For Honduras
JOH Trial Was Set April 24 But Now US
Proposes June While JOH August
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell
Book
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Jan 3 – After the
president of Honduras' brother
Tony Hernandez was convicted
of drug trafficking and
sentenced to life plus thirty
years, on April 21, 2022 the
ex-president himself, Juan
Orlando Hernandez, was
extradited to the United
States.
[Espanol aqui]
Inner City
Press which covered the trials
of Tony Hernandez and Giovanny
Fuentes Ramirez immediately published
the unsealed JOH indictment,
which was returned on January
27, 2022 but left under seal.
On October 25,
JOH's October 27 proceeding
was pushed back, to November
15, 2022 - and when it
happened, Inner City Press was
there, and live tweeted,
thread here
and below.
Now on January 3,
2023, the US is asking to
delay JOH's April 24 trial to
mid-June, or to July or August
as the defense requests. His
lawyer had not gotten approved
to view classified
information. From the letter
(full letter here)
"The parties jointly write
with respect to the April 24,
2023 trial date and other
upcoming deadlines currently
scheduled in this matter. The
defense respectfully requests
that the Court adjourn the
trial to a date in July or
August 2023. In light of the
considerations outlined below,
the Government agrees that a
brief adjournment of the trial
date is appropriate, and
believes that an adjournment
to approximately mid-June 2023
is sufficient. The Government
has produced voluminous
discovery materials to the
defense, amounting to over a
terabyte of data, beginning in
June 2022 and continuing on a
rolling basis. The Government
understands that the defense
is in the process of reviewing
this very large volume of
materials. The Government
anticipates that it will
further supplement its
discovery productions to date,
including with classified
materials. The Government
initiated the process for
defense counsel to obtain the
requisite clearances to view
the classified materials in
June 2022 and understands that
defense counsel is in the
process of submitting
necessary forms to obtain his
clearances. The Classified
Information Security Officer
has advised the Government
that, once those forms have
been received, defense
counsel’s clearance process is
expected to take (on an
expedited basis) approximately
60 to 90 days."
On November 8,
the (then-current) lawyer for
co-defendant Mauricio
Hernandez-Pineda Howard Leader
wrote to Judge Castel stating
the MHP "has sought to retain
new counsel but is unable to
do so because he does not have
the funds to do so." He wants
a conference this week, in
light of the January 23 trial
date.
On November 10,
Judge Castel denied the motion
but appointed a second CJA
lawyer, Richard J. Ma and set a
Status Conference for 11/22/2022
at 02:00 PM.
Inner City Press went to the
courtroom on November 22. MHP
was brought in in Essex prison
yellow. He told Judge Castel, in
Spanish, that he lost confidence
in his lawyer, was not getting
the papers, and when he did,
only in English, mostly not
about him.
Judge Castel said that
would be the same with any other
lawyer, that it not the
practices in this Courthouse to
appoint Spanish language lawyers
for Spanish language clients.
The rift, it emerged, opened at
and after a July 26, 2022
virtual proceeding. Leader was
in Puerto Rico; he gently opined
that the Court's questioning
that day may have undermined
MHP's confidence in him. Judge
Castel pointed out, accurately,
that he asks hard questions of
the prosecution, too.
Ma said he has a trial
before Judge Preska on May 15,
2023 - and that it might move
back. Judge Castel nevertheless
set MHP's trial for September
18, 2023, with responses to
motion in limine due June 16,
and a final pre-trial conference
on July 13. We'll see - watch
this site.
From November 15:
OK - #NarcoHonduras case of US
v. Juan Orlando Hernandez,
Inner City Press has been
waiting in the hall with many
who came to Tony's
trial, Juan Orlando
Hernandez is brought in tan
prison uniform, with Angel
Martinez. Now Judge Castel.
All rise!
Assistant US
Attorney: We have made five
productions of discovery,
recording of meeting with
co-conspirators, extractions
from electronics...
AUSA: We also
have drug ledgers... We have
produced a significant amount
of information, in an
abundance of caution. For
classified information, we are
mindful of the February 1
deadline. We will file ex
parte and under seal. Judge:
When?
AUSA: Next
several weeks
Judge
Castel: Trial is set for April
2023. Let me hear from the
defense - I'll set a date for
the government's disclosure of
the government's request to
charge, and a date for the
final pre-trial conference.
Any motions?
JOH's lawyer
Raymond Colon: The discovery
is voluminous.
m JOH's lawyer: I
speak fluent Spanish, but some
of the audio is not clear.
Judge Castel: What type of
motion would that be?
JOH's lawyer.
Some type of audibility
hearing. Also there is a lot
of noise in the jail. We need
newer headphones, theirs date
back to 9/11
Judge
Castel: Get in touch with the
warden of the MDC and dialogue
about what brand and model of
headphones and why you need
them. But with regard to the
recordings, is the US
providing you with draft
translations? JOH's lawyer:
Some, that go back 8 or 9
years.
