| As Epstein Victim Jane Doe
3 Sues Indyke Counsel Says Watch
Out Because Press Present
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SDNY
COURTHOUSE,
Dec 20 – Jane Doe 3 sued
Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer
Darren Indyke and accountant
Richard Kahn for their role in
Epstein's rape, sexual assault
and sex
trafficking.
On
November 6, U.S. District
Court for the Southern
District of New York Judge
Arun Subramanian held a public
proceeding, and Inner City
Press live tweeted it. From
the thread:
Judge
Subramanian: OK, we'll address
the request to depose Doe's
husband
Plaintiff's
lawyer: Ms. Doe does not want
her husband to know about
this. So we are willing at
trial to drop claims having to
do with harm to the marriage.
Jane Doe had not told
anyone...
Judge:
Defendants, what do you want
to ask?
Defense counsel:
He dated her before the
Epstein time, before her
return to [voluntarily
redacted here - see Substack
below the line here].
They got married in 2017,
these alleged incidents took
place in 2014.
Defense lawyer:
We got copies of her texts to
her now-husband, he had moved
to
[voluntarily
redacted here
- see Substack
below the line
here].
Jane Doe 3 appeared to be
having a fine time with
Epstein, Broadway shows and
the like.
Substack here
On December 20,
more bristling at
transparency, thread:
OK - now covering
Jeffrey Epstein-related case
of Doe v. Indyke et al. It
began with counsel
highlighting presence of Inner
City Press to the Judge's
courtroom deputy, who rightly
said, It is not currently
sealed?
While waiting to
see if counsel would ask Judge
Subramanian to seal, looked up
some caselaw, 2d Circuit 2013.
But not necessary - counsel
only says to others, remember
the Press is present. Judge:
Have you resolved the
discovery disputes? Plaintiffs
lawyer: Mostly
Plaintiffs
lawyer: There is a Ghislaine
Maxwell database.. There are
still non-privileged documents
in their log. Mr. Kahn's and
Mr. Indkye's logs are
different. Judge: What is the
number of documents?
Plaintiffs lawyer: I heard
3000 documents without
descriptions
Plaintiffs
counsel: We suspect there are
a number of payments to women
more that the 4 searched for.
I would say it is in the
hundreds. They produced 937,
these are some of the hottest
documents we have every seen
working on these cases [tried
to get Press out]
After back
and forth about privilege,
Judge Subramanian wishes all
happy holidays, adjourns.
This case is Doe
3 v. Indyke, et al.,
1:24-cv-1204
(Subramanian)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station,
NY NY 10013
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2024 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|
,
