On
Yemen, ICP
Asks Envoy
IOCA About
Kerry Plan,
Hadi's Central
Bank Desire
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 31 --
The UN
Secretariat of
Ban Ki-moon's
bungling of
Yemen
mediation has
become ever
more clear,
according to
multiple
sources and
documents
exclusively
seen by Inner
City Press,
see below.
On August 31
after the UN
Security
Council
meeting in
which envoy
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
and his team
briefed the
Council, Inner
City Press
asked the
envoy for the
UN's view of
Hadi's plan to
move the
Central Bank
from Sana'a to
Aden or
beyond, and if
the Kerry /
Jubeir “new”
plan involved
Hadi. Video
here.
He replied
that the UN
does not
support moving
the Central
Bank, while
chiding the
Houthis and
saying
salaries in
the south
should be
paid. He
praised the
Governor of
the Central,
whom numerous
sources have
plugged to
Inner City
Press has a
possible
replacement
for Hadi.
While
claiming, in
Arabic as
well, that the
Kerry plan is
the same as
his, one is
left
wondering, if
his plan
failed in
Kuwait, is
Kerry just
announcing
more of the
same? This is
something on
which the US
needs to
speak. Watch
this site.
Before the
meeting, Inner
City Press
asked UK
Ambassador
Matthew
Rycroft and
then his
French
counterpart
Francois
Delattre what
the relation
is between the
“new approach”
announced by
John Kerry and
Saudi Foreign
Minister Al
Jubeir and the
Council and
its envoy. Video here.
Rycroft seemed
to indicate
that Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed is
coming up with
his final
proposal --
what was the
last, rejected
one? -- and
Delattre said
the two are
related.
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
went in with
his full team,
the members
and
work-locations
of which we've
previously
named, and
indicated he
will speak to
the Press
afterwards.
Watch this
site.
On August 24,
when Inner
City Press
asked Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
Hadi planning
to move the
Central Bank
to Aden or
beyond, the
spokesman
said... he
hasn't seen
those reports.
How is that
possible? Vine here;UN
transcript
here and
below.
On August 25,
things got
worse. US
Secretary of
State John
Kerry at a
press
conference in
Riyahd with
his Saudi
counterpart al
Jubair said
that the two,
along with the
UK and UAE,
had come up
with a new
plan for
Yemen, and
that Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed would
start working
on it. Who
does he work
for? At the
August 25 UN
noon briefing,
Inner City
Press Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric these
questions, UN transcript
here:
Inner City
Press: I
wanted to ask
you about
Yemen.
Yesterday I’d
asked you
about the
proposal to
move the
Central Bank,
which Oxfam…
many groups
have said… you
said you
haven’t seen
it, so I’m
hoping to get
some response
to it.
But also John
Kerry, in the
last hour or
so, has held a
press
conference in
Riyadh with
Foreign
Minister
Al-Jubeir.
And they’ve
said they have
a new plan,
and it doesn’t
seem to really
involve the UN
or the Envoy,
Ismail Ould
Cheikh
Ahmed.
So I wanted to
know, what is
the
relationship
between the
UN’s
initiative on
this and what
was announced
in Saudi
Arabia…?
Spokesman:
I don’t… first
of all,
unfortunately,
I don’t have
anything for
you on the
Central Bank.
But on the… on
the talks, I
mean, I… we
have to see
what exactly
was
said.
We’ll take a
look at
it. From
what I
understand,
Ismail is
still having
discussions
with various
parties.
So we’ll have
to see how
that’s… that
meshes.
Obviously,
both the US,
the Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia,
GCC, and
others have
been
supportive of
the
talks.
And we hope
that all
parties
continue to be
supportive of
the UN effort.
Inner City
Press:
And just also,
still on
Yemen, this…
you read out
Prince Zeid’s
call for an
investigation,
but I guess I
wondered, if
you can, can
you say… given
the
Secretary-General
removed the
Saudi-led
Coalition from
the list for
the same
crimes that
Zeid… Mr. Zeid
is talking
about in a
wider picture,
does he… does
he have a
message in
terms of…
let’s say
Saudi Arabia
has… or its
allies make
financial
threats to the
UN system
again or to
the UN human
rights
architecture.
What’s the
relationship
between the
decision that
was reached
here by the
Secretary-General
and what he
believes
Prince Zeid
should do
now? It
seems similar…
Spokesman:
I…
Inner City
Press:
It seems
related.
