.

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, March 24 – JPMorgan Chase bought a start-up called Frank, which claimed to have 4 million students signed up to file their FAFSA forms, for $175 million. Then Chase learned Frank had only 300,000 customers.

On April 4, 2023, Frank founder Ms. Charlie Javice was brought before U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses and was freed on $2 million bond.

On January 24, 2025 Inner City Press published the first book on the case, Fintech Fraudster? here

February 20 openings, thread here.

On February 21 as Houston Cowan took the stand, then paused due to audio problems, Javice filed that "evidence and argument regarding Bank-1 should be excluded." Letter on Patreon here.

On March 3 the US put on a Google record custodian (thread here), then a former Frank staffer Jen Wong who said she was pissed Chase fired her.

On March 5 Jen Wong finished, then a man from ASL (thread)

On March 6 there was Sarah Youngwood, now of NASDAQ, about minutiae (thread) then the orange jumpsuit quote and judge's timing questions.

On March 10 US witness Patrick Vovor was cross examined (thread) including about his body talk and coming onto Charlie.

On March 11 US witness Adam Kapelner described Javice doubling his rate (thread), the NDA for synthetic in the continued thread on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

On March 12, Kapelner was cross examined by Sullivan, thread, then a Capital One witness began direct.

On March 13 the Capital One witness on cross could not remember of Olivier Amar (or Matt Glazer) were on the video calls, or is his camera was on - thread

  eextended on Substack here.

On March 17 the trial continued, including with witness quoting Charlie Javice that Frank's customer acquisition cost was below $5, thread

On March 18, the US put on JPMC witnesss Keono Drakeford in from Columbus, Ohio - and it set to rest it case on March 19, when the defense will be asked if it will put on a case. Thread

On March 19, Javice's lawyers files a letter including that Amar’s desire to admit this exhibit exemplifies his antagonistic defense."Letter on Patreon here

On March 20 the defense case proceeded, until one of Javice's lawyers asked Judge Hellerstein to admonish a witness under subpoena that he must remain and testify.

At the end of the trial day on March 24 Amar's lawyer said they should not have to close on Wednesday at 4 pm - the AUSA said they jury should be allowed to reach a verdict on Friday, the end of the six weeks jurors were told the case would take. Judge Hellerstein said to try to reach agreement and was told it probably wouldn't happen.

More on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

  This case is USA v. Javice, et al., 1:23-cr-251 (Hellerstein)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 130222 NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2025 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com