling
seats with Ban
Ki-moon for
$6000 and did
an interview
with the same
pro-Saudi /
GCC media.
So
where did
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
go this time?
Watch this
site.
Inner City
Press on
December 20
reported that
the
UN-facilitated
talks have
been such a
failure that
there is
already a
clamor to
replace Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed. Sources
exclusively
tell Inner
City Press
that among the
names being
mulled is
Germany's
Bettina
Muscheidt, the
European
Union's
Ambassador to
Yemen.
UN
insiders point
to Germany
having lost a
UN post when
Kim Won-soo
replaced
Angela Kane as
Under
Secretary
General for
Disarmament
Affairs. Achim
Steiner was
passed over
for the UN
High
Commissioner
for Refugees
post, in favor
of Italy's
Grandi.
Germany
already "got"
Libya with
Martin Kobler
- why not
Yemen too?
Previously:
Inner City
Press obtained
UN envoy
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed's
documents for
the delayed
talks in
Switzerland,
and
exclusively put
them online
here.
Back
on November
10, while
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon was on
the next to
last day of
his trip to
Saudi Arabia
to discussed
among other
things Yemen,
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric to
confirm that
envoy Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed is not
even IN Saudi
Arabia with
Ban.
Dujarric
confirmed that
he is not
there, but
would not
confirm that
he is in his
native
Mauritania, to
which Inner
City Press is
informed he
flew on the
UN's dime, for
a vacation,
signed off on
by the top of
the Department
of Political
Affairs.
Inner
City Press has
reported from
sources dates
on which the
UN's envoy
went to Dubai,
purpose
UNknown. Given
his follow UN
enovy
Bernardino
Leon's deal
with the UAE,
this must now
be explained
and acted on
by the UN.
Inner
City Press previously
reported
on and
published the
Houthis'
letter denouncing
UN envoy Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
as little more
than a Saudi
tool. Now it's
gotten worse:
even Kenny
Gluck who
works for the
envoy and went
to Muscat
trying to meet
the Houthis
was unable. He
waited then
returned to
Riyadh.
The envoy,
meanwhile, is
said by those
who know him
to not only be
“laughably”
cheap --
putting in for
reimbursement
for an eight
dollar taxi
ride from the
UN to a
Mission on
67th Street,
for example --
but also still
involved in
the same
business for
which Inner
City Press
previously
dubbed him
“the
Fisherman” or
the “Fishy
Envoy.”
He has
traveled on
the UN's funds
to Dubai,
claiming he
would meet the
Houthis there.
Not only will
the Houthis
not meet with
him -- even if
they would,
they would not
be found in
Dubai, given
that the UAE
is part of the
coalition. In
any event, Abu
Dhabi is the
capital, not
Dubai. There
is
something...
fishy.
Now we can
report what UN
sources say
are dates of
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed's
travel to
Dubai: May 11;
June 3 and
June 5; August
1 and August
4; September
12-15; October
9-11; October
26; November
4; and
prospectively
November 10
and November
12.
What
are Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed's trips
to Dubai for?
Given the
UAE's offer to
UN Envoy
Bernarndino
Leon, while he
was UN Envoy
to Libya, this
question must
be answered.
On October
26 Inner
City Press reported
that its
sources
exclusively
told it of
a new low,
that the UN
brought into
Sana'a what
the Houthis
call two
members of US
intelligence,
with the cover
identification
that they work
for the
company
running the
former hotel
now occupied
by the UN.
But, the
sources say,
security in
Sana'a
recognized the
two and they
are now
detained.
On October 30,
Inner City
Press asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
it, video
here, transcript here
and below.
Dujarric
acknowledged
he knew about
two
"contractors."
Meanwhile
on November 2
the US
Statement
Department was
referring
questions to
this
UNresponsive
UN: "We’re
aware of those
reports. Due
to privacy
considerations,
I’m not going
to comment on
them...
I would direct
your questions
to the UN."
After Inner
City Press'
October 26
report and
October 30
noon briefing
questions, on
October 31
Reuters "reported"
a piece citing
an unnamed UN
spokesperson
about two
"contractors,"
with no
mention of the
Houthis claim
they work with
US
intelligence,
which by now
had also been
reported,
along with
Inner City
Press' October
30 Q&A
with Dujarric,
by Al-Akhbar.
But it's
worse. Reuters
initially
(mis) reported
that "'Two
contractors
have been
detained and
the Deputy
Secretary-General
(Jan Eliasson)
is looking
into it,' a
U.N. spokesman
said without
elaborating or
confirming if
the two were
American
citizens."
Then a day
after that,
Reuters blamed
the UN for its
correction to
"'Two
contractors
have been
detained and
DSS
(Department of
Safety and
Security) is
looking into
it,' said a
U.N.
spokesman."
Meanwhile the
Houthis are
denouncing UN
envoy Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmad and his
(mis)
representation
to the
Security
Council
regarding what
they agreed
to. This has
happened
before and the
goal seems to
be delay to
allow for more
air strikes.
There's work
of
mercenaries,
in essence,
including from
Colombia in
Aden, joining
the troops
from
ICC-indicted
Sudan.