Spokesman:
I’m not sure I
follow
you.
Prince Zeid
has… is… has
stated clearly
his report on
human rights
violations.
The
Secretary-General
fully supports
the High
Commissioner’s
work in all
his areas.
The Saudi-led
Coalition was
removed
temporarily.
If you look at
the annex,
there’s an
asterisk
pending an
ongoing… an
ongoing
review.
I think the
message from
all parts of
the UN is that
there is a
need for
accountability
for those
crimes that
have been
committed
against
civilians.
August 24:
Inner City
Press: the
Hadi
Government in
exile has
announced that
it wants to
move the
Central Bank
either to…
from Sana’a to
Aden or even
out of the
country.
And many
people,
including
humanitarian
groups, are
saying this
will cause,
you know, even
more problems
in terms of
aid.
What does the
UN believe the
Hadi
government
should do and
what's their
response?
Spokesman:
I haven't seen
those
particular
reports.
If I have
something, I
will share
that with you.
Five hours
later and
counting,
nothing. Some
envoy.
In connection
with the
demonstration
in Sana'a, the
Houthi and GPC
side wrote to
Ban's envoy to
say they will
not engage
with him. On
August 22,
Inner City
Press asked
Ban Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric, Beyond the Vine here, UN Transcript
here:
Inner City
Press: I also
wanted to ask
this about
Yemen.
I'm sure the
UN is aware
there was a
pretty large
demonstration
in Sana'a over
the weekend
largely
against the
airstrikes.
And there's
also announced
that the… the…
at least some
part of the
Houthi GNC
side, GPPC
side, have
said they
won't meet
with the Envoy
anymore.
In part,
they're
complaining
about being
banned from
even returning
from the
Kuwait talks
on a plane
through
Oman. So
I wanted to
know, one, was
the Envoy
aware that
some if his
interlocutors
were unable to
return to the
country?
And, two, what
does he say
to--
Spokesman:
The Envoy
continues his
work.
He's meeting
with different
interlocutors.
He met
recently, I
think, with
one of the
deputy Russian
Foreign
Ministers.
So, his work
is
continuing.
We're aware
that, due to
the increased
military
activities,
there were
restrictions
on flights in
and out of
different
parts of… of
Yemen.
We would once
again
reiterate our
call for a
cessation of
the
hostilities,
especially
cessation of
the
airstrikes,
which we have
seen have
caused and
continues to
cause
tremendous
damage on… on
the civilian
population,
both in terms
of directly on
people and on
infrastructure
that people
need… that
humanitarian
workers need
to access… to
access those
in need.
Inner
City Press has
previously
reported
growing calls
to replace
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
after his
failure - and
that one
Permanent
member of the
Security
Council in
particular was
insisted IOCA
remain in his
role. We
hinted it was
neither the UK
nor Russia.
Today
we report it
is the United
States, most
notably
through the US
Ambassador to
Yemen Matthew
Tueller. While
other media
breathlessly
report that
the US is
pulling back
from
supporting the
Saudi-led
coalition's
airstrikes
(and others,
that Ban
Ki-moon might
reverse course
and “get
tough” with
the Saudis),
one wonders
why the US
supports IOCA,
on
transparency
grounds alone.
The US
says it is for
transparency.
Yet UN
official
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
is one of the
UN officials
who refuses to
make any
public
financial
disclosure. Vine here.
Why
does Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed refuse
any public
disclosure?
Well, Inner
City Press was
informed, when
IOCA was Ebola
Envoy, that he
maintained a
fishing
business (and
thus dubbed
him the fishy
envoy). More
recently,
Inner City
Press has
quoted sources
that Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed is
involved in
the luxury
vehicle trade.
While the UN
refuses to
answer basic
questions,
Inner City
Press has been
informed that
two
individuals
stopped in the
compound in
Kuwait where
the failed
talks took
place were, in
fact, involved
in Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed's
luxury vehicle
business. The
lack of
disclosure,
and the
refusal to
answer, only
makes these
questions more
serious. Watch
this site.
The
proposal by
Ban's envoy
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
set as a
prerequisite
the
“withdrawal of
militias and
armed groups
from the
defined
locations, in
Interim
Security
Arrangements 2
(iii), and the
“surrender of
heavy and
medium
weapons” in
Sana'a (Amanat
al-Asima),
Taizz and
Houdeidah.
