In
Charlie Javice Trial She Moves to
Preclude Amar From Using Exhibit
in His Closing
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
March 19 – JPMorgan
Chase bought a
start-up
called Frank,
which claimed
to have 4
million
students
signed up to
file their
FAFSA forms,
for $175
million. Then
Chase learned
Frank had only
300,000
customers.
On
April 4, 2023,
Frank founder
Ms. Charlie
Javice was
brought before
U.S. District
Court for the
Southern
District of
New York
Magistrate
Judge Barbara
C. Moses and was
freed on $2
million bond.
On
January 24, 2025
Inner City
Press
published the
first book on
the case, Fintech
Fraudster? here
February
20
openings, thread here.
On February
21 as Houston
Cowan took the
stand,
then paused
due to audio
problems,
Javice filed that "evidence
and argument
regarding
Bank-1 should
be excluded."
Letter on
Patreon here.
On
March 3 the US
put on a
Google record
custodian
(thread here),
then a former
Frank staffer
Jen Wong who
said she was
pissed
Chase fired
her.
On
March 5 Jen
Wong
finished, then
a man from ASL
(thread)
On
March 6 there
was Sarah
Youngwood, now
of NASDAQ,
about minutiae
(thread)
then the
orange jumpsuit quote
and judge's timing
questions.
On
March 10 US witness
Patrick Vovor
was cross examined
(thread)
including
about his body
talk and
coming onto
Charlie.
On
March 11 US witness
Adam Kapelner
described
Javice doubling
his rate (thread),
the NDA for synthetic in
the
continued
thread on
X for
Subscribers here and
Substack here
On March
12, Kapelner
was cross examined
by Sullivan, thread,
then a Capital
One
witness began
direct.
On
March 13 the
Capital One
witness on cross
could not
remember of
Olivier Amar
(or Matt
Glazer) were
on the video
calls, or is his
camera was on - thread
eextended on
Substack here.
On March 17
the trial
continued,
including with
witness
quoting Charlie
Javice that
Frank's
customer
acquisition
cost was below
$5, thread
On March
18, the US put
on JPMC
witnesss Keono
Drakeford in
from Columbus,
Ohio - and it
set to rest it
case on
March 19,
when the
defense will
be asked if it
will put on a
case. Thread
On March
19, Javice's
lawyers files
a letter
including that
"The jury has
heard ample
evidence that
GX 3.1.8 is
evidence of a
mistake in the
document’s
title that was
corrected by
Frank, and
relayed to
both Capital
One and JP
Morgan &
Chase. See GX
1747; GX 1691.
Mr. Amar’s
desire to
admit this
exhibit
exemplifies
his
antagonistic
defense. Ms.
Javice
believes that
Mr. Amar
intends to use
this exhibit
to argue in
closing that
Ms. Javice
refused to
correct this
alleged
mislabel until
July 13, 2025"
- typo? Letter
on Patreon
here
This case is
USA v. Javice,
et al., 1:23-cr-251
(Hellerstein)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 130222 NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2025 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|