JOH's
lawyer: My client's English is
not the bad, the summaries are
in English. But there are
omissions in the summaries.
Exculpatory statements, S-O-N
O-F A B-I-T-C-H, I'm being
diplomatic for the record -
these words are not in there,
there is a pattern
Judge: If the
government sees conversation
they intend to use as trial,
they should make the interim
or draft translations
available to you on the
rolling basis, would that
help?
JOH's lawyer:
Maybe but --
Judge: Of course
they would not be the final
translations
Judge Castel: In
my experience, it is common to
have instances where it says
"inaudible." If you are saying
it says, "That SOB," call the
government. Maybe it says "Son
of," then you have have an
intelligent discussion. Let me
hear the balance. JOH's
lawyer: The other issue is the
ability to have access to my
client... The discovery is
voluminous, we have a
protective order. I've kept
all the materials. I don't
leave any of the materials
with him. But he needs to be
able to look at it when I'm
not there
JOH's
lawyer: I think the US is now
going to provide a redacted
copy that I can leave there
with him. I have to say, the
BOP personnel have been very
helpful. But jails have their
own rules we have to abide by.
The basic problem is, they
don't have the cannon fire
JOH's lawyer:
Some of the corrections
officers say they have to
relieve themselves, it's
understandable, but it cuts
out visit short. Or if there's
a situation that requires
reinforcement. It's
frustrating. We've asked for
separation orders,
co-conspirators...
JOH's
lawyer: My client was not
transported by himself. He
felt uncomfortable in that big
a crowd. He is the ex
President of Honduras. Some in
the transport may have been
part of a terrorist group...
JOH's
lawyer: I can bring in my
charger, then it's taken away.
There's been a see-saw back in
force. The lack of the
charger, it implicates the
Sixth Amendment.
Judge Castel:
Charge up your machine in
advance, right?
JOH's lawyer: My
charge only lasts a few hours
Judge Castel: The BOP is in
the Executive Branch, they
report up to the same chain as
the US Attorney. I'm in a
different branch. I cannot
modify their charger rule. I
make sure there is a counsel
at the facility who will
accept communications from
defense lawyers
Judge Castel: I
can't order them to let you
bring your charger in. I have
not idea of the issues. Are
people strangled with the
cords? JOH's lawyer:
There are other cables in the
room they could use to
strangle people. Anyway, I
think that's it.
Judge
Castel: Any suppression
motions? Motions addressed to
the face of the indictment?
JOH's lawyer: No motions, no
sir. Judge Castel: The
government should submit its
request to charge and any
motions then the defense has
to March 31 to respond, with
any motions
Judge
Castel: I've tried 2 cases,
the [Geovanny] Ramirez case,
& the Tony Hernandez. Look
at the jury instructions I
gave, that's my advice.
AUSA: We'll produce 3500
material next month, to end
several months before trial.
Judge Castel: That sounds
unusual & good
AUSA: There
might be several witnesses who
present safety concerns, so we
might wait until closer to
trial.
Judge Castel: By
March 24, 2023 - except for
witnesses they apply for and I
review - and some earlier on a
rolling basis.
AUSA: We move to
exclude Speed Trial Act time
until the date of the trial,
April 24. JOH's lawyer
Colon: I understand. Judge:
Any objection? Colon: No.
Judge: I exclude
time. We are adjourned.
A related case
that was moving toward trial,
on Salguero
Morales and
Ronald Enrique
Salguero
Portillo, with
problems about a witness,
Ardon Soriano -- will not.
Instead, after withdrawing the
Ardon motions after Inner City
Press sought their unsealing,
they were set to plead guilty
on October 6. And they did:
"Minute Entry for proceedings
held before Judge P. Kevin
Castel: Plea entered by Otto
Rene Salguero Morales (6)
Guilty as to Count 1,3 and
Ronald Enrique Salguero
Portillo (7) Guilty as to
Count 1,3."
On
September 19,
2022, JOH's
trial was
pushed back to
April 24,
2023:
"ENDORSED
LETTER as to
(S7
15-Cr-379-10)
Juan Orlando
Hernandez
addressed to
Judge P. Kevin
Castel from
AUSAs Jacob H.
Gutwillig,
Michael D.
Lockard, Jason
A. Richman,
Elinor L.
Tarlow, dated
September 19,
2022 re: The
parties
jointly write
with respect
to the
September 28,
2022 status
conference and
other upcoming
dates
currently
scheduled in
this matter.
ENDORSEMENT:
September 28,
2022
conference is
adjourned to
October 27,
2022 at 2:00
p.m. in
Courtroom 11D.
The date for
the
Government's
CIPA motion is
extended to
February 1,
2023. The
trial date is
moved from
January 17,
2023 to April
24, 2023. Time
is excluded to
April 24, 2023
so that the
parties may
engage in the
activities
described in
the
Government's
letter of
September 19,
2022 and
otherwise
prepare for
trial. SO
ORDERED.