There's
a vague, even
bracketed
“Political
Dialogue”
including on
“Addressing
the Southern
Question in a
manner which
meets the
aspirations of
the people in
the South and
ensures that
they enjoy the
full benefits
of good
governance.”
The envoy, of
course,
imagined a
central role
for himself.
His failure
has led to
deaths,
abetted by the
decision to
remove the
Saudi-led
Coalition from
the Children
and Armed
Conflict
annex. We'll
have more on
this.
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's deputy
spokesman
Farhan Haq,
who said Ban's
UN couldn't
confirm the
casualties.
Ban Ki-moon
went on leave
after a junket
to Los Angeles
and Calgary -
for his one
day of "work"
in between,
there was
nothing on his
schedule. Tweeted
photo here.
Hours later
Ban issued
another canned
statement,
which InnerCityPro.com
immediately
published here
but which did
not mention
much less
explain Ban
taking the
Saudi led
coalition off
the Children
and Armed
Conflict annex
for Yemen.
Instead,
unnamed Ban
officials have
spun that he
might put
Saudi and the
Coalition back
on. Inner City
Press asked on
August 18, but
there was and
is no there,
there.
Inner City
Press has been
informed in
more detail of
the Saudis'
outreach to
USg Feltman,
including that
officials
immediately
next to Ban
believed there
would be a
fatwa, when
that many not
have come
directly from
the Saudis.
Also,
in light of
Ban's
continued
expressed
support for
his envoy,
that the only
one of the P5
still
supporting him
is the US,
primarily its
Ambassador to
Yemen, and
that in
connection
with Ismael
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed's
automotive
sales
business, two
individuals
were arrested
and questions
in the Kuwait
compound where
the failed
talks
occurred. This
is Ban's
(corrupt) UN.
At the
August 15 noon
briefing Ban's
deputy
spokesman
Farhan Haq
wanly read-out
Ban's
statement form
the night
before, and
insisted that
envoy Ismael
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed is doing
a good job,
this week the
parties are
"consulting."
With air
strikes?
What happened
to Ban
Ki-moon's lead
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric's
claim to Inner
City Press
that Ban's
removal of the
Saudi-led
coalition from
the annex
actually
helped Yemeni
children?
Long
afterward,
after even US
Representative
Ted Lieu
commented, Ban
issued a
statement
which did not
refer in any
way to his
having dropped
Saudi Arabia
from the Yemen
child killer
list for
money. Here is
the full text:
"The
Secretary-General
condemns the
attack,
reported to
have been an
airstrike, on
a school in
the Sa'ada
governorate of
northern Yemen
on 13 August.
The attack
killed at
least 10
children and
injured many
more.
The
Secretary-General
notes with
dismay that
civilians,
including
children,
continue to
bear the brunt
of increased
fighting and
military
operations in
Yemen. He
calls for a
swift
investigation
of this tragic
event and
urges the
parties to
take all
necessary
measures to
prevent
further
violations of
international
humanitarian
lawand human
rights and do
everything in
their power to
protect
civilians and
civilian
infrastructure.
The
Secretary-General
reiterates
that there is
no military
solution to
the crisis in
Yemen.
He calls upon
the parties to
renew --
without delay
and in good
faith -- their
engagement
with his
Special Envoy
for Yemen in
pursuit of a
negotiated
solution."
(Meanwhile,
the Houthi and
GPC delegates
to the failed
talks were
intentionally
delayed in
returning to
Yemen, to try
to avoid
quorom for the
vote on the
new High
Political
Council.
Shameful.)
From Ban's
envoy Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed, little
to nothing is
expected. As
Inner City
Press first
reported,
discussions
are underway
to replace him
- perhaps from
Egypt. But he
still has one,
and only one,
P5 supporters.
And, here's a
hint: it's not
Russia, and
it's not the
UK. Watch this
site.
With the Yemen
talks in
Kuwait run by
Ismael Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
on their last
legs, the UN
Security
Council met on
the topic on
August 3.
While from
what was said
outside the
meeting it
appears the
difference of
opinion about
whether to
only chide the
Houthi / GPC
delegation or
all parties
was between
Russia and the
UK, Inner City
Press is
informed that
as before, the
most
intransigent
pro-Hadi (that
is, pro-Saudi)
member was
Egypt.
Egypt
previously
argued that
the UN Group
of Experts has
no right to
look at the
impacts of the
Saudi-led
Coalition.
