In
Yemen, Ban
Ki-moon
Doesn't
Protect UN
National
Staff, Unions
Complain
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, April
9 --
Not only did
UN Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon fail
to call for a
halt or even
pause in the
airstrikes on
Yemen on April
9 -- he has
also failed to
protect UN
national staff
there, UN
staff unions
complain.
"2,000
UN staff and
their families
are trapped in
Yemen as the
civil war
rages on. Some
have been
injured,
others killed.
Staff unions
are doing what
we can to help
our colleagues
in need.
Meanwhile
India has
evacuated
4,000 of its
citizens," the
UN staff
unions say.
[The Staff Union
at the UN
Headquarters
in New York
has
effectively
been broken,
as Inner City
Press has
reported.]
Ban scheduled
a "press
encounter" for
April 9, his
first one this
year in UN
Headquarters
by some counts;
the UN
canceled its
noon briefing.
After bland
open
statements
(one
correspondent
called them
platitudes,
others were
less
diplomatic),
Ban's
spokesman
handpicked
questions such
that the only
question on
Yemen was
whether Iran
could be
condemned for
sending
warships to
the Gulf of
Aden.
Inner City
Press asked,
quite audibly,
Should the
airstrikes
stop? But this
simple
question was
not answered.
And now, what
about the UN
national staff
in the
country?
In fact, Inner
City Press has
been reliably
informed that
when Ban
deigned to ask
the Saudis for
a mere two
hour
humanitarian
pause, they
said only if
Ban more
openly
supported
their
coalition
(which
included, for
example,
Sudan, which
now brags that
Saudi Arabia
has removed
trade
sanctions on
it.)
Then Ban left,
to Panama and
tellingly
Qatar.
It was
surprising to
some that Ban
or his team
did not go
public with
this attempt
to condition
humanitarian
access on a
political
statement.
Why for
example hasn't
outgoing UN
Emergency
Relief
Coordinator
Valerie Amos
spoken out?
Where is her
successor,
Stephen
O'Brien, also
of the UK?
(Inner City
Press'
exclusives on
that UK to UK
hand-over of a
UN post were credited
during the
process by for
example
Channel 4,
and after
by the
Telegraph.)
On Saturday
April 4 an
urgent UN
Security
Council
meeting began
at 11 am, on a
proposal for
Russian draft
resolution for
"humanitarian
pauses" -- and
evacuation.
Nearly an hour
after the
meeting broke
up, April's
Security
Council
president Dina
Kawar of
Jordan came to
the stakeout
and gave a
summary, or
two (as
President and
in her
national
capacity) and
took two
questions,
including one
from Inner
City Press
(the US did
not raise the
issue of
evacuations in
the meeting).
Here's
what
Ambassador
Kawar said as
Jordan's
Ambassador:
“As
you know the
GCC has been
engaged for
some time on a
draft
resolution
that deals
with the
political
situation in
Yemen. We will
continue our
efforts to
reach a
consensus on
that. We
should not
forget the
root causes
that led to
the current
grave
situation and
humanitarian
situation in
Yemen is due
to the failure
of the
implementation
of Resolution
2201 by the
Houthis.”
“We just met.
We have
arranged for
meeting on the
side between a
few members of
the Council
and the GCC,
we are working
on that all
day today. We
hope that by
Monday we can
come up with
something.”
Inner City
Press asked
Kawar if any
UN Security
Council member
raised the
issue of
evacuations.
She said,
evacuations
are under way.
Inner City
Press asked if
the US had
raised the
issue of
evacuations in
the meeting.
She said, No,
the US did not
raise it.
Here
is what
Ambassador
Kawar said as
UNSC
President:
“The
Council met
this morning
upon a request
from the
Russian
delegation.
The Council
members
reaffirmed
their views on
the importance
of the full
implementation
of the
Security
Council's
resolutions on
Yemen in
particular
Resolution
2201. The
Council
members also
reiterated
their concern
over the grave
humanitarian
situation that
Yemen has been
facing for a
while.
“The
Russian
delegation
circulated a
draft
resolution to
the Council
members
regarding
humanitarian
pauses in
Yemen and
expressed
concerns over
the
humanitarian
situation in
Yemen since a
long time. The
Council
members need
time to
reflect on the
Russian
proposal.”
The meeting
ended at just
after noon at
12:30. Saudi
Arabia's
ambassador and
an entourage
arrived
outside the
Security
Council. Inner
City Press
asked him if
Saudi Arabia
has spoke with
the US about
allowing safe
evacuation of
Americans.
Video
here and
embedded
below.
Overall, the
Saudi
ambassador
said that the
GCC draft
resolution is
"more
comprehensive"
than what
Russia
proposed, and
that he hopes
Russia
wouldn't veto
the GCC
proposal. He
said that aid
access should
be coordinated
with the
Secretary
General -- now
though this
exclusive we
know why.
When the
meeting ended,
UK Deputy
Peter Wilson
said he'd
leave it to
the Presidency
- that is,
Jordan's Dina
Kawar - to say
what happened
as a result of
the meeting.
Which was,
very little.
The
UK's Wilson on
his way into
the Security
Council said,
"we continue
to support the
Saudi-led
action in
Yemen... in
response to a
legitimate
request.”
Wilson said,
"any civilian
casualties and
all civilian
casualties are
ones that we
deeply regret.
We remain
fully
committed to
ensuring that
international
humanitarian
law is
complied with
and that
proper access
is given to
agencies who
need to get
access to
grant relief."
So does Saudi
Arabia trying
to condition
humanitarian
access on Ban
Ki-moon making
a statement in
support of the
military
offensive
comply with
international
humantarian
law?
Back on March
30 Inner
City Press
asked the US
State
Department if
any steps are
being taken to
evacuated
Yemeni
Americans.
On March 31 a
State
Department
official
provided Inner
City Press on
background
with this
answer:
"We
have no
current plans
to evacuate
private U.S.
citizens from
Yemen. We
continue to
watch the
situation
closely. The
protection and
safety of U.S.
citizens
overseas are
among our top
priorities."
Some of those
impacted,
including
Yemeni
Americans,
pointed out to
Inner City
Press that
other
countries, as
simply one
example
Pakistan which
is part of the
Saudi-led
coalition,
have done
evacuations.
This has been
followed by
India, China
and
others.
But not (yet?)
the US,
leading to the
campaign
#StuckInYemen.
We'll have
more on all
this.