A
new level of
dysfunction
was hit with
the deployment
in Aden of
hundreds of
troops from
Sudan, putting
ICC-indicted
Omar al-Bashir
on the same
side as the US
and UK. (Inner
City Press is
exclusively
informed that
"UN" envoy
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
is working on
a similar
Saudi deal
with his
native
Mauritania,
see below.)
Inner City
Press is
reliably and
exclusively
informed that
the Saudis
snubbed
Eliasson,
denying
several of his
meeting
requests and
finally
providing him
only with the
Foreign
Minister, just
before he
left. In Iran,
complaints
against envoy
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
were lodged,
that he does
not have the
trust of the
Houthis. What
kind of envoy
is this? What
kind of UN?
After the UN
Security
Council's
praise of
talks
ostensibly
committed to
UN envoy
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
was not
updated after
Hadi canceled
participation
in the talks,
then the Saudi
led coalition
bombed Oman's
Ambassador's
house in
Sana'a.
The Saudi
Mission to the
UN, doling
out
information
selectively as
always,
tweeted a photo of a
meeting
between its
Ambassador and
the deputy
ambassadors of
Security
Council
members the UK
and US, of the
EU - and UN
humanitarian
deputy
Kyung-hwa
Kang. What did
Kyung-hwa
Kang, if not
the
Ambassadors,
say about the
airstrikes?
The UN's envoy
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed,
after
complaining
about his
leaked email
showing his
marginalization
from Yemen
talks, that
Hadi had
committed to
come to talks.
The Security
Council
praised him in
a Press
statement.
Then Hadi
canceled. It
is similar to
the UN's
ceasefire-that-wasn't,
and the failed
"talks" in
Geneva in
which the UN
never gave the
Houthis passes
to get into
the UN
building,
after allowing
them to be
delayed along
the way so
that Ban never
met them
(while meeting
with an
individual on
the US Al
Qaeda
sanctions
list.)
In many
contexts it's
"three strikes
and you're
out," in this
case faux
ceasefire and
two talks that
never
happened. But
the Security
Council has
not updated
its Press
Statement of
praise; some
members
apparently
simply work
around the UN
envoy. We'll
have more on
this.
On September 5
as airstrikes
on Sana'a
picked up
force, there
was no comment
from the UN or
its envoy
Ismail Ould
Cheihk Ahmed.
Nor on
September 6.
On September
7, the UN
finally spoke
-- not about
the airstrikes
but about a
leak.
On September
8, Inner City
Press asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujrarric if
he was denying
the veracity
of the UN
email Inner
City Press
published,
below.
Dujarric did
not deny it. Video here. Inner City Press on
September 9
asked
Dujarric's
deputy, below,
on September 9
about Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed.
Inner City
Press
exclusively
reported the
following: on
August 27-28
in Muscat, the
US and UK, the
EU Ambassador
to the UN and
Saudi
intelligence,
met with the
Houthis --
without the UN
and its envoy
present, or
even sources
say aware of
the meeting.
These sources
say that the
UN's Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed was on
vacation in
his native
Mauritania,
and was
entirely out
of the loop.
On September
10, Inner City
Press asked UK
Ambassador
Matthew
Rycroft if the
UK had met
with the
Houthis and
GPC in Muscat,
without the UN
Envoy present.
Video
here.
Meanwhile
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
says the same
parties will
now meet with
him. Replay?
On September
9, Inner City
Press asked UN
Deputy
Spokesperson
Farhan Haq, video here, transcript
here.
On August 7
Inner City
Press was
informed that
as Houthis and
Saleh's GPC
headed to Oman
for
consultations
on August 8
and 9, the
UN's
replacement
envoy Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed was not
even initially
invited. He
had to beg to
get included,
which after
sweating has
been allowed,
in the run-up
to his
briefing on
August 12 to
the Security
Council.
On
August 12,
Inner City
Press asked
Yemen
Permanent
Representative,
outside the
Council
meeting,
questions
ranging from
the
destruction of
schools and
health care
facilities in
Sa'ada by
Saudi
airstrikes to
when,
according to
him, the
Houthis might
be "driven"
out of Sa'ana.
Video
here. He
said in a few
weeks - and
added that the
Oman talks
were "not UN."
So
how then might
the parties
negotiate? UN
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric said
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
was headed
back to
Riyadh. That
seems to be
his base,
where he works
from - and
for? Watch
this site.
After
publishing its
multi-sourced
story, Inner
City Press on
July 22 asked
the UN's
Associate
Spokesperson
about new APC
and weapons in
Aden, and if
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
is on
vacation. Video here. She replied that she
would check -
but did not
revert with
any response
either way.
So on July 23,
amid reports
that without
Cheikh Ahmed
or any UN
presence talks
were occurring
about Yemen in
Cairo, Inner
City Press
asked,
here.
On
June 25, Inner
City Press
asked new UN
aid chief
Stephen
O'Brien three
questions
about Yemen:
cholera, the
destruction of
ambulances in
Sa'ada and
about
international
staff. Video
here.
O'Brien
replied that
cholera is a
risk; he had
no information
on WHO it was
that destroyed
the ambulances
in Sa'ada (we
can guess.) On
international
staff, which
the UN
evacuated
earlier, he
spoke of a
rise from 17
to 70, with
the goal of
getting to
200. He would
not say if
they are
anywhere in
the country
outside of
Sana'a, citing
security. But
at least he
spoke - the Free UN Coalition for Access thanked
him.