This as
Egyptian state
media Akhbar
Al Yom, gifted
with Inner
City Press'
long-time
office by Ban
Ki-moon, has
an invisible
correspondent
Sanaa Youssef
who asks no
questions,
even on
Egyptian
topics. This
is a scam,
that must be
reversed.
At the
August 3 UN
noon briefing,
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's
spokesman
Dujarric why
the envoy IOCA
focused on
military
issues and
only now at
the eleventh
hour says he
might put
forward a
political
proposal.
Dujarric,
garbling an
American
idiom, said
he's against
“Monday
quarterbacking,”
dropping the
word
“Morning.”(The
UN simply
inserted it
into the
transcript,
without
brackets:
Inner City
Press: on
Yemen, just
now before
this briefing,
Ambassador
[Vitaly]
Churkin said
that… that the
Secretary-General's
envoy, Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed, has a…
may have a
political
proposal that
what he
unveiled in
Kuwait was
only a
military
proposal for
the Houthis to
leave cities
and that's
what they
rejected,
which he
seemed to say
was
understandable.
Is there, in
fact, a
political
proposal by
Ismail Ould
Cheikh
Ahmed?
And when is he
going to
present it?
Spokesman:
Well, I think,
you know,
obviously, the
Special Envoy
has a number…
has proposals
and
ideas.
Those will be
first unveiled
and announced
in Kuwait to
the parties,
and I think we
just have to
be a little
patient.
ICP
Question:
But do you… I
mean, if… if
it was a
process of
sequencing, of
going public
with the
military
proposals
before the
political ones
and it almost
resulted in
the breakdown
of the talks,
what do you
think of
that?
Does it make
more sense…?
Spokesman:
What I think
is I'm not
going to, if
you'll excuse
the mixed
metaphor,
Monday-morning
quarterback
and nitpick
the work of
the Special
Envoy.
He is working
in an
extremely
challenging
diplomatic
atmosphere, to
say the
least.
He is in the
lead, and I
will… we will
support his
ideas and his
working
methods.
It's
morning in
America: by
the afternoon,
during the
Council's
North Korea
meeting, US
Samantha Power
issued a
statement on
Yemen, with a
phrase for the
Houthi / GPC
delegation.
Inner City
Press: you
just said in
response to a
question about
the high
profile
diplomats that
Ban Ki moon
has assigned
to the Syria
file. I
want to ask
you about the
Yemen
file.
Most people
are saying…
although it’s
constantly
said from this
podium that
there’s still…
hope remains
alive even as
people walk
away.
Is… Would you
put Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed on the
same
level?
You just made
this
distinction,
you listed
these
illustrious
long-term
diplomats.
Is there a
consideration…
Spokesman:
I do think
that, whether
it is Jamal
Benoma [sic]
who had the
file
previously or
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed,
I think they
are extremely
talented
diplomats and
mediators,
working in
trying to
untangle a
particularly
difficult
situation;
trying to find
a political
way forward
while fighting
is ostensibly
still going
on, and I
think the
point is that
we will
continue our
efforts in
that direction
and we will
not stop.
Now Ban's
bungling and
worse have
become more
public. He put
Saudi Arabia
on the annex
to his
Children and
Armed Conflict
report, for
what it has
done in Yemen.
Then he
reversed
course - and
when slammed
by human
rights groups
and others,
had first his
officials,
then on June 9
did himself,
spin scribes
about how he
had been
blackmailed,
how he had
only sold out
in order to
help
Palestinians
who would be
left without
aid.
On August 2 as
Ban Ki-moon
entered the UN
Security
Council
meeting on
Children and
Armed
Conflict,
Inner City
Press asked
him about what
he had
received from
Saudi Arabia.
Ban did not
answer. Video
here.
Inside
the Security
Council, Ban
claimed that
his dropping
of the Saudi
Arabia-led
coalition from
the annex was
“very closely
considered” --
“After very
careful
consideration,
the Saudi
Arabia-led
coalition was
removed from
the annexes.”
What was so
“very
careful”?
When Ban
Ki-moon came
out of the
Council, Inner
City Press
nearly alone
at the
stakeout asked
him again, Has
Saudi Arabia's
coalition been
permanently
removed? Ban
only waved,
did not
answer. (He's
been known to
oust and
evict, at
least through
his Spokesman
and DPI chief
Cristina
Gallach.)
