Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg NYLJ Fortune 2023, CJR, NY Mag, AJE, Georgia, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



  

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube


UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial



 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



On Discover Merger Fed Ex Parte Met Capital One Redacted FOIA Docs Now Appeal Filed

by Matthew R. Lee

SOUTH BRONX, March 6 – Before Capital One announced and applied to buy Discover, they and their law firm were allowed to meet secretly with the Federal Reserve.

  After they applied late March 20,  Inner City Press submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the Fed. While they granted expedited treatment, they delayed nearly a near before on March 4 dumping over 1000 redacted pages.

  These begin with ex parte meetings between the bank, its law firm and the Fed - telephone calls in February 2024, and a meeting inside the Fed on March 7, 2024 (the Fed waited until March 4, 2025 to disclose this). 1000 page on Inner City Press' DocumentCloud here. 200+ more pages here.  FOIA determination letter here

Inner City Press has filed a FOIA appeal to the Federal Reserve including that "the records are heavily redacted. On this proposed merger in which antitrust harm to consumers is a major issue, the Board has withheld in full for example so-called 'Confidential Exhibit B Additional Information on Competitive Impact.'    In the second file the Board provided on March 4, 2025, pages 119 to 201 are redacted in full.     FOIA expressly mandates that any "reasonably segregable portion" of a record must be disclosed to a requester after the redaction - 5 U.S.C. § 552(b). And see, PHE, Inc. v. Dep’t. of Justice, 983 F.2d 248,252. Likewise, from the communications between Federal Reserve staff and representatives of the bank(s) there are redactions we are challenging on appeal. As simply one example, FRB attorney Lucy Chang received an email from Capital One's outside counsel on March 22, 2024, before public announcement of the merger proposal - after "thanks for getting back to me," an entire paragraph is redacted. In the same chain, "the vmail I left you next week [REDACTED]." These should all be reviewed on appeal.  

On March 3, days after the CFPB dropped its lawsuit against Capital One, the OCC suddenly declared Capital One "Outstanding" under the Community Reinvestment Act. Who's in the  OCC's and Fed's wallet, now?

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2024 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com