| Fed Asked PNC Why Response
to FFW Was Late But Accepted It on
Bid for FirstBank
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE,
Oct 28 – As PNC Bank has grown
it has become more disparate
in its lending. After its CEO
Bill Demchak announced a $4.1
billion proposal to buy
FirstBank and bragged, "We
just effectively bought
Colorado," Fair Finance Watch
prepared an early filing to
the regulators demanding
scrutiny and
hearings.
This takes place
as the regulators, led by the
FDIC, are seeking to eliminate
public notice and limit public
comment. See, e.g., American
Banker, Sept 10, 2025, "The
FDIC is taking the 'community'
out of CRA enforcement," by
Matthew R. Lee, here
On
September 13 Fair Finance
Watch filed challenges with
the Federal Reserve and OCC,
and Inner City Press filed
Freedom of Information Act
requests, see below.
Compare OCC
denial of expedited processing
here
to FRB grant of identical
request here
Inner City Press
appealed.
On October 20 the
Federal Reserve belatedly
asked PNC questions, now on
Patreon here
On October 28,
the Fed provided Fair Finance
Watch with its email to PNC
asking why did it did not
respond to FFW's September 18
comment within the time
granted. Instead, PNC late
submitted a breezy letter
saying it "welcomed hearing
from the two commenters who
expressed concerns regarding
the Proposed Transaction:
Matthew Lee, Esq. of Fair
Finance Watch" then citing
15 suborned
letters.
On October 15 the
OCC provided some responsive
documents - but withheld in
full 435 pages, while
providing suborned letters
from supportive commenters who
have PNC on their Board of
Directors (can you say,
conflict of interest) or who
name support. OCC responsive
documents in Inner City Press'
CloudDocument here.
Appeal has been
filed, for action before the
comment period expires or it
must be extended. We'll have
more on this, and on PNC Bank,
NA.
New issues have
arisen that FFW will raise in
its second comment.
From the
filings:
Fair
Finance Watch has long been
concerned about PNC.
Fair Finance Watch has
reviewed the just-released
2024 Home Mortgage Disclosure
Act data of PNC, not reviewed
in any Community Reinvestment
Act performance
evaluation.
In state
after state, PNC for African
Americans has (many) more
denials than originations,
while the opposite is true for
white borrows. The pattern is
striking:
In New
York, where PNC recently and
unceremoniously closed a
deposit facility, PNC in 2024
denied 52 applications from
African Americans while making
fewer, only 28 loans - while
it made fully 289 loans to
whites and denied only 252
applications. This follows the
same PNC pattern and is
disparate.
In
Colorado, which PNC CEO's says
the bank has now "effectively
bought," PNC in 2024 denied 12
applications from African
Americans while making only 17
loans - while it made fully
422 loans to whites and denied
only 244 applications. This is
disparate.
In Arizona, where PNC lists 60
branches and now proposes to
further expand, PNC in 2024
denied 15 applications from
African Americans while making
only 22 loans - while it made
fully 796 loans to whites and
denied only 466 applications.
This is disparate.
There are more states.
There are
many more - including
regarding the debanking the
OCC said will now be
considered in connection with
merger and other applications
- to be addressed at the
requested hearings.
Watch this site.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station,
NY NY 10013
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2025 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|
,
