Melzer Who Wanted Mid East
War Pled Guilty now Admits Antifa Talk But
Says It Was Bluster
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- The
Source
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Feb 24 – Ethan Melzer a/k/a
Etil Reggad was charged with
conspiring to target his U.S.
Army unit, allegedly because
"another 10 year war in the
Middle East would definitely
leave a mark."
Since his
indictment his lawyers at
Federal Defenders have sought
information about the
selection of the grand jury,
and the constitution of the
Master and Qualified Jury
Wheels (others are seeking
this too, as covered by Inner
City Press here).
Jump cut to June
23, 2022, two weeks before
trial, word of a guilty plea:
"ENDORSED LETTER as to Ethan
Phelan Melzer addressed to
Judge Gregory H. Woods from
AUSAs Sam Adelsberg / Matthew
Hellman / Kimberly Ravener,
dated June 23, 2022 re:
Following consultation with
Your Honor's Chambers earlier
today, the parties write
jointly to advise they have
reached a plea agreement,
which they believe will
obviate the need for any trial
in this matter, and to request
that the Court schedule a
change-of-plea hearing...
ENDORSEMENT: Application
granted in part. The Court
will hold a change of plea
hearing."
On February 3,
2023, Melzer's Federal
Defenders filed his sentencing
memo, asking for 15 years
rather than the 45 year
Guideline Sentence the
calculation of which they do
not object to. They cite a
troubled background in
Kentucky complete with
"role-playing video games."
Next he was in a US Army base
in Vincenza, Italy drinking
heavily and "spending too much
time online." Before a
deployment to Turkey he
disseminated info about the
deployment on chat rooms on
Telegram. Nearly all of page
18 is redacted.
On February 17,
the US Attorney's Office filed
its sentencing request: the
full 45 year guideline.
After that,
Melzer's Federal Defender
filed objections to the PSR,
for example not denying Melzer
said he trained with antifa
but adding it was just bluster
"in order to impress his
fellow chat participants."
Judge Woods has asked for
filings by February 27, if a
Fatico hearing is necessary.
Watch this site.
Back on
July 6, 2020 he was arraigned
before U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New
York Magistrate Judge Sarah
Netburn. Inner City Press live
tweeted it, below.
In November,
Melzer through his Federal
Defenders filed a motion to
dismiss based on the racial
and ethnic make up of the Jury
wheel used during the COVID-19
pandemic - in White Plains.
On July 26, 2021,
this: "ORDER as to Ethan
Phelan Melzer. Trial in this
matter will commence at 9:00
a.m. on April 25, 2022."
On March 3, Judge
Woods moved it up: "ORDER as
to Ethan Phelan Melzer. On
July 26, 2021, the Court
scheduled trial in this matter
for April 25, 2022. The trial
will now begin on April 19,
2022. This is the first
priority trial for that day.
Trial will take place in a
courtroom to be determined in
the United States District
Court for the Southern
District of New York, Daniel
Patrick Moynihan U.S.
Courthouse at 500 Pearl
Street, New York, New York,
10007. All other deadlines
laid out in the Courts July
26, 2021 order remain in
effect. SO ORDERED. (Signed by
Judge Gregory H. Woods on
3/3/2022)."
Hours later the
Federal Defenders wrote in,
saying that the US Attorney's
Office agreed that the trial
should be delayed to July.
Docketed on March
7, this: "ORDER [101] JOINT
LETTER MOTION addressed to
Judge Gregory H. Woods from
Jonathan Marvinny dated March
3, 2022 re: Adjourn trial. The
parties' March 3, 2022 request
for an adjournment of the
trial in this case, which was
previously scheduled to begin
on April 19, 2022, is granted.
Trial will commence at 9:00
a.m. on July 5, 2022."
And on June 16, a
more detailed schedule
including a Daubert hearing:
"the Court is currently
reviewing the Governments
motion to exclude the
testimony of Defendants
expert, Dr. David Greenfield.
The parties are requested to
hold June 22, 2022 at 10:00
a.m. for a Daubert hearing to
address that motion. Absent
any indication otherwise from
the Court, the Daubert hearing
will proceed at that time in
Courtroom 12C, Daniel Patrick
Moynihan Courthouse, 500 Pearl
Street, New York, NY 10007.
Any application to hold that
hearing remotely, which should
include the legal basis for
the Court's ability to do so,
is due no later than June 19,
2022. In addition, and as
discussed on the record during
the June 16, 2022 hearing, the
Court will hold a hearing to
discuss the jury questionnaire
and voir dire in this case on
June 27, 2022 at 10:00 am."