At the day's
noon briefing
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's
spokesman
Dujarric to
clarify, which
didn't happen
- he wouldn't
even answer
simple yes or
no questions.
But back at
the stakeout,
Inner City
Press asked
Leila
Zerrougui and
she answered
at length,
video here.
On Dujarric's
comment that
the US is not
in the Saudi
coalition, she
referred to a
“Note Verbale”
listing 10
countries.
That seems to
include Egypt,
whose state
media Akhbar
Al Yom's Sanaa
Youssef for
once was
around, as
usual asking
no questions.
That and
previous UNCA
presidency
seems the
basis to try
to use her to
take over
Inner City
Press long
time office,
despite Akhbar
Al Yom not
even complying
with the UN's
stated rules.
Saudi Arabia's
Ambassador
also did a
long stakeout,
denying that
Saudi Arabia
pressured Ban
Ki-moon. Inner
City Press
asked, What
about Jeffrey
Feltman, and
Saudi Foreign
Minister AL
Jubeir
repeatedly
calling him?
He
acknowledged
the calls.
Some
ask, So is it
that Feltman
pressured Ban
on behalf of
the US?
On July 28,
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's deputy
spokesman
Farhan Haq, UN
transcript
here:
Inner City
Press: heard
that in the
talks in
Kuwait on
Yemen that the
Houthi and
[Ali Abdullah]
Saleh side
have announced
that they are
setting up a
high political
council to
essentially
run the
country and
many people
are
interpreting
this as an end
to the talks
in
Kuwait.
Do you have
any comment on
it, and is
there any
discussion in
terms of maybe
seeking a new
UN envoy to be
dealing with
these issues?
Deputy
Spokesman:
We are aware
that Ansar
Allah, the
General
People's
Congress
(GPC), and
their allies
have signed an
Agreement
today
establishing a
Political
Council with
broad
political,
military,
security,
economic,
administrative
and social
executive and
legislative
powers.
The Special
Envoy for
Yemen, Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed, said
that this
development
contravenes
the
commitments
provided by
Ansar Allah
and the GPC to
support the
UN-led peace
process.
The
announcement
of unilateral
governing
arrangements
is not in line
with the peace
process and
endangers the
substantial
progress made
during the
Kuwait
talks.
There is a
clear
violation of
the Yemeni
Constitution
and the
provisions of
the GCC
Initiative and
its
implementation
Mechanism.
I would also
like to recall
that Security
Council
resolution
2216
explicitly
demands that
all Yemeni
parties must
refrain from
further
unilateral
actions that
could
undermine the
political
transaction in
Yemen.
ICP
Question:
Follow-up
question.
Do you… Kuwait
had set a
two-week
deadlines for
the talks to
reach some
kind of
conclusion.
I've heard
that Mr.
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
is asking for
an
extension.
Is that true,
and do you
believe that
Kuwait will
grant
it? And
that's why I
was asking
about the
possible end
of the talks.
Deputy
Spokesman:
Well, I can't
speak for
Kuwaiti
authorities.
ICP
Question:
Are you asking
for an
extension?
Deputy
Spokesman:
But regarding
our side, at
this point the
talks are
continuing.
If there is
any need for
us to ask for
any extension,
we will let
you
know.
But at this
point the
talks have
been
continuing.
Of course,
you've heard
what we have
said about
this latest
development,
however.
Ban is debased
as well. After
being made to
wait 45
minutes to see
the Saudi
crown prince,
on July 13
when Inner
City Press
showed up to
cover Ban's
3:30 pm
meeting with
Saudi foreign
minister
Al-Jubeir, it
was told it
was delayed,
then put over
to the next
day.
On July
13 Inner City
Press came
through the UN
metal
detectors
early, to
cover the 9:15
am rescheduled
Saudi meeting
with Ban.
After being
screened
again, on the
37th floor
Inner City
Press was told
that Al-Jubeir
would again be
late.
Finally the
press was
brought into
Ban's
conference
room. Arriving
were Jeffrey
Feltman, with
whom Inner
City Press has
been informed
and reported
Al-Jubeir
already
engaged to get
off the CAAC
list, Chef de
Cabinet Edmond
Mulet, Deputy
Secretary
General Jan
Eliasson --
who it was
said would
take the
meeting, since
Ban had to
leave on a
trip including
to a meeting
also attended
by
ICC-indicted
Omar al Bashir
-- Leila
Zerrougui,
Andrew Gilmour
and spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric.
