Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Charged With Helping Deripaska Sanctions Bust Bardakova Disentitled to Motion to Dismiss

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon

SDNY COURTHOUSE, July 25 – Oleg Deripaska and three others were indicted on September 28, 2022, for violating the US OFAC sanctions imposed on him April 6, 2018 with regard to Russia's actions in Ukraine.

 On September 29, co-defendant Olga Shriki, charged with selling a music studio and other sanctions-busting for Deripaska, was arrested.

 On November 15, 2022, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge P. Kevin Castel held an in-person arraignment. Inner City Press went and covered it, with only three other people in the courtroom gallery.   

A year later in November 2023, with co-defendant Natalia Bardakova in Russia, she moved to dismiss on venue and other grounds.

On December 27, the US Attorney's Office opposed the motions, saying as a fugitive she is "disentitled" to move to dismiss, and distinguishing the 2d Circuit's decision in Bescond who, they say, was "never here" in the US, unlike Bardakova. 41-page filing on Patreon here

On July 25, 2024, Judge Castel denied Bardakova's motion to dismiss based on the doctrine of disentitlement: "
Bardakova’s fugitive status means that it is unlikely that any decision rendered against her will be enforced; the “gravamen of [her] petition is the posture of heads I win, tails you’ll never find me.” Gao v. Gonzales, 481 F.3d 173, 177 (2d Cir. 2007) (internal quotation omitted). She resides in Russia, has not submitted to the Court’s jurisdiction, and an adverse ruling would not affect her. Second, she has flouted the judicial process and exhibited disrespect for the laws of the United States. She allegedly entered the United States to assist Deripaska in evading lawfully imposed sanctions, did in fact assist Deripaska in doing so, lied to FBI Special Agents, and promptly returned to Russia once she became aware that her conduct attracted the attention of law enforcement."

The case is US v. Deripaska, et al., 22-cr-518 (Castel)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 130222, NY NY 10013

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2024 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com