On
Yemen, Amid
Saudi Airstrikes,
Ban Poised to
Name Fisherman
As New Envoy
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, April
15 --
How weak is
today's UN?
Earlier
this evening,
Inner City
Press reported
that despite
UN Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
claims to
stand behind
the UN's envoy
to Yemen Jamal
Benomar, who
refused to
call Saudi
airstrikes
positive, Ban
was planning
to replace
him.
Now,
after that
Inner City
Press report,
the UN
Spokesman has
just sent out
this:
Note to
correspondents
on Jamal
Benomar
stepping down
as Special
Adviser on
Yemen
Jamal Benomar,
the Special
Adviser to the
Secretary-General
on Yemen, has
expressed an
interest in
moving on to
another
assignment.
A successor
shall be named
in due course.
Until that
time and
beyond, the
United Nations
will continue
to spare no
efforts to
re-launch the
peace process
in order to
get the
political
transition
back on track.
Mr. Benomar
has spent the
past four
years working
closely with
the Yemenis to
realise their
legitimate
aspirations
for democratic
change
fulfilled. On
behalf of the
Secretary-General,
Mr. Benomar
brokered the
Transition
Agreement in
November 2011,
facilitated
the successful
conclusion of
the National
Dialogue
Conference in
January 2014
that took 10
months of
deliberations,
and mediated
the Peace and
National
Partnership
Agreement in
September
2014. More
recently, Mr.
Benomar
chaired and
facilitated
all-inclusive
negotiations
for over two
months to get
the transition
back on track.
Unfortunately,
this process
was
interrupted
with the
dramatic
escalation of
violence.
The
Secretary-General
greatly
appreciates
the tireless
efforts Mr.
Benomar has
made over the
years to
promote
consensus and
trust on a
peaceful way
forward in
Yemen. New
York, 15 April
2015
This is
a new low for
the UN - and
there have
been many.
After Saudi
Arabia started
it airstrikes
on Yemen,
knocking out
electricity
and hitting an
internally
displaced
persons camp,
UN Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon
belatedly
asked Saudi
Arabia for a
two hour a day
humanitarian
pause.
When
Saudi Arabia
said, No,
unless Ban
endorsed the
airstrikes,
Ban never went
public. More
people
suffered, more
people died.
Now Ban has
acquiesced in
the ouster of
his own envoy
to Yemen,
Jamal Benomar
- and is
poised to
accept Saudi
dictates and
name as
Benomar's
successor
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmad,
previously the
deputy chief
of the UN
Support
Mission in
Libya.
There, as
Inner City
Press
exclusively
reported,
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmad
used his
UN-paid time
running a
fishing
business.
Previously, in
Yemen, Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmad was “an
embarrassment,”
as multiple UN
sources put it
to Inner City
Press. But,
hey, whatever
the Saudis
want.
It's
like Ban
accepting
Sudan's PNG of
Jordan's
Za'tari -
except here,
it will be
portrayed a
good thing.
This is
today's UN.
Inner City
Press has been
multiply and
exclusively
informed of
plans to
create
supposedly
"safe
havens"
for UN
national staff
inside
Yemen - even
after the
staff
representatives
said clearly
that
"relocation
inside the
country is not
an option any
more."
Inner
City Press: I
want to ask
pretty
specifically
about this
request by
national staff
of the UN in
Yemen.
They
basically, in
writing,
requested the
evacuation and
they said that
relocation
inside the
country is not
an option
anymore.
And from what
I've seen,
Helen Clark of
UNDP [United
Nations
Development
Program] wrote
back and said,
we are doing
everything we
can consistent
with UN
regulations at
this time and
saying that we
are currently
exploring safe
haven
approaches.
So, I wanted
to know, is
this response
by Helen Clark
only
applicable to
UNDP
regulations?
Has there been
any
discussions
within the
agencies?
And what
regulations
are there that
are holding
back making
the offer of
evacuation and
what safe
haven
approaches
which the
staff union
said are
unacceptable?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
I'm not going
to go into
what Helen
Clark may or
may not have
written.
I did not see
that
email.
All I can tell
you is that
our colleagues
in the
Department of
Safety and
Security
working with
the relevant
agencies,
funds and
programs are
doing whatever
they can to
support and to
keep safe our
staff in
Yemen.
Inner City
Press:
What I want to
understand, is
it a policy
decision by
the
Secretary-General
that no agency
of the system
will evacuate
people?
Is there some
regulation
that prohibits
it?
Spokesman:
I'm not going
to go further
into it.
Yes, sir
As
noted, it
wasn't Ban
Ki-moon who
told UN
national staff
in Yemen that
their plea was
being
rejected, it
was Helen
Clark of the
UN Development
Program, who
answers press
questions at
UN
headquarters
even less than
Ban, while
seeking to
succeed him.
