| Sean Combs and
Marriott Were Sued for Assault
of Co-ed Doe Disallowed Now
Threats Recalled
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SDNY
COURTHOUSE,
Nov 4 – At 4:30 pm on
September 16 Inner City Press
was told by its SDNY source to
expect "the big one" - Sean
Combs - the next day in the
courtroom here.
At US Attorney
Damian Williams' press
conference Inner City Press
asked if his office would be
seeking detention - Yes, he
said. Detention memo on
Patreon here.
In the run-up to
the 2:30 pm hearing Combs'
counsel file a bail proposal,
with $50 million bond - filing
on Patreon here.
[Inner City Press
published book / audio book
Diddy Do It? on Sept 20 on
Amazon here]
On mid October a
slew of cases were filed in
SDNY by the Tony Buzbee Firm,
including one by a
then-Brooklyn college student
for sexual assault, including
against Marriott for its
alleged role. Complaint on
Patreon here.
On October 15,
the assigned District Judge
Jennifer H. Rearden ruled that
as complaint by pseudonym it
had to be filed as a
miscellaneous case, citing ECF
Rule 6/14(b) - and dismissed
the case.
On October 23,
the same facts were re-filed
with a motion for pseudonymous
status. Refiled complaint on
Patreon here.
It was was
assigned to Judge Mary Kay
Viskocil (and Magistrate Judge
Aaron)
On October 30,
Judge Vyskocil denied
pseudonymous status and said
if it is not refiled with the
name by November 12 it will be
dismissed. 14 page Order on
Patreon here.
On October 31,
the Buzbee firm filed a notice
of related case to try to get
this Jane Doe combined with a
John Doe / Royal Reigns case
about 2021 that Judge J. Paul
Oekten accepted and set a
February 18, 2025 conference
in.
On November 1,
Judge Vyskocil denied it:
"DENIED treatment as related
to Case No. 24-cv-07772 (JPO).
See Rule 13 of the SDNY Rules
for the Division of Business
Among District Judges."
On November 4, a
request for reconsideration
reference a still unfiled
declaration by Jane Doe, that
"three years after she was
raped, her friend was
contacted through Facebook by
someone who appeared to work
for defendant Combs [who]
believed that Plaintiff's
friend had been talking to the
police and they threatened her
life unless she agreed to
'stop talking.'"
More on X for
Subscribers here
& Substack here
The criminal case
is USA v. Combs, 1:24-cr-542
(Subramanian). This case was
Jane Doe v. Combs, et al.,
24-cv-7769 (Readden)
Then it became 24-mc-478
(Swain)
Now the substance
is Jane Doe v. Combs,
24-cv-8054 (Vyskocil)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station,
NY NY 10013
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2024 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|
,
