In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYT,  Azerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, June 7 – UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres lavished praised on Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on March 27, with not a word of the Saudi led bombing campaign that has killed civilians and caused cholera in Yemen. Inner City Press on May 29 asked Guterres' spokesman Stephane Dujarric about the Saudi led Coalition's assault on Hodeida, which the UN had previously said would be a catastrophe but was been quiet about this time. On June 7, Inner City Press asked Dujarric again, UN transcript here: Inner City Press: in terms of Yemen, just in terms of Martin Griffiths and his plan, it seems like the… the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) has called on the Saudi-led coalition to investigate the… a bomb that fell right next to its facility in Sana’a on 5 June.  And I'm just wondering, one, is Mr. Griffiths or whoever here in the Secretariat is looking at this, are they satisfied with the way in which the Saudi-led coalition has investigated and acted on its bombs?  And what's the status of the children and armed conflict report, which I know last year they were upgraded in terms of  their attempts to minimize civilian casualties.  And it looks like NRC is saying these steps are not having any impact.

Spokesman:  Well, the report should be out soon.  The report will be looking at the year of 2017.  Right?  But it will be sent to the Council probably not… next couple weeks, not too long from now.  We have been continuously concerned with the civilian death toll, the attacks on civilians, the attack on civilian infrastructure.  And we have repeatedly called on the coalition and other parties to fully investigate those incidents." Back on June 1 Inner City Press asked UN Security Council President for June Vassily Nebenzia, who said that seizing Hodeida would not accomplish much and that he hoped UN envoy Martin Griffiths would be in Sana'a soon to speak with the Houthis. On June 2 Martin Griffiths landed, perhaps as the velvet glove of the Saudi and UAE military offensive. Shouldn't the UN be providing more transparency, rather than a Secretary General who refuses to answer even budget questions and still restricts the Press?  On June 5, Inner City Press asked Jonathan Allen the deputy ambassador of the UK, penholder on Yemen, about requests to help seize Hodeida. UN video here. From the UK transcript: Inner City Press: As the penholder on Yemen, what do you make of these requests to the US to help with taking over the port of Hodeida. What’s the status of your view of what’s happening on the ground? Amb Allen: "I’ve seen those reports as well. We support everything Martin Griffiths is trying to do to bring about a political solution in Yemen. That’s vital. He will be talking to the parties and he’ll be bringing forward proposals in due course so we wait to see what he has to say about that." And what happens until then? Is Griffiths essentially trying to talk the Houthis into giving up Hodeida? On May 29 in response to Inner City Press' question, Dujarric said, "We are extremely concerned about the situation around Hodeida [and have] already started to take precautionary measures in terms of ramping up assistance and redefining contingency plans in case there is further escalation.Increased fighting would unleash even more internally displaced people." (Agence France Presse AFP wrote it up as if the UN had said it unilateral, a proactive statement - but it was a response to the Press. If the UN was so concerned, why didn't it say anything until asked?) Inner City Press on May 7 asked the Deputy UN Ambassador of the UK, penholder on Yemen and arms seller to Saudi Arabia, a Yemen question on which they were, they said, to revert, see Periscope video here and below. But in three days, there had been no response from the UN Mission of the UK, which this year denied in full Inner City Press' request about Yemen and Cameroon under the UK Freedom of Information Act. So on May 10 Inner City Press asked again, video here. And soon this comment, from a Spokesperson for the UK Mission: “The UK is closely following the situation on the Yemeni island of Socotra. We continue to engage all parties to reinforce Yemen’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, as well as the need for de-escalation. The Yemeni people have already suffered immeasurably as a result of the ongoing conflict in Yemen. Yemen cannot afford further divisions. We call on all parties to the conflict to support the UN-led political process." A day earlier on May 9, the US State Department issued this: "The United States is closely following the situation on the Yemeni island of Socotra and engaging with all parties to reinforce Yemen’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, as well as the need for de-escalation and dialogue.  Political dialogue is necessary for the Republic of Yemen Government to rightfully ensure the safety and security of its residents on Socotra and throughout the rest of the country.  The Socotra archipelago has been designated by UNESCO as a World Heritage site.  The Yemeni people, along with their unique cultural and natural heritage, have already suffered immeasurably as a result of the ongoing conflict in Yemen.  Yemen cannot afford further divisions.  The United States calls on all parties to the conflict to focus on and embrace the UN-led political process, with the unified aim of a safe, secure, and prosperous Yemen." At to the UN, the occasion for the check giving was Guterres accepting a $930 million check for the 2018 Yemen Humanitarian Response Plan. But that's not the only buying going on. Former UN Yemen envoy Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed reportedly went to the United Arab Emirates seeking a paid job like Bernardino Leon got there, negotiated while still with the UN. The UAE is also said to be looking for a place or landing for UN counter-terrorism official Jahangir Khan. Would this be ethical? Inner City Press asked that on April 25, see below - and on May 3 asked about the UAE's deployment on Socotra Island. UN transcript here and below. And while the UN and envoy Martin Griffiths have had nothing to say, now even Hadi is complaining. “The government is considering sending a letter to the United Nations demanding the dismissal of the Emiratis from the Yemeni intervention,” a Hadi official said, adding that "the UAE has occupied the airport and seaport of Socotra island, despite the Yemeni government's presence there. What the UAE is doing in Socotra is an act of aggression." And the UN and its envoy remain silent. On May 7 Inner City Press asked UK Ambassador Allen about it and he said he was not aware, his spokesman would revert. Here's what Inner City Press asked the UN on May 3: Inner City Press: on Yemen, and it's a specific question, the UAE (United Nations Arab Emirates) has deployed some 100 soldiers to Socotra Island, which is a UNESCO World Heritage Site.  And the residents there — it's part of Yemen.  It's not part of the UAE — have been protesting it.  And I'm wondering whether it's something that Mr. Martin Griffiths is aware of and whether he thinks it's a… complies with… even with international law or is a useful step to have the UAE making a military deployment on Yemen Socotra Island.

Deputy Spokesman:  "We haven't made any comment on this.  I'll see whether there's any particular position that Mr. Griffiths is taking.  But his work, as you know, is focused primarily on making sure that the parties to the Yemen peace process get back to the table." Six hours later, nothing from Haq or Griffiths. On April 25 Inner City Press asked Guterres' spokesman Stephane Dujarric, UN transcript here: Inner City Press: There are published reports that the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is seeking to create an offer position to Mr. Jehangir Khan, a current UN official, in the same way that Bernardino León moved from being the UN envoy in Libya to working for the diplomatic one.  It's said that they're seeking a counter-terrorism post for him.  It's also said that Mr. Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed recently visited the UAE and sought a UAE-funded position.  I don't know… can you distinguish… one, would it be against UN rules for a current UN official to be seeking a job…

Spokesman:  First of all, on Mr. Jehangir Kahn, as far as I understand, those reports are false.  Second…

Inner City Press:  Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed.

Spokesman:  …On Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed, he no longer works with the United Nations, so I have no way to verify what his whereabouts are.  And I know that he discharged his role as Special Envoy with complete impartiality and only keeping the interests of the United Nations at the centre of his work.

Inner City Press:  Are there any kind of what's called anti-revolving-door provisions?  Meaning, would the Secretary-General view it as normal and fine if a recent UN official went to work, you could say it's hypothetical, but since it happened in the case Bernardino León, what are the current rules and best practices for UN officials when they leave a UN post?

Spokesman:  I think everyone expects people to use their best judgment.  Evelyn?"

 We'll have more on this.

***

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Search innercitypress.com  Search WWW (censored?)

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2015 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com for