Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg NYLJ Fortune 2023, CJR, NY Mag, AJE, Georgia, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Follow on X

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - 

Support this work by buying this book
Belt and Roadkill
and paperback

 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



As Syria TPS Faces End SDNY Judge Holds Injunction Hearing With Ruling Coming

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Nov 17 – Days before the expiration of Temporary Protected Status in the US for people from Syria, a court hearing was held on a request to enjoin the termination, before U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Inner City Press covered it live, on BlueSky here

Petitioners' lawyer: We're challenging an executive action that we say goes against a statutory scheme. Where there is that tension, the court should look more at the public interest.

Judge Failla: I'd like a copy of the transcript of this to be ordered. How ever I rule, the losing side will be taking it to the 2nd Circuit.

Plaintiffs' lawyer: We bring contrary to law claims. We say the Secretary [Noem] is influenced by extra statutory factors   Judge Failla: You're telling me you are not challenging the substance of her decision - but you're saying she didn't do a very good job in assessing country conditions. I am worried that your arguments are a little bit too clever  

Judge Failla: I'm focusing on Syria and TPS. You are asking to focus on cases in Texas and California that found animus in other cases. I'm supposed to use that evidence here? I'm not privy to those cases.

Plaintiffs' lawyer: We included some. Plaintiffs' lawyer: We argue this is about discrimination against non-white people Judge Failla: You're citing back to the first Trump administration. Are you asking me to consider that? Plaintiffs' lawyer: Yes. Look at their statements during the campaigns  

Judge Failla: You're saying that if some judge in the first Trump administration made a finding, it can never change? Plaintiffs' lawyer: The first administration is couple with the current - there are 9 terminations now, essentially every one that has come up

Judge Failla: The Biden administration allowed extensions on Haiti and Venezuela. I'm not sure how I can consider what's happened in Venezuela and Haiti except as a history of this Administration's treatment of TPS. Plaintiffs' lawyer: There's South Sudan  Judge Failla: You're saying I can review under the APA and Constitution. What about the TPS statute itself?

Plaintiffs' lawyer: You can review.  Judge: Are you saying the US can't use national interest as a basis for termination, if armed conflict was cited? Yes    Plaintiffs' lawyer: The Secretary is required to study conditions in the country. 

Judge Failla: How can I look behind the Secretary's statements in the Federal Register that she has done the review? Plaintiffs' lawyer: Look at the campaign statements J: Inartful 

Plaintiffs' lawyer: The Vice President says there would be no more TPS writ large only case by case... The Secretary has terminated TPS each time it has come up. That is not an objective review. There are other deviations, in this Trump administration 

Plaintiffs' lawyer: These are no consultation on Nicaragua, Nepal, Venezuela and Cameroon. Perhaps others. There's emails that termination determination had been made on Nicaragua, no letter. On Venezuela the letter was late 

 Plaintiffs' lawyer: This was a pre-determined decision, not in accord with the statute.  We have established a pattern, for purpose of the change in position doctrine. An explanation is required. Judge: The national interest? Plaintiffs' lawyer: We have a chart   

Judge Failla: You want me to consider nine countries which lost TPS. You want me to consider that a pattern? Plaintiffs' lawyer: A very strong trend. It undergirds our claims in general. There are also the campaign trial statements. There's EO 14159 

Plaintiffs' lawyer: We acknowledge the Secretary may share the views, but we still think there is inappropriate political influence from the White House. It contradicts what the law requires. Domestic politics are supposed to be kept out. 

Judge: Break.

More on Substack here

The case is Doe v. Noem, et al., 1:25-cv-8686 (Failla)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station, NY NY 10013

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2025 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com