(Signed by
Judge P. Kevin
Castel on
9/19/2022)(bw)
Inner City
Press live tweeted a
proceeding on August 17, 2022,
here
then filed to unseal the
secret motions, response due
August 22, docketed request here.
On Sunday
September 4, before any ruling
on Inner City Press' unopposed
motion to unseal, now they are
seeking to "withdraw" the
motions. But they are judicial
documents. The request: "Dear
Judge Castel, On or about
August 17, 2022, sealed
motions were filed by previous
defense counsel for defendant
Ronald Enrique Salguero
Portillo. The motions were
jointly filed, Mr. Feitel,
attorney for Otto
Salguero-Morales, joined in
the motion on behalf on his
client. Defendant Ronald
Enrique Salguero Portillo
hereby withdraws the sealed
motions filed on his behalf.
Faithfully yours, /s/David
Zapp Attorney for Ronald
Enrique Salguero Portillo CC:
AUSA Kaylan Lasky."
On September 6,
Judge Castel granted the
motion to withdraw, and
dismissed Inner City Press'
application to unseal as moot:
"MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Otto
Rene Salguero Morales (6),
Ronald Enrique Salguero
Portillo (7) on re: [466]
MOTION filed by Ronald Enrique
Salguero Portillo to Withdraw
Document specifically,
previously filed motions.
ENDORSEMENT: Based upon the
decision of both defendants to
withdraw the motion the motion
filed by defendant Ronald
Salguero Portillo joined in by
Otto Salguero-Morales are
deemed WITHDRAWN. The
application to UNSEAL is
DENIED as MOOT. SO ORDERED:
(Signed by Judge P. Kevin
Castel on 9/6/2022). We'll
have more on this.
Some of Inner
City Press' request - which
should be granted as the
motions they now seek to
disappear:
"Dear Judge
Castel: On
behalf of Inner City Press and
in my personal capacity, this
is near immediate request to
unseal, in full or at least in
part, the motions discussed
this afternoon in open court
in the above-captioned
proceeding, which Inner City
Press is
covering.
Outgoing counsel for Mr.
Ronald Enrique Salguero
Portillo, it was said,
submitted a motion on August
3, 2022 regarding alleged
problems with the testimony of
a witness, "Ardon Soriano."
This was apparently followed
up with a second motion
submitted today, August 17,
2022. But neither
motion is contained in the
docket on PACER, nor any
request to file under seal.
The First Amendment to the
U.S. Constitution guarantees
to the public a right of
access to court proceedings.
U.S. CONST. AMEND. I; Globe
Newspaper Co. v. Superior
Court, 457 U.S. 596, 603
(1982). The public’s right of
access is strongest when it
comes to criminal proceedings
such as these, which are
matters of the “high[est]
concern and importance to the
people.” Richmond Newspapers,
Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S.
555, 575 (1980) (plurality
opinion).
This is a Press request that
the filings be unsealed
consistent with Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435
F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006).
Parties such as Inner City
Press and myself have standing
to intervene in criminal
proceedings to assert the
public’s right of access.
United States v. Aref, 533
F.3d 72, 81 (2d Cir.
2008).
This is a request that this
opposition to sealing be
docketed as, for example, took
place in US v. Bright,
19-cr-521 (PKC), and in this
case, regarding Juan Carlos
Bonilla Valladares, on May 11,
2022,, after which Magistrate
Judge Katharine H. Parker
ruled: "The Financial
Affidavit was filed under
seal. On May 11, 2022, Matthew
Russell Lee (“Lee”), a
reporter with Inner City
Press, filed a letter
intervening on behalf of the
public and requesting that the
Financial Affidavit be
unsealed. I find that
the Financial Affidavit should
be unsealed."
The same should happen here.
On May 11, JUAN
CARLOS BONILLA VALLADARES, or
Tigre Bonilla, formerly of the
Honduran National Police, was
presented and Inner City Press
live tweeted it here
On May 10, Juan
Orlando Hernandez was brought
into court to be arraigned.
Inner City Press live tweeted
it, thread here
Back on April 21,
a lawyer filed a notice of
appearance to represent JOH:
Raymond L. Colon of 131
Pugsley Avenue in The Bronx,
with 30 other cases over the
years in SDNY.
On April 22 by
video Colon represented JOH at
his presentment. Inner City
Press live tweeted here
Previously,
Inner City Press asked UN
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres why he supported
already-disgraced JOH in
helping to steal his second
election, by sending a four
person panel with no read-out.
There has still
been no answer from UN
Spokesman Stephane Dujarric -
but Guterres' head of media
access Melissa Fleming has
banned Inner City Press,
ongoing.
On April 21 Inner
City Press posted vlogs in English
and Spanish,
and streamed the DEA press
statement from DC, here.
We will cover JOH's
presentment, arraignment and
trial.
The case is US v.
Juan Orlando Hernandez, et
al., 15-cr-379 (Castel).
***
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a
month helps keep us going and grants you
access to exclusive bonus material on our
Patreon page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2023 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|