| Winston & Strawn Is
Accused of Copying Rule 12 Motion
by Smaller Firm
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SDNY
COURTHOUSE,
Dec 26 – A six-attorney law
firm in Boston late on
December 26 sued Winston &
Strawn for stealing its brief
- actually, a Rule 12 Motion
which it says was protected by
copyright law.
The lawsuit,
filed past 10 pm in the U.S.
District Court for the
Southern District of New York,
was found minutes later in the
dockets by Inner City Press,
which closely covers SDNY -
but will not be quoting the
complaint, even though that
would be fair use.
Hsuanyeh
Law Group filed a Rule 12
motion on August 23, 2023 for
Phison Electronics
Corporation. The motion,
it was, was copyrighted as of
August 30.
On August
24 Winston and Strawn filed
Rule 12 motion that Hsuanyeh
says was a"nearly verbatim"
copy. Hsuanyeh cites a
decision by SDNY Judge Jed S.
Rakoff (in White v. West Pub.
Corp. 12-cv-1340), and a 2016
CDCA decision.
Winston &
Strawn, in a letter annexed to
the complaint, argued that
"any suggestion that the act
of filing the Motion
constitutes publication is
incorrect." Instead, it was a
"public display" on PACER.
Note we are quoting from
Winston's letter...
This case
is Hsuanyeh Law Group PC v.
Winston & Strawn LLP et
al., 23-cv-11193 (Unassigned)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2023 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|
,