After yet more
delay, Ban
emerged from
his office,
said to be
better
air-conditioned
than the rest
of the UN
these days,
and greeted
al-Jubeir
after he shook
hands with
Feltman. Tweeted
photos here and
here.
Ban began some
wooden
comments then
Dujarric
gestured to UN
Security to
remove the
press. Periscope
video here.
At the
elevator, some
Saudi
representatives
were trying to
come in
without any UN
IDs at all.
How did they
get to the
38th floor?
We'll have
more on all
this.
For now,
another money
issue: where
did the funds
for the
expenses of
the parties in
Kuwait,
particuarly
for those from
Sanaa, go?
Members of the
delegation
from Sanaa
speak of
having to
borrow money,
unlike for
previous
rounds in
Geneva.
Inner City
Press has
spoken with
members of the
UN's previous
team in Geneva
voicing these
and other
doubts about
Ismael Ould
Cheikh Ahmed.
Meanwhile
Ban's envoy
Ismael Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
has or had a
larger and
larger team -
and is
failing. Even
the Riyadh
delegation
disagrees with
the rosy
picture IOCA
and Ban's
spokesman
painted, of a
mere hiatus in
progress to be
resumed July
15.
On July 5
before noon
with Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric
present in the
building but
declining to
hold a noon
briefing in
the room from
which he
ordered Inner
City Press to
leave, used as
a pretext to
evict it,
Inner City
Press asked
him:
"For the Yemen
talks in
Kuwait, Inner
City Press is
informed that
delagate(s)
from Sa'ana
did not
receive daily
financial
support while
participating
in the talks;
some took out
personal loans
to
participate.
What was the
budget for
these
UN-facilitated
talks that Ban
visited? What
was the size
of Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed's
team? Why did
delegates from
Sa'ana have to
take out
personal loans
to
participate?"
Three hours
later, with
Dujarric in a
baseball cap
outside the UN
"focus booth"
it must now
use to return
phone calls -
some about Ban
Ki-moon and
corruption -
there was
STILL no
answer or
explanation.
After 48
hours, on July
7 Inner City
Press asked
Dujarric, Video here,UN
Transcript
here:
Inner City
Press:
the question
about Yemen
that I’d asked
you about in
writing on
Tuesday, I
wanted to know
whether the
delegation
from Sana’a, a
number of the
delegates are
saying that,
in the Kuwait
talks, they
received
substantially
less funding
to be
participating
in the talks
than they had
in
Geneva.
In fact, some
of them took
personal…
[inaudible]
Spokesman:
My
understanding
is that the
Government of
Kuwait
provided the
accommodations,
provided the
venue for the
talks.
The UN itself
is not
responsible or
did not
provide DSA
(daily
subsistence
allowance)… is
not
responsible
for providing
DSA for the
delegations.
That’s a
question you
need to ask
the
delegations
themselves.
Inner City
Press:
What’s the
size of Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed’s team
and… and are
they all still
in
Kuwait?
Where are they
now?
Spokesman:
I don’t know…
I don’t think
they’re all
still in
Kuwait,
because the
talks have
been on a
pause for a
little bit.
In the short
period of time
between Ban
publicly
listing Saudi
Arabia and
then reversing
course and
removing them
from the
Annex, what
happened?
Inner City
Press is
informed that
Saudi Arabia's
foreign
minister Adel
al-Jubeir
repeatedly
called the
former (and
perhaps
future) U.S.
State
Department
official who
is Ban's head
of Political
Affairs,
Jeffrey
Feltman, and
told him of an
upcoming
cabinet
meeting.
Feltman told
Ban to drop
Saudi from the
list. The US,
of course,
supports the
Saudi led
coalition.
Meanwhile,
Inner City
Press' sources
tell it,
Houthis are
negotiating
directly with
Saudi, making
the UN talks
in Kuwait
essentially a
sideshow, now
suspended.
The UN
Security
Council is
negotiating a
draft
Presidential
Statement
shepherded by
the UK - now
under Boris
Johnson -
about Yemen.
But Egypt is
representing
the Saudi
view, Russia
going another
way, and the
draft is
stalled.
On June 27,
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's deputy
spokesman
Farhan Haq, UN Transcript
here.
On June 23,
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq
about Ban's
meeting, with
his deputy,
chief of staff
and spokesman,
with the Saudi
Crown Prince
Mohammed bin
Salman bin
Abdulaziz Al
Saud. UN
transcript.
