After
Three Guilty
Verdicts In
Hugh Austin
Trial for
Crypto Fraud
He Is For Now
Remanded
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SDNY Exclusive,
Oct 1 –
A man charged
with financial
and
cryptocurrency
fraud, whose
son as already
pleaded
guilty, was
arrested and
presented on
July 5 before
U.S. District
Court for the
Southern
District of
New York
Magistrate
Judge Jennifer
E. Willis.
Inner City
Press was
there, the
only media in
the courtroom.
Thread.
AUSA:
He and his son
victimized 20
people for
over $10
million,
offering
crypto through
other family
members' bank
accounts. He
has a history
of mental
health issues
and oxy use,
living a
nomadic
lifestyle
AUSA:
He serially
opened free 1
month gym
memberships in
variations of
his
name.
Defense:
He has A.D.D.
and used
fentanyl only
once, by
mistake, in
2021. He is
not affluent -
look, he is
here in short
and a T-shirt.
Judge
Willis has
returned to
the bench and
notes that
defendant
didn't flee
after son's
plea. He is
being released
tonight, with
no GPS yet,
with 2 days to
come up with a
co-signer.
Jump
cut to August
7 - the
conditions
still no yet,
Austin
reappeared in
Mag Court.
Inner City
Press went, thread:
OK
- now Eugene
Austin is in
Mag court, in
a track suit.
Conditions of
bail not
met.
Judge
Gorenstein:
why didn't you
seek an
exrension?
Defense
counsel (by
phone) US
wanted this
hearing.
Because of
publicity, no
one will sign.
Judge:
He could be
remanded right
now. Did you
see my email?
When can you
come in
person?
Defense:
Tomorrow
afternoon?
Austin
is sitting at
defense table
in his track
suit.
Judge
comes down off
bench to look
at big View
Sonic computer
monitor, says
Maybe the
email wasn't
sent. Or, it
was in my
order.
Defense
lawyer: I
couldn't open
my email.
Judge: It's an
order on ECF.
Defense: I
want a
modification,
not an
extension.
Judge:
Lot of
mysteries
here. I'm on
the brink of
remanding him,
but I'd like
you to be
present if I
do. Do you
hear me?
Defense: No,
there is an
echo.
Now
judge speaking
softly
directly into
phone.
Defense:
I'm leaving
the country
Thursday at 10
am.
Judge:
Wednesday at
noon. Have the
Marshals
present.
Afterward
Austin said he
left his phone
at home
because he
thought he'd
be remanded
today. So the
non-appearance
(in person)
and non-filing
may have won
him two days -
or more.
On
August 8, the
US opposed
Austin's
motions for
more time,
acknowledging
that a
potential
co-signer had
been served
with a grand
jury subpoena
but adding
that "the
defendant does
not allege
that the
Government
threatened
this
co-signer."
His sister
Margaret
Cherpak
"apparently
has been
unwilling to
post her home
to securte the
defendant's
appearance in
court."
On
August 9
Austin and his
lawyer were in
the Mag court
in person, as
was Inner City
Press. Thread:
OK
- Accused
crypto
fraudster Hugh
Austin, last
here Monday in
a tracksuit,
is back in
SDNY Mag court
in a blue
Oxford cloth
shirt,
untucked.
Defense:
His sister has
no equity in
her Port
Jefferson
house. Austin:
She's working
with lawyers.
Judge:
The money is
not important.
You need two
more
co-signers.
Defense: Give
him two weeks.
AUSA: He can
seek them from
a phone in
jail.
AUSA:
He's reaching
out to
victims.
Judge: I'll
give him, to
find 3
co-signers,
until August
23, 11 am. No
co-signers,
expect remand.
Question:
But can the
Magistrate
Judge on duty
on August 23
be bound by
this?
Apparently
not. When
Austin showed
up at 11 am on
August 23,
Inner City
Press was
there.
Austin's
lawyer said
Austin's
ex-wife had
been about to
sign until her
new husband
got involved.
He was given
until August
25 at 10 am. Thread:
Austin
has not found
the co-signer.
His ex-wife
was going to,
defense says,
until her new
husband got
involved.
Judge: He's
been given
time....
Judge:
If he finds
one, he could
be released.
Defense: Just
a few more
days. Judge:
What will
change?
