Terraform Labs SEC Case
Moves Toward Trial with Experts
Grilled and Howey
Briefing
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SDNY
COURTHOUSE,
Nov 17– The SEC's case
against Terraform Labs
is moving toward a January
2024 trial. On November 17 US
District Court for the
Southern District of New York
Judge Jed S. Rakoff held a
hearing on potential trial
experts. Inner City Press live
tweet, thread:
OK - now in
crypto case of SEC v.
Terraform Labs Pte Ltd. et
al - defendants want in
a defi expert, Professor
Parlour, from Berkeley.
SEC lawyer: Prof
Parlour says the use case for
UST was as a fiat replacement-
but admits she's never seen
that. We'll be calling Terra
employees as witnesses.
Prof Christine Parlour
takes the stand, and says (in
British accept) I put the
system design in context
Judge Rakoff: So
we're talking crypto
securities- I mean
cryptocurrency, I'm sure no
one is interested in that
distinction (grins) This case
alleges fraud Parlour: The
DiMaggio paper has a limited
scope. Judge Rakoff: I'll rule
by Thanksgiving.
Judge: The next
proposed defense expert didn't
do the analysis himself,
Cornerstone Research did. SEC:
He has no certifications in
blockchain analysis. Now Raj
Unny on the stand. Judge: How
much are you being paid? Unny:
$950 an hour. Judge: Do you
want a raise?
Unny: I know the
code. Judge: Why is the name
of the company that tried to
maintain the peg in May 2021
kept confidential? Counsel:
They asked for it. Judge: I'm
about to say their name
Company's outside counsel "
Elliot Bacon" says the
material is confidential
Judge: The
name of the company is Jump,
jumping right into it.
SEC: Jump
has an incentive to support
the peg. Judge: Sure there
were motivations. But this
proposed expert was looking at
the effects of Jump's trading,
not its motives. SEC: Jump
earned a $400,000 profit from
a long position in UST.
Terrence
Hendershott: The motivations
don't go into the statistical
model. Judge: You were
paid $1400 an hour. Why more
than Ms Parlour? Hendershott:
I have more experience.
Judge: But are
your opinions within your area
of expertise? Hendershott:
I've studied technology and
markets for 30 years. Judge: I
will let the SEC question you
- like Perry Mason, go up to
him. SEC: You estimate Jump
made $400,000? [Note: that 400
thousand]
Next
proposed expert is on stand.
Defense lawyer: If Jump trades
ten seconds apart, does your
model consider if there was
another trader- SEC's rebuttal
expert [to Hendershott] I
don't see one. I used the same
data in both reports. Judge:
SEC questions?
SEC: What
occurred that day between
13:30 and 14:00? A: The Jump
witnesses will tell us. Next
SEC expert is Matthew Edman
Judge: How tall are you?
Edman: 6'3". I reviewed source
code. Judge: SEC alleges it
was a lie that Chai was using
the blockchain
Edman: The
inputs from the server were
not available for review SEC:
Defendants says they couldn't
get it from Naver Edman:
That's like the AWS of Korea
Judge: We'll break here
We're back.
2d defense lawyer: We too are
interest in Chai and the LP
server. Judge: Is any of this
data in the US? TFL lawyer:
No. It's all in Korea. Judge:
I can compel anything in the
US. There's the Hague
Convention, or I can write
letters to judges overseas
Edman: I reviewed
posts by Do Kwon in which he
claimed some transactions were
Chai transactions...
Judge: We're done for today.
Get me Howey briefing. I will
get you a bottom line decision
by Thanksgiving. Inner City
Press will cover it
There's more:
SEC: Will Do Kwon attend? TFL
lawyer: We can't know. Judge:
We need to know by late
December. Oh and I'll speak at
Columbia but not about thus
case, only Howey.
More on Substack
here
The case is
Securities and Exchange
Commission v. Terraform Labs
Pte Ltd. et al., 23-cv-1346
(Rakoff)
Do Kwan's
criminal case has been
assigned to District Judge
John P. Cronan, after
his arrest at
the airport in
Montenegro.
The
indictment, formally against
Do Hyeong Kwon, cites Terra
LUNA and TerraUSD. South Korea
has also asked that Do Kwon be
extradited. Inner City
Press, which covers all things
crypto in the SDNY and beyond,
is tracking it.
The SDNY case is
US v. Kwon, 23-cr-151 (Cronan)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2023 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|