Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg NYLJ Fortune 2023, CJR, NY Mag, AJE, Georgia, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

ICP on YouTube

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Trump Asked to Remove NY Bragg Case to SDNY Now Reargument on Remand

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Feb 4 – Donald Trump filed a first  notice of removal to Federal court of Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg's indictment of him in state court, on May 4, 2023.

 The notice was reassigned to U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Alvin Hellerstein, as Inner City Press reported.

 Jump cut to August 29, 2024, after Trump was found guilty on 34 counts before NYS Justice Juan Merchan. Trump lawyer's filed a second notice of removal, on Patreon here.

On August 30 this: "Re-file and attach either opposing party's written consent or Court's leave.."

On September 3 leave was sought - and at 5 pm, Judge Hellerstein denied removal. Ruling on Patreon here

At 11:30 pm, Trump's lawyers filed notice of appeal to the Second Circuit. Notice of Appeal on Patreon here.

After 9 pm on September 4 Team Trump asked Judge Hellerstein to stay his own order, 6 page filing on Patreon here. Watch this site.

On September 6, Judge Hellerstein denied the request as "academic."

Jump cut to February 4, 2026 when after decision by the Second Circuit, Judge Hellerstein held an argument, Inner City Press live tweeted, ending:

DA Bragg's Wu: If you look at the evidence they are challenging here. This is not a case like the E. Jean Carroll case - they are challenging tweets, and the testimony of Ms. Hicks and Ms. Westerhout. It was about private conduct

Judge Hellerstein: OK, I'm not going to do any evidentiary hearing.  Trump's Wall: Should the scope of immunity of a US President be decided in a state court, or this Federal court, then the 2d Circuit, Supreme Court? It answers itself.

Judge Hellerstein: I'll rule later


More / analysis on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station, NY NY 10013

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2026 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com