| JPM Chase Challenged on
Epstein Files and Debanking But
OCC Denies Hearing on Both
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SDNY
/ SOUTH
BRONX,
Dec 2 – JPMorgan Chase's
apparent enabling of sex
trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein
and Ghislaine Maxwell, as well
as its "debanking," have been
formally raised by Fair
Finance Watch on November 24
to the US Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency,
opposing JPMC's applications
including to open eight
branches while closing in low
and moderate income
communities.
As
the US bank regulators
including the OCC under
Comptroller Jonathan V. Gould
move to limit public notice
and participation in review of
banks' applications for
approvals, and purport to take
seriously debanking and even
banks' enabling of sex
trafficking, this was a test.
On and December
2, the test was failed. The
OCC wrote: " Dear Mr. Lee: The
OCC has decided not to extend
the public comment period.
Your request for a public
hearing did not appropriately
describe the nature of issues
or facts to be presented in
such a hearing. Therefore,
your request for a public
hearing was denied."
But the OCC
loudly claims to take
debanking seriously, and tells
at least one Senator it is
taking the Epstein files and
JPM Chase seriously. Not so
much - no hearing. How can
there be details, for example,
while the files are not yet
unsealed in the SDNY?
To Comptroller
Gould and To Whom it May
Concern at the OCC:
On behalf of Fair Finance
Watch and in my personal
capacity there are timely
comments opposing JPMorgan
Chase NA's branch applications
list below, all of which have
comment periods running
through today November 24 or
later. These comments are
timely.
FFW
has reviewed the Home Mortgage
Disclosure Act data of
JPMorgan Chase NA and finds
that it is deteriorating. For
now, here are JPMC's
nationwide numbers..
Also for
the record on these and all
other JPM Chase applications
before the OCC, now and until
at least the end of the year:
JPM Chase has been exposed as
having enabled sex traffickers
Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine
Maxwell, including a current
Congressional inquiry into
Suspicious Activity Reports it
should have filed by
didn't.
Also, on the
issue of debanking which the
OCC (and Comptroller) have
said they take so seriously,
for the record on these and
all other JPM Chase
applications, consider:
"Strike CEO Jack Mallers said
JPMorgan Chase closed his bank
accounts without a proper
explanation last month,
prompting concerns of
debanking of crypto CEOs.
"Last month, J.P. Morgan Chase
threw me out of the bank,"
Mallers wrote on social media
platform X on Sunday. "It was
bizarre. My dad has been a
private client there for 30+
years." When Mallers inquired
why his accounts were closed,
he said JPMorgan’s only
response was: "We aren’t
allowed to tell you.'"
This is a debanking complaint
to the OCC, on pending
applications - please
immediately confirm receipt,
and take action. Public
hearings are hereby timely
requested
Meanwhile, JPM
Chase NA is moving to CLOSE
branches in low and moderate
income areas. As only one
example - and hereby raised,
along with the request(s) for
public hearings, FFW opposes
this proposed closing by JPM
Chase in a moderate income
census tract, over 80%
"minority" --
South
Holland 370
EAST 162ND
STREET
SOUTH
HOLLAND
IL
60473
Cook
141494A
Note: the
law REQUIRES a hearing or
process on LMI closures. But
the OCC is now violating that
law, on TD Bank as well...
Watch this site.
FFW notes in the
FDIC's pending proposal RIN
3064-AG10, which is mirrored
by other OCC proposal to move
away from even having
applications, and shortening
review times, while
purportedly taken issues like
the debanking herein raised
seriously: "the FDIC has
received a limited number of
public comments in response to
subpart C applications....
Therefore, the FDIC is
proposing to eliminate the
public notice and related
public comment period from
subpart C and to make
conforming changes to subpart
A of 12 CFR part 303 of the
FDIC Rules."
See,
American Banker, BankThink:
"The FDIC is taking the
'community' out of CRA
enforcement," by Matthew R.
Lee, here.
Again, the only enforcement
mechanism of CRA is its
consideration on applications
for deposit facilities:
branches. A hearing is
requested, timely opposition
made.
Thank you for
your attention, /s/ Matthew
Lee, Esq. Executive Director
Fair Finance Watch
Watch this site.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station,
NY NY 10013
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2025 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|