On May 4, after a
proceeding that ranged into
how WhatApp messages are
downloaded and saved - or not
- this: "ORDER as to Ethan
Phelan Melzer: the
Government's motions in limine
are granted in part and denied
in part. The Court determines
that, based on the information
currently available, the
probative value of the
materials referred to by the
Government as the "Jihadist
Materials" and the "O9A
Materials" is not
substantially outweighed by
risk of unfair prejudice or
the other concerns articulated
in Federal Rule of Evidence
403. The Court also determines
that, at this point, it is
likely that the Government
will be able to prove by a
preponderance of the evidence
that a conspiracy existed
between Defendant, CC-1, and
CC-3 as required to admit
their statements pursuant to
Federal Rule of Evidence
801(d). However, the
Government has not provided a
sufficient basis to admit
statements by CC-1 and CC-3 as
statements against interest
under Federal Rule of Evidence
804(b)(3). At this point, the
Court will not preclude, under
Federal Rule of Evidence 403,
the admission of Defendant's
statement regarding his lack
of patriotism made to
Individual-1. The Court will
also refer the military base
described in the parties'
briefs as the "Military Base"
at trial, and will prevent the
disclosure of the jurors'
names and other identifying
information to the public. As
further discussed during the
pretrial conference, the
parties are directed to submit
a joint letter setting forth
their positions as to whether
the use of a jury
questionnaire would be
appropriate and preferable in
this case no later than May
13, 2022. In that joint
letter, the parties should
also indicate whether there
are any issues regarding the
phrasing or scope of the
proposed voir dire questions
to be provided by the Court.
Further, as discussed during
the conference, the parties
are ordered to meet and confer
and submit any proposed
limiting instructions to the
Court no later than June 3,
2022. If the parties cannot
agree on any particular
limiting instruction, they
should submit a joint letter
along with that submission
setting forth their respective
positions. In addition, and as
discussed during the
conference, no later than June
21, 2022, the parties are
ordered to submit a joint
letter setting forth their
respective positions regarding
any statements that the
Defendant seeks to admit
pursuant to the rule of
completeness. If there is no
disagreement regarding the
statements Defendant seeks to
admit pursuant to that rule,
the parties need not file a
joint letter. (Signed by
Judge Gregory H. Woods on
5/4/2022)." Watch this site.
On May 24,
Melzer's Federal Defenders
filed a 24-page motion to
dismiss arguing that "counts
must be dismissed because the
charged statutes do not reach
Mr. Melzer's overseas
conduct." They cite a 2018
Georgetown Law Journal
article.
As to the
Order of Nine Angles, which
the US calls a "Satanic
anarchist group founded in the
UK," the argument is for that
reason, the UK HQ, US law
cannot reach it. They
continue: "in the civil
context, federal courts have
repeatedly held that certain
civil laws do no reach conduct
on overseas U.S. military
bases because these bases are
not within the 'jurisdiction'
of the United States." Watch
this site.
Days earlier, on
May 20, the US Attorney Office
has put in a letter that
Melzer was taken into custody
at a U.S. military facility in
Europe on June 10, 2020 - and
was flown directly to Stewart
International Airport in
Newburgh, north of New York
City. Watch this site.
On
September 9 the assigned
District Judge, Gregory H.
Woods, arraigned Melzer on the
superseding indictment. Inner
City Press again live tweeted
it, below.
At week's
end the US Attorney's Office
previewed for Judge Woods
requests for sealing they will
make under CIPA: "To the
extent the Court would like
additional information about
the Government’s anticipated
CIPA § 4 motion, the
Government is available to
participate in an ex parte
classified CIPA § 2 conference
at the Court’s convenience.
See 18 U.S.C. app. 3 § 2
(establishing that the court,
at a party’s request or
on its own initiative, can
hold “a pretrial conference to
consider matters relating to
classified information that
may arise in connection with
the prosecution”); see also
United States v. Saipov, No.
S1 17 Cr. 722 (VSB), 2019 WL
5558214, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Oct.
29, 2019) (concluding that it
was proper for the Court to
conduct several ex parte
conferences, including a
conference pursuant to CIPA §
2). The Government anticipates
that by the time of the next
conference, defense counsel
will have had an opportunity
to review the limited amount
of classified discovery that
the Government plans to
produce and the Government’s
CIPA § 10 notice. Accordingly,
at that conference, the
Government will ask the Court
to set the deadline for the
Government’s CIPA § 4 motion
as the same date as the
deadline for the defendant’s
pretrial motions, and to set a
schedule for the defendant’s
CIPA § 5 notice and for CIPA §
6 briefing." Inner City Press
will continue to report on
this.
The case is US v.
Melzer, 20-cr-314 (Woods /
Netburn)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|