Back on June
10, Inner City
Press asked
Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric to
confirm that
Bangladesh
also
“demarched” or
pressure the
UN to drop
Saudi Arabia
from the annex
-- Dujarric
said yes, the
foreign
minister
demarched --
then asked if
the country,
now or in the
past,
threatened Ban
with the
withdrawal of
its troops
from UN
peacekeeping
missions. UN Transcript.
Many in
Bangladesh
noticed Ban's
already-weak
criticism go
dormant, at a
time when Ban
needed or
wanting
Bangladeshi
peacekeepers
in South
Sudan. Inner
City Press
asked
Dujarric, who
had just
described his
boss Ban as
transparent,
to provide a
list of times
Ban has
changed or
modified
position based
on threats to
withdraw
funding or
peacekeepers.
He
declined, just
as he has
refused to
provide or
even take a
question about
the UN
Handbook for
Security and
Safety
Personnel
alleged
violation of
which the UN
uses as
justification
for
evicting
and censoring
Inner City
Press. Ah,
transparency.
Earlier
on June 10,
the UN Media
Accreditation
and Liaison
Unit told
Inner City
Press it could
not attend a
Western Sahara
briefing in
the UN
Delegates
Lounge to
which it had
been invited.
This is
censorship.
On June
9-10, Inner
City Press was
interviewed
about Ban and
his Saudi flip
flop on BBC
World Services
Newsday, here
from Min 6:18.
At a June 9
stakeout where
Ban did not
take Press
question on
peacekeepers'
rapes and Team
Ban's
retaliation,
Ban said "my
decision to
temporarily
remove the
Saudi-led
Coalition
countries from
the report’s
annex... had
to consider
the very real
prospect that
millions of
other children
would suffer
grievously if,
as was
suggested to
me, countries
would de-fund
many UN
programmes.
Children
already at
risk in
Palestine,
South Sudan,
Syria, Yemen
and so many
other places
would fall
further into
despair." Vine here.
This
means that
countries with
money can, at
least under
Ban, buy their
way off UN
blacklists.
Soon
after Ban
rushed off,
leaving the
audibly
"thrown" Press
question on
retaliation
unanswered,
Saudi Arabia's
Ambassador
showed up.
Inner City
Press asked
him to
disclose what
he had said to
Ban's Deputy.
He would not,
while denying
the threats
Ban attributed
to Saudi
Arabia to
explain his
sell-out.
Inner
City Press
asked Saudi
Arabia's
Ambassador,
for the second
time this
week, about
Saudi use of
cluster bombs
in Yemen. The
first time, he
flatly denied
it, without
equivocation.
On June
9, when Inner
City Press
cited an
admission by
the
Coalition's
spokesperson,
Saudi's
Ambassador
acknowledged
use of cluster
bombs "early"
in the
conflict,
on
military
targets. He
said Saudi
Arabia is free
to use
cluster bombs,
like the US. Video here.
Inner City
Press asked
him to confirm
the Obama
administration
is halting
transfers of
cluster bombs
to Saudi
Arabia; he
said that's
not his
understanding.
Vine
here.
On June 8,
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric, if
he couldn't
deny that
Saudi monetary
threats led to
its deletion
from the annex
(he did not
deny that), to
explain how
this doesn't
discredit UN
human rights
blacklists.
Those on them
just can't
afford to buy
their way off.
At 1 pm on
June 6,
Dujarric told
the press the
report was
"done" and
wouldn't be
changed. Vine
here,
below from
the UN
transcript.
Then at 4:08
pm, Dujarric's
office said
Ban was
dropping the
Saudi led
coalition from
the Annex.
What changed?
On June 7,
Inner City
Press asked
Dujarric, Video here,
So,
money talks.
What does
Ban's reversal
on and for
Saudi Arabia
portend, for
example, for
what for now
his call to
return 80 some
members of the
MINURSO
mission to
Western
Sahara?
At the UN
Security
Council
stakeout on
June 6 after
Ban's
spokesman's
statement,
Saudi Arabia's
Permanent
Representative
to the UN
crowed that he
was sure the
removal was
also
permanent.
Inner City
Press asked
him about the
evidence the
Saudi-led
Coalition has
dropped
cluster bombs
on Yemen. He
flatly denied
it. Video
here. Then
Inner City
Press asked
him about
others on the
list -- most
with many
fewer
resources --
who would like
to get off the
list or get
due process.
