On
Yemen, UN
Announced
Pause Without
Speaking With
Some Armed
Groups
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, July
10 -- The UN
Secretariat's
bungling of
Yemen
mediation has
become ever
more clear,
according to
multiple
sources and
documents
exclusively
seen by Inner
City Press,
see below. On
July 9, the UN
Secretary
proudly
announced a
humanitarian
pause to start
on July 10 at
midnight.
At
the July 10 UN
noon briefing
in New York,
Inner City
Press asked
Ban Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric if
the UN had
spoken with
those in Yemen
opposing the
Houthis but
not supporting
or in contact
with Hadi. Video here. From Dujarric's
answer, it
seems no such
contact has
been made.
So, Inner City
Press asked,
if such a
group fires on
the Houthis
and they fire
back, is the
pause over,
has it been
violated?
We'll see what
happens.
Back
on July 9,
Inner City
Press asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric, transcript here:
Inner
City Press:
can you, one,
characterize
not the
communications
with Mr. Hadi,
but with Saudi
Arabia that's
running the
coalition, the
Saudi-led
coalition.
And does this
mean the
Secretary-General's
understanding
is no
airstrikes
during this
time period,
and no further
advances or
use of heavy
weapons by the
Houthis?
Does the pause
mean no
firing? What
does it mean
to each of
those two
sides?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
What it means
is that, if
you read the
statement, the
President…
Secretary-General
notes that the
President,
President
Hadi, has
communicated
his acceptance
of the pause
to the
coalition to
ensure their
support.
A humanitarian
pause means no
fighting.
It means no
bombing.
It means no
shooting.
It means no
fighting.
It means
exactly
that: a
humanitarian
pause in the
fighting that
we've seen, to
enable our
humanitarian
colleagues to
get the aid to
where it's
needed, to
preposition,
and stockpile,
and to reach
the millions
that need it.
Inner City
Press:
Right.
But just for
example,
policing,
who's doing
policing in
these various
cities?
Things happen.
Spokesman
Dujarric:
Obviously I
think… [cross
talk] In any
area in the
country, there
is a… there is
de facto
control and,
obviously,
there is a
need to ensure
safety and
security.
What we're
talking about
is a
humanitarian
pause in the
fighting that
we've been
witnessing for
weeks on end
now.
Inner City
Press:
So just one
last thing on
this. So
the commitment
on airstrikes
is through
President Hadi
to the UN?
Spokesman:
You know, the…
[cross talk]
Obviously,
President Hadi
is a critical
interlocutor
with the
coalition.
And as I've
said, we've
taken note of
the fact that
he's conveyed
to the
coalition his
acceptance.
We expect
everyone
involved in
this conflict
to honor this
humanitarian
pause.
On
July 7 the
UN's Office of
the High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights upped
its estimate
of civilians
killed since
March 27 to
1,528, adding
that one
million people
have been
displaced
since the
beginning of
this round of
the conflict.
To the Saudi
airstrike on
UNDP in
Khormaksar,
Aden, OHCHR
added that
"IOM’s Migrant
Response
Centre in
Basateen, also
in Aden, was
struck by a
mortar and an
airstrike
damaged IOM’s
office in
Harad."
IOM, as Inner
City Press
reported, had
earlier paused
its evacuation
by air of
those seeking
to flee Yemen
due to some
party, which
it left
unnamed,
demanding
information
about those
fleeing BEFORE
the flights
could leave.
Inner City
Press has
asked others
in the UN
about this and
has been told
IOM should
have done the
screening
after the
people were
able to flee.
IOM refused a
direct
question about
caused it to
violate this
best practice,
then stopped
sending the
Press any
information.
There are
countries,
normally vocal
about civilian
deaths, which
are selling
military
equipment to
Saudi Arabia
and its Gulf
allies. Ban
Ki-moon, now
in Oslo, is
relying
entirely on
Saudi-selected
replacement
envoy Ismael
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed, who was
unable to even
get the
parties in the
same room in
Geneva, much
less reach an
agreement.
There remain,
for now,
OHCHR's body
counts.
On June 24,
Inner City
Press asked
the UN's
replacement
envoy Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed about
the request by
the Houthis
and others to
meet not with
him but with
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon, who
did not meet
with them in
Geneva.
Transcribed
here.
On June 25
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq to
confirm
receipt of the
letter and if
Ban will meet
them. Haq said
Cheikh Ahmed
is the envoy,
and Ban's
headed to San
Francisco. The
UN Security
Council issued
a Press
Statement, here.
Also
on June 25,
Inner City
Press asked
new UN aid
chief Stephen
O'Brien three
questions
about Yemen:
cholera, the
destruction of
ambulances in
Sa'ada and
about
international
staff. Video
here.
