Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg NYLJ Fortune 2023, CJR, NY Mag, AJE, Georgia, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Follow on X

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - 

Support this work by buying this book
Belt and Roadkill
and paperback

 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Mahmoud Khalil Files Habeas Corpus in SDNY versus Noem and Bondi Now March 12 Hearing

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, March 10 – After Mahmoud Khalil was sent to the ICE detention facility in Elizabeth, NJ - and then it seems to Louisiana - his lawyer filed a habeas corpus petition in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It was not viewable on PACER but it was, at terminals in the courthouse itself. On Bluesky here, Threads here (fwiw X was down).

  The first claim for relief was for "relief pending adjudication pursuan to Mapp v. Reno.

Then: "Declare that Respondents' actions to detain M.K. violate the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment; enjoin Respondents from transferring the Petitioner from the jurisdiction of this Distrist pending these proceedings; order the release of Petitioner under reasonable conditions of supervision" - but where is he?

Later on March 10 it was assigned to Judge Jesse M. Furman who ordered: "that counsel for all parties appear for a conference with the Court on March 12, 2025 at 11:30 a.m. in Courtroom 1105 of the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, New York, New York. Counsel must confer in advance of the conference and submit a joint letter, no later than March 11, 2025, at 5:00 p.m., indicating whether the conference is necessary and addressing how the Court should handle the present Petition. If counsel do not believe a conference is required, and that briefing is appropriate, counsel should propose a briefing schedule (expedited or otherwise) in the joint letter."

The case is M.K. v. Joyce, et al., 1:25-cv-1935 (Furman)

More on Substack here

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station, NY NY 10013

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2025 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com