| Alleging Rape by Jeffrey
Epstein Doe 200 Sued Indyke and
Kahn Who Seek to Quash & Seal
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SDNY
COURTHOUSE,
March 26 – Jane Doe 200 sued
Jeffrey Epstein's executors
Indyke and Kahn, alleging
their connection to an
incident in which "Epstein
came up behind Doe, grabbed
her and pulled her pantyhose
down before he physically
forced her face down on the
massage table and violently,"
etc. On March 26,
2025 a proceeding was held
before U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New
York Judge Edgardo Ramos.
Inner City Press, which wrote
the book on Ghislaine Maxwell,
Maximum Maxwell, covered it.
From the thread:
Defense lawyer:
Jane Doe 200, who claims Mr.
Epstein raped her, also says
she met Mr. Indyke - but he'd
know nothing about it. Her
lawyer suggests this was a
RICO enterprise. That is
false. Indyke did not deal
with him daily. My client Mr.
Kahn was the bookkeeper
Defense: If Mr.
Kahn helps some of these women
with tax returns, it was not
to help keep them in the
country as sex slaves. And it
had nothing to do with Jane
Doe 200. We have settled 199
claims but not this one, which
is unlike the others.
Judge: Their
letter does say that Jane Doe
200 had personal contact with
Mr. Indyke. Defense: It
was never raised until
responding to these motions. I
am skeptical. Jane Doe 200's
lawyer: Propensity evidence is
admissible
Jane Doe 200's
lawyer: These two men have
personal knowledge of Mr.
Epstein's sexual assault and
assisted in concealing them-
Judge: You are making factual
allegations that I don't know
if they have basis in the
record. I've read he assaulted
women
Indkye's lawyer:
Plaintiff's lawyer is not new
to this Jeffrey Epstein saga.
Our clients were sued in
another case, yes, that they
should have known - it was not
based on personal knowledge of
assaults. He does not need
this for Rule 415
Defense: Jeffrey
Epstein is dead. The only
evidence will come from Jane
Doe 200, saying that he raped
her. We will oppose her,
saying that she continued to
visit him. There is no
need for this discovery about
a 1-time incident. It would
take us months to
respond.
Plaintiff's
lawyer: They are sitting on
evidence of 191 other sexual
assaults- Judge: If a Mets
shortstop shot a Yankees
shortstop in front of 50,000
fans, you would not be
expected to call 50,000
witnesses. Why not a sample?
Plaintiff's lawyer: Subtract
the 56
Plaintiff's
lawyer: We believe that when
Jeffrey Epstein was under
investigation he modified
documents to reward people who
helped conceal his crimes - we
believe including Mr. Indyke
and Mr. Kahn. We need to
understand their financial
interest in this case
Judge: What's the basis of
your theory?
Plaintiff's
lawyer: Depositions we took in
Epstein cases against JP
Morgan Chase and against
Deutsche Bank. Kahn's lawyer:
There is a sealed deposition,
under a protective order - if
it has leaked, it violates an
SDNY order
Judge: I'll let
defendants move to quash, or
for a protective order
Afterward, the defendants
asked to seal some of the
transcript. Watch this site.
The case is
Jane Doe 200 v. Indyke, et
al., 1:24-cv-4775 (Ramos)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station,
NY NY 10013
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2025 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|
,