He said, We're
off.
On May
9, Inner City
Press asked
Ban Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
Saudi-led
Coalition air
strikes on
Amran, and if
the UN would
admit that the
Houthis have
controlled the
base there
since 2014.
"Not for us to
say, "was the
answer from
Dujarric, who
as it happens
blocks Inner
City Press on
Twitter just
as the UN
Envoy blocks
journalists in
Yemen. Video
here. From the
UN
Transcript.
Earlier,
Inner City
Press asked
Ban Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric to
explain Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed's
repeated trips
to Dubai,
without
answer. Now
we've heard:
IOCA has been
importing
luxury cars
from there
into his
native
Mauritania.
Kicking
the tires,
indeed. He has
STILL not
released the
public
financial
disclosure
that Ban
claims he
urges from his
senior
officials.
Then again,
Ban and his
officials like
USG Cristina
Gallach are
embroiled in
the UN bribery
scandal, and
respond by
evicting the
files of the
critical
Press, video
and petition,
and trying to
hinder
reporting.
We'll have
more on this.
On
April 27,
Inner City
Press asked UN
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
complaints to
his envoy
about
violations of
the cessation
of hostilities
by Saudi
Arabia, and if
a "plenary"
had been
canceled.
Video here, UN transcript
here.
A
month before
the one year
anniversary of
the Saudi-led
Coalition's
campaign of
airstrikes on
Yemen, Inner
City Press
exclusively
published, not
for the first
time, an email
leaked to it
between UN
envoy Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed and UN
Department of
Political
Affairs chief
Jeff Feltman.
As Inner City
Press
subsequently
reported,
Feltman
conducted
questioning --
some called it
a witch hunt
-- of DPA
staff to try
to find out
who had leaked
it to Inner
City Press.
And then the
UN moved to
evict Inner
City Press
from the UN, video here and here.
But
still, the UN
is supposed to
send out its
Yemen news or
statement
beyond its own
"UN News
Center." On
April 20,
Inner City
Press asked, UN transcript
here.
Over the April
23-24 weekend,
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
and the / his
UN News Center
did it again,
here:
"Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed, UN
Special Envoy
for Yemen,
said in a
press release
that
'significant
differences in
the
delegations'
points of view
remain but
nonetheless
there is
consensus on
the need to
make peace and
to work
intensively
towards an
agreement.'"
The
UN's media
practices have
moved from
evicting
independent
critical media
to controlling
like state
media their
own UN
"scoops."
On April 15,
the eve of
eviction,
Inner City
Press asked
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
to respond to
Ali Abdullah
Saleh, to a
large rally on
March 26,
saying he
would not work
with the UN on
anything.
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
replied he
does not
comment on
public
statements,
just the
presence of
Saleh party
members in the
negotiations.
On
March 28,
after
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq had
refused to let
Inner City
Press ask
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed a
single
question at
his length
press
conference at
the UN, Ban's
top lawyer
issued a
threat of
imminent
eviction
threat to
Inner City
Press.
Not
surprisingly,
particularly
given
Feltman's
witch hunt,
some viewed
the UN's
escalation
against Inner
City Press as
a response to
its
publication of
UN leaks.
On
March 29,
Feltman wrote
to Inner City
Press and we
publish it in
full:
"Dear
Matthew,
On
Yemen:
Your job is to
publish what
you consider
to be
news. My
job includes
the protection
of what is UN
sensitive
information.
So we are
naturally
going to be at
odds over
things such as
leaked
e-mails;
that's just
part of the
respective
roles we
play. I
don't blame
you for
publishing
what you had
-- were I a
journalist, I
would likely
do the same --
but you are
surely
sophisticated
enough not to
be surprised
that I would
try to stop
leaks.
As for your
status at the
UN, you are of
course welcome
to continue to
send e-mails
to me, but, as
I expect you
know, others,
not DPA, have
the
appropriate
responsibilities
in this
case.
DPA is not
involved.
Jeffrey
Feltman
Under-Secretary-General
for Political
Affairs
United
Nations, New
York"
Feltman
cc-ed his
spokesman, who
ironically
used to work
at Amnesty
International.
Feltman's
statement that
the
retaliation
against Inner
City Press is
only
attributable
to Cristina
Gallach's DPI
does not wash.
While not
absolving
Gallach, it
goes to the
top. We'll
have more on
this.