In Other Media-eg NYLJ New Statesman, CJR, NY Mag, AJE, Georgia, CSM Click here to contact us     .

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Oct 29 – Cholo Abdi Abdullah is charged with planning with al Shabaab to attack the US with a commercial jet. 

 On September 5, 2023 he appeared in court saying he has lost faith in lawyers, and intially saying he now wants to represent himself. Inner City Press was there, the only media in the courtroom.

  U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Analisa Torres advised him that without a lawyer he would be at a major disadvantage.

On November 21, 2023 Inner City Press went at 9 am to Abdullah's Faretta hearing. But it was asked to leave the courtroom, from 9:22 am to 9:50 am. It filed a letter to get the transcript of the closed proceeding, here.

On August 5, 2024Judge Torres set a schedule for an October 28 start of trial.

On October 18, the US Attorney's Office wrote in with issues for the final pre-trial conference on October 21, and trial set to start October 28: he "wants to merely sit passively during the trial... because he does not believe that this is a legitimate system."

He has not requested assistance in filing a proposed clothing order. So will he sit on trial in MDC tan? 

On October 21, he appeared in MDC tan for the final pre-trial conference. Inner City Press was there. Thread:

All rise! [Inner City Press is the only media - the only civilian - in the courtroom] Judge: Mr Abdullah, the trial begins next week.  Abdullah: I wish to remain passive

 Judge: If your stand-by counsel becomes active, I will assume it is with your consent. Abdullah: I am deliberating if I might question some witnesses. It is up to me. They are not going to participate in this case.

 Judge: If you engage in misconduct you may lose your right to represent yourself. You are at an extreme disadvantage if you represent yourself. You are putting yourself in extreme danger. Abdullah: I have my reasons. I keep them to myself

 Abdullah: I would prefer to not even have stand-by counsel. But you do not allow that. Judge: Did you receive the US motions in limine? Abdullah: I have objections, but no stamps to mail them. Judge: You may make them now.

Abdullah: The US is going to use Al Shabaab propaganda videos. Fine. But they should not show video of suicide bombers to the jury. It is going to play with verdict. I want them to cut the part with the shooting,start with the reporter

 Abdullah: There is CCTV provided by the Kenyan government. I do not want the suicide bomber video in AUSA: We want it in. He searched for the video almost contemporaneously. It is probative. [White noise is turned on]

 Abdullah: I don't object to the jury being shown the anti American and anti Zionist statements... But using the other Al Shabaab statements of CC-1 and CC-2, it is hearsay.

 Judge: Having received no objections, I issued an order on October 16. I assume you got it- Abdullah: I did not. Judge: You should read it. We will take a break.

On October 24 stand-by counsel wrote in that Abdullah has only been given access to legal research six days before trial. He had wanted jurors to asked about "bias about Israel and Palestine" but withdrew his request.

On October 28, Inner City Press attended the first day of jury selection, from the thread:

defendant who is representing himself (with 3 stand-by counsel) did not ask to appear in a suit, so he is here in tan MDC jail uniform

Judge: Does anyone have religious or philosopical beliefs that would impact their fairness in this case? No one says yes. Break taken.

Now judge questioning prospective jurors. Judge: Number 21? Woman: New Rochelle, Master in finance. I could be fair 2d woman: Rockland, hospice social worker.  Man (playwright)  I am concerned about the defendant representing himself, that I'll perceive propaganda

Woman, Lower East Side, Islamic Studies, Meddle Eastern studies. Spouse is a lawyer in estates and a Animal law... Woman, lawyer in larges civil rights & civil liberties firm. Concerned colleagues would talk about case. Would not ask them not to.

Judge: We'll break here.

On October 29, Inner City Press covered the end of jury selection, the shut-down of defense opening, then the US opening - they say (not surprisingly) the pace is "brisk." From the thread:

final  jury selection AUSA: We challenge Number 37. Judge: Does the defense challenge 38 or 48? Cholo (pro se) No. [Jury picked]

Judge: Openings? AUSA: 50 minutes. Cholo: I will explain why I will not participate. Judge: That is not a proper subject for opening. Cholo: Then no openingDefendant said he wanted to open by telling  jurors why he will NOT be defending himself, but was told that is not a proper subject for an opening. So, no opening by him (!)

AUSA: The defendant traveled to meet al Shabaab. He learned to use explosives. He learned what's called operational security. After many months, he was told he was chose for a special important mission: to hijack a plane and attack. He agreed

 AUSA: He enrolled in flight school. He stayed in it for more than a year. He tried to get a job with a US airline. [Defendant Cholo Abdullah is sitting slumped in his chair at defense table, in a tan MDC-Brooklyn prison jacket. 2 of his 3 stand-by lawyers there

AUSA: After an attack, the defendant Googled it. He searched online. He maintained contact with his Al Shabaab handlers. In June 2019 he reached the final stages of his pilot training. But he was arrested [and has been in jail since, next cell to Joshua Schulte

AUSA: At the end of this trial [Nov 15?!?] we'll have a change to talk to you again. Between now & then, pay attention, follow Judge Torres' instructions, and use your common sense. If so, you'll reach the only verdict, that defendant Cholo Abdullah, is guilty

 Judge: Witnesses, after lunch. We'll break.Update: as US puts on the stand an American University professor about global jihad, Cholo Abdullah is not cross examining anyone, and once told that explaining why was not a proper opening argument, didn't make one...

As US v. Cholo Abdi Abdullah trial ends for the day, without defendant doing any cross, AUSA says "We are moving briskly." Story coming.

Watch this site.

More on Substack here

  The case is US v. Abdullah, 20-cr-677 (Torres)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2023 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com