O'Brien
replied that
cholera is a
risk; he had
no information
on WHO it was
that destroyed
the ambulances
in Sa'ada (we
can guess.) On
international
staff, which
the UN
evacuated
earlier, he
spoke of a
rise from 17
to 70, with
the goal of
getting to
200. He would
not say if
they are
anywhere in
the country
outside of
Sana'a, citing
security. But
at least he
spoke - the Free UN Coalition for Access thanked
him.
Here's
from the June
24 stakeout,
as fast
transcribed by
Inner City
Press:
Inner
City Press: On
the parties in
Sanaa
requesting to
meet the
Secretary
General –
what’s your
response?
Cheikh
Ahmed: "This
question was
raised during
our discussion
with the
Houthis, the
GPC and their
allies. The
Secretary
General had
delayed twice
his travel in
order to be
there for the
parties. We
have sent
twice a plane
from Sanaa
which the
delegation
from Sana'a
could not
take..
Therefore the
Secretary
General had a
major
engagement,
which was the
election of
the new
president of
the General
Assembly which
takes place
only once a
year , and he
had to attend
it. But the
Secretary
General will
continue being
engaged on
this."
The ceremonial
elevation of
the President
of the GA who
will take over
in September
was not an
election at
all - no vote
was taken. At
the top,
Cheikh Ahmed
said (again,
as fast
transcribed by
Inner City
Press)
"I
just briefed
the Security
Council on the
latest
developments
in Yemen, with
a particular
focus on the
Geneva
Consultation.
I informed the
Council that
the Geneva
intra-Yemeni
Consultations
are a
milestone...
Despite the
raging battles
and ongoing
violence, and
the dramatic
humanitarian
situation,
Yemenis
accepted the
Secretary
General’s
invitation and
participated
in the
consultations.
"The
personal
presence of
the Secretary
General was an
indication of
the primary
importance
attached by
the United
Nations and
the
international
community, and
in particular
the Secretary
General
himself on the
Yemeni
situation. I
deeply regret
the deep
division
between the
parties and
the lack of
compromise
that prevented
an agreement
that was
within reach.
The holding of
the Geneva
consultation
was itself a
great
achievement in
light of the
extreme
violence
unleashed in
Yemen.
"While
the government
came to Geneva
to seek the
implementation
of Security
Council
Resolution
2216, the
government
acted in a
positive and
constructive
spirit. Both
sides showed
signs of
constructive
engagement.
There is an
emerging
common ground
upon which we
can build to
achieve a
ceasefire
coupled with a
withdrawal.
"While
we pursue a
long term
cessation of
violence, I
call on all
relevant
parties to
agree without
delay to the
humanitarian
truce,
especially
during
Ramadan. We
should not
forget that
Yemenis are
living under
dire
conditions and
it pains me to
witness this
ongoing
suffering. I
call on all
stakeholders
to spare no
effort to help
us achieve a
temporary
respite for
the Yemeni
people.
"I am
aware that
reviving the
political
process will
not be easy.
The Secretary
General and I
have been
clear from the
outset that
this
consultation
was only a
stepping stone
towards the
long inclusive
political
process. All
the parties
affirmed their
commitment to
remain engaged
with the UN in
search of a
peaceful
solution of
the conflict.
I have no
doubt that it
is possible to
build upon
this positive
spirit in the
forthcoming
consultation.
"I
strongly
believe that
the UN
facilitated
intra-Yemeni
consultations
offer the best
chance for
moving towards
a
de-escalation
of the crisis
and a return
to the
political
process. I
personally
believe there
is no military
answer to this
conflict. I
therefore
remain
committed and
will spare no
effort to
achieve a
cease fire and
the swift
return to a
peaceful,
inclusive
political
process."
Before
the meeting,
UK Ambassador
Matthew
Rycroft
stopped and
told the press
of the danger
of famine in
the country,
and of his
hope for a
Yemen Press
Statement from
the UNSC, in
which the UK
is the
"penholder" on
Yemen. Periscope
video here,
replay
including on
desktop for 24
hours.
Inner
City Press was
digging into
the letter
from political
parties IN
Yemen, asking
for a meeting
with Ban
Ki-moon, NOT
with
replacement
envoy Cheikh
Ahmed. These
parties,
including but
not limited to
the Houthis,
were delayed
in getting to
Geneva so that
they could not
meet with Ban
(who while
there DID meet
with a
US-listed Al
Qaeda
terrorist).
While some are
sure to argue
that Ban now
meeting with
the parties
would undercut
Cheikh Ahmed,
others point
out the the
underlying
resolution
speaks of the
Secretary
General's Good
Offices
INCLUDING his
Envoy. The
envoy is not
the only game
in town - nor,
given his lack
of disclosure,
raised by
Inner City
Press, should
he be. We'll
have more on
this.