Inner City Press Investigative Reporting from the SDNY Court, the United Nations, Federal Reserve, IMF and beyond
SDNY Courthouse — Inner City Press
In Other MediaFortune 2023, CJR, NY Mag, AJE, CSM  •  Contact us  •  These reports are usually available through Google News and Lexis-Nexis

As CashNetUSA Parent Enova Application Protested Fed Withholds All Questions under FOIA So Appeal

SOUTH BRONX/SDNY, Feb 24 – Amid the FDIC's bid to eliminate public notice of and public comment on branch applications, the Federal Reserve and OCC are entertaining applications by Enova, the parent of high cost lender CashNetUSA, to acquire Grasshopper Bank, already deeply engaged in AI banking.

Fair Finance Watch filed, in January 2026:

  "opposition to the applications of Enova, parent of the high-cost payday lender CashNetUSA, to become a national by seeking to acquire Grasshopper Bank.    To allow a payday lender already fined by the CFPB to become a bank would be a new low. See, CFPB, Press Release, CFPB Fines Repeat Offender Enova $15 Million for Violating Order, Deceiving Customers, and Withdrawing Funds Without Consent (Nov. 15, 2023).

 The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago confirmed receipt and and sent FFW its Additional Information letter - with each and every question withheld. So this FOIA has been filed:

"This is an immediate FOIA request for the AI letter the FRB of Chicago sent to Enova, owner of payday lender CashNetUSA, on its application to acquire Grasshopper Bank.  All of the AI question have been withheld...the entirety of this AI letter should not have been withheld during the comment period.  Here, the Enova AI must released during the comment period, or the comment period extended."

On February 13, still without documents, Enova wrote it bragging that "Enova fulfilled its obligations under the CFPB consent orders referenced in Fair Finance Watch’s letter. Enova paid civil money penalties, provided for customer remediation, and enhanced controls as required by the orders. As a result, the CFPB terminated the consent orders pursuant to its authority under 12 U.S.C. § 5563(b)(3).2- in July 2025  - See Enova's response on Inner City Press' DocumentCloud here

  The Fed on February 24 responded to the FOIA request - by withholding all substantive information. Determination letter here; entirely redacted pages from the Fed here. FFW has commented a second time, after filing a FOIA appeal:

"To allow a payday lender already fined by the CFPB to become a bank holding company would be a new low for the Fed. This, too - the total withholding of all of the Fed's questions to Enova. This FOIA appeal has just been filed; the comment period must be extended:  "On behalf of Fair Finance Watch and Inner City Press and in my personal capacity, this is an immediate FOIA appeal of the Board's February 24, 2026 denial of our February 4 FOIA request the Fed summarized as follows:  the AI letter the FRB of Chicago sent to Enova, owner of payday lender CashNetUSA, on its application to acquire Grasshopper Bank. All of the AI question have been withheld - and should be release[d] during the comment period    Troublingly, all eight pages of the Feb 3 AI letter are entirely redacted, as are all three pages of the January AI letter, except the request for proof of newspaper publication.     The context of this FOIA request is a company charged with predatory lending by the CFPB, and which was fine for non-compliance:  CFPB, Press Release, CFPB Fines Repeat Offender Enova $15 Million for Violating Order, Deceiving Customers, and Withdrawing Funds Without Consent (Nov. 15, 2023).     The public has a right to know what the FRS is asking - and not asking - Enova as it tries to become a bank holding company.    The comment period, set to expire on February 27 (three days after this total withholding of even the FRS' questions) must be extended.    To withhold every single page, while purporting to have "partially granted" the request, is ludicrous - and, separately, games the FRB's annual reporting on its compliance (or not) with FOIA. This appeal must be presented directly to the Governors. Please confirm. Thank you."   Request Submitted Successfully.

See, e.g., Sept 10, 2025: https://www.americanbanker.com/opinion/the-fdic-is-undercutting-a-key-element-of-the-cra  

 But now the Federal regulator(s) blithely propose(s) to eliminate public notice and public comment on banks' proposals to expand.  The above-quoted reasoning is that few comments are filed. So, that is now changing.

More on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.