In the six
hours after
the noon
briefing,
apparently the
Secretariat
did not review
Clark's email
or ask that
any of it be
withheld, as
Inner City
Press initial
did. So now
her full
email is
exclusively
here (and
portion
below.)
In the midst
of this, the
UN Security
Council
scheduled an
April 14 vote
on a
resolution
imposing an
arms embargo
on the Houthis
and Saleh
supporters,
with no
commitment to
halt the
airstrikes on
the country.
The resolution
passed and
afterward
Inner City
Press asked
Saudi Arabia's
ambassador
about
evacuating UN
national
staff; this
part, he did
not answer.
The so-called
UN
Correspondents
Association,
rather than
push for
answers or
even just more
Q&A
sessions from
Ban (and
Clark) instead
bragged they
will party
with Ban and
Prosecco --
"UN
Secretary-General
Ban Ki-moon
will attend
for a toast!
Cocktail and
refreshments
to be served:
Italian
Appetizers,
Piadina,
Ravioli,
Dolcini, Red
& White
Wine, Prosecco
and Spirits."
They took and
tweeted photos
of their meno;
it was listed
on Ban's own
"public"
schedule,
after he met
with a
minister from
Burundi who
justified the
killing of
civilians in
2013.
At
the April 10
UN noon
briefing,
which UNCA's
partier-in-chief
attended
without asking
a single
question at,
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric:
Inner
City Press:
Yesterday the
UN staff
unions, with
the plural, I
guess, because
the one in New
York, it's
unclear who
the union is,
basically
raised
questions
about the UN
not making any
move
whatsoever to
either
evacuate or
offer
protection to
national staff
members inside
Yemen.
Farhan said
it's not the
policy to ever
evacuate
national
staff.
But, if it's
unsafe for
international
staff...
the safely
level doesn't
matter what
your passport
is. So,
what's the
UN's thinking?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
I think we're
obviously… our
national staff
is continuing
to work
inasmuch as
they can to
help deliver
humanitarian
aid, which is
critical, and
I think we
honour their
bravery in
doing so in
very
challenging
circumstances.
We are in
touch with
them, whether
it's through
the
Secretariat or
through the
heads of
agencies, to
ensure that
they're as
safe as
possible.
And we're
doing that on
a daily
basis.
And if we have
anything more
to say on
that, we'll…
Inner City
Press:
Does Ban
Ki-moon join
this call by
the
humanitarian
resident
coordinator
for
humanitarian
pause?
Is that…?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
I think I
just… I just
said we
obviously were
urging for
cessation of
hostilities.
I think
that… I
think that
covers it
fairly
broadly.
Inner City
Press:
Have you
conveyed that
to the Saudi
led coalition?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
I think that…
this is a
message that
will be passed
along to… in
the
Secretary-General
and his
contacts and
obviously the
ones our
humanitarian
partners are
having.
In the more
than three
days since,
the UN has
provided no
information on
any evacuation
of its
national staff
from Yemen.
But multiple
sources have
exclusively
provided Inner
City Press
with an email
from Helen
Clark as head
of the UN
Development
Program,
floating among
other things
the idea of
"safe haven"
inside Yemen:
Subject:
RE:
SOS-URGENT-
Request for
Evacuation for
National Staff
of UNDP in
Yemen
From: Helen
Clark,
Administrator,
UNDP
Date:
04/09/2015
01:27PM
To: [REDACTED]
..."At this
time we are
also in
contact with
some Member
States asking
for all to
respect the
neutrality and
non-belligerent
status of UN
premises and
staff.
For national
staff of UNDP
who are
working from
locations
outside Yemen,
we will adopt
a work from
home approach
until we have
reassessed the
situation.
"And, finally,
we are
currently
exploring safe
haven
approaches
within Yemen
for national
staff and
families that
will allow a
place of
greater safety
for you and
allow a return
as soon as
possible of
our
international
colleagues."
Many have
asked, what
are these
"safe haven
approaches,"
and how do
they differ
from "shelter
in place"?
We'll have
more on this.
Ban scheduled
a "press
encounter" for
April 9, his
first one this
year in UN
Headquarters
by some
counts; the UN
canceled its
noon briefing.
After bland
open
statements
(one
correspondent
called them
platitudes,
others were
less
diplomatic),
Ban's
spokesman
handpicked
questions such
that the only
question on
Yemen was
whether Iran
could be
condemned for
sending
warships to
the Gulf of
Aden.
Inner City
Press asked,
quite audibly,
Should the
airstrikes
stop? But this
simple
question was
not answered.
And now, what
about the UN
national staff
in the
country?
In fact, Inner
City Press has
been reliably
informed that
when Ban
deigned to ask
the Saudis for
a mere two
hour
humanitarian
pause, they
said only if
Ban more
openly
supported
their
coalition
(which
included, for
example,
Sudan, which
now brags that
Saudi Arabia
has removed
trade
sanctions on
it.)
