| As Prosperity Bids
for Southwest Challenged on
Disparities It Belatedly Unseals
Exhibits
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SOUTH
BRONX/SDNY, Dec 9 –
Amid the Federal Reserve's
proposal to cut 30% of its
regulatory staff, Prosperity
Bank has applied to the Fed to
buy San Antonio-based
Southwest Bank for $269
million.
Fair
Finance Watch on November 7
commented to the Federal
Reserve:
This is a timely first comment
on the application by
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.,
to merge with Southwest
Bancshares, Inc., and
indirectly acquire Texas
Partners Bank.
Fair Finance Watch has
reviewed the just-released
2024 Home Mortgage Disclosure
Act data of Prosperity Bank,
not reviewed in any Community
Reinvestment Act performance
evaluation.
In the state of Texas in 2024,
Prosperity Bank denied 109
applications from African
Americans while making fewer
than half that, 40 loans -
while it made fully 1502 loans
to whites and denied only 904
applications. This is
disparate.
In
Oklahoma in 2024, Prosperity
Bank denied three applications
from African Americans while
making only four loans - while
it made fully 84 loans to
whites and denied only 22
applications. Though lesser
volume, this too is
disparate.
Also for now
consider: "Does anyone else
find Prosperity Bank terrible?
Should I go shopping for
another bank. I don't know if
this is the place to vent
about this, but it seems that
Prosperity Bank is constantly
triggering fraud alerts and
then it's extremely long waits
on customer service calls to
get them restored, and twice I
have had all my cards
canceled" and "I was with them
since they were Legacy Texas
and then Viewpoint and once
Prosperity took over service
completely tanked." Would that
happen to Southwest?
The Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas
responded that "please be
advised that the Board will
not consider the part of the
comment that pertains to a
proposal by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation
(“FDIC”) regarding the FDIC’s
procedures for insured
nonmember bank branch
applications. This part
of the comment is considered
non-substantive, and it does
not relate to the statutory
factors the Board considers in
acting on an application under
the Bank Holding Company Act."
Inner City
Press filed a second comment:
Earlier
this evening Fair Finance
Watch received from the FRB of
Dallas a portion of the
application, noting that a
FOIA request was required for
the rest. We
have FOIA-ed, including
communications:
This is also a request of all
records reflecting this
delegated approval, including
why it is listed as "addition"
in the H2: Prosperity
Bancshares, Inc., Houston,
Texas—to acquire by merger
American Bank Holding
Corporation and thereby
indirectly acquire American
Bank, National Association,
both of Corpus Christi,
Texas.* Approved: October 28,
2025
*Addition
We have courteously been told
"This is a 'Reg Y request
fulfillment' as delineated in
the e-mail – and the Reserve
Bank wished to fulfill this
request as expeditiously as
possible."
But still do not understand
it. The FRB of Dallas also
ruled, in advance, that the
Governors will not consider
the portion of our first
comment about the federal
regulators' reduction of
public notice. FFW
believes that is a
determination that must be
made by the Board, not a
Reserve Bank on a delegated
basis.
Fair Finance Watch has
reviewed the just-released
2024 Home Mortgage Disclosure
Act data of Texas Partners
Bank, not reviewed in any
Community Reinvestment Act
performance evaluation
-
Surprisingly, Texas Partners
lists only a loan to a white
borrower. We are inquiring
into this, as well as into
what the FRB will do with the
CFPB telling DDC it will
receiving no more funds from
the FRB and foreseeably close,
along with the HMDA portal, at
the end of 2025. FFW has
petitioned the FRB on that -
but that is apparently beyond
the scope of this comment (to
be determined by the
Governors).
In the portion of the
Application provided,
Prosperity gushes about its
CRA and fair lending record
without mentioning a 2023
condition imposed by the FDIC
after comments by FFW.
For the record on this
application, this
How has
Prosperity complied - given
that Prosperity is not even
disclosing the condition to
the Federal Reserve, including
on the record application
approved under delegated and
apparently expedited
authority?
On December 9,
Prosperity belatedly removed
its specious claim to
confidential treatment for
exhibits - "The Applicant
provided the Board with an
updated public exhibits
section of the application,
which includes exhibits
previously designated as
confidential.
Accordingly, we are providing
you with the updated public
exhibits volume of the
application pursuant to
Regulation Y." But this is
long after the Fed says its
comment period is closed. So
what's the point?
FFW and Inner City Press have
been deeply concerned about
the rush by the Federal
Reserve to rubber-stamp
mergers by redliners, money
launderers and predatory
lenders. This has been killing
the Community Reinvestment Act
--
We note the
FRS proposal to cut 30% of
supervisory staff.
Really?
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station,
NY NY 10013
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2025 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|