| On
Luigi Mangione
After Judge Sees
DOJ Violation of
Order Posts Came
Down WH Next
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Substack Book Patreon
SDNY
COURTHOUSE,
Oct 8 – Luigi Mangione was
presented in Federal court on
December 19 on four charges,
one of them death penalty
eligible, for the killing of
UnitedHealth CEO Brian
Thompson. Inner City Press was
there, covering the case
toward a book.
On February 4,
death penalty qualified
(learned) counsel was
appointed for Mangione in
SDNY, endorsed letter on
Patreon here
On April 1 DOJ
announced it will seek the
death penalty against
Mangione.
In the
interim, after some push back,
Inner City Press published a
book Luigi Mangione Lone Wolf
here,
audiobook here.
On April 15 the
US responded to Mangione's
anti-death penalty filing with
a ripeness argument: "The
defendant has identified no
authority for the notion that
it can prevent the Government
from seeking capital
punishment before indictment."
Full filing on Patreon here
On April
17, Inner City Press vlogged
in the morning to expect
something - and past 5 pm the SDNY prosecutors
docketed an indictment
of Mangione,
with "Special
Findings
Regarding the
Murder of Brian
Thompson" - here.
On
April 24 the
US filed
"NOTICE OF
INTENT TO SEEK
THE DEATH
PENALTY - here.
On
September 16,
after a state
court
proceeding
covered in
person by
Inner City
Press in which
murder by act
of terror as
dismissed,
in the Federal
case
Mangione's
lawyers asked
to push back
briefing dates
(but not
December 5),
and noted that
their death
penalty
motions are
due September
19. Filing on
Patreon here.
It was
just past
midnight when
the motion was
filed, more than 100
pages,
attacking the
Constitutionality
of the death penalty, on
Patreon here
On the
evening
of September
23 Mangione's
lawyer filed a
complaint that
the " Justice
Department is
knowingly and
intentionally
in violation
of this
Court’s Order
by continuing
to make false
and damaging
statements in
this death
penalty case."
On the morning
of September
24 Judge
Garnett ruled
that "It
appears from
this letter
that multiple
employees at
the Department
of Justice may
have violated
Local Criminal
Rule 23.1, and
this Court's
order of April
25, 2025" - on
Patreon here
On
October 3 the
US Attorney's
Office got
more time to
respond.
On
October 8 they
filed that "the
statements
reposted by
these
individuals,
who are not
part of, and
do not report
to, the
prosecution
team, did not
(and could
not) violate
Rule 23.1. 3
Nonetheless,
as reflected
in the
enclosed
Declaration,
upon becoming
aware of the
reposted
statements,
the Department
promptly
directed that
the posts be
removed." Filing
on Patreon here.
The Federal case
is US v. Mangione, 1:25-cr-176
(Garnett)
More / extra on X
for Subscribers here
and Substack here
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station,
NY NY 10013
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2026 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|
,
