| As Giuliani Fights
Giving FLA Condo to
Plaintiffs His Bid for NY
Coop Escrow Denied
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SDNY
COURTHOUSE,
Nov 19 – In Ruby Freeman's and
Wandrea' Moss' ongoing attempt
to collect from Rudy Giuliani,
a proceeding was held on
September 27 before U.S.
District Court for the
Southern District of New York
Judge Lewis J. Liman. Inner
City Press was there; thread
Caruso: Can I
have 3 more days?
Judge: No. Judge:
Your client owes money. This
should move quickly. Adjourned
And on October 8,
a motion to intervene by
Andrew Giuliani: "Amongst that
property are '3 Yankee World
Series Rings.' However, the
Mayor gifted those World
Series rings to his son."
Filing on Patreon here.
On October 22
Judge Liman wrote that
Giuliani is "ordered under
C.P.L.R. 5225 to transfer all
personal property specified in
the list below at pp. 16-18" -
full list on Patreon here
On November 6,
Giuliani's lawyer wrote in
that "Plaintiffs contend that
the apartment was
“substantially empty[]” when
they arrived last week. ECF 81
at 1. Full letter on Patreon here
On November 7
Inner City Press live tweeted
the proceeding, complete with
Judge Liman previewing
possible contempt sanctions,
and setting a deadline on
November 11, Veteran Day.
Thread here.
On November 13,
after an order, they docketed
that they "respectfully
request that the Court grant
this motion to withdraw and
enter an order relieving
Kenneth Caruso Law LLC and
Labkowski Law, P.A. as counsel
for Defendant" - with the
substance redacted, letter on
Patreon here
On November 18,
Giuliani's new lawyers filed
with Judge Liman requesting an
order that "With respect to 45
E. 66th Street, Apt. 10W, New
York, NY 10065 (the “New York
Cooperative Apartment”), upon
the sale of the New York
Cooperative Apartment,
Plaintiffs-Receivers are
hereby ordered to hold, in an
escrow account the sum of
$204,825, pending further
order of the Court, sufficient
to satisfy the New York
homestead exemption."
On November 19,
Judge Liman denied it on
procedural grounds - for not
following the (local) rules:
"The Court denies Defendant’s
letter-motion at Dkt. No. 123
to modify the Turnover Order
issued by the Court on October
22, 2024, see Dkt. No. 62, as
modified by the order of
November 8, 2024, see Dkt. No.
9, for failure to comply with
Local Rules 6.1 and 7.1 of the
United States District Courts
for the Southern and Eastern
Districts of New York, Rules
6.1 and 7.1, and this Court’s
Individual Practices." - Order
on Patreon here.
More on X for
Subscribers here,
Substack here
One of these
cases is Freeman, et al. v.
Giuliani, 1:24-mc-353 (Liman)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station,
NY NY 10013
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2024 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|
,