Then Ban left,
to Panama and
tellingly
Qatar.
It was
surprising to
some that Ban
or his team
did not go
public with
this attempt
to condition
humanitarian
access on a
political
statement.
Why for
example hasn't
outgoing UN
Emergency
Relief
Coordinator
Valerie Amos
spoken out?
Where is her
successor,
Stephen
O'Brien, also
of the UK?
(Inner City
Press'
exclusives on
that UK to UK
hand-over of a
UN post were credited
during the
process by for
example
Channel 4,
and after
by the
Telegraph.)
On Saturday
April 4 an
urgent UN
Security
Council
meeting began
at 11 am, on a
proposal for
Russian draft
resolution for
"humanitarian
pauses" -- and
evacuation.
Nearly an hour
after the
meeting broke
up, April's
Security
Council
president Dina
Kawar of
Jordan came to
the stakeout
and gave a
summary, or
two (as
President and
in her
national
capacity) and
took two
questions,
including one
from Inner
City Press
(the US did
not raise the
issue of
evacuations in
the meeting).
Here's
what
Ambassador
Kawar said as
Jordan's
Ambassador:
“As
you know the
GCC has been
engaged for
some time on a
draft
resolution
that deals
with the
political
situation in
Yemen. We will
continue our
efforts to
reach a
consensus on
that. We
should not
forget the
root causes
that led to
the current
grave
situation and
humanitarian
situation in
Yemen is due
to the failure
of the
implementation
of Resolution
2201 by the
Houthis.”
“We just met.
We have
arranged for
meeting on the
side between a
few members of
the Council
and the GCC,
we are working
on that all
day today. We
hope that by
Monday we can
come up with
something.”
Inner City
Press asked
Kawar if any
UN Security
Council member
raised the
issue of
evacuations.
She said,
evacuations
are under way.
Inner City
Press asked if
the US had
raised the
issue of
evacuations in
the meeting.
She said, No,
the US did not
raise it.
Here
is what
Ambassador
Kawar said as
UNSC
President:
“The
Council met
this morning
upon a request
from the
Russian
delegation.
The Council
members
reaffirmed
their views on
the importance
of the full
implementation
of the
Security
Council's
resolutions on
Yemen in
particular
Resolution
2201. The
Council
members also
reiterated
their concern
over the grave
humanitarian
situation that
Yemen has been
facing for a
while.
“The
Russian
delegation
circulated a
draft
resolution to
the Council
members
regarding
humanitarian
pauses in
Yemen and
expressed
concerns over
the
humanitarian
situation in
Yemen since a
long time. The
Council
members need
time to
reflect on the
Russian
proposal.”
The meeting
ended at just
after noon at
12:30. Saudi
Arabia's
ambassador and
an entourage
arrived
outside the
Security
Council. Inner
City Press
asked him if
Saudi Arabia
has spoke with
the US about
allowing safe
evacuation of
Americans.
Video
here and
embedded
below.
Overall, the
Saudi
ambassador
said that the
GCC draft
resolution is
"more
comprehensive"
than what
Russia
proposed, and
that he hopes
Russia
wouldn't veto
the GCC
proposal. He
said that aid
access should
be coordinated
with the
Secretary
General -- now
though this
exclusive we
know why.
When the
meeting ended,
UK Deputy
Peter Wilson
said he'd
leave it to
the Presidency
- that is,
Jordan's Dina
Kawar - to say
what happened
as a result of
the meeting.
Which was,
very little.
The
UK's Wilson on
his way into
the Security
Council said,
"we continue
to support the
Saudi-led
action in
Yemen... in
response to a
legitimate
request.”
Wilson said,
"any civilian
casualties and
all civilian
casualties are
ones that we
deeply regret.
We remain
fully
committed to
ensuring that
international
humanitarian
law is
complied with
and that
proper access
is given to
agencies who
need to get
access to
grant relief."
So does Saudi
Arabia trying
to condition
humanitarian
access on Ban
Ki-moon making
a statement in
support of the
military
offensive
comply with
international
humantarian
law?
Back on March
30 Inner
City Press
asked the US
State
Department if
any steps are
being taken to
evacuated
Yemeni
Americans.
On March 31 a
State
Department
official
provided Inner
City Press on
background
with this
answer:
"We
have no
current plans
to evacuate
private U.S.
citizens from
Yemen. We
continue to
watch the
situation
closely. The
protection and
safety of U.S.
citizens
overseas are
among our top
priorities."
Some of those
impacted,
including
Yemeni
Americans,
pointed out to
Inner City
Press that
other
countries, as
simply one
example
Pakistan which
is part of the
Saudi-led
coalition,
have done
evacuations.
This has been
followed by
India, China
and
others.
But not (yet?)
the US,
leading to the
campaign
#StuckInYemen.
We'll have
more on all
this.