Defense:
One day we'll
be before a
judge who
won't take any
more. Judge:
This may be
the day. I may
be the judge.
AUSA:
We may
interview a
prospect on
Friday.
Defense: How
about his
former mother
in law, now
that Ms Walker
backed out.
Judge:
I'll give you
to Friday 10
am - satisfy
the bond or
remand, no
hearing
needed.
Next,
after a
continuance in
the interest
of justice,
Austin was
indicted on
October 4, and
the case
assigned to
Judge Jennifer
H. Rearden.
On
October 11 it
was reassigned
to Judge P.
Kevin Castel,
to whom
Austin's
counsel wrote
on November
asked for Hugh
Austin to meet
without
counsel
present with
his son
Brandon who
has pleaded
guilty and is
set to be
sentenced on
February 22,
2024 - by
Judge Castel.
On
December 7,
Judge Castel
approved two
in-person
meetings a
month, outside
the presence
of counsel.
On
July 24
Brandon
Austin's
Federal
Defender asked
to delay his
surrender from
July 30 to
August 8 so
Brandon can
responded to
the
government's
subpoenas "in
connection
with Hugh
Austin's
upcoming
trial."
The
son's case is
US v. Brandon
Austin,
23-cr-199
(Castel)
On
July 29 the US
Attorney's
Office filed
its motions in
limine,
including
arguing that
"evidence of
the
defendant's
failure to
file tax
returns or
report income
from the
charged crimes
is admissible
as direct
evidence or
pursuant to
Rule 404(b)."
There is be
testifying
victims 1, 2,
3, 4, 10 and
16.
On
September 11,
Judge Castel
addressed
motions in
limine, Inner
City Press was
there, from
the thread:
AUSA:
He didn't file
tax returns
for years, in
one year he
filed he made
$1. Defense:
They had a
problem with
their
accountant. He
didn't show
tax returns to
clients [Note
is passed at
defense table]
Judge:
Not filing
fraudulent
income with
the IRS can
show
consciousness
of guilt - I
find that the
evidence is
admissible
Judge
Castel then
brought up US
v. Saint
Clair, another
of his cases
which Inner
City Press
covered....
On
September 18,
from thread:
Defense
lawyer: Wasn't
it Brandon
Austin who
sent you the
fake wire
transfer
documents?
Witness: Yes.
Defense: And
my client Hugh
Austin reached
out to you
saying he'd
try to pay you
back? Witness:
No, I reached
out to him
first
Next
witness is in
from
California,
from a failed
"social music
streaming"
service. She
identifies the
defendant,
says she met
him in the
Napa Valley in
2019 and he
claimed to
have a network
of "super high
net worth
individuals"
including
athletes to
invest
On
September 19,
document after
document went
into evidence,
with
stipulations
about whose
cell phone and
email address
was whose.
On
September 20,
a cooperator
was on the
witness stand.
Thread
On
September 23,
a show of
texts from
victims, cross
about who
really sent
the replies,
and then they
rested. Thread
back
in US v Austin
crypto fraud
trial,
prosecutor
questioning
Special Agent
about
blockchain
data,
transfers of
Bitcoin to
Coinbase
account. AUSA:
What is this?
Special Agent:
It's a chart
of data from
the ethereum
blockchain, in
Tether,
tracking the
US dollar.
Judge: We'll
take a break.
We're
back. Shown to
jury, an email
from the
defendant
claiming that
the current
witness was
the receiver
on a Bitcoin
transaction.
AUSA: Were
you? Witness:
No.
5:13
PM update -
both sides
have just
rested in US v
Austin
On September
24 the jury
returned
guilty
verdicts on
all three
counts;
sentencing was
set for
February 20,
2025 at 11 am.
On
October 1,
there was a
detention
hearing, thread:
AUSA
wants him
jailed, saying
he faces 15
year
sentence.
Defense:
If he's
remanded it
would be to
MDC, he could
be slashed.
AUSA:
We have no
confidence he
can secure the
bond.
Judge:
The trial
showed the con
jobs, they
could
continue. But
I will lower
the security
to $650,000 -
remand until
then
[But
no US Marshal
here]
Now
2 US Marshals
arrive and
take Austin
out
The case is US
v. Austin,
23-cr-508
(Castel)
More
including on
son's case on
Substack here
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2023 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|